Catastrophic implant failure after immediate loading of full arch implant prosthesis and its association with CPAP therapy: A case report.

Full arch implant-supported restorations are a common treatment modality for patients with a terminal dentition or an edentulous mouth. Several mechanical and biological factors that contribute to complications or failure are already extensively documented. Some patients receiving complex implant-based treatment plans also suffer from obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The use of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask in some of these patients is a lesser-known factor that could contribute to implant complications or failures. This article describes how the use of a CPAP machine may be a risk factor in implant dentistry and describes a patient whose use of a CPAP machine and mask led to a catastrophic failure of mandibular full arch dental implants.

9-Year Follow-Up on Maxillofacial Implant-Supported Framework Designed to Accommodate Childhood Growth.

This clinical report focuses on the challenges and solutions for a child subjected to craniofacial trauma from a wild hyena biting off his nose and anterior maxilla. Unique considerations in prosthodontics and biomedical engineering were required based on future craniofacial growth and development of the child. The physical requirement of a maximum retentive prosthesis for an active, athletic child required unique engineering designs and executions. The sequence of treatment and prosthesis fabrication are detailed. The patient has been followed for 9 years without physiologic complications and only minor prosthodontic complications.

Identification of the Pathway and Appropriate Use of Four Zygomatic Implants in the Atrophic Maxilla: A Cross-Sectional Study.

PURPOSE: This cross-sectional study aimed to identify and characterize the pathway for appropriate placement of four zygomatic implants in the severely atrophic maxilla and to group the anatomical variations of the osteotomy trajectory for anterior zygomatic implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT images of patients presenting indications for the use of four zygomatic implants to withstand a maxillary rehabilitation were reviewed. Cross-sectional planes corresponding to the implant trajectories, designed according to a zygoma anatomy-guided approach for implants placed in the anterior and posterior maxilla, were assessed separately. The relationship of the implant osteotomy trajectory with the correlated residual alveolar bone, nasal and sinus cavities, maxillary wall, and zygomatic bone anatomies was established. RESULTS: The study population included 122 globally recruited patients, with 488 zygomatic implants, 244 of which had their starting point on the anterior incisor-canine area and 244 on the posterior premolar-molar area. The anatomy of the osteotomy path designed for the anterior implants ("A") was named and grouped into five assemblies from zygomatic anatomy-guided ZAGA A-0 to A-4, representing 2.9%, 4.5%, 19.7%, 55.7%, and 17.2% of the studied sites. Percentages for posterior implant ("P") trajectories of the osteotomy were grouped and named as ZAGA P-0 to P-4, representing 5.7%, 10.2%, 8.2%, 18.4%, and 57.4% of the sites, respectively. Approximately 70% of the population presented anatomical intra-individual differences. CONCLUSION: The trajectory of the zygomatic implant followed different anatomical pathways depending on its coronal point being anteriorly or posteriorly located, which justifies a new zygoma anatomy-guided approach classification for anteriorly placed zygomatic implants. Topographic characteristics of the anatomical structures that are cut by an anterior oblique plane joining the lateral incisor-canine area to the zygomatic bone, representing the planned anterior osteotomy path in a quadruple-zygoma indication, have not been previously reported. Adaptation of surgical procedures and implant sections/designs to individual patients' anatomical characteristics is essential to reduce early and long-term complications.

Incidental Findings in Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Dental Implants in 1002 Patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to analyze the frequency and elevate the awareness of the prevalence of nondental pathology in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans taken for implant placement treatment planning and postplacement evaluation. The data from the CBCT should be read by an oral and maxillofacial radiologist for proper diagnosis of dental and nondental pathology and referred to the medical specialist for proper management when necessary. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 1002 consecutive CBCT scans taken at a single private practice noting the prevalence of nondental pathology in CBCT images for all dental implant procedures. All scans were taken from November 2007 to March 2020. One board certified oral and maxillofacial radiologist systemically read all scans and reported all findings in the maxilla and mandible, condyles and TMJ, paranasal sinuses, nasal fossa, pharyngeal airway, skull base and temporal bone, neck soft tissues, and cervical spine. The incidental findings, variation of normal anatomy, or pathology reported in these structures were categorized based on anatomic location and significance and the incidence was investigated. RESULTS: Pathologies ranged from innocuous sinusitis, to more serious atherosclerotic calcification of the carotid arteries, narrowed airways, and neoplastic lesions. Fifty-one different findings were noted, of which 36 were pathologies that required referral or follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental findings can be detected in CBCT scans for dental implants. The clinician must be familiar with the radiographic diagnosis of head and neck pathology, and/or must refer these images to an appropriate specialist for the radiographic interpretation of the full volume.

Decision Process in Treatment of Reduced Periodontium: A Case Report.

The relationship between attachment loss and occlusal trauma has been debated for many years. When a patient presents with advanced periodontal disease, a decision has to be made on whether the teeth can be saved or extracted. In this treatment example, the decision process in therapeutic planning for a patient with stage IV periodontal disease is discussed. The main dilemma is whether the patient should receive a prosthodontic reconstruction supported by osseointegrated implants or by periodontally compromised natural teeth. It is assumed that implants do better than teeth over the long term based on firm documentation in the literature, but this article describes why a periodontal prosthesis is still a viable treatment option.

Management of Maxillary Cluster Implant Failures with Extra-Maxillary Implants: A Clinical Report.

Late cluster implant failures can be one of the most devasting outcomes of implant therapy for patients. It can have anatomic, functional, psychological and financial consequences for patients, and sometimes the loss of residual bone can preclude subsequent implant placement. Fortunately, management of cluster implant failures in the maxilla can be mitigated by using implant anchorage from remote sites like zygomatic and pterygoid regions. Few reports exist in the literature that have described the management of cluster implant failure using extra-maxillary implants such as zygomatic and pterygoid implants. This case report describes the management of a female patient with bruxism who experienced late cluster implant failure in the maxilla after 9 years of function with an overdenture. Due to the loss of residual bone, subsequent implant therapy involved the use of bilateral zygomatic, pterygoid and anterior maxillary implants, which were immediately loaded and thereafter used to support a complete arch fixed implant-supported zirconia prosthesis.

Evolution of Full-Arch Implant Prosthodontics: From Analog Protocols to Digital Workflows.

Ever since orthopedic research emanating from Sweden revealed that human bone could consistently fuse to titanium, forward-thinking prosthodontists have pursued the enormous possibilities for restoring patients with implant-supported prosthodontics. Applications for osseointegration in full-arch prosthetic dentistry have evolved, with the chronologic development of technique and technology progressing from multi-step complex analog procedures to streamlined digital production of immediately loaded prosthetic dentitions that predictably deliver restorative excellence. This article presents a historical perspective that describes how dental implant prosthodontic materials and methods have advanced and are effectively keeping pace with other medical disciplines while remaining entrenched in scientifically based methodology. The article discusses current methods available for producing desirable prosthodontic treatment results to provide patients healthy, esthetic, enduring rehabilitations. The authors conclude that a wealth of research and experience has contributed to the progress of implant prosthodontics and that, based on current technological advances, this area of dentistry is only at the cusp of further development.

A 30-Year Follow-Up of a Patient with Mandibular Complete-Arch Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis on 4 Implants: A Clinical Report.

Mandibular complete-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses are recognized as one of the earliest and most popular prostheses in implant dentistry. This prosthesis was the main focus in the early era of osseointegration. Despite its widespread popularity, few clinical reports have described long-term follow-up greater than 10 years for this type of prosthesis. This report describes a 30-year follow-up of a patient who underwent treatment for a mandibular complete-arch fixed implant-supported prosthesis with 4 machined surfaced implants, opposing a maxillary complete denture. This report documents a variety of photographs and radiographs taken over a period of 30 years to compare bone levels at various stages of care and maintenance, including de novo bone formation underneath the distal cantilevers due to functional loading. The biologic and biomechanical response to this treatment protocol and long-term clinical observations and prosthodontic outcome and maintenance needs are also addressed.

Thirty-Two-Year Success of Dental Implants in Periodontally Compromised Dentition.

Osseointegrated dental implants have become an integral factor in the replacement of missing teeth. These implants have demonstrated long-term success for periodontally compromised patients, who require a high level of success to maintain a sense of optimism. This case report offers 32-year results of implant treatment in the maxilla and 25-year results in the mandible. Some maxillary implants suffered a few threads of bone loss, but all seven mandibular implants met Albrektsson's definition of success after 25 years. The purpose of this case report is to provide evidence that further supports the findings of osseointegrated implant treatment's longevity and success, as reported in other studies.

The Retread: A Definition and Retrospective Analysis of 205 Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.

PURPOSE: Acrylic resin teeth on fixed implant prostheses are subject to time-dependent wear. The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to evaluate and describe the management of such wear in the context of selected variables--patient gender and age, dental arch location, and opposing dentition. The clinical and dental laboratory process to replace the worn teeth is defined as a retread. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective database review from a single private prosthodontic practice was carried out on all patients who had undergone a retread procedure. The patient pool included 205 arches in 194 patients (70 in men, 135 in women) with a mean age of 57.4 years (range: 19.9 to 80.5 years). The retread procedure is described. RESULTS: The mean time between final prosthesis delivery and retread was 7.8 years (range: 1.1 to 22.9 years). Statistical analysis was significant according to dental arch and opposing dentition. A statistical difference was also noted in patients undergoing multiple retread procedures, with a reduction in time between the subsequent procedures. CONCLUSION: Acrylic resin components of implant-supported hybrid prostheses wear over time and are influenced by a combination of the nature of the opposing dentition and patient habits. The dental laboratory process to retread the implant-supported framework is important for long-term patient care and maintenance of an appropriate vertical dimension of occlusion.

Positioning handle and occlusal locks for the Teeth-in-a-Day protocol.

Positioning handles and occlusal locks have evolved as improvements to the Teeth-in-a-Day protocol. These improvements have enabled a more accurate alignment of the removable dental prosthesis during the conversion prosthesis technique. These improvements can be easily incorporated through computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing digital denture fabrication process.

A long-term retrospective analysis of survival rates of implants in the mandible.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively analyze the survival rate of endosseous dental implants placed in the edentulous or partially edentulous mandible over a long-term follow-up period of 10 years or more. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The charts of patients who underwent mandibular implant placement at a private prosthodontics practice and received follow-up care for 10 years or more were included in this study. Implants were examined according to the following study variables: patient sex, patient age, degree of edentulism (fully vs partially edentulous), implant location, time of loading (delayed vs immediate), implant size and type, bone quality, prosthesis type, and the presence of other implants during placement. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 2,394 implants placed in 470 patients with 10 to 27 years of follow-up. Of these 2,394 implants, 176 failed, resulting in an overall cumulative survival rate (CSR) of 92.6%. A total of 1,482 implants were placed in edentulous mandibles, and 912 implants were placed in partially edentulous mandibles, with CSRs of 92.6% and 92.7%, respectively. Comparisons of the study variables with respect to CSR were largely nonsignificant. However, there were significant differences in CSRs between anterior vs posterior locations and rough- vs smooth-surfaced implants in addition to some prosthesis types, ages, and bone qualities. The overall CSR of 92.6% in the present study is high and comparable to survival rates observed in previous long-term analyses of mandibular implants. The significant differences observed between implant locations, patient age groups, bone qualities, and prostheses were not suggestive of any remarkable trends. CONCLUSION: Patient sex, age, degree of edentulism, implant location, time of loading, implant size and type, bone quality, prosthesis type, and the presence of multiple implants did not result in any significant effect on long-term implant survival. The CSR observed after 10 to 27 years of follow-up in a single private prosthodontic center was high (92.6%) and supports the use of endosseous dental implants as a long-term treatment option for the rehabilitation of the edentulous and partially edentulous mandible.

Fabricating an Accurate Implant Master Cast: A Technique Report.

The technique for fabricating an accurate implant master cast following the 12-week healing period after Teeth in a Day® dental implant surgery is detailed. The clinical, functional, and esthetic details captured during the final master impression are vital to creating an accurate master cast. This technique uses the properties of the all-acrylic resin interim prosthesis to capture these details. This impression captures the relationship between the remodeled soft tissue and the interim prosthesis. This provides the laboratory technician with an accurate orientation of the implant replicas in the master cast with which a passive fitting restoration can be fabricated.

Oral rehabilitation and psychosocial evaluation of a patient with bulimia nervosa following Teeth in a Day® immediate loading protocol.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this patient report is to accurately portray the clinical experience of treating an active bulimic patient by employing an immediately loaded dental implant protocol to provide the patient with an expedited esthetic and functional result. Implementation of a psychometric component statistically quantifies the psychological effects of the oral rehabilitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 34-year-old woman presented with severe dental perimolysis (erosion) resulting from a 28-year history of bulimic behaviors. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the existing dentition indicated advanced dental erosion and previous restoration attempts in a state of failure. The patient's existing teeth were extracted and treated with full maxillary and mandibular implant-supported prostheses, following the Teeth in a Day® (TIAD) immediate functional loading protocol. Psychometric assessment was conducted through administration of a 20-item questionnaire, as seen in previous literature. RESULTS: Radiographic and clinical analysis suggested all implant fixtures to be viable and accompanied by normal levels of alveolar bone 7 months into treatment. Questionnaire results at the new-patient presentation (T1) resulted in a composite score of 4.0 (SD = 2.9; P = 0.004), indicating severe body-image dysphoria. At 3 months postoperative (T2), the questionnaire score was 0.4 (SD = -1.7; P = 0.09). The final psychometric questionnaire at 7 months (T3) resulted in a score of 0.5 (SD = -1.5; P = 0.12). The patient was followed for a total of 7 years following implant placement. CONCLUSION: In this patient report, oral rehabilitation using the TIAD protocol provided an expedited and predictable alternative method for restoring functional abilities, esthetics, and self-esteem to a severely depressed bulimic patient. Psychometrically, at the postoperative (T2) and final testing period (T3), the patient's body image profile was no longer considered to be significantly different from established normative values.

Management of soft tissue irritation around exposed zygomatic implant in a hemimaxillectomy patient: a technical report.

Patients missing portions or all of the maxillary alveolar bone who are restored with zygomatic implants frequently have threads exposed that can be a mucosal irritant. If such irritation is reported, covering the threads with a highly polished titanium sleeve is recommended. The technique of placing said custom sleeve is described. This adjunctive treatment method has eliminated mucosal irritation.

Etiology and treatment of periapical lesions around dental implants.

The widespread use of oral implants in recent years has resulted in various types of complications. One of those complications is the periapical implant lesion. Different factors have been proposed to play a role in the development and emergence of a periapical implant lesion. To date, there is no consensus on the etiology and therefore periapical lesions around dental implants are considered to have a multifactorial etiology. The diagnosis of an implant periapical lesion should be based on both clinical and radiological findings. Additionally, in order to apply the best treatment strategy the evolution of the lesion should be taken into account. The treatment of this kind of lesion, however, is still empiric. Data, primarily from case reports, seem to indicate that the removal of all granulation tissue is a first step to arrest the progression of the bone destruction. The removal of the apical part of the implant seems a valuable treatment strategy.

Zygomatic implants as a rehabilitation approach for a severely deficient maxilla.

A gunshot injury is one of the main trauma injuries that affect the head and neck region. Severe esthetic, functional, and psychologic deficiencies are consequences of gunshot injuries. The use of implants anchored in the zygomatic bone has been advocated as an approach to the prosthetic rehabilitation of a severely deficient maxilla. This approach provides the patient with an immediate, high-quality, esthetic, and functional complete fixed prosthesis and eliminates the need for bone grafting. In this case report, a patient with a severely deficient maxilla caused by a gunshot injury was rehabilitated by placement of four zygomatic and two pterygomaxillary implants, which were immediately loaded with a complete fixed all-acrylic resin interim prosthesis. The definitive CM Prosthesis (CM Prosthetics) was constructed using computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture (CAD/CAM) technology.

Ectodermal dysplasia: an 11-year follow-up of siblings with 2 implant treatment approaches.

PURPOSE: To describe 2 different treatment approaches for a 20-year-old Caucasian man and his 22-year-old sister who were affected by ectodermal dysplasia (ED) and compromised maxillary bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sister had a history of an iliac crest transplant with 6 implants placed in the maxillary and mandibular arches, 6 years before complications. It was necessary to debride the right sinus, remove the failing infected bone graft and 2 implants. Her brother presented with missing teeth, few remaining deciduous teeth, and wearing all-acrylic resin temporary partials in both the maxillary and mandibular arches. RESULTS: Zygomatic and pterygomaxillary implants were used to rehabilitate the brother with a screw-retained fixed prostheses. His sister had 6 new maxillary implants. Both siblings' mandibular arches were restored with screw-retained implant-supported prostheses. CONCLUSION: Although these siblings affected with ED had different treatment approaches, they both eventually obtained successful outcomes. The brother's treatment was expedited. Both siblings have been followed for a period of 11 years, and all postoperative evaluations have been uneventful.

A retrospective analysis of 800 Brånemark System implants following the All-on-Four™ protocol.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate implant survival rates in patients treated with the All-on-Four™ protocol according to edentulous jaws, gender, and implant orientation (tilted vs. axial). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All Brånemark System implants placed in patients following the All-on-Four™ protocol in a single private practice were separated into multiple classifications (maxilla vs. mandible; male vs. female; tilted vs. axial) by retrospective patient chart review. Inclusion criteria consisted of any Brånemark System implant placed with the All-on-Four™ protocol from the clinical inception (May 2005) until December 2011. Life tables were constructed to determine cumulative implant survival rates (CSR). The arches, genders, and implant orientations were statistically compared with ANOVA. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two patients, comprising 200 arches (800 implants) from May 2005 until December 2011, were included in the study. Overall implant CSR was 97.3% (778 of 800). Two hundred eighty-nine of 300 maxillary implants and 489 of 500 mandibular implants survived, for CSRs of 96.3% and 97.8%, respectively. In male patients, 251 of 256 implants (98.1%) remain in function while 527 of 544 implants (96.9%) in female patients survived. Regarding implant orientation, 389 of 400 tilted implants and 389 of 400 axial implants osseointegrated, for identical CSRs of 97.3%. All comparisons were found to be statistically insignificant. The prosthesis survival rate was 99.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study suggest that edentulous jaws, gender, and implant orientation are not significant parameters when formulating an All-on-Four™ treatment plan. The high CSRs for each variable analyzed demonstrate the All-on-Four™ treatment as a viable alternative to more extensive protocols for rehabilitating the edentulous maxilla or mandible.