Beyond-the-edge proliferation after relaxing retinectomy.

PURPOSE: To report beyond-the-edge proliferation (BTEP) after relaxing retinectomies (RR) i.e. fibrous sheets stretched between the RR edge and the far periphery; to evaluate the tractional potential and report the long-term course of BTEP. METHODS: Retrospective review of the medical records of 83 patients having undergone a RR between January 2009 and December 2014 to identify patients with BTEP. RESULTS: Six patients aged 31 to 76 were identified. Retinectomy had been performed for traumatic retinal incarceration in one case and anterior PVR in 5 cases. BTEP occurred within weeks of the RR (earliest: 5 weeks). It was discovered intraoperatively in two patients with silicone oil tamponade, at 7 weeks and 6 months respectively after RR. It recurred over a few months after excision in 5 patients, causing inferior tractional retinoschisis in 4 patients and inferior tractional retinal detachment in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: BTEP is an unusual form of proliferative vitreoretinopathy developing despite the absence of the usual vitreo-retinal support (excised during RR), probably through compartmentalization and cell migration along the inferior interface between silicone oil or gas and the aqueous humour. BTEP can cause serious retinal traction, develops over weeks after the RR and recurs frequently a few months after excision.

[Evaluation of diabetic retinopathy screening using non-mydriatic fundus camera performed by physicians' assistants in the endocrinology service]. / Évaluation du dépistage de la rétinopathie diabétique par rétinographe non mydriatique effectué par des aides-soignant(e)s d'un service d'endocrinologie.

INTRODUCTION: Since 2010, the High Authority for health (HAS) recommends the use of non-mydriatic fundus camera for diabetic retinopathy screening. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of screening for diabetic retinopathy using the non-mydriatic retinal camera by a physician's assistant in the endocrinology service. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of all diabetic patients hospitalized in the endocrinology department between May 2013 and November 2013. For each endocrinology patient requiring screening, a previously trained physician's assistant performed fundus photos. The ophthalmologist then provided a written interpretation of the photos on a consultant's sheet. RESULTS: Of the 120 patients screened, 40 (33.3%) patients had uninterpretable photos. Among the 80 interpretable photos, 64 (53.4%) patients had no diabetic retinopathy, and 16 (13.3%) had diabetic retinopathy. No patient had diabetic maculopathy. DISCUSSION: Specific quality criteria were established by the HAS for screening for diabetic retinopathy using the non-mydriatic retinal camera in order to ensure sufficient sensitivity and specificity. In our study, the two quality criteria were not achieved: the rates of uninterpretable photos and the total number of photos analyzed in a given period. CONCLUSION: In our center, we discontinued this method of diabetic retinopathy screening due to the high rate of uninterpretable photos. Due to the logistic impossibility of the ophthalmologists taking all the fundus photos, we proposed that the ophthalmic nurses take the photos. They are better trained in the use of the equipment, and can confer directly with an ophthalmologist in questionable cases and to obtain pupil dilation as necessary.