Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 26(4): 1103-1109, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30746598

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine the correlation between intraoperative and pathological findings for patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) and to determine their prognostic significance. METHODS: Pathological reports of all colorectal cancer (CRC) patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC between 2009 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Pathological specimens lacking tumor cells were defined as negative pathological specimens (NPS). The intraoperative peritoneal cancer index (PCI) and pathological PCI (excluding NPS) were calculated separately. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were applied to compare the prognostic value of intraoperative and pathological scoring systems. RESULTS: For 108 CRC patients, 113 CRS/HIPEC procedures were performed. Of 959 pathological specimens examined, 178 (18.6%) were NPS. Overall, 78 procedures (69%) showed NPS. In 52 procedures (46%), the pathological PCI differed from the intraoperative PCI (∆PCI > 0). The ROC areas for intraoperative PCI and pathological PCI were similar in predicting 1-year overall survival (OS), 2-year OS, and 1-year disease-free survival (all p values not significant). However, for the patients with NPS, the number of positive specimens (containing tumor tissue) was superior to intraoperative PCI in predicting 2-year OS (ROC under the curve areas, 0.69 vs. 0.58, respectively; p = 0.012). In addition, a subgroup of 15 patients with a high ∆PCI (≥ 3) had a more favorable median OS than a matched group of 30 patients with similar intraoperative PCI and a ∆PCI of 0 (median survival not reached vs. 21.6 months, respectively; p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of CRC CRS/HIPEC procedures, NPS may be found. Among patients with NPS, pathological correlation may have a prognostic significance.


Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
2.
World J Surg ; 42(7): 2036-2042, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29302727

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Formation of protective stoma as part of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) may be an effective tool in reducing anastomotic leak incidence. Our aim was to evaluate the incidence and implications of stoma formation during CRS-HIPEC and to examine whether a creation of protective stoma reduces the postoperative morbidity. METHODS: A cohort retrospective analysis of all CRS-HIPEC procedures performed between 2004 and 2016 was conducted. Predicting factors for stoma formation were assessed by comparing all patients who underwent stoma formation to those who did not; both groups were then restricted to cases with ≥2 bowel anastomoses and compared in terms of perioperative outcomes in order to determine whether protective stoma confers a morbidity benefit. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-nine CRS-HIPEC procedures were performed on 186 patients. Thirty-four patients (17%) underwent stoma formation, 24 of them as protective stoma. Formation of a stoma was correlated with higher peritoneal carcinomatosis index score (13.6 ± 8 vs. 9.5 ± 7.7, p = 0.007), larger number of organs resected (p < 0.001), greater number of anastomoses (p < 0.001), prolonged operative time (8.1 ± 2.7 vs. 6.6 ± 2.2 h, p = 0.002), and prolonged hospital stay (12 vs. 8.5 days, p = 0.001). In procedures requiring ≥2 anastomoses, formation of protective stoma reduced the anastomotic leak rate (6 vs. 37%, p = 0.025), the morbidity rate (6 vs. 41%, p = 0.017), and reoperation rate (0 vs. 28%, p = 0.03). Overall, 15 patients (44%) underwent stoma reversal, 3 of whom had a complication treated non-operatively. CONCLUSIONS: Protective stoma should be considered in extensive CRS-HIPEC procedures requiring two or more bowel anastomoses in order to reduce the postoperative morbidity rate.


Asunto(s)
Fuga Anastomótica/prevención & control , Carcinoma/terapia , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA