RESUMEN
Diabetes in pregnancy is associated with risks to the woman and her developing fetus. Management of the condition at the primary care level includes pre-conception care, screening, diagnosis, as well as antenatal and postpartum care. A multidisciplinary approach is essential in ensuring its holistic management.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between total uterine artery blood volume flow rate (TVFR) and birth weight and gestational age at delivery, and to establish normal ranges of TVFR throughout pregnancy. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of 334 nulliparous women booking antenatal care at University College London Hospital between August 2008 and September 2009. Women underwent a transabdominal ultrasound examination of uterine arteries for measurement of TVFR at 12, 20 and 24 weeks' gestation. Pregnancy outcomes were recorded and linear regression was used to study the relationship between TVFR and gestational age at delivery and birth weight. RESULTS: A total of 551 ultrasound scans were performed. There was a significant, positive correlation between TVFR at 11-13 weeks (TVFR1) and at 22-26 weeks (TVFR3) and birth weight. For every 100-mL/min increase in TVFR1 and TVFR3, there was an increase in birth weight of 45 g and 27 g, respectively. There was also a positive association between TVFR1 and gestational age at delivery, with a 1.4-day increase in gestational age for every 100-mL/min increase of TVFR1. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound measurement of TVFR in the first trimester is significantly associated with both birth weight and gestational age at delivery. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Asunto(s)
Ultrasonografía Prenatal/métodos , Arteria Uterina/diagnóstico por imagen , Peso al Nacer , Volumen Sanguíneo , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of excluding cases with unrecorded best estimate of gestational age at birth on pregnancy outcome reporting and to determine the reasons for unrecorded gestational age data. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Fifteen maternity units in North West London. POPULATION: 497,105 women who booked for antenatal care from 1988 to 1998. METHOD: Multiple logistic regression analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preterm birth rate of, and the factors associated with, cases with unrecorded best estimate of gestational age at birth. RESULTS: Of the 53,981 cases with an unrecorded best estimate of gestational age at birth, by using additional data, it was possible to compute a new best estimate of gestational age in 80%. In this latter group, the preterm birth rate was 42% (95% CI 41.5-42.6). The corrected, overall preterm birth rate in North West London (9.8%, 9.7-9.9) was higher than the original estimate (7.6%, 7.5-7.7), which included only cases with recorded data on gestational age at birth. The most significant factors associated with an unrecorded gestational age were no ultrasound scan (OR 49, P < 0.001), and preterm birth <31 weeks (OR 30, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of preterm birth are likely to be under-reported in studies where only cases with readily available gestational age data are included. In routinely collected maternity data, human omission is an important contributing factor for an unrecorded best estimate of gestational age at birth. This is associated with the urgent transfer of babies to the neonatal intensive care unit.