Impact of audit of routine second-trimester cardiac images using a novel image-scoring method.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of using an objective scoring method to audit cardiac images obtained as part of the routine 21-23-week anomaly scan. METHODS: A prospective audit and re-audit (6 months later) were conducted on cardiac images obtained by sonographers during the routine anomaly scan. A new image-scoring method was devised based on expected features in the four-chamber and outflow tract views. For each patient, scores were awarded for documentation and quality of individual views. These were called 'Documentation Scores' and 'View Scores' and were added to give a 'Patient Score' which represented the quality of screening provided by the sonographer for that particular patient (maximum score, 15). In order to assess the overall performance of sonographers, an 'Audit Score' was calculated for each by averaging his or her Patient Scores. In addition, to assess each sonographer's performance in relation to particular aspects of the various views, each was given their own 'Sonographer View Scores', derived from image documentation and details of four-chamber view (magnification, valve offset and septum) and left and right outflow tract views. All images were scored by two reviewers, jointly in the primary audit and independently in the re-audit. The scores from primary and re-audit were compared to assess the impact of feedback from the primary audit. RESULTS: Eight sonographers participated in the study. The median Audit Score increased significantly (P < 0.01), from 10.8 (range, 9.8-12.4) in the primary audit to 12.4 (range, 10.4-13.6) in the re-audit. Scores allocated by the two reviewers in the re-audit were not significantly different (P = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Objective scoring of fetal heart images is feasible and has a positive impact on the quality of cardiac images acquired at the time of the routine anomaly scan. This audit tool has the potential to be applied in every obstetric scanning unit and may improve the effectiveness of screening for congenital heart defects.

Assessment of the intraobserver variability in the measurement of fetal cardiothoracic ratio using ellipse and diameter methods.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the variability of fetal heart and thoracic area and circumference measurements using the ellipse and diameter methods at different gestational ages. DESIGN: This was a prospective cross-sectional study of 200 singleton pregnancies, with no apparent fetal abnormalities. The gestational age ranged between 19 and 42 weeks. At each examination, two transverse frames of the fetal chest at the level of the four-chamber view during diastole were obtained. For each frame, the area and the circumference of the heart and thorax were obtained by the ellipse and diameter methods. In the diameter method, cardiac and thoracic areas and circumferences were derived from the measured anteroposterior and transverse diameters. All measurements were made by the same observer. RESULTS: For the same method, intraobserver variability was good. Coefficient of variation for all measurements varied between 3-11%. The ellipse method tended to give larger measurements than did the diameter method, the absolute difference increasing with fetal age. The mean ellipse/diameter ratio was 1.10, 1.04, 1.05 and 1.02 for heart area, thorax area, heart circumference and thorax circumference, respectively. In most cases, intraobserver variability of the thorax measurements was independent of gestational age. In contrast, there was a greater variability of heart measurements with increasing gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: Both the ellipse and diameter methods of measuring cardiothoracic ratio are clinically useful and fairly reproducible at certain gestations, but are not interchangeable as the ellipse method overestimates measurements compared to the diameter method. The less reproducible measurement of heart size in later gestation should be taken into account when assessing cardiothoracic ratios.

Interscorers' agreement of the human figure drawings with a referred group of children.

Agreement of two scorers using the Koppitz scoring system for emotional indicators on the Human Figure Drawings with 30 subjects randomly chosen from 132 students referred for special education services was .85. Implications for clinicians using the Human Figure Drawings in a battery of tests are discussed.