Intra-cardiac pressure drop and flow distribution of bicuspid aortic valve disease in preserved ejection fraction.

Background: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is more than a congenital defect since it is accompanied by several secondary complications that intensify induced impairments. Hence, BAV patients need lifelong evaluations to prevent severe clinical sequelae. We applied 4D-flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for in detail visualization and quantification of in vivo blood flow to verify the reliability of the left ventricular (LV) flow components and pressure drops in the silent BAV subjects with mild regurgitation and preserved ejection fraction (pEF). Materials and methods: A total of 51 BAV patients with mild regurgitation and 24 healthy controls were recruited to undergo routine cardiac MRI followed by 4D-flow MRI using 3T MRI scanners. A dedicated 4D-flow module was utilized to pre-process and then analyze the LV flow components (direct flow, retained inflow, delayed ejection, and residual volume) and left-sided [left atrium (LA) and LV] local pressure drop. To elucidate significant diastolic dysfunction in our population, transmitral early and late diastolic 4D flow peak velocity (E-wave and A-wave, respectively), as well as E/A ratio variable, were acquired. Results: The significant means differences of each LV flow component (global measurement) were not observed between the two groups (p > 0.05). In terms of pressure analysis (local measurement), maximum and mean as well as pressure at E-wave and A-wave timepoints at the mitral valve (MV) plane were significantly different between BAV and control groups (p: 0.005, p: 0.02, and p: 0.04 and p: <0.001; respectively). Furthermore, maximum pressure and pressure difference at the A-wave timepoint at left ventricle mid and left ventricle apex planes were significant. Although we could not find any correlation between LV diastolic function and flow components, Low but statistically significant correlations were observed with local pressure at LA mid, MV and LV apex planes at E-wave timepoint (R: -0.324, p: 0.005, R: -0.327, p: 0.004, and R: -0.306, p: 0.008, respectively). Conclusion: In BAV patients with pEF, flow components analysis is not sensitive to differentiate BAV patients with mild regurgitation and healthy control because flow components and EF are global parameters. Inversely, pressure (local measurement) can be a more reliable biomarker to reveal the early stage of diastolic dysfunction.

Natural History of Myocardial Injury After COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Myocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocarditis is a rare complication of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination. Little is known about the natural history of this complication. METHODS: Baseline and convalescent (≥ 90 days) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging assessments were performed in 20 consecutive patients meeting Updated Lake Louise Criteria for acute myocarditis within 10 days of mRNA-based vaccination. CMR-based changes in left ventricular volumes, mass, ejection fraction (LVEF), markers of tissue inflammation (native T1 and T2 mapping), and fibrosis (late gadolinium enhancement [LGE] and extracellular volume [ECV]) were assessed between baseline and convalescence. Cardiac symptoms and clinical outcomes were captured. RESULTS: Median age was 23.1 years (range 18-39 years), and 17 (85%) were male. Convalescent evaluations were performed at a median (IQR) 3.7 (3.3-6.2) months. The LVEF showed a mean 3% absolute improvement, accompanied by a 7% reduction in LV end-diastolic volume and 5% reduction in LV mass (all P < 0.015). Global LGE burden was reduced by 66% (P < 0.001). Absolute reductions in global T2, native T1, and ECV of 2.1 ms, 58 ms, and 2.9%, repectively, were documented (all P ≤ 0.001). Of 5 patients demonstrating LVEF ≤ 50% at baseline, all recovered to above this threshold in convalescence. A total of 18 (90%) patients showed persistence of abnormal LGE although mean fibrosis burden was < 5% of LV mass in 85% of cases. No patient experienced major clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 mRNA vaccine-associated myocarditis showed rapid improvements in CMR-based markers of edema, contractile function, and global LGE burden beyond 3 months of recovery in this young patient cohort. However, regional fibrosis following edema resolution was commonly observed, justifying need for ongoing surveillance.

Portal hypertension: Imaging of portosystemic collateral pathways and associated image-guided therapy.

Portal hypertension is a common clinical syndrome, defined by a pathologic increase in the portal venous pressure. Increased resistance to portal blood flow, the primary factor in the pathophysiology of portal hypertension, is in part due to morphological changes occurring in chronic liver diseases. This results in rerouting of blood flow away from the liver through collateral pathways to low-pressure systemic veins. Through a variety of computed tomographic, sonographic, magnetic resonance imaging and angiographic examples, this article discusses the appearances and prevalence of both common and less common portosystemic collateral channels in the thorax and abdomen. A brief overview of established interventional radiologic techniques for treatment of portal hypertension will also be provided. Awareness of the various imaging manifestations of portal hypertension can be helpful for assessing overall prognosis and planning proper management.

False positive computed tomographic angiography for Stanford type A aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) has emerged as the defacto imaging test to rule out acute aortic dissection; however, it is not without flaws. We report a case of a false-positive CTA with respect to Stanford Type A aortic dissection. CASE: A 52 year-old male presented with sudden onset shortness of breath. He denied chest pain. Due to severe hypertension and an Emergency Department bedside ultrasound suggesting an intimal flap in the aorta, CTA was requested to better assess the ascending aorta and was interpreted as consistent with Stanford Type A aortic dissection with thrombosis of the false lumen in the ascending aorta. However, intra-operative imaging (TEE and epi-aortic scanning) did not identify an intimal flap or dissection, and neither did definitive surgical inspection of the aorta. The suspected aortic dissection and thrombosed false lumen were not visualized on repeat CTA two days later. DISCUSSION: False positive diagnosis of Stanford Type A aortic dissection on CTA can be the result of technical factors, streak artifacts, motion artifacts, and periaortic structures. In this case, non-uniform arterial contrast enhancement secondary to unrecognized biventricular dysfunction resulted in the false positive CTA appearance of an intimal flap and mural thrombus. Intra-operative TEE and epi-aortic scanning were proven correct in excluding aortic dissection by the standard of definitive surgical inspection of the aorta.