Colonoscopy uptake for high-risk individuals with a family history of colorectal neoplasia: A multicenter, randomized trial of tailored counseling versus standard information.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopic screening is recommended for first-degree relatives of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) or colorectal adenomatous polyps (CAP) before the age of 60 years. This has the potential to reduce CRC-related morbidity and mortality, but uptake is currently inadequate. METHODS: The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of standard information versus a nurse-led tailored intervention designed to promote uptake of colonoscopy screening by siblings of CRC or CAP patients. A randomized controlled trial was conducted. Digestive surgeons and gastroenterologists recruited index patients who developed CRC or CAP before the age of 60 years. All index patients received standard screening information for their siblings, in keeping with current guidelines. Centrally computerized randomization of index patients resulted in allocating all their siblings to the same group, intervention or control. The tailored intervention targeted the index patient first, to help them convey information to their siblings. The nurse then provided the siblings with tailored information based on their answers to a self-questionnaire which explored health behaviors, derived from psychosocial models of prevention. Then the siblings were given a personalized information leaflet to hand to their regular physician. The primary endpoint was the rate of documented colonoscopy performed in siblings within 1 year after diagnosis of the index patient. The intent-to-treat analysis included siblings who refused to participate in the study. Statistical analysis was adjusted for intrafamilial correlation. RESULTS: A total of 304 siblings of 125 index patients were included: 160 in the intervention group and 144 in the control group. The rate of colonoscopy uptake among siblings was 56.3% in the intervention group and 35.4% in the control group (P = 0.0027). The respective rates after exclusion of refusals were 69.2% and 37.0% (P < 0.0001). More lesions were detected in the intervention group (1 invasive cancer and 11 advanced adenomas vs 5 advanced adenomas; P = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a nurse-led tailored intervention designed to promote colonoscopy screening uptake by siblings of patients diagnosed with CRC or CAP before age 60 years. Such tailored interventions that also involve physicians should help to reduce CRC-related mortality.

Evaluation of French guidelines on the indications of colonoscopy: results of a regional practice survey.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Compliance with guidelines on colonoscopic indications can improve colorectal cancer screening efficiency. We conducted a regional practice survey of gastroenterologists working in the public and private sectors in France, and compared the results with French national guidelines. METHODS: Four consecutive yearly questionnaire-based practice surveys were conducted, and remedial measures were recommended on the basis of the results. RESULTS: We analyzed 5128 colonoscopies carried out by 65 practitioners. Of these, 4266 (83.2%) conformed to contemporary guidelines, 391 (7.6%) did not conform, and 471 (9.2%) could not be classified, owing to a lack of information. Remedial measures led to a significant increase in the number of colonoscopies conforming to guidelines (p=0.037) and to a significant fall in the number of unclassified procedures (p=0.0018). The distribution of colonic lesions differed between procedures that did and did not conform to guidelines (2.4% versus 0.3% of colorectal cancers, 11.4% vs. 6.9% of advanced adenomas, and 17.5% vs. 14.6% of non-advanced adenomas; p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: This longitudinal multicenter survey shows that national colonoscopy guidelines are largely respected in France and improve the detection of colonic neoplasia. Practices improved following implementation of remedial measures.

Determinants of participation in colonoscopic screening by siblings of colorectal cancer patients in France.

BACKGROUND: Targeted colonosocopic screening is recommended for first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients diagnosed before the age of 60 and offers the possibility of reducing morbidity and mortality, but participation remains too low. The objective of this study was to determine in a French population the factors that affect siblings' participation in screening, notably those relating to the individuals, their medical care, their family and their social network. METHODS: A cross sectional survey was conducted in siblings of index patients having undergone surgery for colorectal cancer between 1999 and 2002 in two French counties. Siblings were contacted during 2007 and 2008 through the index patient. The factors affecting participation in colonoscopic screening were studied by logistic regression taking into account family cluster effect. RESULTS: 172 siblings of 74 index cases were included. The declared rate of undergoing at least one colonoscopy among siblings was 66%; 95%CI 59-73%. Five variables were independently associated with colonoscopic screening: perceiving fewer barriers to screening (OR = 3.2; 95%CI 1.2-8.5), having received the recommendation to undergo screening from a physician (OR = 4.9; 1.7-13.7), perceiving centres practising colonoscopy as more accessible (OR = 3.2, 1.3-7.8), having discussed screening with all siblings (OR = 3.9; 1.6-9.6) and being a member of an association (OR = 2.6; 1.0-6.6). CONCLUSIONS: The factors independently associated with participation in CRC screening by an individual at increased risk belonged to each of four dimensions relating to his individual psychosocial characteristics, to his relationship with a physician, within the family and social environment. The relevance of these results to clinical practice may help to improve compliance to recommendations in a global preventive strategy including all stages of the information pathway from the physician to the index patient and his relatives.

Short-term and long-term vital outcomes of cirrhotic patients admitted to an intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate short-term and long-term vital outcomes of cirrhotic patients admitted to a general ICU, to evaluate the prognostic value of severity scores and to identify risk factors associated with death. METHODS: Observational retrospective single-center epidemiological study. All cirrhotic patients admitted to the ICU were eligible for the study. Clinical data, general ICU severity scores, and liver-specific severity scores were recorded. The mortality rate was analyzed during the stay in ICU, at day 28 and month 6 after admission. Risk factors for death were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: During the study period, 86 cirrhotic patients were admitted to the ICU. The in-ICU, day-28 and month-6 mortality rates were 37, 48, and 60%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, mechanical ventilation, the prothrombin time, and the plasma albumin level on admission were associated with the in-ICU mortality, whereas only the plasma albumin level was associated with the 6-month mortality [odds ratio 0.80; 95% confidence interval (0.70-0.92)]. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was more predictive than liver-specific scores for mortality in the ICU, but not at day 28 or month 6. CONCLUSION: ICU admission should not be ruled out for patients with complicated cirrhosis. Although common in cirrhotic patients, low plasma albumin level was the only factor independently associated with short-term and long-term mortalities.

General practitioner and specialist views on colonoscopic screening of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Barriers to targeted colonoscopic screening of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients have been the subject of considerable literature, always as seen from the patient's viewpoint. In the specific context of screening individuals with a family history, physicians may also play a predominant role in motivating their colorectal cancer patients to pass on screening information to their relatives. The aim of this study was to examine the views of general practitioners and specialists regarding barriers and facilitators affecting participation of relatives in colonoscopic screening. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted to collect and analyse information from two focus groups of 4 general practitioners and 9 gastroenterologists respectively, and from semi-structured individual interviews with 10 general practitioners, 2 surgeons and 3 oncologists. An extended focus group of 36 gastroenterologists was organized to validate the results. RESULTS: The main barriers to colonoscopic screening of FDRs were associated with lack of direct communication between physicians and FDRs. Physicians needed support in the task of informing index patients and persuading them to transfer information on screening to their FDRs. The general practitioners spoke of their expectations in terms of training in and motivation for promoting screening and the gastroenterologists expressed the wish for patient education material specific to colonoscopy and for systematic post-colonoscopy consultations to inform patients about their results, follow-up and screening their relatives. CONCLUSION: The findings, notably the need for specific education materials and for training to improve the motivation of physicians, will help to develop effective interventions intended to increase participation in screening.

Evaluation of the French national plan to promote screening and early management of viral hepatitis C, between 1997 and 2003: a comparative cross-sectional study in Poitou-Charentes region.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of this repeated cross-sectional survey was to document trends in screening practices, to analyze the evolution of the epidemiological characteristics of patients with newly diagnosed hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, and to evaluate the implementation of hepatitis C management guidelines. METHODS: Medical laboratories in Poitou-Charentes region were surveyed on serological tests for HCV infection prescribed during two 2-month periods in 1997 and 2000, and a 4-month period in 2003. An epidemiological questionnaire and a 12-month follow-up questionnaire were addressed to physicians who prescribed tests that were positive. RESULTS: The annual screening coverage rate increased by 40% during the study period, whereas the number of positive tests fell by 53%. The estimated detection rate of new cases decreased from 43 to 26 per 100 000 inhabitants between 1997 and 2003. In 2003, 56% of serological tests were prescribed to patients who already knew that they were HCV-seropositive. The frequencies of the two main risk factors (transfusion and intravenous drug use) slightly decreased. Management of newly diagnosed patients was inappropriate in 42% of cases in 1997, 33% in 2000, and 34% in 2003; 26% of the participants at the three periods declined follow-up. Among drug users, the proportion of treated patients remained stable (17%). One-third of the drug users were lost to follow-up by their family doctor. CONCLUSION: Campaigns to encourage HCV screening have been effective, but the number of newly diagnosed cases has fallen markedly. National campaigns targeting the general public and healthcare professionals seem to have had no impact on patient management: in particular, drug users still do not receive adequate follow-up.

Interactions among physicians, patients, and first-degree relatives in the familial screening of colorectal cancer in France.

AIMS: To characterize determining factors for compliance with colonoscopy recommendations in the familial screening of colorectal cancer through exploration of individual psychosociological factors and issues relating to patient/physician/sibling communication. METHODS: A qualitative approach involving a review of the literature and interviews with general practitioners, specialists, patients, and their siblings. RESULTS: A confrontation of the content of interviews with data from the literature made it possible to confirm the relevance of classic prevention models, the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior in the French cultural and healthcare environments, as well as their ability to identify the main individual factors liable to motivate or to discourage familial screening. The family network plays a decisive part in the transmission of information from the patient towards siblings. Physicians have expectations relating to communication aids and backup. This study above all highlights the difficulty in determining who is best suited to giving information to the patient, and when and how to relay this information to first-degree relatives. CONCLUSION: In view of the many difficulties in establishing interaction between patient, physician and siblings that is liable to lead on to efficient screening, we propose the study of the usefulness of a health-counseling intervention aimed to tailor and follow-up the delivery of screening information to the first-degree relatives.

Use of replacement blood donors to study the epidemiology of major blood-borne viruses in the general population of Maputo, Mozambique.

The seroprevalence rates of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), human T-cell leukemia/lymphoma virus (HTLV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis D virus (HDV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in Mozambique are poorly documented. The epidemiology of these infections was studied in the Maputo region. All donors attending the blood bank during the study period were interviewed and underwent serological and molecular tests for markers of virus exposure. Thus, 1,578 consecutive replacement blood donors were investigated, as they undergo no selection (other than their relation with a patient needing a transfusion), and may thus provide reliable estimates of the prevalence rates in the general population. The age-standardized prevalence rates among 15- to 49-year-old men and women were, respectively, 12.3 and 15.4% for HIV and 0.9 and 1.2% for HTLV. Low educational status (P = 0.014) and tattooing/scarification (P = 0.023) were predictive of HIV infection in multivariate analysis. The age-adjusted prevalence rates of markers of hepatotropic virus among men and women were, respectively, 10.6 and 4.5% for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), 1.2 and 1.0% for anti-HCV, and 0 and 0% for anti-HDV. Two percent of donors had viral co-infections, involving most frequently the combination of HIV and HBsAg +. A significant association was found between anti-HIV and anti-HBc (P = 0.012). HBsAg was associated with the place of birth (P = 0.011) and a history of transfusion (P = 0.069). Smokers had higher seroprevalence rates than nonsmokers for HIV (P < 0.0001) and HBsAg (P = 0.045). Genotype A was the most frequent HBV genotype (86.3%) followed by E and D. HCV genotypes were 1a, 1b, 3a, and 5a. These results show that HBV vaccination and HIV-preventive measures need to be reinforced in Mozambique.

Management practices for gastrointestinal hemorrhage related to portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients: evaluation of the impact of the Paris consensus workshop.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this before-after observational survey was to evaluate compliance with good clinical practice guidelines for gastrointestinal hemorrhage related to portal hypertension and the impact of the French Consensus Workshop held in Paris in 2003. METHODS: Data were recorded concerning episodes of gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurring in cirrhotic patients using a survey questionnaire in 2003 before the workshop and again in 2004. RESULTS: Seventy-six index episodes were included in 2003 and 84 in 2004 in patients attending French hospitals. Before hospital admission, primary prophylaxis was similar in 2003 and 2004, but beta blockers were used alone more often in 2004 for secondary prophylaxis (42% vs 19%, P=0.018). The time from onset of bleeding to hospital admission was greater than 12 hours for 43 and 42% of patients and was not shorter in the event of recurrent hemorrhage. At admission, vasoactive drugs were given earlier in 2004 (<2h: 68% vs 35%, P<0.001). Use of antibiotic prophylaxis was similar in 2003 and 2004 (70% vs 61%, P=0.098), and was more common for Child-Pugh B or C patients (P=0.044). CONCLUSION: The Paris Consensus Workshop enabled improved clinical practices. Weak points were insufficient screening for cirrhosis, long delay before admission, insufficient use of antibiotic prophylaxis which should be systematic.