Prevalence of intrarenal reflux in pediatric patients on contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography.

BACKGROUND: Intrarenal reflux may be seen with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) when contrast from the pelvocalyceal system extends into tubules in the parenchyma. Because intrarenal reflux has been associated with scarring, detecting intrarenal reflux may influence management to avoid renal damage. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the prevalence of intrarenal reflux identified on contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS) and its association with sex, age, grade of VUR, location in kidney and stage of bladder filling or voiding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CeVUS studies performed from August 2019 through July 2020 with VUR were retrospectively reviewed by two pediatric radiologists. They independently graded VUR and assessed for intrarenal reflux, noting its location and stage of bladder filling or voiding during which it occurred. The presence and location of scarring was also recorded. RESULTS: One hundred and six ceVUS exams were reviewed with 211 kidneys evaluated (one solitary kidney). Patients were ages 2 weeks to 12 years (mean: 1.8 years) with 71 females (67%) and 35 males (33%). Grades 2 to 5 VUR were detected in 165 kidneys with intrarenal reflux seen in 42 (25.4%). Intrarenal reflux was present in 1 of 40 kidneys (2.5%) with grade 2, 10 of 67 (14.9%) with grade 3, 25 of 47 (53.2%) with grade 4 and 6 of 11 (54.5%) with grade 5 VUR. Intrarenal reflux occurred during voiding in 31 of 42 kidneys (73.8%) and was seen most often in the lower pole (71.4%) with significant association between intrarenal reflux and interpolar renal scarring (odds ration [OR] 3.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49, 10.32; P-value 0.01). CONCLUSION: Intrarenal reflux was often seen on ceVUS, with the highest frequency occurring in young patients with grades 4 and 5 VUR and during voiding. Radiologists should have a high index of suspicion for intrarenal reflux on ceVUS, especially in young children with high-grade VUR.

Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma, Version 3.2021.

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a highly curable form of cancer, and current treatment regimens are focused on improving treatment efficacy while decreasing the risk of late effects of treatment. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for pediatric HL provide recommendations on the workup, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment of classic HL, including principles of pathology, imaging, staging, systemic therapy, and radiation therapy. This portion of the NCCN Guidelines focuses on the management of pediatric classic HL in the upfront and relapsed/refractory settings.

Assessment of distal ureteral and ureterovesical junction visualization on contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography.

BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (CEVUS) uses intravesically administered microbubble contrast to detect vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and urethral anomalies with ultrasound. Multiple studies have suggested CEVUS can replace voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) as a radiation-free alternative. Analysis of the ureterovesical junction and ureters on VCUG documenting the ureterovesical junction position, ureteral duplication, periureteral diverticula and ureteroceles is important as anatomical variations may affect management and surgical approach. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to assess distal ureteral and ureterovesical junction region visualization in children with VUR detected on CEVUS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CEVUS studies performed between June 2018 and March 2019 with reported VUR were retrospectively reviewed by two pediatric radiologists to confirm VUR and to qualitatively assess the ureterovesical junction region for each renal moiety using a 3-point scale for clear, limited or absent visualization of the distal ureter, ureterovesical junction, ureteral duplication, periureteral diverticula and ureteroceles. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies with VUR on CEVUS were identified. Sixty-seven renal moieties were evaluated including a solitary kidney in one child. VUR was detected in 52 moieties by reader 1 and in 53 by reader 2. A single moiety with discrepancy between readers regarding VUR was excluded from statistical analysis. No diverticula were detected by either reader and one ureterocele was detected by both readers. Visualization of the ureterovesical junction was described as clear in 5/52, limited in 14/52 and absent in 33/52 refluxing renal moieties by reader 1 and as clear in 12/52, limited in 20/52 and absent in 20/52 by reader 2. The ureterovesical junction was clearly visualized in 5/52 (9.6%) by reader 1 and 12/52 (23.1%) by reader 2. The Kappa value of -0.29 (confidence interval [CI] -0.25, 0.21) reveals a lack of agreement between the readers for clear versus limited or absent ureterovesical junction visualization. Distal ureteral visualization was described as clear in 14/52, limited in 16/52 and absent in 22/52 refluxing renal moieties by reader 1 and as clear in 27/52, limited in 7/52 and absent in 18/52 by reader 2. The distal ureter was clearly visualized in 14/52 (26.9%) by reader 1 and 27/52 (51.9%) by reader 2. The Kappa of 0.43 (CI 0.22, 0.64) reveals moderate agreement between the readers for clear versus limited or absent distal ureteral visualization. Duplication of the renal collecting system was identified in 13/52 refluxing kidneys by reader 1 and 11/52 refluxing kidneys by reader 2. Visualization of ureteral duplication was described as clear in 9, limited in 4 and absent in 39 of 52 refluxing renal moieties by reader 1 and as clear in 9, limited in 2 and absent in 41 by reader 2. Ureteral duplication was clearly visualized in 9/52 (17.3%) by reader 1 and 9/52 (17.3%) by reader 2. Kappa of 0.87 (CI 0.68, 1) reveals high agreement between the readers for clear versus limited or absent identification of ureteral duplication. CONCLUSION: The distal ureter and ureterovesical junction region frequently are not clearly visualized in refluxing renal moieties on CEVUS. Awareness of this limitation is important as there may be implications when evaluating patients for surgical management of VUR.

Alvarado Scores Predict Additive Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Workup of Suspected Appendicitis in Children.

BACKGROUND: The presentation of appendicitis in pediatrics is variable, and diagnostic imaging is often used. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is replacing computed tomography in some centers, particularly after a nondiagnostic ultrasound (NDUS). Nonetheless, MRI is not widely used in this setting because of cost, procedure time, institutional capacity, and high rates of negative scans. We hypothesized that the Alvarado Score (AS) could be used to determine the additive diagnostic value of MRI after an NDUS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients aged ≤18 y at a single tertiary care children's hospital who received an ultrasound for suspected appendicitis during 10 consecutive months in 2017. NDUS were defined as nonvisualization of the appendix or secondary signs without radiologic diagnosis. AS were retrospectively calculated from the electronic medical record. Primary outcomes were pathology-confirmed appendicitis, appendectomy, and perforation. RESULTS: AS was determined for 352 patients out of 463 who met inclusion criteria (76%). Sixty-two percent had an NDUS, and 45% of these patients received MRI. Patients with high-risk AS were significantly more likely to have MRI diagnostic of appendicitis (P = 0.0015), and low-risk AS patients were more likely to have a negative or equivocal MRI (P = 0.0169). Twenty-one MRI scans were required per each additional diagnosis of appendicitis in patients with low AS after NDUS versus 4.2 in intermediate-risk AS patients and 2.1 in high-risk AS patients. CONCLUSIONS: Risk stratification with AS can help assess the additive diagnostic utility of MRI after NDUS. MRI may be overutilized for diagnosing acute appendicitis in pediatric patients with low-risk AS.

Evaluation of a pediatric fluoroscopy training module to improve performance of upper gastrointestinal procedures in neonates with bilious emesis.

BACKGROUND: Life-threatening midgut volvulus usually occurs in infants with malrotation and requires rapid diagnosis and surgical treatment to prevent bowel necrosis and death. However, because of the low frequency of upper gastrointestinal studies performed in infants younger than 1 month, many diagnostic radiology residents finish their residency training having limited or no opportunity to perform or observe an upper gastrointestinal (GI) series for evaluation of bilious emesis in a neonate. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adding simulated upper GI series on neonates with bilious emesis to the curriculum improves residents' skill and accuracy in diagnosing midgut volvulus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed the performance of 12 residents in training whose curriculum included simulated upper GI series (study group) and 10 traditionally trained residents (control group) using a multiple-choice test, checklist procedure evaluation and diagnostic accuracy scores for 3 randomly selected simulated upper GI series. We then compared the results from the study group that had simulation curriculum to the scores for the control group using the Mann-Whitney test. We also analyzed the scores for the study group obtained prior to and after simulation curriculum using Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in test scores (study group median = 84.5%, control group median = 67.2%, P=0.001), overall diagnostic accuracy (study group median = 100%, control group median = 50%, P=0.011) and checklist evaluation (study group median = 83.3%, control group median = 70.8%, P=0.025) for the residents in the study group who completed simulation curriculum compared with the control group. There was also a significant difference in multiple-choice test scores for the study group before and after completion of simulation curriculum (before simulation curriculum median = 56.9%, after simulation curriculum median = 84.5%, P=0.002), checklist evaluation (before simulation curriculum median = 58.3%, after simulation curriculum median = 83.3%, P=0.002) and overall diagnostic accuracy scores (before simulation curriculum median = 50%, after simulation curriculum median = 100%, P=0.024). CONCLUSION: Radiology residents had significantly higher scores on a multiple-choice test, checklist procedure evaluation and overall diagnostic accuracy after completing a structured pediatric fluoroscopy curriculum that included simulated neonatal upper GI series and when compared to a control group of traditionally trained residents.

Upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopic simulator for neonates with bilious emesis.

Prompt diagnosis of malrotation and midgut volvulus in infants with bilious emesis is critical. However because of the limited frequency of pediatric upper gastrointestinal (UGI) fluoroscopic procedures in neonates, many diagnostic radiology residents complete their training never having seen or performed a UGI on a baby for evaluation of malrotation and midgut volvulus. A UGI simulation model for infants with bilious emesis was created to supplement the hands-on fluoroscopic experience of residents in training. We are now studying the addition of simulated UGI studies to our pediatric radiology curriculum.

Fluoroscopy screen time during contrast enema for the evaluation and treatment of intussusception.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe fluoroscopy screen time (FST) for children undergoing contrast enema (CE) for suspected intussusception. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of children younger than 7 years examined for intussusception by CE. We reviewed medical records for demographics, radiographic results, and FST. We used nonparametric descriptive statistical tests and calculated odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: The median FST for 457 included CEs was 116 seconds. The median FST for positive CEs (n = 194) was 138 seconds (95% confidence interval [CI], 126-152); for negative CEs (n = 250), 86 seconds (95% CI, 78-102); and for uncertain studies (n = 13), 138 seconds (95% CI, 89-208) (P < 0.01). There was no difference in median FST if symptoms were present 24 hours or less versus longer than 24 hours. There was no difference between contrast types. Median FST for successful reductions was 122 seconds (95% CI, 114-138). In cases of failed reductions, median FST for those undergoing surgery was 277 seconds (95% CI, 195-370) and 175 seconds (95% CI, 128-271) (P < 0.01) for those undergoing delayed repeat CE. The OR for receiving a repeat CE was 1.3 (95% CI, 1.1-1.4; P < 0.01) for every minute of FST. The OR for undergoing surgical reduction was 1.3 (95% CI, 1.2-1.5; P < 0.01) for every minute of FST and 3.7 (95% CI, 2.0-6.9; P < 0.01) for FST longer than 3 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopy screen time for the evaluation and diagnosis of intussusception is shorter than that previously described. When an initial screening ultrasound is not available or nondiagnostic and the suspicion is high, further evaluation with a CE may be warranted because the radiation exposure is likely lower than that previously reported.

Factors influencing subspecialty choice among radiology residents: a case study of pediatric radiology.

PURPOSE: Persistent workforce shortages exist in some radiology subspecialties. Residents' motivations for selecting particular fellowships, as well as their perceptions of the subspecialty fields, heavily influence the supply of new radiologists to these areas. The authors investigated the factors residents consider most important in subspecialty choice, fellowship choice patterns between 1999 and 2008, and changes that might attract residents to one particular shortage field: pediatric radiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online questionnaire was developed and sent to 1,000 radiology trainees in the United States using contact information from the ACR's national resident database. Anonymized responses were evaluated using analysis of variance and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Leading factors for fellowship selection were "area of strong personal interest," "advanced/multimodality imaging," and "intellectual challenge." Compensation ranked low, 13th among 20 factors. Large shifts in subspecialty preference were seen between 1999 and 2008. Those with a pediatric radiology preference ranked "physician-physician interaction," "physician-patient contact," and "altruism" higher than respondents selecting other subspecialties. Respondents believed that pediatric radiologists make less money than other subspecialists ($325,000 vs $385,000 per year). There was no association between choosing pediatric radiology and gender, age, research plans, or parental status. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple factors account for subspecialty selection among residents, and it is useful to understand these factors when attempting to recruit residents to specific subspecialties. To ease the workforce shortage in pediatric radiology, advanced and varied imaging modalities, numerous job opportunities, and well-paid private practice positions should be emphasized to residents.

Contrast enema in children with Henoch-Schönlein purpura.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: There are references in the medical literature that Henoch-Schönle purpura (HSP) and abdominal pain are contraindictions to performing contrast enemas (CEs) for diagnosis and possible reduction of intussusceptions. We investigated the safety of performing CEs in patients with abdominal pain and HSP. METHODS: A retrospective chart review and literature search were conducted. RESULTS: CEs were not associated with complications in patients with HSP and abdominal pain and intussusceptions. CONCLUSIONS: CEs are safe to perform in patients with HSP and suspected intussusceptions and may be useful for diagnosis and treatment.