Effect of certolizumab pegol on signs and symptoms in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results of a Phase 3 double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study (RAPID-PsA).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) after 24 weeks in RAPID-PsA (NCT01087788), an ongoing Phase 3 trial in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Patients were randomised 1:1:1 to placebo, 200 mg CZP every 2 weeks (Q2W) or 400 mg CZP every 4 weeks (Q4W). Patients could have had exposure to one previous tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor therapy. Primary endpoints were American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response at week 12 and modified Total Sharp Score change from baseline at week 24. Secondary endpoints included; Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) score, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, Leeds Enthesitis Index, Leeds Dactylitis Index, and Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index. RESULTS: Of 409 patients randomised, 368 completed 24 weeks of treatment. ACR20 response was significantly greater in CZP 200 mg Q2W and 400 mg Q4W-treated patients than placebo (58.0% and 51.9% vs 24.3% (p<0.001)) at week 12, with improvements observed by week 1. There was a statistically significant improvement in physical function from baseline, measured by HAQ-DI in CZP patients compared with placebo (-0.50 vs -0.19, p<0.001) and more patients treated with CZP 200 mg Q2W and CZP 400 mg achieved an improvement in PsARC at week 24 than placebo (78.3% and 77.0% vs 33.1% (p<0.001)). Sustained improvements were observed in psoriatic skin involvement, enthesitis, dactylitis and nail disease. Higher ACR20 response with CZP was independent of prior TNF inhibitor exposure. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid improvements in the signs and symptoms of PsA, including joints, skin, enthesitis, dactylitis and nail disease were observed across both CZP dosing regimens.

Effect of different imputation approaches on the evaluation of radiographic progression in patients with psoriatic arthritis: results of the RAPID-PsA 24-week phase III double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study of certolizumab pegol.

OBJECTIVES: To report the effect of different imputation methodologies on the assessment of radiographic progression in clinical trials. METHODS: The 216-week RAPID-psoriatic arthritis (PsA) (NCT01087788) trial of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in patients with active PsA was double-blind and placebo-controlled until week 24. A primary end point was change from baseline in modified Total Sharp Score(s) (mTSS). Prespecified imputation methodology in patients with fewer than two analysable mTSS used minimum observed baseline score for missing baseline values and maximum observed week 24 score for missing week 24 values. Post hoc analyses used alternative methods of imputation in patients with fewer than two analysable mTSS. mTSS non-progressors were defined as patients with ≤0 (predefined) or ≤0.5 (post hoc) change in mTSS from baseline to week 24. Baseline mTSS and C-reactive protein levels as predictors of radiographic progression were investigated. RESULTS: 409 patients were randomised. Baseline demographics were similar between groups. Prespecified imputation analysis inappropriately overestimated radiographic progression (least squares mean placebo, 28.9; CZP, 18.3; p≥0.05). Multiple post hoc analyses demonstrated that CZP inhibited radiographic progression compared with placebo, particularly in patients with high baseline mTSS and C-reactive protein levels. mTSS non-progression rate was higher in CZP than placebo groups in all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate prespecified imputation methodology resulted in an unrealistic assessment of progression in all arms. Methodologies for imputing missing radiographic data can greatly affect assessment and reporting of mTSS progression.

Applications of pharmacogenetics to drug development: the Glaxo Wellcome experience.

The Genetics Directorate was established at Glaxo Wellcome (GW) in 1997. The goals of the Directorate are to identify susceptibility genes for common diseases with large unmet therapeutic need, apply genetic methods for the targeted development of medicines so that the right medicine is developed for the right patient, assist in translating gene discoveries into target selection, and represent genetics accurately internally within GW and externally (to laypersons, the medical community, the business community, government representatives, and regulatory agencies). As part of the goal of developing the right medication for the right patient, GW has added genetic research to its clinical drug studies in every major therapeutic area. GW worked closely with international ethicists experienced in the area of genetic research to develop the process and documents that are currently in use; these undergo frequent, rigorous review in light of the changing regulatory and legal environment and the needs of clinical investigators and patients. The addition of genetic research to clinical studies was accompanied by significant education efforts within GW and for study-site personnel, ethics committees, and regulatory authorities. Feedback from all those involved is an integral part of implementing GW's genetic research and is used to fine-tune the processes and protocol and consent document templates. A recently completed review of the approval rate from ethics committees in several countries has revealed trends in EC/IRB (Ethics Committees/Institutional Review Boards) questions and concerns about genetic research. This article will focus on the lessons learned from incorporating genetic research into clinical studies at over 1,500 international sites and will include summaries of the feedback from investigators, EC/IRBs, and regulatory authorities. It also will include a discussion of the potential applications of SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) map technologies to pharmacogenetics by increasing the ability to correlate patients' genetic information with their response to medicines.

A 1-year study of salmeterol powder on pulmonary function and hyperresponsiveness to methacholine.

BACKGROUND: Long-acting beta(2)-sympathomimetic agonists such as salmeterol have been proved safe and effective for the treatment of asthma. However, controversy still exists as to the appropriateness of scheduled long-term therapy with these agents. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the degree of bronchodilation provided by treatment with salmeterol for a period of 52 weeks and evaluated bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine during and after the treatment period. METHODS: Three hundred fifty-two patients with mild to moderate asthma were assessed by 12-hour serial spirometry and serial methacholine challenge tests. RESULTS: The mean area under the FEV(1) curve above baseline over 12 hours after drug at day 1 was significantly greater with salmeterol powder compared with placebo (5.06 liter hours vs 0.77 L/h) and did not change significantly over 1 year. The mean increase in the log(2) of the provocative cumulative methacholine dose producing a 20% decrease in FEV(1) (PD(20)FEV(1)) during treatment was significantly higher in the salmeterol-treated patients than in the placebo group (1.02 doubling doses vs 0.43 doubling doses at week 4, 1.06 doubling doses vs 0.41 doubling doses at week 24). At week 52 the increase from baseline in log(2)PD(20)FEV(1) was not significantly different between salmeterol and placebo (1.08 vs 0.69 doubling doses). Seven days after treatment the log(2)PD(20)FEV(1) was -0.60 doubling doses lower than baseline for salmeterol compared with 0.10 doubling doses for placebo (P =.031). Long-term salmeterol use was not associated with a deleterious effect on asthma control during and after treatment. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the bronchodilator properties of salmeterol are sustained over 52 weeks and that bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine is decreased to a modest degree during treatment. Clinically significant increases in hyperresponsiveness did not develop after discontinuation of salmeterol treatment.

Long-term cardiovascular safety of salmeterol powder pharmacotherapy in adolescent and adult patients with chronic persistent asthma: a randomized clinical trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the long-term cardiovascular safety of salmeterol powder vs placebo in adolescent and adult patients with mild persistent asthma. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. SETTING: Eighteen US clinical centers. PATIENTS: Three hundred fifty-two patients (> or = 12 years) with mild persistent asthma (duration > or = 6 months) requiring pharmacotherapy; with FEV1 of 70 to 90% of predicted and without abnormal ECG/continuous ambulatory ECG (Holter). INTERVENTIONS: Randomized to twice-daily salmeterol powder (50 microg) or placebo via breath-actuated device for 52 weeks. Backup albuterol was available to control asthma symptoms. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Cardiovascular safety was regularly assessed by 12-lead ECG with a 15-s lead II rhythm strip, 24-h continuous ambulatory ECG (Holter) monitoring, serial vital sign measurements, and review of adverse cardiovascular events. No deaths occurred during the study. No clinically significant between-group differences were observed in pulse rate, ECG QTc interval, median number of ventricular or supraventricular ectopic events, incidence of ventricular ectopic couplets and runs, or incidence of > 100 ventricular or supraventricular ectopic events in 24 h. No clinically significant between-group differences were observed in arterial BP or incidence of adverse cardiovascular events. Salmeterol was well tolerated throughout the 52-week study period, with a cardiovascular safety profile similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term, twice-daily pharmacotherapy with salmeterol powder is safe and is not associated with unfavorable clinically significant changes in cardiac function or increases in cardiovascular adverse effects.

Prevention of exercise-induced bronchospasm in pediatric asthma patients: a comparison of salmeterol powder with albuterol.

BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) is a common problem in children with asthma. Pretreatment with the beta2 (beta 2)-adrenoreceptor agonist albuterol is effective for preventing EIB, but is recognized as providing only short-term (2 to 3 hour) protection. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 12-hour efficacy and safety of single doses of 25 micrograms and 50 micrograms of salmeterol powder administered via Diskus inhaler versus albuterol aerosol via pressurized metered-dose inhaler and placebo in preventing EIB in asthmatic children. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, single-dose, four-way crossover study was conducted in pediatric patients (4 to 11 years of age) demonstrating EIB and mild-to-moderate asthma. Serial forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was measured before and after standard treadmill exercise at hour 1, hour 6, and hour 12 after administration of 25 micrograms or 50 micrograms salmeterol powder, 180 micrograms albuterol aerosol, or placebo. Adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: After completion of the hour 1 exercise challenge, mean minimum % predicted FEV1 was significantly higher following albuterol (91.3%) than for placebo (75.3%) and for both dosages of salmeterol (86.9% and 85.8% for salmeterol 25 micrograms and 50 micrograms, respectively; P < or = .026). After completion of both the hour 6 and hour 12 exercise challenges, the 50-microgram salmeterol treatment produced a significantly higher mean minimum percent of predicted FEV1 (90.6% and 87.3% predicted, respectively) than the mean minimum percent of predicted FEV1 for placebo or albuterol (73.8% to 78.4% of predicted; P < or = .041). At hour 6, the 25-microgram salmeterol treatment was not significantly different from albuterol or placebo. At hour 12, the 25-microgram salmeterol treatment mean minimum percent of predicted was significantly higher than albuterol (87.9% versus 73.8% of predicted; P = .006) and there was also a trend toward significance over placebo (76.9% predicted; P = .056). At all exercise periods, no statistically significant differences in spirometry values were observed between the two salmeterol treatment groups. Safety profiles were similar among treatments, including placebo. No drug-related adverse events or withdrawals due to adverse events occurred. Changes in laboratory values, vital signs, 12-lead ECGs, and physical examinations were unremarkable. CONCLUSIONS: A single 50-microgram dose of salmeterol powder provided effective and safe protection against EIB for at least 12 hours in asthmatic children and provided a significantly more prolonged effect than albuterol aerosol (180 micrograms).

Efficacy of salmeterol xinafoate powder in children with chronic persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of salmeterol powder have not previously been evaluated in children with asthma in the United States. OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and safety of salmeterol powder versus placebo were compared in children between the ages of 4 and 11 years with chronic persistent asthma. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial was performed at 11 clinical centers. Two hundred seven patients were randomly assigned to receive 50 microg salmeterol powder or placebo (and albuterol as needed) twice daily via a breath-actuated device for 12 weeks. Twelve-hour serial pulmonary function assessments were conducted on day 1 and at week 12. Daily recordings of morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), supplemental albuterol use, asthma symptoms, and nocturnal awakenings were assessed. RESULTS: On day 1 and at week 12, weighted mean percent of predicted PEF (P < .001, day 1 and P=.008, week 12) and weighted mean forced expiratory volume in one second (P < .001, day 1 and week 12) were significantly higher at all timepoints evaluated over the 12-hour postdosing period in patients treated with salmeterol powder compared with placebo. Overall reductions in supplemental albuterol use and mean asthma symptom scores were also significantly greater in children administered salmeterol compared with placebo (P=.004 and P=.006, respectively). The frequency of adverse events was similar in the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Salmeterol powder (50 microg twice daily) is effective and safe in producing bronchodilation and relieving symptoms in children with chronic persistent asthma during 12 weeks of treatment.

Salmeterol powder compared with albuterol aerosol as maintenance therapy for asthma in adolescent and adult patients.

Two multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled studies involving 451 adolescent and adult patients with mild-to-moderate asthma compared the efficacy and safety of salmeterol powder 50 micrograms twice daily with albuterol 180 micrograms four times daily or placebo (with albuterol as needed) for 12 weeks. Patients had forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 50% to 80%. Throughout the 12-week treatment period, the mean change from baseline in percentage of predicted FEV1 was significantly greater with salmeterol than with placebo; mean area under the curve for FEV1 was significantly greater with salmeterol than with albuterol or placebo. Significant improvements in morning and evening peak expiratory flow, percentage of nights without awakening, and asthma symptoms were observed with salmeterol. Salmeterol was well tolerated, and no clinically significant changes in electrocardiographic activity were observed.