Something old, something new: a successful case of meprobamate withdrawal.

Meprobamate, a benzodiazepine-like drug, was commonly prescribed for anxiety in the 1960s and 1970s, but fell out of favour, at least in part, due to the risk of dependence, for which there is little published evidence to guide clinical management. We discuss a 70-year-old man with a 45-year history of meprobamate dependency and multiple failed previous withdrawal attempts who was successfully withdrawn from meprobamate using diazepam during a 2-week inpatient stay on a specialist Addictions ward. An appropriate diazepam dose was established using the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment scale for benzodiazepines (CIWA-B). This dose was then slowly reduced over 12 days. Multidisciplinary input, especially psychological therapy tackling his underlying anxiety disorder during his admission, was thought to be particularly helpful.

Auricular acupuncture as an adjunct to opiate detoxification treatment: effects on withdrawal symptoms.

It was hypothesized that auricular acupuncture would lead to reduced severity of opiate withdrawal symptoms and craving when provided as an adjunct to methadone detoxification. The study used a randomized, placebo-controlled study design. The sample consisted of 83 drug misusers who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for opiate dependence. Daily measures of withdrawal severity and craving were taken using the Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale and an eight-item craving questionnaire. Urine screening was used as an objective assessment of treatment adherence. The study hypothesis was not confirmed. Auricular acupuncture had no effect upon withdrawal severity or craving when provided as an adjunct to a standard methadone detoxification treatment. The results are consistent with the findings of other studies that failed to find any effect of acupuncture in the treatment of drug dependence. The failure to find any clinical gains from the adjunctive use of auricular acupuncture during detoxification from opiates raises concerns about the widespread acceptance of this intervention.

Influence of the dose on the severity of opiate withdrawal symptoms during methadone detoxification.

AIM: This study investigates factors influencing the severity of opiate withdrawal symptoms, focusing on the relationship between methadone dose and withdrawal severity among opiate-dependent in-patients receiving methadone detoxification. METHODS: The sample comprised 48 opiate-dependent patients admitted to a specialist in-patient drug treatment service and withdrawn from opiates, using a 10-day methadone reduction schedule. The severity of withdrawal symptoms was assessed daily using the Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale. RESULTS: Patients withdrawn from higher doses of methadone and those reporting higher levels of anxiety reported more severe withdrawal symptoms. No relationship was found between methadone dose and completion of detoxification or length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients on higher doses of methadone reported more severe opiate withdrawal symptoms than patients on lower doses, the dose effect accounted for only a small percentage of the total variance. Nonetheless, the finding of a dose-response effect supports one of the basic principles of clinical practice during detoxification, namely the matching of the medication withdrawal schedule to the pre-admission opiate dose.

Comparison of buprenorphine and methadone in the treatment of opiate withdrawal: possible advantages of buprenorphine for the treatment of opiate-benzodiazepine codependent patients?

The study is a preliminary investigation to compare the effectiveness of buprenorphine and methadone as opiate detoxification treatments. The sample comprised 123 drug misusers who were dependent upon opiates only or who were codependent upon opiates and benzodiazepines. Drug misusers dependent upon methadone doses up to 70 mg were eligible for the study. Detoxification took place within a specialist inpatient drug-dependence unit. Withdrawal symptom severity was assessed on a daily basis by means of the Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale. Outcome was assessed for reductions in severity of withdrawal symptoms, treatment retention, and treatment completion. Buprenorphine detoxification was associated with less severe opiate withdrawal symptoms than methadone. Opiate/Benzodiazepine codependent patients reported less severe withdrawal symptoms during treatment with buprenorphine than with methadone and were also more likely to complete detoxification when treated with buprenorphine.

The rise of buprenorphine prescribing in England: analysis of NHS regional data, 2001-03.

AIMS: Since its launch in the prescribing market in 1999 for the treatment of opiate dependence, buprenorphine has rapidly become established as an alternative to methadone treatment in the United Kingdom. In the absence of evidence of its clinical superiority over methadone, and given its high relative cost, we sought to examine the impact of buprenorphine availability on opiate treatment services in England. METHODS: Quarterly buprenorphine and methadone community prescription figures were obtained for 28 Strategic Health Authorities (SHAs) in England, for the 2-year period September 2001 to September 2003. Rates of buprenorphine prescribing (as proportion of all opiate prescriptions) were examined over time by number of prescriptions and net ingredient cost. RESULTS: Buprenorphine prescription rates increased disproportionately to methadone in all 28 SHAs. By the end of 2003 the number of buprenorphine prescriptions had increased to 23% of all opiate prescriptions, but accounted for 45% of opiate prescription costs in England. Buprenorphine prescribing rates varied substantially across different regions. CONCLUSIONS: Buprenorphine prescribing has increased dramatically and represents a disproportionately large fraction of community opiate prescribing costs. The marked regional variation suggests the need for further research and the development of national guidelines to support rational prescribing and equitable access to treatment.

Recognition of a dopamine replacement therapy dependence syndrome in Parkinson's disease: a pilot study.

Patients with Parkinson's disease may use Dopamine Replacement Therapy (DRT) in excess of therapeutic need. We investigate whether a group of 10 patients with Parkinson's disease, provisionally diagnosed with "Hedonistic Homeostatic Dysregulation" because of their excessive use of DRT, met established operational psychiatric criteria for substance dependence, compared with 10 patients with Parkinson's disease compliant with prescribed DRT. Using a semi-structured questionnaire designed to distinguish between adaptive therapeutic dependence on DRT and a maladaptive pathological pattern of DRT use, in conjunction with the SCID-1, we found that seven of the patients deemed by their treating physicians to be misusing DRT fulfilled operational criteria for maladaptive dependence in contrast to none of the compliant group. The majority experienced dysphoric "withdrawal" symptoms in the "off" state and increased their dose of DRT in an effort to control their mood. They also continued to use high doses of DRT despite disabling dyskinesias and social difficulties. This study provides preliminary evidence that some patients with Parkinson's disease may become maladaptively dependent on DRT. This finding has both clinical relevance for the treatment of PD and further implicates dopaminergic pathways in the genesis of substance dependence.

Benzodiazepine co-dependence exacerbates the opiate withdrawal syndrome.

Patients seeking treatment for opiate withdrawal are commonly also dependent on benzodiazepines, although the interactions between benzodiazepine and opiate dependence and withdrawal syndromes have been subject to little systematic investigation. This is the first study comparing type, severity and course of opiate withdrawal symptoms between opiate dependent patients with, and without, concurrent benzodiazepine dependence. Patients dependent only on opiates (n = 39), and patients dependent on both opiates and benzodiazepines (n = 22), were recruited from consecutive admissions to an in-patient drug treatment unit. Quantity and duration of prior opiate use was similar for both groups. Patients completed daily self-ratings of opiate withdrawal (SOWS) for the duration of a standard in-patient detoxification treatment. Co-dependent patients were detoxified from benzodiazepines and opiates concurrently. Co-dependent patients reported a more severe withdrawal symptoms than patients withdrawing from opiates alone. Co-dependent patients had significantly more severe opiate withdrawal symptoms. Concurrent benzodiazepine withdrawal exacerbates opiate specific withdrawal symptoms. Possible psychological and neurophysiological mechanisms for the observed sensitisation are discussed.

Occult benzodiazepine dependence.

Illicit street heroin is often adulterated with other substances, which may expose the unknowing user to additional adverse risks. This case study describes an intravenous heroin user with a history of epileptic seizures, who presented with unexpected benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms. It highlights the importance of a thorough drug history with corroborative urine drug testing.

Sulphatoxymelatonin excretion during opiate withdrawal: a preliminary study.

The excretion of sulphatoxymelatonin (aMT6S), a major metabolite of melatonin in urine, is dependent on noradrenergic (NA) neuronal activity within the pineal gland and thus represents a neuroendocrine marker of NA neuronal function. Many of the clinical features of opiate withdrawal result from increased firing of central NA neurones. In this study, we test the hypothesis that aMT6S excretion is increased during opiate withdrawal in opiate-dependent patients. The 24-h urinary aMT6S excretion was measured at three time points during in-patient methadone detoxification treatment in 11 opiate-dependent patients, during methadone stabilisation and on Days 6 and 12 of withdrawal treatment. There was a significant increase in aMT6S excretion on Day 6 but not on Day 12, compared to stabilisation. A significant correlation between individual withdrawal symptom score severity and aMT6S excretion was demonstrated during stabilisation (r=.68, P<.05) and on Day 6 of treatment (r=.62, P<.05). Our preliminary findings suggest that melatonin secretion may represent a neuroendocrine marker of NA neuronal hyperactivity during opiate withdrawal in opiate-dependent patients. Areas of future research are discussed.

Lofexidine and desipramine: Interaction results in breakthrough opioid withdrawal symptoms.

A patient was receiving treatment for concurrent opioid and stimulant dependency. When desipramine was added to his lofexidine regimen for treatment of stimulant withdrawal, there was an exacerbation of opioid withdrawal symptoms. With the increasing use of lofexidine for opioid withdrawal, clinicians need to be aware of the potential for interactions with tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of concomitant stimulant users. (Int J Psych Clin Pract 2002; 6: 179-181 ).