The efficacy of the Bogota Bag technique for wound closure in limb fasciotomy patients: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Fasciotomy is a surgical procedure that involves the incision of fascial compartments in the body to relieve pressure, prevent tissue damage, and maintain blood flow. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the Bogota Bag technique in closing fasciotomy wounds in patients with lower limb compartment syndrome. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted between October 2022 and October 2023 to document our experience in employing the Bogota Bag technique for fasciotomy closure. The study included the evaluation of medical files from fifteen patients aged 17 to 61. RESULTS: The outcomes of the study present the initial series of limb fasciotomies treated with the Bogota Bag technique. Fifteen patients (14 male, 1 female) were included in the study. The average age of the patients was 34.73 ± 13.9 years and the average hospitalization was 8.33 ± 3.2 days. The average closure time of fasciotomy is 3.6 ± 1.4 days. CONCLUSION: This report makes a significant contribution as the first documented series of limb fasciotomies treated with the Bogota Bag technique. This method exhibits simplicity in execution, cost-effectiveness, and a low incidence of complications.

Can The Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) be used to predict mortality in patients with necrotizing fasciitis?

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the impact of mortality and morbidity indices on the diagnosis and prognosis of patients suffering from necrotizing fasciitis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 41 patients (26 females, 15 males) with necrotizing fasciitis (NF). The SII (Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index) was computed using the formula SII = (P × N)/L, where P, N, and L measure the counts of peripheral platelets, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, respectively. This study evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics and follow-up information to assess the comparative effectiveness of SII, CCI (Charlson Comorbidity Index), and LRINEC (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) scores as mortality and morbidity indices for patients with NF. RESULTS: The optimal cut-off for SII was determined to be 455. The SII value in the group with mortality was significantly higher compared to the group without mortality (p < 0.05). The CCI value in the group with mortality was significantly higher than the group without mortality (p < 0.05). The SII and CCI values were found to be effective in distinguishing between patients who suffered mortality and those who did not. CONCLUSION: SII is a powerful tool for predicting mortality in patients with necrotizing fasciitis (NF). The SII index provides a novel, easily accessible, and inexpensive indicator for monitoring the progress and predicting the survival of patients with NF.

Mortality analyses of elderly patients with proximal femoral fracture during the pandemic: vaccination affects or not.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the mortality rate, intensive care unit (ICU) referral, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) between different types of vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients operated on due to intertrochanteric femoral fracture (IFF) during the pandemic. METHODS: Ninety-six patients (43 males, 53 females) who had proximal femur nails (PFN) for the IFF during the pandemic were included in the study. The patients were divided into four subgroups; non-vaccinated, and different types of vaccinated. Mortality rates, ICU referrals, and CCI relations were evaluated. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in terms of demographic data such as age, gender, side, CCI, and ICU referrals between the subgroups (p = 0.164, p = 0.546, p = 0.703, p = 0.771, p = 0.627 respectively). The mortality rate was significantly lower in the Sinovac + BioNTech subgroup (p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: No relationship was found between mortality rate, ICU referral, and CCI in different types of vaccinated and non-vaccinated patient subgroups.

Erectile Dysfunction after Conservative Treatment of Sacral Fractures in Males without Injury to the Urinary System.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the incidence of erectile dysfunction (ED) reported by patients, and to define the prognostic relationship between ED and conservatively treated sacral fracture without urethral injury. METHODS: Patients aged between 20 - 50 years who were sexually active and had no known sexual dysfunction prior to the trauma were included in the study. Seventy-seven patients (47 married, 30 single) treated conservatively for sacral fracture between April 2012 and February 2017 were retrospectively screened. Patients were compared in terms of age, marital status, body mass index (BMI), trauma mechanism, additional system injury, functional outcomes, and complications. Functional outcomes were assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and the Majeed pelvic fracture functional assessment scale (MPS). RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed between fracture types with respect to age, BMI, follow-up, marital status, trauma mechanism, and accompanying injury. The incidence of ED was 27.3% for those that received conservative treatment after sacrum fracture. The mean score of IIEF-5 was 18.6 ± 6.6 and MPS was 77.2 ± 13.2. There was no significant relationship between the injury type of the patients and the IIEF-5 and MPS scores (p = 0.593 and p = 0.907, respectively). The lowest IIEF-5 score was found in Denis type 2 fractures (p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: The frequency of ED was higher in Denis type 2 sacrum fractures. Sexual function should be questioned in the follow-up, especially in those fracture types.

Partial load-bearing rabbit ulnar segmental defects are regenerated with biocompatible grafts with or without bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

BACKGROUND: The autologous bone grafts still have been used as the gold standard to initiate and facilitate bone healing in cases with bone defects. Because of some disadvantages of autologous bone grafts, the new biocomposite grafts have been researched. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) loaded into a biocomposite scaffold enhance bone regeneration. METHODS: In our study, a 10 mm osteoperiosteal segmental bone defect was created in the middle of the right and left ulnar bones of eight rabbits. The created defects were filled in the right ulnar bones of eight rabbits (Group I) with BM-MSCs loaded onto a bio-composite scaffold (Plexur PTM, Osteotech, Eatontown, NJ, USA) and in the other ulnar bones of the same rabbits (Group II) with only biocomposite graft. Radiographs of each forelimb were taken postoperatively at the end of the 6th week. Then, the rabbits were euthanized pharmacologically for histopathological evaluation. RESULTS: Were scored using a modified Lane and Sandhu scoring system. All defects healed in both groups. Radiological and histo-logical total scores were slightly better in Group I, but statistical tests did not reveal any significant differences between the two groups at the end of the 6th week radiologically and histologically (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of our study demonstrated that in rabbit ulnar segmental bone defect model was obtained satisfactory regeneration with using biocomposite graft with or without BM-MSCs.

Does plate-screw density affect the functional outcomes in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures?

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to evaluate the relationship between plate-screw density (PSD), functional results, and complication rates in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) with proximal humerus locking anatomical plate (PHLAP). METHODS: Consecutive 43 patients (22 females and 21 males) who underwent PHLAP for the treatment of PHF between 2010 and 2016 were evaluated. AO classifications were used for the classification of fractures. Based on the biomechanical stability the-ory of Erhardt et al., the patients were divided into two groups as <60% and >60% according to the number of screws fixed to the humeral head for the determination of PSD. The patients were divided into two groups as PSD <60% (n=21) and PSD>60% (n=22) according to the number of screws fixed to the humeral head for the determination of PSD. Functional results were evaluated using the Constant-Murley shoulder score (CMS). Radiological evaluation was performed with collodiaphyseal angle (CDA), varus-valgus angulation, avascular necrosis (AVN), and arthrosis. The groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics, functional results, radiological scores, and complications. RESULTS: The mean age was 54.47±17.43 years and the mean follow-up time was 19.51±5.27 months. Although the CMS scores of patients with a PSD of over 60% were higher than those below 60%, the CMS score did not differ statistically. In groups, the mean CDA of the operated shoulder was significantly lower than that of the non-injured side (p=0.002). Eight patients had varus angulation, whereas two patients had humerus head AVN. No significant relationship was observed between PDS and functional scores, radiolog-ical results, and complications. CONCLUSION: Functional results of PSD >60% are higher than PSD <60% group but there is no statistical difference between groups according to functional, radiological results, and complications.

Fibular fixation improves ankle functional outcomes and alignment in the intramedullary nailing of distal third tibiofibular diaphyseal fractures.

PURPOSE: The study aims to determine the effect of fibular fixation on alignment and fracture healing of tibia, and ankle functional outcomes in the treatment of distal third tibiofibular diaphyseal fractures. METHODS: Consecutive 111 patients (33 females and 78 males) with distal third tibiofibular diaphyseal fracture who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups as those who underwent fibular fixation with tibia intramedullary nailing (study group) and those who did not (control group). Groups were compared in terms of demographic features, trauma and fracture characteristics, functional and radiological outcomes. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of demographic features, trauma characteristics, complications, and follow-up time (p > 0.05). Surgery time was significantly lower in the control group (p = 0.001). Ankle joint range of motion, AOFAS score, OMAS score, and full weight-bearing time were significantly better in the fibular fixation group (p = 0.023, p = 0.001, p = 0.001 and p = 0.039, respectively). Significantly better coronal alignment and sagittal alignment were found in the fibular fixation group (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Patients who underwent fibular fixation had significantly better radiological outcomes in terms of fibular rotation angle and ankle arthrosis (p = 0.000 and p = 0.022, respectively). CONCLUSION: Fibular fixation not only contributes to fracture union, early full weight-bearing, and alignment but also improves ankle functional outcomes in the distal third tibiofibular fractures treated with intramedullary nailing for tibia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective study.

Which external fixation method is better for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures due to gunshot injury?

INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes of AO type monolateral external fixator (AO-EF) and Ilizarov type external fixator (I-EF) in definitive fixation of tibial shaft fractures due to gunshot injury. HYPOTHESIS: Patients undergoing I-EF would have faster fracture healing with the help of early weight-bearing and the functional scores would be better compared to AO-EF. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study consisted of 76 (67M, 9F) patients who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2016 for tibial shaft fracture due to low-velocity gunshot injury (LVGI). The patients were divided into two groups according to the fixation method (AO-EF and I-EF) which was discussed by the surgeon team due to their experience. The average age at the time of injury was 37.8±9.8 (20 to 59 years). Groups are compared according to LEFS score, coronal-sagittal-rotational angle, Johner-Rush score, and complications such as nonunion, malunion, osteomyelitis, and pin-tract infection. The mean follow-up time 31.61±3.83 months (between 24 and 44 months). RESULTS: No statistical difference was found between groups in terms of demographic characteristics. There was no statistical difference between groups regarding body mass index (BMI). LEFS score and operation duration were higher in the I-EF group (p=0.000 and p=0.006 respectively, p˂0.05). In the I-EF group, hospitalization period, full weight-bearing time, and healing time was shorter than the AO-EF group (p=0.001, p=0.000, and p=0.025 respectively, p˂0.05). DISCUSSION: Although AO-EF has advantages such as ease of application and short surgery time in the definitive fixation of LVGI tibia shaft fractures, I-EF is a superior technique in terms of functional scores. However, I-EF is a surgical approach that requires relatively more experience. Therefore, the choice of fixator should be determined according to the surgeon's experience in the permanent treatment of LVGI tibial shaft fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective, case-control study.

Comparison of Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterolateral Fusion Techniques in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare posterolateral fusion with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLF + TLIF) and PLF only in terms of revision surgery rates and complications, as well as functional and radiological outcomes in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients. METHODS: Seventy-one patients (37 patients in the PLF + TLIF group and 34 patients in the PLF only group) who underwent surgery due to LSS between January 2013 and December 2016 were retrospectively investigated. Functional evaluation was performed by using the McGill-Melzack Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scales pre-and postoperatively. Radiological evaluation was made by examining adjacent vertebrae, posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) morphology, and sagittal balance on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: Postoperative MPQ, RMDQ, and ODI scores were significantly better in the PLF + TLIF group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.001, respectively). The complication rate was significantly higher in the PLF only group (p = 0.026). In the PLF + TLIF group, postoperative functional scores showed significant improvement in terms of the instrumented segment and level of interbody fusion. Postoperative functional scores showed significant improvement in PLF + TLIF patients with no complications, no revision surgery, no postoperative MRI findings, and neutral sagittal balance compared to the preoperative functional scores (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PLF + TLIF is significantly superior in terms of functional scores and complications, despite the statistical similarity in terms of postoperative MRI findings and sagittal balance between the groups. Surgeons should prefer PLF + TLIF for the surgical treatment of LSS for better results.

The effect of COVID-19 positivity on inflammatory parameters and thirty day mortality rates in patients over sixty five years of age with surgically treated intertrochanteric fractures.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of COVID-19 positivity on inflammatory parameters and 30-day mortality rates in patients over 65 years of age who were operated on for intertrochanteric femur fractures (IFF). METHODS: Eighty-seven patients (31 males, 56 females) who had a dynamic hip screw (DHS) or proximal femur nail (PFN) for the IFF between March 2020 and November 2020 were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups as COVID-19 confirmed and probable positive (Group 1) and COVID-19 negative (Group 2). Time to surgery, operation duration, length of hospital stay, 30-day mortality, rates of the intensive care unit (ICU) referral, and inflammatory parameters such as haemoglobin, CRP, sedimentation, PCT, D-Dimer, and ferritin were evaluated. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in terms of demographic data such as age, gender, comorbidity, and fracture type between the groups. Thirty-day mortality, ICU referral rate, blood transfusion rate, and hospitalization period were higher in Group 1 (p = 0.016, p = 0.012, p = 0.031, and p = 0.011, respectively). The inflammatory parameters were higher in Group 1 compared to Group 2 in the preoperative and postoperative periods (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 positivity increases inflammatory parameters (as expected) and increases the 30-day mortality and ICU requirement in patients with surgically treated IFF.