Mental health service use by Americans with severe mental illnesses.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the patterns and determinants of service use in severely mentally ill persons drawn from the National Institute of Mental Health Epidemiological Catchment Area (ECA) program, a community-based epidemiologic survey. This information provides a baseline against which to track ongoing changes in the US mental health service system. METHODS: Severe mental illness (SMI) was defined according to US Senate Appropriations Committee guidelines. Comparisons were made with persons who had a mental disorder that did not meet these criteria (non-SMI). Sociodemographic factors, and 1-year volume and intensity of mental or addictive services use were determined. Differences between those who used services and those who did not were examined using logistic regression. RESULTS: Persons with SMI differed from persons with non-SMI in most sociodemographic characteristics. A higher proportion of persons with SMI used ambulatory services, but the mean number of visits per person did not differ from the non-SMI population. Persons with SMI comprised the bulk of hospital inpatients admitted during a 1-year period. Several significant sociodemographic determinants of service use were found, with different patterns for general medical and specialty service use, pointing out potential barriers to care. CONCLUSIONS: As health care reform measures continue to be debated, attention to the service needs of the severely mentally ill is of crucial importance. Pre-managed care (pre-1993) baseline service use benchmarks will be essential to assess the impact of managed care on access to care, particularly for the severely mentally ill. Periodic collection of epidemiologic data on prevalence and service use would thus greatly facilitate service planning and addressing barriers to receiving mental health services in this population.

The National Depressive and Manic-Depressive Association consensus statement on the undertreatment of depression.

OBJECTIVE: A consensus conference on the reasons for the undertreatment of depression was organized by the National Depressive and Manic Depressive Association (NDMDA) on January 17-18, 1996. The target audience included health policymakers, clinicians, patients and their families, and the public at large. Six key questions were addressed: (1) Is depression undertreated in the community and in the clinic? (2) What is the economic cost to society of depression? (3) What have been the efforts in the past to redress undertreatment and how successful have they been? (4) What are the reasons for the gap between our knowledge of the diagnosis and treatment of depression and actual treatment received in this country? (5) What can we do to narrow this gap? (6) What can we do immediately to narrow this gap? PARTICIPANTS: Consensus panel members were drawn from psychiatry, psychology, family practice, internal medicine, managed care and public health, consumers, and the general public. The panelists listened to a set of presentations with background papers from experts on diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment, and cost of treatment. EVIDENCE: Experts summarized relevant data from the world scientific literature on the 6 questions posed for the conference. CONSENSUS PROCESS: Panel members discussed openly all material presented to them in executive session. Selected panelists prepared first drafts of the consensus statements for each question. All of these drafts were read by all panelists and were edited and reedited until consensus was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: There is overwhelming evidence that individuals with depression are being seriously undertreated. Safe, effective, and economical treatments are available. The cost to individuals and society of this undertreatment is substantial. Long suffering, suicide, occupational impairment, and impairment in interpersonal and family relationships exist. Efforts to redress this gap have included provider educational programs and public educational programs. Reasons for the continuing gap include patient, provider, and health care system factors. Patient-based reasons include failure to recognize the symptoms, underestimating the severity, limited access, reluctance to see a mental health care specialist due to stigma, noncompliance with treatment, and lack of health insurance. Provider factors include poor professional school education about depression, limited training in interpersonal skills, stigma, inadequate time to evaluate and treat depression, failure to consider psychotherapeutic approaches, and prescription of inadequate doses of antidepressant medication for inadequate durations. Mental health care systems create barriers to receiving optimal treatment. Strategies to narrow the gap include enhancing the role of patients and families as participants in care and advocates; developing performance standards for behavioral health care systems, including incentives for positive identification, assessment, and treatment of depression; enhancing educational programs for providers and the public; enhancing collaboration among provider subtypes (eg, primary care providers and mental health professionals); and conducting research on development and testing of new treatments for depression.

President Clinton's proposal for health care reform: key provisions and issues.

Shortly after his election in 1992, President Clinton appointed a health care reform task force to develop a proposal for providing health care benefits for all American citizens and legal residents. Between February and May 1993 the Interdepartmental Working Group, composed of more than 30 working groups addressing specific health care issues, prepared options for the task force. The Health Security Act was introduced in November 1993. Besides universal coverage and a basic benefit package, provisions included health insurance reform, regional alliances for structuring competition among health insurance plans, consumer choice of health plans, and provisions for Medicaid beneficiaries. Proposed mental health and substance abuse provisions included coverage of intensive nonresidential services, medical management, evaluation and assessment services, and case management. Initial limitations on coverage of inpatient mental health services and psychotherapy would be removed by 2001. The Clinton plan also called for integration of public mental health and substance abuse services into the full range of health services offered by local health plans. Major issues that will have to be resolved if health care legislation is to be enacted include whether regional alliances should be mandatory and whether employers should be required to contribute to insurance premiums.

Human resource needs, health care reform, and the practice of medicine/psychiatry.

Health care reform, which is anticipated at the federal level and is ongoing at the state level, presents both challenges and opportunities for psychiatrists and other mental health practitioners. It is important that all the mental health professions examine their training programs in preparation for the changes that are likely to occur in the future. The author relates training and practice trends to trends in mental health services delivery that are likely to accelerate in the context of health care reform.

Mental health and substance abuse coverage under health reform.

President Clinton's health care reform proposal articulates a complete vision for the mental health and substance abuse care system that includes a place for those traditionally served by both the public and the private sectors. Mental health and substance abuse services are to be fully integrated into health alliances under the president's proposal. If this is to occur, we must come to grips with both the history and the insurance-related problems of financing mental health/substance abuse care: (1) the ability of health plans to manage the benefit so as to alter patterns of use; (2) a payment system for health plans that addresses biased selection; and (3) preservation of the existing public investment while accommodating in a fair manner differences in funding across the fifty states.

Barriers to mental health care for Hispanic Americans: a literature review and discussion.

The Hispanic American population, the second largest and fastest growing minority population in the United States, faces barriers to access to both medical health and mental health care. This paper examines both financial and cultural barriers to utilization of mental health care services; it is a broad review of the literature and is not intended to be comprehensively detailed. The research review suggests that the financial barrier is a major determinant of mental health service access for Hispanic American populations. Also, nonfinancial barriers such as acculturation are examined. A two-part plan is suggested to reduce both financial and nonfinancial barriers. Very little literature on utilization of substance abuse services was found; suggestions for further research are thus proposed.

Effective use of community meetings on psychiatric treatment units.

The community meeting is often established as a part of the program on a psychiatric treatment unit to enhance the therapeutic atmosphere and advance the unit's goals. Such meetings usually consist of at least 30 or more individuals, including patients, staff, and trainees, and therefore incorporate small-group dynamics as well as phenomena more typical of large groups. Leaders should try to ensure the effectiveness of their meetings by assessing tasks and boundaries, as well as the extent to which small-group dynamics and techniques used in large groups apply.

First reported dreams in psychoanalytic group psychotherapy.

Analysis of dreams is often used in group psychotherapy to explore common group tensions and individual internal conflicts. The author pays special attention to the first dream which a patient reports in the course of group psychotherapy. These first reported dreams clearly and accurately reveal the patient's basic conflicts and also reflect the progressive stages of group-as-a-whole tension from issues of dependency, advice-giving, and universality to explorative resolution of conflicts.