Recurrence rates for patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with IOERT at a community hospital per the ASTRO consensus statement for APBI.

PURPOSE: To report the recurrence rates after single-fraction intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated on a single institution prospective Phase I/II protocol at a community hospital. Results were retrospectively analyzed according to suitability criteria from the updated American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) consensus statement for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients over 40 years with early-stage invasive or in situ breast cancer (<2.5 cm and node negative) were enrolled. IOERT 2100 cGy was delivered during breast conservation surgery, and patients were followed up for a median of 3 years (0.8-6.5 years) to determine toxicity and recurrence rates. RESULTS: Single-fraction IOERT was performed in 215 cases (6 bilateral treatments, 196 patients) with 13 patients receiving whole-breast radiation (WBR) after IOERT for adverse pathologic features. Of 202 cases of IOERT without WBR, 89 patients experienced an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) giving a cumulative incidence of 3.96%. When the ASTRO APBI suitability criteria were applied, the IBTR rate was significantly lower for suitable patients vs. cautionary or unsuitable patients (1.6% vs. 3.4% vs. 21.0%, p = 0.0002). 3-year progression-free survival after IOERT alone was 93.4%. For patients who received standard WBR (4500-5040 cGy) after IOERT, no Grade 3 or 4 toxicities (acute or late) occurred and all patients are disease-free. CONCLUSIONS: Single-fraction IOERT results in a low rate of IBTR when strictly adhering to ASTRO criteria for APBI suitability. Standard dose WBR for unfavorable pathologic results after 2100 cGy IOERT is well tolerated.

Intraoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer: its perceived simplicity.

Over one-quarter of a million cases of breast cancer are diagnosed in the United States each year, many of which are early stage.The radiotherapeutic options after breast-conserving surgery in early-stage breast cancer are evolving quickly, with a focus on minimizing treatment volume, toxicity, and treatment duration. One such emerging option is intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), administered either as a single fraction or as a boost.With many centers seeking to adopt such technology, there are licensing, proctoring, staffing, technical support, and reimbursement issues that need to be considered. We have reviewed the current international experience and describe one community cancer center's experience with initiating an IORT breast cancer program.

Intraoperative electron radiotherapy boost as a component of adjuvant radiation for breast cancer in the community setting.

To reduce toxicity/treatment time and improve accuracy, intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) was used as an alternative to electron beam radiation therapy boost. Primary objective was to determine feasibility and acute toxicity. From August 2009 to June 2011, 50 patients (age 32 to 76 years) with in situ or invasive breast cancer (Stage 0 to IIIA) were treated. Toxicity assessed according to standard National Cancer Institute scales. Median tumor size was 20 mm (range, 6 to 80 mm) with 43 infiltrating ductal, two infiltrating lobular, and five ductal in situ carcinoma. A single 10-Gy fraction boost was given to the tumor bed after resection followed by whole-breast radiotherapy. After IOERT, three patients required completion axillary lymph node dissection, eight had reexcision resulting from positive margins, and four opted for completion mastectomy. The median follow-up was 10 months (range, 2 to 24 months). Ten patients had Grade 1 and one reported Grade 2 breast pain 2 weeks after IOERT; all resolved at 6 weeks. Two patients had delay in wound healing, but none developed a wound infection. Three patients reported symptomatic fat necrosis. No other toxicities were reported. IOERT resulted in a reduction in treatment time, was not associated with additional toxicity or change in the acute toxicity profile, and is a feasible treatment option in a community hospital setting.

Does sex influence the impact that smoking, treatment interruption and impaired pulmonary function have on outcomes in limited stage small cell lung cancer treatment?

PURPOSE: To look for survival differences between men and women with limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) by examining stratified variables that impair treatment efficacy. METHODS: A retrospective review of 215 LS-SCLC patients treated from 1989 to 1999 with concurrent chemotherapy-radiotherapy modelled on the 'early-start' thoracic radiotherapy arm of a National Cancer Institute of Canada randomized trial. RESULTS: Of 215 LS-SCLC patients, 126 (58.6%) were men and 89 (41.4%) were women. Smoking status during treatment for 186 patients (86.5%) was: 107 (58%) nonsmoking (NS) (76 [71%] male [M]; 31 [29%] female [F]) and 79 (42%) smoking (S) (36 M [46%]; 43 F [54%]) (continuing-to-smoke F versus M, P=0.001). Fifty-six patients (26%) had radiotherapy interruptions (RTI) during chemotherapy-radiotherapy because of toxicity. Radiotherapy breaks were not associated with sex (P=0.95). Survival by sex and smoking status at two years was: F + NS = 38.7%; F + S = 21.6%; M + NS = 22.9%; and M + S = 9.1% (P=0.0046). Survival by sex and RTI status at two years was: F + no RTI = 32.4%; F + RTI = 23.6%; M + no RTI = 23.0%; and M + RTI = 3.8% (P=0.0025). Diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was recorded for 86 patients (40%) and median survival by sex and DLCO was F = 16.7 months and M = 12.1 months for a DLCO less than 60%; and for a DLCO 60% or more, F = 15.1 months and M = 15.3 months. First relapses were recorded in 132 cases (61%), with chest failure in men (45%) greater than for women (35%) and cranial failure rates similar between sexes (48%). Upon multivariable analysis, continued smoking was the strongest negative factor affecting survival. CONCLUSIONS: In LS-SCLC, women overall do better than men, with or without a negative variable. The largest quantifiable improvement in survival for women came from smoking cessation, and for men from avoidance of breaks during treatment.

Impaired diffusion capacity predicts for decreased treatment tolerance and survival in limited stage small cell lung cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation.

PURPOSE: To determine if stratification of limited stage small cell lung cancer (LSCLC) patients by pre-treatment pulmonary function test (PFT) prognostic indicators predicts for treatment-related toxicity risks and survival following concurrent chemoradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1989 to 1999, 215 LSCLC patients received six cycles of alternating cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine and etoposide/cisplatin (EP). Thoracic radiation (RT) was initiated only with EP and at cycle 2 or 3. RT dose was: 40 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks or 50 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks. RT fields encompassed gross and suspected microscopic disease with a 2 cm margin. Pre-treatment PFT values analyzed included forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) (in liter and as % predicted) and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (as % predicted). The "marker" for toxicity during concurrent chemoradiation was the duration of any RT breaks initiated for severe hematologic or locoregional symptomatology. Patient outcomes were analyzed for associations between recognized PFT cut-offs (FEV1 <2l, > or =2l; FEV1 <60%, > or =60% predicted; DLCO <60%, > or =60% predicted), toxicity rates, and survival. RESULTS: For the whole study cohort, median, 2- and 5-year overall survivals were: 14.7 months, 22.7 and 7.2%, respectively. Fifty-six patients (26%) required treatment breaks due to toxicity. FEV1 and DLCO results were available for 96 (45%) and 86 (40%) patients, respectively. Two thirds of FEV1s measured were <2l. On statistical analysis, the incidence of toxicity-related interruptions was significant for DLCO<60% (P=0.043), suggestive for FEV1<2l (P=0.1) and non-significant for FEV1<60%. Patients with simultaneous DLCO<60% and FEV1<2l showed a trend toward increase toxicity risk (P=0.1). For selected PFT measures, median overall survivals were: 12.7 months versus 14.8 months for DLCO<60% versus > or =60%; 13.4 months versus 17.7 months for FEV1<2l versus > or =2l; 15.4 months versus 19.9 months for DLCO<60% + FEV1<2l versus DLCO> or =60% + FEV1> or =2l. Although absolute differences favored all patients with PFT values above the prognostic cut-offs, differences were not statistically significant on this analysis. Patients with both a treatment break and a DLCO<60% had the poorest median survival of all patient subsets, at 11.4 months (P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Impaired DLCO (i.e. <60%) is a novel predictor of increased treatment-related toxicity leading to interruptions. The present study suggests a probable role for DLCO and FEV1 (in l) as prognostic factors for predicting survival but larger patient samples are required for confirmation. Patients with impaired DLCOs experiencing treatment interruptions have the poorest survival. Assessment of pre-treatment PFTs contributes to determining optimal management strategies for LSCLC patients receiving definitive chemoradiation.