Clinical utility of counting intraepithelial lymphocytes in celiac disease intestinal mucosa / Utilidad clínica del recuento de linfocitos intraepiteliales en la mucosa intestinal para el diagnóstico de enfermedad celíaca

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Our aims were to establish the clinical utility of assessing the intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) density in intestinal biopsies from a large series of individuals and to determine the best threshold discriminating celiac disease (CD) patients and controls in two populations with different pre-test prevalence. METHODS: We prospectively performed intestinal biopsy and CD-related serology in 349 subjects undergoing upper GI endoscopy. While 116 had symptoms suggestive of a small bowel disorder (high prevalence), 233 individuals were randomly selected from patients referred to endoscopy because upper GIsymptoms (low prevalence). Diagnosis of CD was based on the concordance of classical histological features and a positive CD serology. RESULTS: While 58 patients had a newly diagnosed CD (52 in the high and 6 in the low prevalence groups), 291 subjects did not meet diagnostic criteria of the disorder. Patients had a highly significant greater IEL density than controls (p < 0.00001). Based on the ROC curve, a count of 22.8 IEL/100 epithelial cells had the highest performance for diagnosing CD in the overall population and for subjects in the high pre-test probability subgroup and 22.5% was ,he best cut-off for those diagnosed in the low risk population (area under the curves: 0.979, 0.979 and 0.993, respectively). An abnormal CD serology confirmed the diagnosis of CD in all the four patients with counts below 22.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that an IEL density of 22.8% is an adequate threshold to discriminate CD patients and controls in individuals irrespective of the prevalence of the disorder.(AU)

Introducción: El recuento elevado de linfocitos intraepiteliales (LIEs) es un rasgo destacado aunque inespecífico de la enteropatía de la enfermedad celíaca (EC). Un recuento mayor a 40 LIEs/100 células epiteliales ha sido considerado por mucho tiempo esencial para el diagnóstico. Sin embargo, estudios recientes con escaso número de muestras han cuestionado este valor de corte. Objetivos: Determinar el rango normal de LIEs en biopsias intestinales y establecer su capacidad diagnóstica de EC en dos poblaciones con diferente prevalencia. Métodos: Realizamos prospectivamente biopsias de duodeno distal y serología para EC en 349 pacientesconsecutivos a quienes se les realizó una videoendoscopia digestiva alta. El grupo A consistió en 116 pacientes derivados a biopsia intestinal por síntomas sugestivos de malabsorción (considerados de alta prevalencia de EC) y el grupo B consistió en 233 pacientes randomizados entre quienes fueron derivados a endoscopía alta por síntomas gastrointestinales no sugestivos de EC (baja prevalencia de EC). El diagnóstico de EC se basó en criterios histológicos clásicos y serología positiva. Resultados: Cincuenta y ocho pacientes tuvieron EC (52 en el grupo de alto riesgo y 6 en el de baja prevalencia) y 291 individuos no tuvieron criterios de la enfermedad. Los pacientes tuvieron una densidad de LIEs significativamente mayor que los controles (p<0.00001). Basado en las curvas ROC, el conteo de 22.8 LIEs/100 células epiteliales tuvo la mejor sensibilidad y especificidad para el diagnóstico de EC en la población general y entre los sujetos con alta probabilidad y 22.5% fue el mejor valor de corte para la población de bajo riesgo (áreas bajo las curvas: 0.979, 0.979 y 0.993, respectivamente). Todos aquellos pacientes celíacos con recuento de LIEs por debajo de 22% (n=4), tuvieron serología positiva para EC. El clásico valor de 40% tuvo una sensibilidad del 55%. Conclusiones: Nuestro estudio confirma que una...(AU)

Clinical utility of counting intraepithelial lymphocytes in celiac disease intestinal mucosa / Utilidad clínica del recuento de linfocitos intraepiteliales en la mucosa intestinal para el diagnóstico de enfermedad celíaca

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Our aims were to establish the clinical utility of assessing the intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) density in intestinal biopsies from a large series of individuals and to determine the best threshold discriminating celiac disease (CD) patients and controls in two populations with different pre-test prevalence. METHODS: We prospectively performed intestinal biopsy and CD-related serology in 349 subjects undergoing upper GI endoscopy. While 116 had symptoms suggestive of a small bowel disorder (high prevalence), 233 individuals were randomly selected from patients referred to endoscopy because upper GIsymptoms (low prevalence). Diagnosis of CD was based on the concordance of classical histological features and a positive CD serology. RESULTS: While 58 patients had a newly diagnosed CD (52 in the high and 6 in the low prevalence groups), 291 subjects did not meet diagnostic criteria of the disorder. Patients had a highly significant greater IEL density than controls (p < 0.00001). Based on the ROC curve, a count of 22.8 IEL/100 epithelial cells had the highest performance for diagnosing CD in the overall population and for subjects in the high pre-test probability subgroup and 22.5% was ,he best cut-off for those diagnosed in the low risk population (area under the curves: 0.979, 0.979 and 0.993, respectively). An abnormal CD serology confirmed the diagnosis of CD in all the four patients with counts below 22.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that an IEL density of 22.8% is an adequate threshold to discriminate CD patients and controls in individuals irrespective of the prevalence of the disorder.

Introducción: El recuento elevado de linfocitos intraepiteliales (LIEs) es un rasgo destacado aunque inespecífico de la enteropatía de la enfermedad celíaca (EC). Un recuento mayor a 40 LIEs/100 células epiteliales ha sido considerado por mucho tiempo esencial para el diagnóstico. Sin embargo, estudios recientes con escaso número de muestras han cuestionado este valor de corte. Objetivos: Determinar el rango normal de LIEs en biopsias intestinales y establecer su capacidad diagnóstica de EC en dos poblaciones con diferente prevalencia. Métodos: Realizamos prospectivamente biopsias de duodeno distal y serología para EC en 349 pacientesconsecutivos a quienes se les realizó una videoendoscopia digestiva alta. El grupo A consistió en 116 pacientes derivados a biopsia intestinal por síntomas sugestivos de malabsorción (considerados de alta prevalencia de EC) y el grupo B consistió en 233 pacientes randomizados entre quienes fueron derivados a endoscopía alta por síntomas gastrointestinales no sugestivos de EC (baja prevalencia de EC). El diagnóstico de EC se basó en criterios histológicos clásicos y serología positiva. Resultados: Cincuenta y ocho pacientes tuvieron EC (52 en el grupo de alto riesgo y 6 en el de baja prevalencia) y 291 individuos no tuvieron criterios de la enfermedad. Los pacientes tuvieron una densidad de LIEs significativamente mayor que los controles (p<0.00001). Basado en las curvas ROC, el conteo de 22.8 LIEs/100 células epiteliales tuvo la mejor sensibilidad y especificidad para el diagnóstico de EC en la población general y entre los sujetos con alta probabilidad y 22.5% fue el mejor valor de corte para la población de bajo riesgo (áreas bajo las curvas: 0.979, 0.979 y 0.993, respectivamente). Todos aquellos pacientes celíacos con recuento de LIEs por debajo de 22% (n=4), tuvieron serología positiva para EC. El clásico valor de 40% tuvo una sensibilidad del 55%. Conclusiones: Nuestro estudio confirma que una...

Comparative study between nadolol and 5-isosorbide mononitrate vs. endoscopic band ligation plus sclerotherapy in the prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: After variceal bleeding, cirrhotic patients should receive secondary prophylaxis. AIM: To compare nadolol plus 5-isosorbide mononitrate (5-ISMN) with endoscopic band ligation. The end points were rebleeding, treatment failure and death. METHODS: One hundred and nine cirrhotic patients with a recent variceal bleeding were randomized: nadolol plus 5-ISMN in 57 patients and endoscopic band ligation in 52 patients. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 17 and 19 months in nadolol plus 5-ISMN and endoscopic band ligation groups, respectively. No differences were observed between groups in upper rebleeding (47% vs. 46%), variceal rebleeding (40% vs. 36%), failure (32% vs. 22%), major complications (7% vs. 13.5%) and death (19% vs. 20%), respectively. The actuarial probability of remaining free of rebleeding, failure and deaths were similar in both groups. Time to rebleeding shows that endoscopic band ligation patients had an early rebleed, with a median of 0.5 month (95% CI: 0.0-4.2) compared with patients from nadolol plus 5-ISMN, 7.6 months (95% CI: 2.9-12.3, P < 0.013). Multivariate analysis indicated that outcome-specific predictive factor(s) for rebleeding was Child A vs. B + C (P < 0.01); for failure was Child A vs. B + C (P < 0.02); and for death ascites (P < 0.01) and rebleeding (P < 0.02). CONCLUSION: This trial suggests no superiority of endoscopic band ligation over nadolol plus 5-ISMN mononitrate for the prevention of rebleeding in cirrhotic patients.

Patients with ascites have higher variceal pressure and wall tension than patients without ascites.

OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that ascites is a risk factor for variceal bleeding. Recently, it has been demonstrated that total paracentesis decreases variceal pressure. However, no data are available showing the basal variceal pressure in patients with and without ascites. METHODS: We studied 76 cirrhotic patients, 49 with and 27 without ascites. Variceal pressure was measured by direct puncture. Variceal size, variceal pressure gradient, and variceal wall tension were also obtained. RESULTS: No demographic differences were observed between the groups. Child score was higher (9.7+/-1.5 vs 7.8+/-2.1, p < 0.001) and serum albumin lower (2.6+/-0.6 vs 3.0+/-0.7 mg %, p < 0.02) in ascitic than in nonascitic patients, respectively. Variceal pressure and variceal pressure gradient were significantly higher in patients with ascites than in those without ascites (25.0+/-6 vs 20.4+/-4.6 mm Hg, p < 0.001 and 18.75+/-4.7 vs 13.70+/-4.1 mm Hg, p < 0.0001, respectively). The variceal wall tension was significantly higher in patients with ascites (71.0+/-25.1 mm Hg/mm) than in those without ascites (55.1+/-22.1 mm Hg/mm, p < 0.03). No relationship was observed between variceal pressure gradient and liver function. Ascites patients included in Child-Pugh grade A+B presented a similar variceal pressure to Child C patients (18.5+/-4.2 vs 19.3+/-5.7 mm Hg, respectively, p = ns). In addition, no relationship was observed between variceal pressure gradient and etiology of cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that patients with ascites have significantly higher variceal pressure and wall tension than patients without ascites. These results suggest that patients with ascites may be at risk for variceal bleeding.

Efficacy of octreotide and sclerotherapy in the treatment of acute variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients. A prospective, multicentric, and randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Sclerotherapy is the most widely used method for treatment of acute variceal bleeding. Previous reports have suggested that octreotide infusion is as effective as sclerotherapy. Our aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of octreotide in comparison with sclerotherapy in controlling variceal bleeding. METHODS: Seventy-six cirrhotic patients were randomized to receive either sclerotherapy (n = 37) or octreotide (n = 39) infusion of 50 microg/h intravenously for 48 h after a bolus of 100 microg, followed by subcutaneous injection of 100 microg/8 h for an additional 72 h. RESULTS: The two groups were similar in base-line data. A similar initial control of bleeding was obtained in 94.6% for sclerotherapy and 84.6% for octreotide (NS). No difference was observed between sclerotherapy and octreotide in rebleeding (23% versus 33%) and treatment failure (22% versus 36%, respectively). Furthermore, the overall success of treatment was 78% for sclerotherapy and 64% for octreotide. No significant difference in mortality was observed between treatments (eight patients for octreotide and three patients for sclerotherapy, NS). CONCLUSIONS: These results show that both treatments present a very high and similar initial and final control of bleeding. However, there is a trend that could be clinically important towards better results in the patients treated with sclerotherapy.

Terlipressin is more effective in decreasing variceal pressure than portal pressure in cirrhotic patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Terlipressin decreases portal pressure. However, its effects on variceal pressure have been poorly investigated. This study investigated the variceal, splanchnic and systemic hemodynamic effects of terlipressin. METHODS: Twenty cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices grade II-III, and portal pressure > or =12 mmHg were studied. Hepatic venous pressure gradient, variceal pressure and systemic hemodynamic parameters were obtained. After baseline measurements, in a double-blind administration, 14 patients received a 2mg/iv injection of terlipressin and six patients received placebo. The same measurements were repeated 60 min later. RESULTS: No demographic or biochemical differences were observed in basal condition between groups. Terlipressin produced significant decreases in intravariceal pressure from 20.9+4.9 to 16.3+/-4.7 mmHg (p<0.01, -21+/- 16%), variceal pressure gradient from 18.9+/-4.8 to 13.5+/-6.0 mmHg (p<0.01, -28+/-27%), estimated variceal wall tension from 78+/-29 to 59+/-31 mmHg x mm (p<0.01, -27+/-22%), and hepatic venous pressure gradient from 19.4+/-4.5 to 16.8+/-5 mmHg (p<0.01, -14+/-12%) at 60 min. The change in variceal pressure after 60 min of terlipressin administration was greater than the change in wedge hepatic venous pressure (-4.7 mmHg vs -0.5 mmHg, respectively, p<0.0001). Terlipressin also caused significant decreases in heart rate and cardiac index and increases in mean arterial pressure and peripheral vascular resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that terlipressin produces significant and prolonged decreases in variceal pressure and variceal wall tension and has intrinsic effects on portal pressure and systemic hemodynamics. Variceal pressure provides a better assessment of the effects of terlipressin administration on esophageal varices than hepatic venous pressure gradient.

Variceal band ligation and variceal band ligation plus sclerotherapy in the prevention of recurrent variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients: a randomized, prospective and controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The combination treatment of band ligation plus sclerotherapy has been proposed to hasten variceal eradication. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of band ligation alone versus band ligation plus sclerotherapy in the prevention of recurrent variceal bleeding. METHODS: Eighty cirrhotic patients were randomized to group I (band ligation) with 41 patients or to group II (band ligation plus sclerotherapy) with 39 patients in whom polidocanol (2%) was injected 1 to 2 cm proximal to each band. RESULTS: At baseline, both groups were similar with regard to clinical, demographic and laboratory data. Mean follow-up time (standard error) for group I was 336.5 +/- 43.4 days and for group II 386.1 +/- 40.1 days (p = 0.4). No statistical differences were observed between group I and group II in relation to recurrence of bleeding (31.7% vs. 23%, p = 0.38), treatment failure (24.4% vs. 12. 8%, p = 0.18), death (39% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.44) and variceal eradication (65.8% vs. 74.4%, p = 0.40). Group II had a significantly higher number of complications than group I, 30.8% versus 7.3%, respectively (p = 0.05). The number of bleeding related deaths was higher in group I than in group II (22% vs. 10.3%, respectively; p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference was observed between band ligation and band ligation plus sclerotherapy in prevention of recurrent variceal bleeding. Furthermore, there was a higher incidence of complications in the latter group.

Total volume paracentesis decreases variceal pressure, size, and variceal wall tension in cirrhotic patients.

It has been suggested that ascites is a risk factor for variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients. However, no data of total volume paracentesis (TVP) effects on variceal hemodynamics has yet been published. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of TVP on variceal pressure, size, and tension in cirrhotic patients. Before sclerotherapy, 18 cirrhotic patients with grade II esophageal varices were studied. The following measurements were performed on 12 patients at basal condition and after TVP: inferior vena cava pressure, esophageal pressure (EP), and intravariceal pressure (IVP) by direct punction and variceal size at endoscopy. The same measurements were performed at basal condition and 1 hour later without TVP on the other 6 patients used as a control group. Variceal pressure gradient (VPG) and variceal wall tension (WT) were calculated. Paracentesis and intra-abdominal pressure were obtained with a direct punction. No demographic differences were observed between both groups. Paracentesis produced a significant reduction of IVP (from 25.6 +/- 2.4 to 17.9 +/- 2.1 mm Hg, means +/- SEM, -30%, P < .05), VPG (from 16.6 +/- 2.4 to 10.8 +/- 1.4 mm Hg, -35%, P < .05). TVP also reduced variceal size (from 9 +/- 0.3 to 5.6 + 0.4 mm, -38%, P < .05) and WT (from 75.3 +/- 11.6 to 30 +/- 4.7 mm Hg. mm, -60%, P < .05). Intra-abdominal pressure decreased from 18 +/- 2.2 to 4 +/- 0.9 mm Hg (P < .05), and IVC decreased from 15.5 +/- 2.4 to 5.7 +/- 1.5 mm Hg (P < .05). No significant differences were observed in mean arterial pressure and heart rate. The mean ascitic fluid removed was 8 +/- 0.71 L. No significant difference between measurements was observed in the control group. Our results show that TVP significantly decreases variceal pressure and tension. These results suggest that ascites removal can be useful in the treatment of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients.

Aspectos clínicos y neuroendócrinos de un granuloma hipotalámico (TBC) y neurolués / Clinical and neuroendocrine aspects of an hypothalamic tuberculous granuloma and neurosyphilis

Se discuten los hallazgos en un paciente de 36 años, sexo masculino, homosexual que comienza, 6 meses antes de la consulta, con un cuadro de diabetes insípida al que se le agregan, 3 meses después, astenia, adinamia, somnolencia, diplopía fugaz, cefaleas parieto-occipitales, bradispsiquia y alucinaciones auditivo-visuales. Como antecedentes personales de importancia refería traumatismo severo de ojo derecho (a los 10 años) y osteomielitis tuberculosa de clavícula izquierda (a los 29 años). Examen físico de ingreso: temblor fino distal en miembro superior derecho y hemiparesia en miembro inferior homolateral. Laboratorio: anemia leve normocítica-normocrómica; eritrosedimentación acelerada; incremento moderado de GPT, GOAT, y GTP y F. Alcalina; hiposmolaridad plasmática; hipostenuria; VDRL y FTA reactivos (plasma y LCR). T.A.C. lesión expansiva supraselar, yuxtaventricular con gran edema perilesional. Estudios neuroendocrinos: alteración del ritmo circadiano y de la respuesta a la hipoglucemia insulínica de la prolactina y cortisol; biporespuesta de LH, FSH y TSH a estímulos específicos. Punción biopsia estereotáxica: granuloma inflamatorio inespecífico. A los 45 días de inicio de tuberculostáticos y dexametasona se efectuá nueva TAC: normal, desparece la diabetes insípida y se instaura penicilinoterapia. Nueva TAC (al año): normal. Como conclusiones merecen destacarse la presentación de un granuloma hipotalámico tuberculoso y diabetes insípida de curación clínica y desparición tomográfica en breve plazo asociado a neurolúes y disfunción hipotálamo-hipofisaria conformando un hallazgo inusual en la literatura médica (AU)

Aspectos clínicos y neuroendócrinos de un granuloma hipotalámico (TBC) y neurolués / Clinical and neuroendocrine aspects of an hypothalamic tuberculous granuloma and neurosyphilis

Se discuten los hallazgos en un paciente de 36 años, sexo masculino, homosexual que comienza, 6 meses antes de la consulta, con un cuadro de diabetes insípida al que se le agregan, 3 meses después, astenia, adinamia, somnolencia, diplopía fugaz, cefaleas parieto-occipitales, bradispsiquia y alucinaciones auditivo-visuales. Como antecedentes personales de importancia refería traumatismo severo de ojo derecho (a los 10 años) y osteomielitis tuberculosa de clavícula izquierda (a los 29 años). Examen físico de ingreso: temblor fino distal en miembro superior derecho y hemiparesia en miembro inferior homolateral. Laboratorio: anemia leve normocítica-normocrómica; eritrosedimentación acelerada; incremento moderado de GPT, GOAT, y GTP y F. Alcalina; hiposmolaridad plasmática; hipostenuria; VDRL y FTA reactivos (plasma y LCR). T.A.C. lesión expansiva supraselar, yuxtaventricular con gran edema perilesional. Estudios neuroendocrinos: alteración del ritmo circadiano y de la respuesta a la hipoglucemia insulínica de la prolactina y cortisol; biporespuesta de LH, FSH y TSH a estímulos específicos. Punción biopsia estereotáxica: granuloma inflamatorio inespecífico. A los 45 días de inicio de tuberculostáticos y dexametasona se efectuá nueva TAC: normal, desparece la diabetes insípida y se instaura penicilinoterapia. Nueva TAC (al año): normal. Como conclusiones merecen destacarse la presentación de un granuloma hipotalámico tuberculoso y diabetes insípida de curación clínica y desparición tomográfica en breve plazo asociado a neurolúes y disfunción hipotálamo-hipofisaria conformando un hallazgo inusual en la literatura médica