Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cureus ; 15(1): e33240, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36606110

RESUMEN

Introduction When COVID-19 vaccination started, there was little data on the safety of immunization against COVID-19 infection in pregnant women. Previous studies revealed no safety concerns for pregnant women or newborns who received a messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. This study aimed to investigate the effects of COVID-19 vaccination on pregnant women and on perinatal outcomes. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in a maternity hospital in King Saud Medical City. It started in January 2022 and ended in June 2022. The questionnaire was developed and validated by experts. This study included all women admitted to the postpartum ward who were more than 18 years old and had received the COVID-19 vaccine. The study excluded women who had no proof of their vaccination status or who could not complete the questionnaire. The primary outcome was the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on gestational age and birth weight. The secondary outcomes included the development of polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios, mode of delivery, Apgar score, postpartum hemorrhage, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Results A total of 365 pregnant women participated in this study. The mean gestational age of the unvaccinated women was 38.83 ± 1.62 weeks, which was significantly (p < 0.001) higher than that of vaccinated women (37.69 ± 2.9 weeks). In addition, the average birth weight for the unvaccinated women was 2.96 ± 0.4 kg, which did not differ significantly (p = 0.89) from that of vaccinated women (2.97 ± 0.66 kg). Conclusion COVID-19 vaccination, regardless of the type of vaccine received before, during, or after pregnancy, is not associated with any unfavorable perinatal outcomes for pregnant women or neonates.

2.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 33(10): 1670-1677, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30231787

RESUMEN

Objective: To endorse the impact of chewing gum on the intestinal functions' restoration, hospital stay and gastrointestinal complications after planned cesarean delivery (CD).Methods: Women aged between 20 and 35 years scheduled for planned CD; either first or repeated, with term, singleton, viable and healthy pregnancy at obstetrics and gynecology department, Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region, Khamis Mushayt, Saudi Arabia were invited to participate and randomized if eligible into three groups. The first group chewed sugar-free gum 2 h after recovery at least for half an hour and at 2-h interval during daytime. The second group received oral fluids 6 h postoperatively, while the third group was the control group. The primary outcome measure was the time to first passage of stool. The secondary outcomes included the time of the first passage of flatus, the first hearing of normal intestinal sounds, the duration of hospital stay the duration of parenteral therapy by intravenous fluids, the time of initiating breast-feeding and the cost of hospital stay. The study was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02386748).Results: The study included 372 women randomized into three groups (124 women in each group). Chewing gum significantly improved intestinal recovery with faster onset of bowel movements, first audible intestinal sounds, passage of flatus and passage of stool (p = .0001). It was associated with significantly shorter duration of hospital stay and parenteral therapy duration (p = .0001). Abdominal distension, vomiting and ileus postoperatively were significantly higher in nonchewing gum groups. Neither paralytic ileus nor side effects were recorded with gum use.Conclusion: Chewing gum, within 2 h postoperatively, is a simple, safe and well-tolerated intervention that can boost rapid intestinal recovery and shorten hospital stay after planned cesarean deliveries.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea/efectos adversos , Goma de Mascar , Motilidad Gastrointestinal/fisiología , Adulto , Defecación/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , Arabia Saudita , Factores de Tiempo
3.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 225: 70-78, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29679814

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of different clinical risk factors in the prediction of recurrent ectopic pregnancies (REP). STUDY DESIGN: This cohort study was carried out at a tertiary-care maternity hospital in Saudi Arabia, between January 2010 and June 2017. All women with a primary ectopic pregnancy (EP) were consecutively recruited, thoroughly assessed and followed up for a minimum duration of five-years (5.6 ±â€¯0.61 years) to diagnose the nature and location of the subsequent pregnancies. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of REP, while the secondary outcomes included intrauterine pregnancy, the pregnancy of unknown location and infertility rates. RESULTS: A total of 272 women with a primary ectopic pregnancy (EP) were initially recruited, 217 women were included in the final analysis, among them 41 (18.9%) women had REP. Univariate analysis showed that women who subsequently developed REP had more prevalent prior miscarriages, evacuation of retained products of conception (ERPC), pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and consanguinity, they also had lower hemoglobin levels at the time of primary EP, and lower prevalence of surgical treatment. Among the 143 surgically treated cases, salpingectomy, when compared to salpingostomy, and laparoscopy, when compared with laparotomy, were found to be associated with a lower risk of REP [RR = 0.32 (95% CI, 0.13-0.77) and 0.40 (95% CI, 0.18-0.86) respectively]. The occurrence of a subsequent delivery at any time after the primary EP was protective against REP [RR = 0.39 (95% CI, 0.22-0.68)], this protection is increased by almost nine folds if this delivery occurred at the descendant pregnancy [RR = 0.04 (95% CI, 0.01-0.17)]. Multivariable binary logistic regression revealed that prior PID, treatment modality and presenting hemoglobin level were independent predictors of REP. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted using the predicted probability values derived from the multivariable binary logistic regression model, the area under the ROC curve was 0.792 (95% CI, 0.732-0.844). CONCLUSION: Careful consideration of primary ectopic pregnancy data is a valuable tool to predict the potential risk of recurrence in the future.


Asunto(s)
Embarazo Ectópico/diagnóstico , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Embarazo Ectópico/cirugía , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Salpingectomía , Salpingostomía , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...