Making the rheumatologist aware of patients' non-adherence does not improve medication adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: We have developed an instrument that provides the physician structured information about medication use and patients' (non-)adherence. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of this instrument on adherence and medication beliefs in outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this within-subject controlled prospective cohort study, 50 outpatients were assessed during three consecutive visits to their rheumatologist. At these three points in time, patients' adherence, medication beliefs, satisfaction about information about medication, and physical functioning were measured using validated self-report questionnaires. An intervention was scheduled during the second visit. The intervention consisted of a written report informing the physician about medication use and adherence to medication for each patient. The effectiveness of the intervention was evaluated by comparing outcome measures at the third visit to the same measures assessed prior to the intervention. RESULTS: At baseline, 30% of the patients (n = 50) were non-adherent. No significant changes in adherence were found between the first and second visit prior to the intervention. Adherence did not change after the intervention, compared to both of the adherence assessments prior to the intervention. Beliefs about medication, patients' satisfaction about information on medication, and physical functioning were also not significantly altered. CONCLUSION: Supplying the rheumatologist a report with information about medication use and adherence did not change adherence or patients' beliefs about medication. Further research is necessary to ensure effective support for adherence for individual patients with RA.

Sustained effect after lowering high-dose infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective dose titration study.

OBJECTIVES: In clinical trials only a small subset of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) benefits from higher than standard dose of infliximab (>3 mg/kg/8 weeks). However, dose escalation of infliximab is frequently applied in clinical practice. Individual adjustment of infliximab treatment based on actual disease activity, instead of subjective clinical judgement, could prevent possible unwarranted dose escalation. METHODS: The infliximab dose of all patients with RA treated at our centre was decreased from 5 mg/kg to 3 mg/kg, leaving dosing intervals unaltered. Subsequently patients were followed for at least three infusions. At every visit, 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), infliximab serum trough levels and anti-infliximab antibody levels were assessed. Inversed European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria (flare criteria) were used as the endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were included in the study. Mean (SD) DAS28 scores before dose reduction and after first and second low dose were 3.2 (1.2), 3.2 (1.8) and 3.3 (1.2), respectively (values not significant). One patient (6%, 95% CI 0% to 17%) developed a persistent flare that subsided after increasing infliximab doses and one patient stopped infliximab because of a lupus-like reaction. In all other patients (n=16) lowering infliximab resulted in unaltered disease activity. Infliximab levels showed that most patients had either low- (<1 mg/litre) or high (>5 mg/litre) serum trough levels. Anti-infliximab antibodies were detected in four patients. CONCLUSION: Infliximab dosages of 5 mg/kg can be lowered in the majority of patients with RA using DAS28-guided dose titration without increase of disease activity. Lowering the dose of infliximab should be considered in every patient receiving higher doses infliximab.

Treatment of postoperative bleeding after fondaparinux with rFVIIa and tranexamic acid.

Treatment of a haemorrhagic shock after just a single dose of fondaparinux in an orthopaedic patient with reduced renal clearance is presented. Since all routine haemostatic parameters were nearly normal, single doses of rFVIIa (90 microg/kg) and of tranexamic acid (15 mg/kg) were administered to improve thrombin generation and reduce fibrinolysis. This case is the first showing the effectiveness of combining single doses of rFVIIa and tranexamic acid in controlling severe postoperative bleeding after fondaparinux.

Does ibuprofen increase perioperative blood loss during hip arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prior exposure of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increases perioperative blood loss associated with major orthopaedic surgery. METHODS: Fifty patients scheduled for total hip replacement were allocated to two groups (double blind, randomized manner). All patients were pretreated for 2 weeks before surgery: Group 1 with placebo drug, Group 2 with ibuprofen. All patients were injected intrathecally with bupivacaine 20mg plus morphine 0.1 mg, in a total volume of 4 mL, to provide surgical anaesthesia. RESULTS: The presence of severe adverse effects caused eight patients in the ibuprofen group and six in the placebo group to terminate their participation in the trial. The perioperative blood loss increased by 45% in the ibuprofen group compared with placebo. The total (+/-SD) blood loss in the ibuprofen group was 1161 (+/-472) mL versus 796 (+/-337) mL in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with ibuprofen before elective total hip surgery increases the perioperative blood loss significantly. Early discontinuation of non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is advised.

Itching after intrathecal morphine. Incidence and treatment.

This study was designed to determine whether low doses of intrathecal morphine still result in itching and it evaluates the outcome of a standardized treatment using promethazine and - for intractable itch - naloxone. Patients (n = 143) scheduled for total hip surgery were allocated to four groups (in a double blind manner) with bupivacaine 20 mg in 4 mL but different doses of intrathecal morphine: Group I, 0.025 mg, Group II, 0.05 mg, Group III, 0.1 mg and Group IV, 0.2 mg. The presence or absence of itching was noted every three hours for a 24-h period. When required, standardized treatment was provided. The incidence of itching was: Group I: 14. 3%; Group II: 21.6%; Group III: 48.6%; and, Group IV: 61.7%. Itch was treated by administering promethazine intramuscularly in 2.9% (Group I); 8.1% (Group II); 10.8% (Group III), and 8.9% (Group IV), respectively. Only in group IV there was a single patient who needed naloxone to treat itching. The incidence and severity of itching is a dose-related side-effect in the dose range of 0.025-0.2 mg of intrathecal morphine. Itching still occurs after the low doses of intrathecal morphine, but symptoms vanish after promethazine 25 mg intramuscularly.