RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Delirium is a disorder of decreased ability to focus, sustain or shift attention, change in cognition and or perception. The main objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) among the nursing and medical staff in a multidisciplinary ICU. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Three hundred ten verbally communicating and non-communicating patients (mean age in years 47.9, standard deviation [SD] 14.5, mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 13.8, SD 6.4) were assessed by a psychiatrist, nurse and intensivist for delirium. Inter-rater agreement was measured by Cohen's kappa coefficient. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. RESULTS: CAM-ICU showed higher sensitivity and DOR (84%, 86.1) compared to ICDSC (78%, 36.9). ICDSC had specificity and positive predictive value (94.5%, 92%) equal to that of CAM-ICU. For both the assessment methods (CAM-ICU and ICDSC), DORs for intensivists (120.5, 53.0) were relatively higher than nurses (67.0, 27.0). CONCLUSIONS: In our mixed ICU population, CAM-ICU remained more sensitive than ICDSC. Though sensitivity and DOR were higher for medical staff, other diagnostic parameters were similar for both medical and nursing staff.
Asunto(s)
Lista de Verificación , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Delirio/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Neurológico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
CONTEXT: The primary goal of septic shock management is optimization of organ perfusion, often at the risk of overloading the interstitium and causing pulmonary edema. The conventionally used end points of resuscitation do not generally include volumetric parameters such as extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) and pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI). AIMS: This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of EVLWI and PVPI by calculating their correlation with the severity of lung injury. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This prospective observational study included twenty mechanically ventilated critically ill patients with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score (APACHE II) >20. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: EVLWI and PVPI were measured using transpulmonary thermodilution, and simultaneously, PaO2:FiO2 ratio, alveolar-arterial gradient of oxygen (AaDO2), and chest radiograph scores from two radiologists were obtained. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The correlation of EVLWI and PVPI with chest radiograph scores, PaO2:FiO2 ratio, and AaDO2 were calculated. The inter-observer agreement between the two radiologists was tested using kappa test. RESULTS: EVLWI and PVPI correlated modestly with PaO2:FiO2 (r = -0.32, P = 0.0004; r = -0.39, P = 0.0001). There was a better correlation of EVLWI and PVPI with PaO2:FiO2 ratio (r = -0.71, P < 0.0001; r = -0.58, P = 0.0001) in the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) subgroup. The EVLWI values correlated significantly with corresponding chest radiograph scores (r = 0.71, P < 0.0001 for observer 1 and r = 0.68, P < 0.0001 for observer 2). CONCLUSIONS: EVLWI and PVPI may have a prognostic significance in the assessment of lung injury in septic shock patients with ARDS. Further research is required to reveal the usefulness of EVLWI as an end point of fluid resuscitation in the management of septic shock with ARDS.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Hypocalcaemia is very much prevalent in critically ill patients yet very less is known about its association with severity of illness. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) are two commonly used and validated scoring tool used to assess the severity of illness in critically ill patients. AIM: To analyze the relation of on admission hypocalcaemia with severity of illness as measured by APACHE-II and SOFA scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institute approval, 111 patients admitted during May to June 2016 were evaluated. Age, sex, on admission, ionized calcium (iCa0) levels, first day APACHE-II and SOFA scores were collected. Data were then divided in different classes based on iCa0 levels (i.e., normocalcaemic, mild, moderate and severe hypocalcaemic), APACHE-II and SOFA scores and their relationship was assessed using INSTAT software (GraphPad Software, Inc, La Zolla, CA, USA) with appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: Seventy eight (70.27%) patients were having hypocalcaemia on admission (<1.15 mmol/L). The mean APACHE-II score of normocalcaemic patients were significantly (p<0.05) lower as compared to moderate and severe hypocalcaemic patients (15.57±6.85 versus 21.72±6.37 and 15.57±6.85 versus 22.34±7.53, respectively). The mean iCa0 level in patients with APACHE-II > 20 were significantly lower than patients with APACHE-II < 9 (0.88±0.26 versus 1.09±0.24, p <0.05) but the mean iCa0 level in patients with SOFA > 9 were not significantly lower than patients with SOFA < 4 (0.99±0.41 versus 1.04±0.23, p > 0.05). The relative risk of on admission hypocalcaemia across increasing illness severity was also not statistically significant. Both relative risk of mortality and length of ICU stay were higher in on admission moderate hypocalcaemic patients as compared to normocalcaemic but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: On admission, hypocalcaemia has inconsistent correlation with increasing illness severity in adult intensive care patients. iCa0 of 0.81-0.90 mmol/L appears to have maximum deleterious effect with regard to mortality and length of ICU stay.