Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Endocr Disord ; 24(1): 145, 2024 Aug 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39123199

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Viral respiratory infections may precipitate type 1 diabetes (T1D). A possible association between the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for COVID-19, and the incidence of T1D is being determined. This study was carried out using Portuguese registries, aiming at examining temporal trends between COVID-19 and T1D. METHODS: Hospital data, comparing the incidence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, from children and young adults diagnosed with new-onset T1D, was acquired beginning in 2017 and until the end of 2022. Data was obtained from nine different Portuguese hospital units. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, beginning in March 2020, was assessed comparing the annual numbers of new-onset T1D cases. The annual median levels of glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting C-peptide at T1D diagnosis were compared. The annual number of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) episodes among new T1D cases was also assessed at two centers. RESULTS: In total, data from 574 newly diagnosed T1D patients was analyzed, including 530 (92.3%) children. The mean ages for child and adult patients were 9.1 (SD 4.4) and 32.8 (SD 13.6) years, respectively. 57.8% (331/573) were male, one patient had unknown sex. The overall median (25-75 percentiles) levels of glucose, HbA1c and fasting C-peptide at diagnosis were 454 mg/dL (356-568), 11.8% (10.1-13.4) and 0.50 µg/L (0.30-0.79), respectively. DKA at T1D diagnosis was present in 48.4% (76/157). For eight centers with complete 2018 to 2021 data (all calendar months), no overall significant increase in T1D cases was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e. 90 cases in 2018, 90 cases in 2019, 112 in 2020 and 100 in 2021 (P for trend = 0.36). Two of the centers, Faro (CHUA) and Dona Estefânia (CHULC) hospitals, did however see an increase in T1D from 2019 to 2020. No significant changes in glucose (P = 0.32), HbA1c (P = 0.68), fasting C-peptide (P = 0.20) or DKA frequency (P = 0.68) at the time of T1D diagnosis were observed over the entire study period. CONCLUSION: The T1D incidence did not increase significantly, when comparing the years before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, nor did key metabolic parameters or number of DKA episodes change.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Masculino , Portugal/epidemiología , Femenino , Incidencia , Niño , Adulto , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Preescolar , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , SARS-CoV-2 , Cetoacidosis Diabética/epidemiología , Glucemia/análisis , Glucemia/metabolismo
2.
Cureus ; 15(11): e48934, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38106777

RESUMEN

Bladder perforation, a significant urological emergency, presents a diagnostic challenge due to its diverse etiologies and varying clinical manifestations. This paper discusses a rare case of bladder perforation in an 87-year-old woman with a history of hypertension and previous stomach and uterine cancer. The patient was admitted with a urinary tract infection and subsequently experienced mild abdominal discomfort and reduced urinary output, prompting further investigation. Imaging studies revealed bladder wall thickening and ureterohydronephrosis, raising suspicion of a bladder tumor. Intriguingly, a catheter-related bladder perforation was identified through MRI. This case emphasizes the importance of considering bladder perforation as a potential complication, especially in elderly patients with indwelling catheters. Clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion and employ appropriate diagnostic modalities to ensure timely recognition and suitable management of this rare condition.

3.
Eur J Case Rep Intern Med ; 9(10): 003585, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36415844

RESUMEN

Fever of unknown origin remains a diagnostic challenge. Aortitis, defined as inflammation of the aorta, has multiple infectious and non-infectious causes. We report the case of an elderly woman with vertigo and bilateral hearing loss, presenting with fever of unknown origin. Blood tests were remarkable for leucocytosis with neutrophilia, elevation of C-reactive protein and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and positive antinuclear antibodies and rheumatoid factor, and an unremarkable search for multiple infectious causes of fever. During admission the patient developed a bilateral red eye. Abdominal and chest computed tomography was performed and demonstrated signs of aortitis. Due to the coexistence of aortitis, ocular inflammation, vertigo and bilateral hearing loss in a patient with persistent fever and elevation of inflammatory parameters, a presumptive diagnosis of Cogan's syndrome was made, with improvement after initiation of steroid therapy. LEARNING POINTS: Fever of unknown origin is a diagnostic challenge with an extensive list of possible causes.The coexistence of fever, aortitis, ocular and vestibulo-cochlear symptoms should raise the suspicion of Cogan's syndrome.Steroid therapy is the first-line treatment for Cogan's syndrome.

4.
Acta Med Port ; 19(1): 67-70, 2006.
Artículo en Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16987445

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) is an instrument to study the appropriate use of hospital beds based in objective criteria that classify a hospital admission as appropriate or inappropriate. OBJECT: Evaluate the appropriateness of hospital admissions and stays of the patients of our Internal Medicine Department using the concurrent version of AEP. METHOD: Transversal study where was evaluated the clinical record of the patients admitted to our Department of Internal Medicine on March 13th of 2003, excluding all these who were admitted the day of the study. We analyzed demographic and clinic parameters and the appropriateness of hospital admission and stay using the AEP. RESULTS: 22 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 54.5% of male gender with a average age of 70.7 years. All the admissions were considered appropriate. The most common criteria was the need of intravenous therapy (100%), followed by the sudden lost of corporal mobility (12.3%). 27.3% of stays were considered inappropriate on the day of the study. The most common criteria of appropriateness was the need of intravenous therapy (93.7%). The most usual reason of inappropriate stay was the existence of planned discharge, but without the order written down in the clinical file (66.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The AEP allows an efficient evaluation of the appropriateness of the hospital admissions and stays in a Health Unit, being used for a better utilization of resources. In our department all admissions were justified and about a quarter of stays were considered inappropriate using the AEP.


Asunto(s)
Revisión Concurrente/normas , Hospitalización , Medicina Interna , Anciano , Revisión Concurrente/métodos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA