Complications associated with removal of airway devices under deep anesthesia in children: an analysis of the Wake Up Safe database.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies examining removal of endotracheal tubes and supraglottic devices under deep anesthesia were underpowered to identify rare complications. This study sought to report all adverse events associated with this practice found in a large national database of pediatric anesthesia adverse events. METHODS: An extract of an adverse events database created by the Wake Up Safe database, a multi-institutional pediatric anesthesia quality improvement initiative, was performed for this study. It was screened to identify anesthetics with variables indicating removal of airway devices under deep anesthesia. Three anesthesiologists screened the data to identify events where this practice possibly contributed to the event. Event data was extracted and collated. RESULTS: One hundred two events met screening criteria and 66 met inclusion criteria. Two cardiac etiology events were identified, one of which resulted in the patient's demise. The remaining 97% of events were respiratory in nature (64 events), including airway obstruction, laryngospasm, bronchospasm and aspiration. Some respiratory events consisted of multiple distinct events in series. Nineteen respiratory events resulted in cardiac arrest (29.7%) of which 15 (78.9%) were deemed preventable by local anesthesiologists performing independent review. Respiratory events resulted in intensive care unit admission (37.5%), prolonged intubation and temporary neurologic injury but no permanent harm. Provider and patient factors were root causes in most events. Upon investigation, areas for improvement identified included improving patient selection, ensuring monitoring, availability of intravenous access, and access to emergency drugs and equipment until emergence. CONCLUSIONS: Serious adverse events have been associated with this practice, but no respiratory events were associated with long-term harm.

Paediatric anaesthesiology education: simulation-based 'attending boot camp' for fellows shows feasibility and value in the early years of attendings' careers.

Background: Established simulation-based 'boot camps' utilise adult learning theory to engage and teach technical and non-technical skills to medical graduates transitioning into residency or fellowship. However, the transition from trainee to the attending role has not been well studied. The primary aim of this study was to design and execute a simulation-based educational day, exposing senior trainees in paediatric anaesthesia to commonly encountered challenges and teaching critical technical skills relevant to their new role. Secondary aims included assessment of its value and relevance in early years of graduated fellows' new careers as attendings. Methods: An 'attending boot camp' day comprised the following: two crisis simulations, an otolaryngologist-taught cadaver cricothyroidotomy laboratory, and a difficult conversations workshop. There was a debriefing after each section. Data were collected using end-of-day and early-career e-mail surveys for five consecutive fellow cohorts from 2016 to 2020. Results: Forty fellows participated; overall feedback was positive. The end-of-day surveys revealed planned changes in practice for 89% (25/28) of fellows, and 54% (15/28) highlighted communication skills as 'most beneficial'. Early-career follow-up surveys found 96% (23/24) identified increased confidence in skill acquisition because of the day; 79% (19/24) experienced scenarios in real life similar to those simulated. The qualitative analysis revealed four high-value themes: delegation, leadership, clinical skills, and difficult communication. Conclusions: The transition from senior trainee to attending physician remains under-researched. A tailored simulation-based 'attending boot camp' was feasible and valued and may be useful in bridging this transition. Participants identified leadership practice, life-saving technical skills, and difficult communication practice as valuable and relevant in their early careers.

Optimization of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Delivery for Pediatric Surgical Procedures.

OBJECTIVES: To optimize prophylactic antibiotic timing and delivery across all surgeries performed at a single large pediatric tertiary care center. METHODS: A multidisciplinary surgical quality team conducted a quality improvement initiative from July 2015 to December 2019 by using the A3 problem-solving method to identify and evaluate interventions for appropriate antibiotic administration. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of surgical encounters for pediatric patients with appropriate timing of antibiotic administration before surgical incision. Surgical site infection rates was the secondary outcome. Intervention effectiveness was assessed by using statistical process control. RESULTS: A total of 32 192 eligible surgical cases for pediatric patients were completed during the study period. Identified barriers to timely perioperative antibiotic administration included failure to order antibiotics before the surgical date and lack of antibiotic availability in the operating room at the time of administration. Resulting sequential interventions included updating institutional guidelines to reflect procedure-specific antibiotic choices and clarifying timing of administration to optimize pharmacokinetics, creating a hard-stop antibiotic order within electronic health record case requests, optimizing pharmacy and nursing workflow, and implementing an automatic antibiotic prophylaxis timer in the operating room. Administration of prophylactic antibiotics during the recommended preincision time window significantly improved; the correct timing was recorded in 38.6% of preintervention cases versus 94.0% at the conclusion of rollout of the sequential interventions (P < .001). Surgical site infection rates remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: Here we demonstrate utility of the A3 problem-solving schematic to successfully optimize prophylactic antibiotic timing and delivery in the surgical setting for pediatric patients by implementing systems-based interventions.

Adverse Events During Intrahospital Transport of Critically Ill Children: A Systematic Review.

Intrahospital transport of a critically ill patient is often required to achieve a diagnostic and/or therapeutic objective. However, clinicians who recommend a procedure that requires transport are often not fully aware of the risks of transport. Clinicians involved in the care of critically ill children may therefore benefit from a clear enumeration of adverse events that have occurred during transport, risk factors for those events, and guidance for event prevention. The objective of this review was to collect all published harm and adverse events that occurred in critically ill children in the context of transport within a medical center, as well as the incidence of each type of event. A secondary objective was to identify what interventions have been previously studied that reduce events and to collect recommendations for harm prevention from study authors. Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and CINAHL were searched in January 2018 and again in December 2018. Terms indicating pediatric patients, intrahospital transport, critical illness, and adverse events were used. Titles and abstracts were screened and full text was reviewed for any article meeting inclusion criteria. If articles included both children and adults, incidence data were collected only if the number of pediatric patients could be ascertained. Of 471 full-text articles reviewed, 40 met inclusion criteria, of which 24 included only children, totaling 4104 patient transports. Heterogeneity was high, owing to a wide range of populations, settings, data collection methods, and outcomes. The incidence of adverse events varied widely between studies. Examples of harm included emergent tracheostomy, pneumothorax, and cardiac arrest requiring chest compressions. Respiratory and airway events were the most common type of adverse event. Hypothermia was common in infants. One transport-associated death was reported. When causation was assessed, most events were judged to have been preventable or potentially mitigated by improved double-checks and usage of checklists. Prospective studies demonstrated the superiority of mechanical ventilation over manual ventilation for intubated patients. Risk of adverse events during critical care transport appears to relate to the patient's underlying illness and degree of respiratory support. Recommendations for reducing these adverse events have frequently included the use of checklists. Other recommendations include optimization of the patient's physiological status before transport, training with transport equipment, double-checking of equipment before transport, and having experienced clinicians accompany the patient. All available recommendations for reducing transport-associated adverse events in included articles were collated and included.

Racial Disparities in Pediatric Anesthesia.

Racial disparities in health care have been extensively documented. Although race is a recognized determinant of the incidence and outcome of disease, few studies have examined the role of race in the delivery of pediatric perianesthesia care. Whereas racial differences in health outcomes may not be easy to modify, disparities in health care delivery are modifiable. The authors examined literature to determine whether racial disparities exist in the delivery of pediatric anesthesia. They explored putative contributors to disparities at the provider, patient, and systems level and propose ideas to address potential causes of disparities in the practice of pediatric anesthesia.

Complications Associated With the Anesthesia Transport of Pediatric Patients: An Analysis of the Wake Up Safe Database.

BACKGROUND: Transporting patients under anesthesia care incurs numerous potential risks, especially for those with critical illness. The purpose of this study is to identify and report all pediatric anesthesia transport-associated adverse events from a preexisting database of perioperative adverse events. METHODS: An extract of the Wake Up Safe database was obtained on December 14, 2017, and screened for anesthesia transport-associated complications. This was defined as events occurring during or immediately after transport or movement of a pediatric patient during or in proximity to their care by anesthesiologists, including repositioning and transfer to recovery or an inpatient unit, if the cause was noted to be associated with anesthesia or handover. Events were excluded if the narrative clearly states that an event was ongoing and not impacted by anesthesia transport, such as a patient who develops cardiac arrest that then requires emergent transfer to the operating room. The search methodology included specific existing data elements that indicate transport of the patient, handover or intensive care status preoperatively as well as a free-text search of the narrative for fragments of words indicating movement. Screened events were reviewed by 3 anesthesiologists for inclusion, and all data elements were extracted for analysis. RESULTS: Of 2971 events in the database extract, 63.8% met screening criteria and 5.0% (148 events) were related to transport. Events were primarily respiratory in nature. Nearly 40% of all reported events occurred in infants age ≤6 months. A total of 59.7% of events were at least somewhat preventable and 36.4% were associated with patient harm, usually temporary. Of the 86 reported cardiac arrests, 50 (58.1%) had respiratory causes, of which 74% related to anesthesia or perioperative team factors. Respiratory events occurred at all stages of care, with 21.4% during preoperative transport and 75.5% postoperatively. Ninety-three percent of unplanned extubations occurred in patients 6 months and younger. Ten medication events were noted, 2 of which resulted in cardiac arrest. Root causes in all events related primarily to provider and patient factors, with occasional references to verbal miscommunication. CONCLUSIONS: Five percent of reported pediatric anesthesia adverse events are associated with transport. Learning points highlight the risk of emergence from anesthesia during transport to recovery or intensive care unit (ICU). ICU patients undergoing anesthesia transport face risks relating to transitions in providers, equipment, sedation, and physical positioning. Sedation and neuromuscular blockade may be necessary for transport in some patients but has been associated with adverse events in others.

Adultification of Black Children in Pediatric Anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Unconscious racial bias in anesthesia care has been shown to exist. We hypothesized that black children may undergo inhalation induction less often, receive less support from child life, have fewer opportunities to have a family member present for induction, and receive premedication with oral midazolam less often. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on those <18 years of age from January 1, 2012 to January 1, 2018 including age, sex, race, height, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, surgical service, and deidentified anesthesiology attending physician. Outcome data included mask versus intravenous induction, midazolam premedication, child life consultation, and family member presence. Racial differences between all outcomes were assessed in the cohort using a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 33,717 Caucasian and 3901 black children were eligible for the study. For the primary outcome, black children 10-14 years were 1.3 times more likely than Caucasian children to receive mask induction (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.6; P = .001). Child life consultation was poorly documented (<0.5%) and not analyzed. Black children <15 years of age were at least 31% less likely than Caucasians to have a family member present for induction (AOR range, 0.4-0.6; 95% CI range, 0.31-0.84; P < .010). Black children <5 years of age were 13% less likely than Caucasians to have midazolam given preoperatively (AOR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.8-0.9; P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that disparities in strategies for mitigating anxiety in the peri-induction period exist and adultification may be 1 cause for this bias. Black children 10 to 14 years of age are 1.3 times as likely as their Caucasian peers to be offered inhalation induction to reduce anxiety. However, black children are less likely to receive premedication with midazolam in the perioperative period or to have family members present at induction. The cause of this difference is unclear, and further prospective studies are needed to fully understand this difference.

Association of sleep disordered breathing symptoms with early postoperative analgesic requirement in pediatric ambulatory surgical patients.

INTRODUCTION: Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) symptoms are associated with increased rates of opioid-induced respiratory depression as well as enhanced nociception. Consequently, practitioners often withhold or administer lower intraoperative doses of opioids out of concern for postoperative respiratory depression. Therefore, SDB may be a critical determinant of analgesic requirement in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). We investigated whether preoperative SDB classification was independently associated with need for PACU analgesic intervention in a cross-sectional sample of 985 children who underwent elective, painful ambulatory surgical procedures. METHODS: Using prospectively collected data, children aged 4-17yr were grouped into two categories based on whether or not they had symptoms of SDB. Perioperative variables were compared between the exposed and control groups using Chi-squared test for categorical or t-test for continuous variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between SDB and the odds of requiring PACU IV opioids. RESULTS: Children with preoperative SDB symptoms (N = 325) compared with the reference group of children who did not have these symptoms had higher rates of PACU analgesic intervention (47.1% vs. 37.4%; p = 0.004) and higher mean arousal pain scores (3.7 ± 3.5 vs.1.9 ± 2.9; p < 0.001). In our primary multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for a number of variables, preoperative SDB symptoms was associated with a two-fold increased odds of receiving PACU intravenous opioid (OR = 2.01, 95%CI, 1.29-3.12; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that preoperative SDB symptoms in children undergoing ambulatory surgery, exerts a significant influence on PACU pain behavior and analgesic requirement. Mechanisms underlying this enhanced pain experience deserve further elucidation.