RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Some lesions not included in the Banff classification, such as inflammation in the scarred areas and total inflammation, have been described to have prognostic value in the evaluation of graft biopsies. Our aim was to reassess kidney graft biopsies and study the impact of histopathologic lesions, both those graded in the Banff classification and those related to inflammation, on the graft function and evolution. METHODS: We selected 20 biopsies exhibiting chronic pathology without a specific phenotype, and we reevaluated them with the use of a modified Banff score. RESULTS: We found statistically significant association between the presence of total inflammation (P = .048; P = .038), the presence of inflammation in scared area (P = .037; P = .018), and creatinine at the time of renal biopsy and 1 year after the renal biopsy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the presence of both inflammation in the scarred areas and total inflammation are related to renal function at the time of the biopsy and to renal function 1 year after the biopsy.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Riñón/patología , Trasplantes/patología , Biopsia , Enfermedad Crónica , Cicatriz/patología , Creatinina/metabolismo , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrectomía/métodos , Nefritis/patología , Nefritis/fisiopatología , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Pronóstico , Trasplantes/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are few reports about the clinical course and prognosis of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) in long-term immunosuppressed patients. Our aim was to study the association and evolution of MGUS and renal transplantation. METHODS: Subjects submitted to renal transplantation between 1996 and 2011 who presented MGUS before or after immunosuppressive treatment was established were selected. RESULTS: Patients (N = 587) underwent kidney transplantation in our center during the selected period. MGUS was detected in 17 (2.9%) patients (10 men and 7 women with a mean age of 69.9 ± 10.07 years), with a median follow-up of 6 years. All patients had a functioning graft. Nine had MGUS before transplantation. One patient had multiple myeloma, and 8 remained stable. Eight patients had development of MGUS after transplantation. Six patients remained stable, 1 showed no MGUS, and 1 displayed an increased monoclonal component in further controls. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, renal transplantation is not a risk factor for the development of malignant processes in patients with MGUS before transplantation. There is a group of patients who tend to have MGUS after transplantation; nevertheless, they had a benign evolution during a 6-year follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón , Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada/epidemiología , Mieloma Múltiple/epidemiología , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , TrasplantesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Post-transplant recurrent glomerulonephritis (RGN) is the third cause of graft failure in the first year after renal transplantation (RT). The purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence of RGN, clinical presentation, and clinical evolution of transplanted renal graft in patients who underwent RT at our center. METHODS: We studied patients with glomerulonephritis (GN) who underwent RT (2007 to 2013).We analyzed sex, age, time in dialysis, type of GN, type of RT, time to post-transplant RGN, kidney function at the time of diagnosis of RGN, and renal graft evolution. Renal biopsy samples were processed in the anatomic pathology laboratory. RESULTS: Three hundred sixteen patients received kidney transplantation during this time period. In 83 cases, the reason for transplantation was primary GN. Of these 83 patients, 15 (18%) had RGN confirmed by renal biopsy. Data for these 15 patients include sex: 73.3% men, 26.7% women; mean age: 42.2 (29-73) years; type of RT: 80% cadaveric donor (CD) versus 20% living donor (LD); type of GN: 18.4% immunoglobulin (Ig)A nephropathy, 35.7% membranous GN, 10.53% type I membrano-proliferative GN (MPGN I), and 16.6% focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS). The mean time to post-transplant RGN was 2 years (1 month to 16 years). Patients who received an LD transplant had a shorter time to post-transplant RGN than those who had a CD transplant. One patient with FSGS and one with MPGN I had a time to post-transplant RGN of less than 1 year. In the evolution of renal function, 33.3% of patients had graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of RGN was lower (18%) than that published in the literature. Membranous nephropathy was the most frequent cause of post-transplant RGN. Patients who underwent LD transplantation and those with IgA nephropathy had a shorter interval of time to post-transplant RGN than patients with FSGS and MPGN I.
Asunto(s)
Glomerulonefritis por IGA/cirugía , Glomerulonefritis Membranoproliferativa/cirugía , Glomerulonefritis Membranosa/cirugía , Glomeruloesclerosis Focal y Segmentaria/cirugía , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Cadáver , Femenino , Glomerulonefritis/complicaciones , Glomerulonefritis/cirugía , Glomerulonefritis por IGA/complicaciones , Glomerulonefritis Membranoproliferativa/complicaciones , Glomerulonefritis Membranosa/complicaciones , Glomeruloesclerosis Focal y Segmentaria/complicaciones , Humanos , Incidencia , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Donadores Vivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , TrasplantesRESUMEN
Cholesterol-crystal embolization (CE) usually presents as an acute or subacute multisystemic disease. When affecting native kidneys prognosis is poor, often leading to chronic kidney disease. Presentation in renal allografts is a rare condition although probably underdiagnosed. If renal CE originates from the recipient, allograft survival is usually good, whereas if the donor is the origin, graft dysfunction and subsequent graft loss are common. Associated risk factors are common to native and transplanted kidneys. We report 2 renal graft recipients of different cadaveric donors, both male and 68 years old, diagnosed with CE in renal grafts at 19 and 72 months after transplantation, respectively. They presented previous risk factors for CE, including severe atherosclerosis. They presented insidious and asymptomatic impairment of renal function initially. Renal graft biopsy specimens showed CE in the interlobular arteries. Potential triggers for CE were suspended and high doses of steroids were started. However, progressive decline in renal function and requirement of chronic dialysis occurred within the first year after diagnosis in both cases. Herein we discuss the causal or incidental role of CE in the graft failure of these cases, highlighting the serious outcome despite the recipient origin of the CE and the initiation of treatment.
Asunto(s)
Embolia por Colesterol/patología , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón , Riñón/irrigación sanguínea , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/patología , Trasplantes/irrigación sanguínea , Anciano , Rechazo de Injerto , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Riñón/patología , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Donantes de Tejidos , Trasplante Homólogo , Trasplantes/patologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Nodular arteriolar hyalinosis (NAH) is a typical, although not specific, histological finding of calcineurin inhibitor toxicity (CNIT). The objective of our study was to assess the reason why some patients showing strong NAH in renal graft biopsies who underwent calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal presented very poor outcome whereas others improved graft function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed 207 renal graft biopsies between January 2011 and May 2014 due to clinical criteria. In 13 patients CNI withdrawal was performed, and the major histopathological finding was severe NAH. The results after this action were analyzed. RESULTS: We selected 2 groups: good outcome and poor outcome. Eight patients showed good results including stabilization or improvement of graft function. Five patients presented poor results requiring chronic hemodialysis. C4d staining was negative in all biopsy specimens, and peritubular capillaritis was not observed. To identify potential prognostic markers we retrospectively reviewed biopsy samples looking for minor or nonspecific features, especially inflammation scores both global and on fibrotic areas as per Banff classification. Mean serum creatinine level at time of biopsy and mean arteriolar hyalinosis score did not show significant differences between both groups. In contrast, the poor results group presented a higher mean global inflammation score compared with the good results patients. CONCLUSIONS: NAH is not a risk factor for poor renal graft outcome by itself. Other histopathologic findings, usually considered as secondary markers, like the inflammation score, should be considered before deciding CNI withdrawal.