Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 310
Filtrar
1.
Gut ; 66(1): 6-30, 2017 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27707777

RESUMEN

Important progress has been made in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection and in this fifth edition of the Maastricht Consensus Report, key aspects related to the clinical role of H. pylori were re-evaluated in 2015. In the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Conference, 43 experts from 24 countries examined new data related to H. pylori in five subdivided workshops: (1) Indications/Associations, (2) Diagnosis, (3) Treatment, (4) Prevention/Public Health, (5) H. pylori and the Gastric Microbiota. The results of the individual workshops were presented to a final consensus voting that included all participants. Recommendations are provided on the basis of the best available evidence and relevance to the management of H. pylori infection in the various clinical scenarios.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Bismuto/uso terapéutico , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Quimioterapia Combinada , Dispepsia/microbiología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Gastritis/microbiología , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Gastroscopía , Infecciones por Helicobacter/complicaciones , Infecciones por Helicobacter/prevención & control , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Nitroimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Estómago/microbiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/microbiología
2.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 37(3): 323-31, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23190336

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms (GERS) are common in the community. However, few studies have examined their long-term natural history, or impact on survival. AIM: To examine these issues in individuals recruited into a community-based screening programme for Helicobacter pylori in 1994. METHODS: Data on mortality and cause of death at 10 years were obtained from the Office for National Statistics. Baseline demographic data, lifestyle factors, gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life were recorded at study entry. The effect of all these factors on persistent and new-onset GERS, and 10-year mortality, were examined using univariate and multivariate analysis, with results expressed as odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HR) with 99% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Of 3967 individuals providing complete GERS data at baseline and 10 years, 549 (13.8%) had GERS at baseline. Of these, 183 (33.3%) had persistent symptoms. Among 3418 individuals asymptomatic at baseline, approximately 0.8% per year developed new-onset GERS. No predictors of persistent GERS were identified. New-onset symptoms were associated with lower quality of life or presence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) at baseline, and higher body mass index (BMI) at 10 years. There were 8331 (99.1%) of 8407 subjects providing complete GERS data at baseline, 1289 (15.5%) of whom were symptomatic. Presence of GERS at baseline did not affect survival (HR: 0.84; 99% CI: 0.44-1.59). CONCLUSIONS: Gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms persisted in one-third of individuals, whilst new-onset gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms were associated with poor quality of life, irritable bowel syndrome and higher body mass index. Gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms did not impact adversely on survival.


Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/mortalidad , Índice de Masa Corporal , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/microbiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/mortalidad , Helicobacter pylori/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Calidad de Vida , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo
3.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 33(7): 768-81, 2011 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21261669

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gastric acid has an important pathophysiological role in human beings. Numerous methods have been evaluated over the years in an attempt to measure gastric acid and stomach acidity, to study the role of gastric acid in gastrointestinal diseases in humans and to evaluate the effects of acid suppressing drugs. AIM: To review methods that have been used to measure gastric acid and gastric acidity. METHODS: Searches of the electronic databases PUBMED, MEDLINE and EMBASE, were performed with articles restricted to English language and human subjects. References were also identified from the bibliographies of selected articles. RESULTS: Methods for measuring gastric acid include both invasive and non-invasive techniques. Invasive tests include the conventional gastric acid aspiration tests, gastric pH measurement techniques and endoscopic methods. Non-invasive methods use urinary analysis, breath analysis, serum pepsinogens assay, scintigraphic techniques, impedence tomography and alkaline tide for measurement of gastric acid. CONCLUSIONS: Several methods of measuring gastric acid exist. Invasive tube tests are uncomfortable and time consuming, whereas most of the non-invasive methods are at best semiquantitative and useful in detecting low or absent acid secretion. Further attempts to explore new methods for measuring gastric acid are therefore warranted.


Asunto(s)
Digestión/fisiología , Ácido Gástrico/metabolismo , Determinación de la Acidez Gástrica , Mucosa Gástrica/metabolismo , Humanos , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Pepsinógenos/sangre , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
4.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 32(3): 425-42, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20456310

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Guidelines and practice standards for sedation in endoscopy have been developed by various national professional societies. No attempt has been made to assess consensus among internationally recognized experts in this field. AIM: To identify areas of consensus and dissent among international experts on a broad range of issues pertaining to the practice of sedation in digestive endoscopy. METHODS: Thirty-two position statements were reviewed during a 1 (1/2)-day meeting. Thirty-two individuals from 12 countries and four continents, representing the fields of gastroenterology, anaesthesiology and medical jurisprudence heard evidence-based presentations on each statement. Level of agreement among the experts for each statement was determined by an open poll. RESULTS: The principle recommendations included the following: (i) sedation improves patient tolerance and compliance for endoscopy, (ii) whenever possible, patients undergoing endoscopy should be offered the option of having the procedure either with or without sedation, (iii) monitoring of vital signs as well as the levels of consciousness and pain/discomfort should be performed routinely during endoscopy, and (iv) endoscopists and nurses with appropriate training can safely and effectively administer propofol to low-risk patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. CONCLUSIONS: While the standards of practice vary from country to country, there was broad agreement among participants regarding most issues pertaining to sedation during endoscopy.


Asunto(s)
Colonoscopía/normas , Sedación Consciente/normas , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/normas , Práctica Profesional/normas , Adulto , Anestesia , Anestésicos Locales , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Cooperación del Paciente , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Propofol/uso terapéutico
6.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 28(8): 1013-20, 2008 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18657131

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are few studies examining the stability of gastrointestinal symptoms during prolonged periods of follow-up. AIM: To examine this issue in individuals previously recruited into a community screening programme for Helicobacter pylori providing symptom data at study entry. METHODS: All traceable participants were sent dyspepsia and IBS questionnaires by post at 10 years. Symptom subgroups were assigned at baseline and 10-year follow-up. Individuals symptomatic at both time points who changed subgroup were compared with those symptomatic and remaining in the same subgroup. RESULTS: Three-thousand eight hundred and nineteen individuals provided data. At baseline, 2417 (63%) were asymptomatic or did not meet diagnostic criteria for a subgroup. Of these, 1648 (68%) remained asymptomatic at 10 years, whilst 769 (32%) reported symptoms. Of the 1402 individuals symptomatic at baseline, 404 (29%) remained in the same subgroup at 10 years, 603 (43%) changed subgroup and symptoms resolved or did not meet criteria for a subgroup in 395 (28%). Symptom stability was more likely in males [odds ratio (OR): 1.50; 99% confidence interval (CI): 0.97-2.31] and older subjects (OR per year: 1.09; 99% CI: 1.01-1.17). CONCLUSION: Of those subjects symptomatic at baseline, almost three-quarters remained symptomatic at 10 years, but over 40% changed symptom subgroup.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/epidemiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/epidemiología , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Helicobacter pylori , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
7.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 26(9): 1267-75, 2007 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17944741

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Screening for Helicobacter pylori reduces dyspepsia and dyspepsia-related costs in positive individuals. AIMS: To assess effect of knowledge of H. pylori status on healthcare-seeking in negative individuals. METHODS: H. pylori-negative subjects in a community screening programme were randomized to placebo triple therapy or informed of their negative H. pylori status. Dyspepsia-related resource data were extracted from primary care records at 2 years, and National Health Service reference costs were applied to calculate the total cost per subject. Proportions of individuals incurring any cost were compared using a relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Differences in costs were compared using an independent sample t-test. RESULTS: A total of 1353 H. pylori-negative individuals were randomized to placebo whilst 1355 were informed of their infection status. In the placebo arm, 212 (16%) subsequently incurred any dyspepsia-related cost compared to 172 (13%) informed of their infection status (RR of incurring cost = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.67-0.97). Those informed of their infection status incurred lower costs (mean saving per individual = pound 11.02; 95% CI: - pound 3.52 to 25.56). CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori-negative individuals informed of infection status sought health care for dyspepsia less often than those who were unaware. Population screening may reduce dyspepsia-related costs in uninfected, as well as infected individuals.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiulcerosos/uso terapéutico , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Helicobacter pylori , Omeprazol/uso terapéutico , Tinidazol/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/economía , Antiulcerosos/economía , Claritromicina/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Dispepsia/economía , Femenino , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Omeprazol/economía , Úlcera Péptica/tratamiento farmacológico , Úlcera Péptica/economía , Tinidazol/economía
8.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 13(12): 1488-92, 2007 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17924566

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunomodulatory drug, and its use in inflammatory bowel disease has previously been reported. The aim of this study was to review the Leeds Colitis Clinic experience of the safety and efficacy of MMF in treating patients with refractory Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). This is an extension of a previously published study from our center with a longer follow-up period and approximately twice the number of patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of the records of all patients treated with MMF for inflammatory bowel disease over a 5-year period. RESULTS: Of 70 patients identified, 67 had previously been treated with azathioprine unsuccessfully. Seventeen of the 70 patients had been successfully maintained in remission with MMF for an average duration of 33 months. Treatment with MMF was discontinued for 53 patients, 17 because of side effects and 36 because they had not responded to the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, 17 patients (24.3%) had a sustained steroid-free remission with MMF therapy. Nineteen patients (27%) experienced side effects, of which 17 (24.3% of the total group) had to discontinue therapy. An additional 36 (51.4%) required an escalation in medical therapy or surgery because of failure of the MMF therapy. MMF may have a role in the treatment of refractory inflammatory bowel disease, especially in patients who have previously failed standard therapies such as azathioprine.


Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Azatioprina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Micofenólico/efectos adversos , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos
9.
Endoscopy ; 39(7): 581-7, 2007 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17611911

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Surveillance in Barrett's esophagus relies on the detection of dysplasia by histopathology. However, the natural history of this condition, particularly that of low-grade dysplasia (LGD) is poorly understood. This paper describes our experience of LGD over a period of 21 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1984 and January 1995, 357 patients with Barrett's esophagus without dysplasia were recruited for annual surveillance: 34 of these patients developed LGD during this period. This was a retrospective cohort study of this group in terms of survival and cancer outcomes >/= 8 years after the original diagnosis of LGD, comparing them with the patients who did not develop LGD over the same period, with a histopathological review of the original diagnoses of LGD. The outcomes of 356/357 (99.7 %) of the patients were established in December 2004. RESULTS: After 8 years, high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or cancer had developed in 9/34 patients with LGD (27 %) and in 16/322 controls (5 %). Cox's proportional hazards model revealed that the time from the first diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus to the first "event" of either HGD, esophageal cancer, or death did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups. A further analysis treating death as "loss to follow-up" showed a significantly increased risk for the LGD group to progress to HGD or cancer (hazard ratio 5.9 [95 % confidence interval 2.6 - 13.4], P< 0.001). The histopathology review demonstrated a fair level of agreement between pathologists, with a kappa value of 0.48. CONCLUSIONS: Patients diagnosed with LGD during surveillance of Barrett's esophagus are at a considerably increased risk of progressing to develop esophageal cancer over an 8-year period but most deaths are not cancer-related.


Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiología , Mucosa Intestinal/patología , Anciano , Esófago de Barrett/complicaciones , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo
10.
Adv Med Sci ; 52: 55-60, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18217390

RESUMEN

Epidemiological evidence strongly indicates that Helicobacter pylori infection is an essential factor for the development of most non-cardia gastric cancer. Furthermore, the identification of an effective animal model and a plausible biological hypothesis provide further compelling evidence for its pathogenic role. Nevertheless, it will be some years before prospective studies in humans are able to confirm cause and effect beyond any doubt. In the meantime sceptics point out that the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in different countries do not always correlate with the incidence of gastric cancer. It is unclear why patients with duodenal ulcer (who are almost invariably infected) are protected from the disease. Cancer often develops in patients from whom Helicobacter disappeared from the stomach years previously. This paper discusses the relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection, the development of gastritis and its evolution to non-cardia gastric cancer. It also addresses possible reasons why the incidence of gastric cancer does not always mirror the prevalence of Helicobacter infection throughout the world and why patients with duodenal ulcer may be protected from developing gastric cancer.


Asunto(s)
Ácido Gástrico/metabolismo , Gastritis/complicaciones , Gastritis/microbiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/complicaciones , Helicobacter pylori/metabolismo , Neoplasias Gástricas/microbiología , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Humanos , Modelos Biológicos , Gastropatías/complicaciones , Gastropatías/microbiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA