Continuing education in diversity and multicultural factors: Current state psychology board requirements and a call to action.

Objective: A growing body of literature shows the unequivocal importance of incorporating diversity-related factors into the practice of clinical neuropsychology. Thus, it is imperative that we continue to seek and obtain updated training and knowledge on how culture and diversity intersect with our clinical roles throughout our careers, not merely to satisfy initial coursework requirements. Although most professional organizations pertaining to clinical psychology - and thereby neuropsychology - strongly encourage the pursuit of training in diversity-related factors, explicit requirements for such training across one's career are minimal. Method: The Asian Neuropsychological Association Advocacy Committee reviewed continuing education (CE) requirements for all US states. Results: We found that only 8 states mandated CE credits pertaining to diversity-related factors for the renewal of licensure. Discussion: Given how inseparable cultural competence is from any aspect of clinical work (and the harm that can be done if culture is not considered), it is essential that our field shift from aspirational guidance to firm requirements with regard to cultural competence and diversity-related training in psychology. Requiring CE units devoted to diversity-related factors represents one avenue to pursue this goal. This commentary outlines the current status of diversity-related CE for psychology licensure renewal and offers future directions for incorporating such training as a part of continuing professional development and education.

A Survey of Doctoral Internships Offering Clinical Neuropsychology Training: Updated Expectations for Competitive Applicants.

OBJECTIVE: The specialty of clinical neuropsychology has experienced significant professional growth and increasing standardization of educational and training guidelines over the past 20 years. Previous literature demonstrated the importance of routine distribution of selection criteria used by training directors and supervising neuropsychologists for competitive applicants aiming to specialize in neuropsychology during internship. This study examined supervisors' updated expectations for competitive applicants from a more diverse sample of doctoral internship programs offering neuropsychological training. These data also provide cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons to help trainees tailor their graduate training experiences. METHOD: The sample included training directors and/or supervising neuropsychologists from 80 internship programs (73.4% of submitted surveys). Spearman correlations, analyses of variance, and chi-square tests of independence were conducted for cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons. RESULTS: Clinical experience in assessment and the personal interview were consistently the two most prioritized criteria across all groups, whereas prioritization of the additional criteria was variable based on the program's characteristics. Internship programs generally preferred practica experience at university-affiliated medical centers, Veterans Affairs medical centers, and private/community-based hospitals. University-affiliated medical centers and internships offering ≥50% neuropsychology training showed similar preferences for applicants with a depth and breadth of graduate school experience in neuropsychology. Longitudinally, the applicant expectations for programs offering ≥50% neuropsychology training remained largely unchanged between 2000 and 2020. CONCLUSIONS: This study updated expectations for competitive applicants from a diverse sample of neuropsychology training programs, underscored the importance of fit between trainee and program, and demonstrated consistency over time for trainees seeking neuropsychology training during internship.