Higher rates of recurrence and worse quality of life in obese patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.

PURPOSE: Prior investigations regarding the effect of obesity on inguinal hernia repair have been mixed. The aim of our study was to retrospectively compare perioperative outcomes, recurrence rate, and quality of life between obese and non-obese patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: Patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair by any approach at a single institution were identified from a prospectively maintained quality database. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2 were considered obese. Quality of life was measured with the Surgical Outcomes Measurement System (SOMS) and Carolinas Comfort Scale (CSS) surveys. Differences between obese and non-obese patients were assessed using independent samples t-tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2021, a total of 5575 patients underwent inguinal hernia repair. Fifteen percent of patients were identified as obese (835 patients, mean BMI 33.2 ± 3.3 kg/m2). A significantly higher percentage of obese patients were diabetic, and operative time and estimated blood loss were higher in the obese group (all p < 0.001). Rates of hernia recurrence in obese patients was significantly more likely than in non-obese patients (4.2% vs 2.0%, p < 0.001). Up to 2 years postoperatively, a greater percentage of obese patients reported worse quality of life on the SOMS and more bothersome symptoms on the CCS. CONCLUSIONS: Inguinal hernia repair in obese patients is a more technically challenging operation. Long-term follow-up revealed a greater risk of hernia recurrence and worse quality of life up to 2 years postoperatively in this patient population.

Per-Oral Plication of (Neo)Esophagus: Technical Feasibility and Early Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty is an example of endoscopic sutured plications being used to remodel a gastrointestinal organ. With per-oral plication of the esophagus (POPE), similar plications are used to remodel the dilated and redundant megaesophagus of end-stage achalasia. Redundancies and dilations can also develop in the neoesophagus of a patient with prior esophagectomy. Megaesophagus and a redundant neoesophagus can both lead to debilitating dysphagia, regurgitation, and recurrent aspiration pneumonia. Traditionally, this anatomic problem requires complex revisional or excisional surgery, to which POPE offers an incisionless alternative. METHODS: This is a dynamic manuscript with video demonstration of POPE, as well as review of five cases performed in 1 year. Data were collected in a prospectively maintained database, and the institutional review board approved retrospective review for this publication. The procedure is performed using a dual-channel upper endoscope fixed with an endoscopic suturing device, with the patient supine under general anesthesia. RESULTS: POPE was technically completed in all cases with no serious complications, and patients either went home the same day or spent one night for observation. Most patients reported immediate and substantial symptomatic improvement. Objective pre- and post-measures include esophagram and nuclear gastric emptying studies. CONCLUSION: This article discusses early experience at one institution with POPE, with detailed description of the procedure and technical considerations. An accompanying video reviews two cases, one with megaesophagus and one with a gastric conduit. While this novel procedure has limited and rare indications, it offers a low-morbidity solution to a challenging anatomic problem that traditionally requires invasive surgery.

Laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair are safe and effective after prior pelvic or low abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND: The ideal approach to inguinal hernia repair (IHR) after prior pelvic or low abdominal surgery is not agreed upon. We compared safety and outcomes of IHR between open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches. METHODS: This retrospective review of a prospective database analyzed demographic, perioperative, and quality of life data for patients who underwent IHR after pelvic or low abdominal surgery. RESULTS: 286 qualifying patients underwent IHR between 2008 and 2020; 119 open, 147 laparoscopic, and 20 robotic. Laparoscopic repair led to faster cessation of narcotics and return to ADLs than open repair (all p <0.05). Post-operative complications, 30-day readmission, recurrences, and quality of life outcomes were equivalent, except less pain at 3-weeks post-op in the minimally invasive groups, p < 0.01. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive IHR after prior pelvic or low abdominal surgery is safe compared to an open approach. Laparoscopic repair provides faster recovery, yet patient satisfaction is equivalent regardless of surgical approach.

A Tailored Approach to Laparoscopic Fundoplication: Outcomes in Patients with Esophageal Dysmotility.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal dysmotility is a common finding in patients being evaluated for antireflux surgery, although its implication remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate outcomes of patients with esophageal dysmotility after fundoplication. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective quality-database was performed. All patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen (NF) or Toupet (TF) fundoplication were included. Esophageal dysmotility was defined using the Chicago Classification v4.0 and conventional metrics, creating three sub-groups: ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), distal/diffuse esophageal spasm (DES), and hypercontractile esophagus (HE). Quality of life (QOL) outcomes were measured by the Reflux Severity Index (RSI), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL), and Dysphagia Scores. RESULTS: Of 487 patients included, 99 (20.3%) had esophageal dysmotility (49 IEM, 40 DES, 10 HE). While a majority in the dysmotility group (81.8%) underwent TF, most patients in the normal group (76.5%) underwent NF (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis controlling for sex, age, BMI, hiatal hernia, and surgery type, the normal group had higher Dysphagia Scores at 3 weeks (2.2 ± 0.9 vs. 1.7 ± 0.8, p < 0.001), but not at 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, or 5-year follow-up. There were no differences between normal and dysmotility groups in terms of RSI or GERD-HRQL scores at any time point. Patients with different sub-types of esophageal dysmotility had similar QOL outcomes at all time points. CONCLUSION: Patients with esophageal dysmotility had similar outcomes compared to those with normal motility after fundoplication, suggesting the tailored approach favoring partial fundoplication for patients with dysmotility as part of an appropriate treatment algorithm.

Identification of 14 novel susceptibility loci for diaphragmatic hernia development and their biological and clinical implications: results from the UK Biobank.

INTRODUCTION: Genetic contributions to hernia development are incompletely understood. This study performed the first comprehensive genome-wide association study (GWAS) for diaphragmatic hernia using a large population-based cohort in the UK Biobank (UKB). METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Two-stage GWAS (discovery and confirmation) was performed for diaphragmatic hernia in the UKB. Briefly, 275,549 and 91,850 subjects were randomly selected for association tests in Stages 1 and 2, respectively. Association tests between 8,568,156 SNPs (genotyped or imputed with MAF > 0.01) in the autosomal genome and diaphragmatic hernia were performed in Stage 1. SNPs with P < 1 × 10-5 were selected for confirmation in Stage 2, and those with P < 0.05 and the same direction of association as Stage 1 were selected for combined association testing; SNPs with combined P < 5 × 10-8 were considered GWAS-significant. LD clumping analysis identified genetically independent chromosomal regions (loci). A genetic risk score (GRS) measured the cumulative risk of independent SNPs in 91,849 additional subjects using odds ratios (ORs) from Stages 1 and 2. RESULTS: 36,351 patients were identified with diaphragmatic hernia (ICD-10 K44). In Stage 1 analysis, 2654 SNPs were associated (P < 1 × 10-5) with diaphragmatic hernia. Stage 2 analysis confirmed 338 SNPs (P < 0.05). In combined analysis, 245 SNPs reached GWAS significance (P < 5 × 10-8). LD clumping analysis revealed 14 independent loci associated with diaphragmatic hernia. Two loci have been previously associated with inguinal hernia at 2p16 (rs181661155) and 11p13 (rs5030123). eQTL analysis suggested genes CRLF1, UBA52, and CALD1 are also significantly associated with these loci. GRS showed significant increase in cases compared to controls (P < 1 × 10-16) and is associated with increased risk of diaphragmatic hernia (P < 1 × 10-7). CONCLUSIONS: We identified 245 SNPs at 14 susceptibility loci associated with diaphragmatic hernia in a large population-based cohort. These results offer insight into pathogenetic mechanisms of diaphragmatic hernia development and may be used in genetic risk scores for pre-operative risk-stratification and clinical prediction models.

Impedance Planimetry (Endoflip) and Ideal Distensibility Ranges for Optimal Outcomes after Nissen and Toupet Fundoplication.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown that impedance planimetry-based functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) measurements are associated with patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. We hypothesize that Nissen and Toupet fundoplications have different ideal FLIP profiles, such as distensibility. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained quality database was performed. Patients who had FLIP measurements during fundoplications between 2013 and 2021 were included. Reflux Symptom Index, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire, and dysphagia score were collected for up to 2 years postoperatively. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare FLIP measurements vs outcomes. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty patients (171 Toupet, 79 Nissen) were analyzed. Distensibility ranges were categorized as tight, ideal, or loose. The ideal distensibility index range of Toupet patients with the 30- and 40-mL balloon fills were 2.6 to 3.7 mm2/mmHg. This range was associated with less dysphagia at 1 year compared with the tight group (p = 0.02). For Nissen patients, the 30- and 40-mL ideal threshold was a distensibility index of ≥2.2 mm2/mmHg. Patients with distensibility exceeding this threshold had a better quality of life than the tight group, reporting better Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (p = 0.02) and lower dysphagia scores (p = 0.01) at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Impedance planimetry revealed different ideal distensibility ranges after Toupet and Nissen fundoplications that are associated with improved patient-reported outcomes, suggesting that intraoperative FLIP has the potential to tailor fundoplication.

Changes in impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) measurements at follow-up after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies show changes in functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) measurements after myotomy during peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), but few report on FLIP measurements at follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative FLIP measurements to those at follow-up EGD. METHODS: Patients who underwent POEM with FLIP in the operating room and POEM patients who had EGD with FLIP at follow-up were included. FLIP measurements, including diameter (Dmin), pressure, cross-sectional area (CSA), and distensibility index (DI), were analyzed at a 30-mL balloon fill. Differences between measurements at different timepoints were assessed using a two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients who underwent POEM and 28 who underwent EGD with FLIP were analyzed. The average age was 63 ± 18 years and 46.4% of the patients were male. Mean preoperative Eckardt score was 6.5 ± 4.8, decreasing to 1.6 ± 2.0 at follow-up. EGDs were performed at a median of 15 months after surgery. When compared to mean measurements obtained post-myotomy, at the time of EGD, pressure was found to be significantly lower (p = 0.007) and DI significantly higher (p = 0.045). Of the patients who underwent EGD, 70.8% had an increase in DI, 55.6% had evidence of reflux esophagitis, and 81.0% met diagnostic criteria for reflux on esophageal pH monitoring. However, there was no correlation with the development of esophagitis or reflux and increase or decrease in DI at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant changes in FLIP measurements between the time of surgery and at follow-up EGD. These results suggest that esophageal remodeling may cause changes in lower esophageal sphincter geometry after POEM and postoperative FLIP targets immediately post-myotomy may need to be adjusted to account for these changes.

A modular simulation curriculum to teach endoscopic stenting to practicing surgeons: an "Into the fire" approach.

BACKGROUND: Flexible endoscopy is a valuable tool for the gastrointestinal (GI) surgeon, creating a need for effective and efficient training curricula in therapeutic endoscopic techniques for trainees and practicing providers. Here, we present a simulation-based modular curriculum using an "into the fire" approach with hands-on pre- and post-testing to teach endoscopic stenting to practicing surgeons. METHODS: Three advanced flexible endoscopy courses were taught by expert surgical endoscopists from 2018 to 2019. The stenting module involved using self-expandable metal stents to manage simulated esophageal and gastroduodenal strictures on a non-tissue GI model. Based on the educational theories of inquiry-based learning, the simulation curriculum was designed with a series of pre-tests, didactics, mentored hands-on instructions, and post-tests. Assessments included a confidence survey, knowledge-based written test, and evaluation form specific to the hands-on performance of endoscopic stenting. RESULTS: Twenty-eight practicing surgeons with varying endoscopic experiences participated in the course. Most of the participants (67.9%) had completed over 100 upper endoscopic procedures and 57.1% were certified in Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery. After completing the modular curriculum, participant confidence survey scores improved from 11.4 ± 4.2 to 20.7 ± 4.0 (p < 0.001). Knowledge-based written test scores also improved from 7.1 ± 1.2 to 8.4 ± 0.9 (p < 0.001). In terms of technical performance, overall hands-on performance scores improved from 21.3 ± 2.7 to 28.9 ± 1.2 (p < 0.001) with significant improvement in each individual component of the assessment (all p values < 0.01) and the greatest improvement seen in equipment handling (88%) and flow of procedure (54%). CONCLUSION: Our modular simulation curriculum using an "into the fire" approach to teach endoscopic stenting is effective in improving learner knowledge, confidence, and hands-on performance of endoscopic stenting. This approach to simulation is effective, efficient, and adaptable to teaching practicing surgeons with varying levels of experience.

Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) after magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX®) compared to fundoplication.

INTRODUCTION: Functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) use during laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) for gastroesophageal reflux disease is well described. However, there is a lack of data on FLIP measurements during magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA). This study aims to report our institutional experience in performing FLIP during MSA and to compare these measurements to those obtained during Nissen and Toupet fundoplication. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained quality database was performed. Patients who underwent MSA or LF and had FLIP measurements between April 2018 and June 2021 were included. FLIP measurements at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) were recorded without pneumoperitoneum at 40 mL balloon fill after hernia reduction, cruroplasty, and MSA or fundoplication. Reflux symptom index (RSI), GERD-HRQL, and dysphagia score were collected up to 2 years. Group comparisons were made using two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum and χ2 tests, with statistical significance of p < 0.05. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients underwent MSA and 100 patients underwent LF (66% Toupet, 34% Nissen). Type III hiatal hernia was present in 3.7% of MSA patients versus over 50% for fundoplication patients. Minimum diameter, cross-sectional area, and distensibility index (DI) were lower after MSA device placement compared to Nissen or Toupet fundoplication (p < 0.05). Postoperative follow-up showed no differences in RSI, GERD-HRQL, and dysphagia score between MSA and Nissen fundoplication (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative impedance planimetry provided objective information regarding the geometry of the GEJ during MSA. The ring of magnetic beads restores the anti-reflux barrier and transiently opens with food bolus and belching. The magnetic force of the beads may explain why the DI after MSA is lower yet postoperative quality of life is no different than Nissen fundoplication.

Patient-reported bowel and bladder function is not adversely impacted by bariatric surgery.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to assess the effect of bariatric surgery on patient-reported outcomes of bowel and bladder function. We hypothesized that bariatric surgery does not worsen bowel and bladder function. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A retrospective review was conducted of a prospectively maintained surgical quality database. We included patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery at a single institution between 2012 and 2020, excluding revisional procedures. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using Surgical Outcomes Measurement System (SOMS) bowel and bladder function questionnaires at time of pre-operative consult and routine post-operative follow-up visits through 2 years. Data were analyzed using a statistical mixed effects model. RESULTS: 573 patients (80.6% female) were identified with completed SOMS questionnaire data on bowel and bladder function. Of these, 370 (64.6%) underwent gastric bypass, 190 (33.2%) underwent sleeve gastrectomy, and 13 (2.3%) underwent either gastric banding or duodenal switch. Compared to pre-operative baseline scores, patients reported a transient worsening of bowel function at 2-weeks post-op (p = 0.009). However, by 3-months post-op, bowel function improved and was significantly better than baseline (p = 0.006); this improvement was sustained at every point through 2-year follow-up (p = 0.026). Bladder function scores improved immediately at 2-weeks post-op (p = 0.026) and showed sustained improvement through 1-year follow-up. On subgroup analysis, sleeve patients showed greater improvement in bowel function than bypass patients at 1-year (p = 0.031). Multivariable analysis showed significant improvement in bowel function associated with greater total body weight loss (TBWL) (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery does not worsen patient-reported bowel or bladder function. In fact, there is overall improvement from pre-operative scores for both bowel and bladder function by 3-months post-op which is sustained through 2-year and 1-year follow-up, respectively. Most encouragingly, a greater TBWL is significantly associated with improved bowel function after bariatric surgery.