[Evaluation of 47,213 infants in neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis, using pancreatitis-associated protein and immunoreactive trypsinogen assays]. / Evaluation sur 47,213 enfants d'une stratégie de dépistage néonatal de la mucoviscidose associant les dosages de pancreatitis-associated protein et de trypsinogène immunoréactive.

OBJECTIVES: The increasing evidence of the benefits of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) indicates that this procedure could soon be implemented throughout France. The screening strategy currently used involves the detection of infants with elevated levels of immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) (approximately 1% of the population), followed by the detection of CFTR gene mutations. However, genetic analysis has certain drawbacks, the most important of which being the management of heterozygotes, and in France the requirement by law of previous informed consent. In cases of CF, pancreatic alterations are already present in utero. A previous study has demonstrated the value of pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) as a screening test for CF, and has indicated that a feasible two-stage strategy could involve the following: 1) selection of infants with elevated PAP levels; 2) in this group of infants, subsequent detection of those with elevated IRT levels for direct CF diagnosis by the sweat test thereby avoiding the use of genetic analysis. The study aim was to evaluate this strategy in a large number of neonates. METHODS AND RESULTS: The aforementioned strategy was evaluated in a prospective study involving 47,213 infants in the Provence region of France. In infants with a PAP > 7.5 ng/mL (1.28%), 176 had an elevated IRT level > 700 ng/mL (0.37%). In this limited population sample (0.37% of the total), the sweat test diagnosed five cases of CF. A sixth case involving the monozygous twin of an infant with diagnosed CF remained undetected, probably because of a registration error. Genetic analysis confirmed the diagnosis, and also detected another case in an infant with two CFTR mutations but with a normal phenotype at 20 months of age. As the observed incidence was similar to that which had previously been reported, and as no further case was subsequently detected two years after the end of the study, this indicated that the sensitivity of this screening strategy was satisfactory. Its specificity makes the direct diagnosis of CF cases by the sweat test feasible, without further selection by genetic analysis. CONCLUSION: The PAP/IRT technique for CF detection seems to be suitable for mass screening, without the drawbacks of genetic testing.

Lithostathine and pancreatitis-associated protein are involved in the very early stages of Alzheimer's disease.

According to one of the theories formulated to explain the etiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD), amylosis may reflect a specific inflammatory response. Two inflammatory proteins, lithostathine and PAP, were evidenced by immunohistochemistry in senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles of patients with AD. In addition, lithostathine and PAP were significantly increased in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with AD when compared to patients with multiple sclerosis, another inflammatory disease, and to normal control subjects. However, no correlation was observed with age of occurrence. Furthermore, lithostathine and PAP were increased even at the very early stages of AD, and their level remained elevated during the course of the AD unlike TNFalpha whose level, very high at very early stages, regularly decreased. Finally, if part of lithostathine and PAP are synthesized in the brain, a large part comes from serum by passage over the blood-brain barrier. These results indicate (i) the existence of an acute phase response followed by a chronic inflammation in AD, and (ii) that lithostathine and PAP are involved even at the first pre-clinical biochemical events of AD. In addition, because lithostathine undergoes an autolytic cleavage leading to its precipitation and the formation of fibrils, we believe that it may be involved in amyloidosis and tangles by allowing heterogeneous precipitation of other proteins.

Blood concentrations of pancreatitis associated protein in neonates: relevance to neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis.

AIM: To determine whether pancreatitis associated protein (PAP) is a marker for cystic fibrosis which could be used in neonatal screening for the disease. METHODS: PAP was assayed on screening cards from 202,807 neonates. Babies with PAP > or = 15 ng/ml, or > or = 11.5 ng/ml and immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) > or = 700 ng/ml were recalled for clinical examination, sweat testing, and cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) gene analysis. RESULTS: Median PAP value was 2.8 ng/ml. Forty four cases of cystic fibrosis were recorded. Recalled neonates (n = 398) included only 11 carriers. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that PAP above 8.0 ng/ml would select 0.76% of babies, including all those with cystic fibrosis, except for one with meconium ileus and two with mild CFTR mutations. Screening 27,146 babies with both PAP and IRT showed that only 0.12% had PAP > 8.0 ng/ml and IRT > 700 ng/ml, including all cases of cystic fibrosis. CONCLUSION: PAP is increased in most neonates with cystic fibrosis and could be used for CF screening. Its combination with IRT looks promising.

Pancreatitis-associated protein: a putative marker for pancreas graft rejection.

BACKGROUND: Graft rejection is one of the major causes of graft loss after pancreas transplantation. Pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) is synthesized by the pancreas due to pancreatic inflammation and has shown to be a good serum marker for injury of the pancreas. It may also be potentially useful in the early recognition of rejection and may thus improve pancreas survival. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated PAP as an early serum marker of pancreas graft rejection in a cross-sectional study in which immunohistochemical analysis of pancreas biopsies was undertaken using antibodies against PAP. PAP concentrations were also measured in sera of blood donors and in patients with renal failure, renal replacement therapy, kidney transplantation alone, and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. RESULTS: All patients had elevated PAP serum levels compared with blood donors (median PAP: 22 ng/ml, range: 5-75 ng/ml; P<0.0001). Patients on renal replacement therapy had higher values than patients with renal failure (median: 420 ng/ml and 150 ng/ml, respectively). There was a strong inverse correlation between PAP levels and creatinine clearance (P<0.001). PAP values in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation patients with histological rejection were significantly higher than values in those who were clinically stable (median: 925 ng/ml and 322 ng/ml, respectively; P=0.006). Rejection was significantly associated with PAP staining of acinar cell surface. There was also a significant correlation between surface positivity of staining and serum PAP levels (P=0.008). No positive PAP staining was observed in concurrently collected biopsies of renal allografts undergoing rejection. CONCLUSIONS: Serum PAP levels appear to strongly correlate with creatinine clearance measurements. In patients with a pancreas-kidney transplantation, PAP may prove to be a useful biological and histological marker of pancreatic graft rejection.

Analysis of 2166 clones from a human colorectal cancer cDNA library by partial sequencing.

Large scale sequencing of cDNAs from a tissue-specific library provides information on the functional phenotype of that tissue and the clones constitute a reservoir of biological markers. For these reasons, we have randomly sequenced 2166 clones of a cDNA library constructed with human colorectal cancer mRNAs. Database searches indicated that 1014 of the cDNAs represented known human genes or human homologs of other genes, 142 sequences corresponded to known ESTs, 119 sequences corresponded to 28S rRNA, repetitive sequences or poly(A) stretches only, and 891 corresponded to unknown transcripts representing the products of 740 new genes. Preliminary studies demonstrated that expression of some of them was altered in cancer. That cDNA collection is therefore a source of potential markers of colorectal cancer.