Evaluation of urgent esophagectomy in esophageal perforation / Avaliação da esofagectomia de urgência na perfuração esofágica

BACKGROUND: Esophageal trauma is considered one of the most severe lesions of the digestive tract. There is still much controversy in choosing the best treatment for cases of esophageal perforation since that decision involves many variables. The readiness of medical care, the patient's clinical status, the local conditions of the perforated segment, and the severity of the associated injuries must be considered for the most adequate therapeutic choice. AIM: To demonstrate and to analyze the results of urgent esophagectomy in a series of patients with esophageal perforation. METHODS: A retrospective study of 31 patients with confirmed esophageal perforation. Most injuries were due to endoscopic dilatation of benign esophageal disorders, which had evolved with stenosis. The diagnosis of perforation was based on clinical parameters, laboratory tests, and endoscopic images. ‪The main surgical technique used was transmediastinal esophagectomy followed by reconstruction of the digestive tract in a second surgical procedure. Patients were evaluated for the development of systemic and local complications, especially for the dehiscence or stricture of the anastomosis of the cervical esophagus with either the stomach or the transposed colon. RESULTS: Early postoperative evaluation showed a survival rate of 77.1% in relation to the proposed surgery, and 45% of these patients presented no further complications. The other patients had one or more complications, being pulmonary infection and anastomotic fistula the most frequent. The seven patients (22.9%) who underwent esophageal resection 48 hours after the diagnosis died of sepsis. At medium and long-term assessments, most patients reported a good quality of life and full satisfaction regarding the surgery outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the morbidity, emergency esophagectomy has its validity, especially in well indicated cases of esophageal perforation subsequent to endoscopic dilation for ...

RACIONAL: O trauma de esôfago é considerado uma das lesões mais graves do trato digestivo. O tratamento de escolha para casos de perfuração esofágica ainda é controverso, visto que esta decisão envolve inúmeras variáveis. As condições clínicas do paciente, as condições locais no segmento do esôfago perfurado, a gravidade das lesões associadas e o tempo de atendimento são essenciais para que a equipe cirúrgica possa instituir o tratamento adequado. OBJETIVO: Demonstrar e analisar os resultados da esofagectomia de urgência em uma série de pacientes com perfuração do esôfago. MÉTODO: Estudo retrospectivo incluindo 31 pacientes com confirmação diagnóstica de perfuração esofágica. A maior parte das lesões foi consequente à dilatação endoscópica de afecções benignas do esôfago que evoluíram com estenose. O diagnóstico da perfuração foi baseado em parâmetros clínicos, exames laboratoriais, radiológicos e endoscopia digestiva alta. A principal técnica cirúrgica utilizada foi a esofagectomia transmediastinal seguida da reconstrução do trânsito digestivo em um segundo tempo cirúrgico. Os pacientes foram avaliados em relação ao desenvolvimento de complicações sistêmicas e locais, notadamente deiscência e estenose da anastomose do esôfago cervical com o estômago ou cólon transposto. RESULTADOS: A avaliação pós-operatória precoce demonstrou sobrevida de 77,1% em relação ao ato cirúrgico proposto, sendo que 45% não apresentou qualquer complicação. Os outros pacientes apresentaram uma ou mais complicações, sendo a infecção pulmonar e a fístula anastomótica as mais frequentes. Sete pacientes (22,9%) evoluíram a óbito por quadro séptico. Tais pacientes foram submetidos à ressecção esofágica após 48 horas do diagnóstico da perfuração. Na avaliação a médio e longo prazo, a maioria dos pacientes relatou estar satisfeito com o ato cirúrgico, referindo boa qualidade de vida. CONCLUSÕES: Apesar da morbidade não desprezível, a esofagectomia de urgência tem ...

Evaluation of urgent esophagectomy in esophageal perforation.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal trauma is considered one of the most severe lesions of the digestive tract. There is still much controversy in choosing the best treatment for cases of esophageal perforation since that decision involves many variables. The readiness of medical care, the patient's clinical status, the local conditions of the perforated segment, and the severity of the associated injuries must be considered for the most adequate therapeutic choice. AIM: To demonstrate and to analyze the results of urgent esophagectomy in a series of patients with esophageal perforation. METHODS: A retrospective study of 31 patients with confirmed esophageal perforation. Most injuries were due to endoscopic dilatation of benign esophageal disorders, which had evolved with stenosis. The diagnosis of perforation was based on clinical parameters, laboratory tests, and endoscopic images. ‪The main surgical technique used was transmediastinal esophagectomy followed by reconstruction of the digestive tract in a second surgical procedure. Patients were evaluated for the development of systemic and local complications, especially for the dehiscence or stricture of the anastomosis of the cervical esophagus with either the stomach or the transposed colon. RESULTS: Early postoperative evaluation showed a survival rate of 77.1% in relation to the proposed surgery, and 45% of these patients presented no further complications. The other patients had one or more complications, being pulmonary infection and anastomotic fistula the most frequent. The seven patients (22.9%) who underwent esophageal resection 48 hours after the diagnosis died of sepsis. At medium and long-term assessments, most patients reported a good quality of life and full satisfaction regarding the surgery outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the morbidity, emergency esophagectomy has its validity, especially in well indicated cases of esophageal perforation subsequent to endoscopic dilation for benign strictures.

Gastric lipoma presenting as a giant bulging mass in an oligosymptomatic patient: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Lipomas of the gastrointestinal tract are a rare condition. Only 5% are of gastric origin, and this corresponds to 2% to 3% of all benign tumors of the stomach and less than 1% of all gastric neoplasms. It is our purpose to report an unusual presentation of a giant gastric lipoma in an oligosymptomatic patient and highlight the importance of discussing differential diagnosis in this situation. A review of the literature has shown that this is one of the largest gastric lipomas described. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a rare case of a benign gastric tumor with uncommon features in a 63-year-old Caucasian woman. She was admitted with abdominal discomfort, nausea, and upper abdominal fullness after eating. The lesion was suspicious of malignancy because of its dimension and central contrast enhancement on computed tomography. Conventional upper digestive endoscopy revealed a large bulging mass in the gastric posterior wall and three ulcerated areas. In this procedure, a technical limitation due to the location of the mass in the submucosa prevented an adequate biopsy from being obtained. The fragments obtained from the ulcers revealed nothing but necrotic mucosa. Our patient underwent a subtotal gastrectomy and D1 lymphadenectomy with a Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Macroscopic findings revealed a 12 × 8 × 6cm mass with a volume of 576cm3, and the histological pattern demonstrated well-differentiated mature adipose tissue surrounded by a fibrous capsule, confirming the diagnosis of gastric submucosal lipoma. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric lipoma is a rare benign disease that eventually simulates a malignant tumor.

[Secular trends in age at menarche in relation to body mass index]. / Tendência secular da idade da menarca avaliada em relação ao índice de massa corporal.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the secular trend of menarche according to body mass index (BMI). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Six hundred and eighty five girls (7-18 years) assessed in 2001 were compared with 750 evaluated in 2010. They were grouped by BMI Z-score: (thin + normal) and (overweight + obese). Menarche was reported by status quo and age at menarche estimated by a logit model. We used the Qui-square test, Mann-Whitney test, and Logistic Regression, at a 5% significance level. RESULTS: Menarche advanced 3.24 months. There was an increase in obesity, and a decrease of the prevalence of normal girls. Menarche was anticipated by 1.44 month in the thin + normal group and by 5.76 months in the overweight + obese group. There was no interaction between the effects determined by the evaluated period and nutritional diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although both the period and BMI influence the menarche, one cannot attribute this advance only to changes in the nutritional profile of the sample. Other factors that were not tested may also contribute to this finding.

Tendência secular da idade da menarca avaliada em relação ao índice de massa corporal / Secular trends in age at menarche in relation to body mass index

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a tendência secular da menarca de acordo com o índice de massa corporal (IMC). SUJEITOS E MÉTODOS: Seiscentos e oitenta e cinco meninas (7-18 anos) avaliadas em 2001 foram comparadas a 750 avaliadas em 2010. Elas foram agrupadas pelo Z-escore do IMC em: (magreza + eutrofia) e (sobrepeso + obesidade). A menarca foi relatada pelo status quo e a idade, estimada pelo logito. Foram utilizados os testes Qui-quadrado, Mann-Whitney e a Regressão logística, com significância de 5%. RESULTADOS: A menarca adiantou 3,24 meses entre 2001 e 2010. Houve aumento da obesidade e diminuição de eutróficas. O evento antecipou 1,44 mês no grupo magreza + eutrofia e 5,76 meses no sobrepeso + obesidade. Não houve interação entre os efeitos determinados pelo período avaliado e diagnóstico nutricional. CONCLUSÕES: Embora tanto o período quanto o IMC tenham influenciado a menarca, não se pode atribuir essa antecipação só à mudança do perfil nutricional da amostra. Outros fatores não testados podem estar contribuindo também para isso.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the secular trend of menarche according to body mass index (BMI). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Six hundred and eighty five girls (7-18 years) assessed in 2001 were compared with 750 evaluated in 2010. They were grouped by BMI Z-score: (thin + normal) and (overweight + obese). Menarche was reported by status quo and age at menarche estimated by a logit model. We used the Qui-square test, Mann-Whitney test, and Logistic Regression, at a 5% significance level. RESULTS: Menarche advanced 3.24 months. There was an increase in obesity, and a decrease of the prevalence of normal girls. Menarche was anticipated by 1.44 month in the thin + normal group and by 5.76 months in the overweight + obese group. There was no interaction between the effects determined by the evaluated period and nutritional diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although both the period and BMI influence the menarche, one cannot attribute this advance only to changes in the nutritional profile of the sample. Other factors that were not tested may also contribute to this finding.