The type 2 diabetes-associated gene ide is required for insulin secretion and suppression of α-synuclein levels in ß-cells.

Genome-wide association studies have identified several type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk loci linked to impaired ß-cell function. The identity and function of the causal genes in these susceptibility loci remain, however, elusive. The HHEX/IDE T2D locus is associated with decreased insulin secretion in response to oral glucose stimulation in humans. Here we have assessed ß-cell function in Ide knockout (KO) mice. We find that glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) is decreased in Ide KO mice due to impaired replenishment of the releasable pool of granules and that the Ide gene is haploinsufficient. We also show that autophagic flux and microtubule content are reduced in ß-cells of Ide KO mice. One important cellular role for IDE involves the neutralization of amyloidogenic proteins, and we find that α-synuclein and IDE levels are inversely correlated in ß-cells of Ide KO mice and T2D patients. Moreover, we provide evidence that both gain and loss of function of α-synuclein in ß-cells in vivo impair not only GSIS but also autophagy. Together, these data identify the Ide gene as a regulator of GSIS, suggest a molecular mechanism for ß-cell degeneration as a consequence of Ide deficiency, and corroborate and extend a previously established important role for α-synuclein in ß-cell function.

A hyper-mutant of the unusual sigma70-Pr promoter bypasses synergistic ppGpp/DksA co-stimulation.

The activities of promoters can be temporally and conditionally regulated by mechanisms other than classical DNA-binding repressors and activators. One example is the inherently weak σ(70)-dependent Pr promoter that ultimately controls catabolism of phenolic compounds. The activity of Pr is up-regulated through the joint action of ppGpp and DksA that enhance the performance of RNA polymerase at this promoter. Here, we report a mutagenesis analysis that revealed substantial differences between Pr and other ppGpp/DksA co-stimulated promoters. In vitro transcription and RNA polymerase binding assays show that it is the T at the -11 position of the extremely suboptimal -10 element of Pr that underlies both poor binding of σ(70)-RNAP and a slow rate of open complex formation--the process that is accelerated by ppGpp and DksA. Our findings support the idea that collaborative action of ppGpp and DksA lowers the rate-limiting transition energy required for conversion between intermediates on the road to open complex formation.

sigma54-promoter discrimination and regulation by ppGpp and DksA.

The sigma(54)-factor controls expression of a variety of genes in response to environmental cues. Much previous work has implicated the nucleotide alarmone ppGpp and its co-factor DksA in control of sigma(54)-dependent transcription in the gut commensal Escherichia coli, which has evolved to live under very different environmental conditions than Pseudomonas putida. Here we compared ppGpp/DksA mediated control of sigma(54)-dependent transcription in these two organisms. Our in vivo experiments employed P. putida mutants and manipulations of factors implicated in ppGpp/DksA mediated control of sigma(54)-dependent transcription in combination with a series of sigma(54)-promoters with graded affinities for sigma(54)-RNA polymerase. For in vitro analysis we used a P. putida-based reconstituted sigma(54)-transcription assay system in conjunction with DNA-binding plasmon resonance analysis of native and heterologous sigma(54)-RNA polymerase holoenzymes. In comparison with E. coli, ppGpp/DksA responsive sigma(54)-transcription in the environmentally adaptable P. putida was found to be more robust under low energy conditions that occur upon nutrient depletion. The mechanism behind this difference can be traced to reduced promoter discrimination of low affinity sigma(54)-promoters that is conferred by the strong DNA binding properties of the P. putida sigma(54)-RNA polymerase holoenzyme.

sigma54-RNA polymerase controls sigma70-dependent transcription from a non-overlapping divergent promoter.

Divergent transcription of a regulatory gene and a cognate promoter under its control is a common theme in bacterial regulatory circuits. This genetic organization is found for the dmpR gene that encodes the substrate-responsive specific regulator of the sigma(54)-dependent Po promoter, which controls (methyl)phenol catabolism. Here we identify the Pr promoter of dmpR as a sigma(70)-dependent promoter that is regulated by a novel mechanism in which sigma(54)-RNA polymerase occupancy of the non-overlapping sigma(54)-Po promoter stimulates sigma(70)-Pr output. In addition, we show that DmpR stimulates its own production through Po activity both in vivo and in vitro. Hence, the demonstrated regulatory circuit reveals a novel role for sigma(54)-RNA polymerase, namely regulation of a sigma(70)-dependent promoter, and a new mechanism that places a single promoter under dual control of two alternative forms of RNA polymerase. We present a model in which guanosine tetra-phosphate plays a major role in the interplay between sigma(54)- and sigma(70)-dependent transcription to ensure metabolic integration to couple sigma(70)-Pr output to both low-energy conditions and the presence of substrate.

Properties of RNA polymerase bypass mutants: implications for the role of ppGpp and its co-factor DksA in controlling transcription dependent on sigma54.

The bacterial nutritional and stress alarmone ppGpp and its co-factor DksA directly bind RNA polymerase to regulate its activity at certain sigma70-dependent promoters. A number of promoters that are dependent on alternative sigma-factors function poorly in the absence of ppGpp. These include the Pseudomonas-derived sigma54-dependent Po promoter and several other sigma54-promoters, the transcription from which is essentially abolished in Escherichia coli devoid of ppGpp and DksA. However, ppGpp and DksA have no apparent effect on reconstituted in vitro sigma54-transcription, which suggests an indirect mechanism of control. Here we report analysis of five hyper-suppressor mutants within the beta- and beta'-subunits of core RNA polymerase that allow high levels of transcription from the sigma54-Po promoter in the absence of ppGpp. Using in vitro transcription and competition assays, we present evidence that these core RNA polymerase mutants are defective in one or both of two properties that could combine to explain their hyper-suppressor phenotypes: (i) modulation of competitive association with sigma-factors to favor sigma54-holoenzyme formation over that with sigma70, and (ii) reduced innate stability of RNA polymerase-promoter complexes, which mimics the essential effects of ppGpp and DksA for negative regulation of stringent sigma70-promoters. Both these properties of the mutant holoenzymes support a recently proposed mechanism for regulation of sigma54-transcription that depends on the potent negative effects of ppGpp and DksA on transcription from powerful stringent sigma70-promoters, and suggests that stringent regulation is a key mechanism by which the activity of alternative sigma-factors is controlled to meet cellular requirements.

The guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) alarmone, DksA and promoter affinity for RNA polymerase in regulation of sigma-dependent transcription.

The RNA polymerase-binding protein DksA is a cofactor required for guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp)-responsive control of transcription from sigma70 promoters. Here we present evidence: (i) that both DksA and ppGpp are required for in vivo sigma54 transcription even though they do not have any major direct effects on sigma54 transcription in reconstituted in vitro transcription and sigma-factor competition assays, (ii) that previously defined mutations rendering the housekeeping sigma70 less effective at competing with sigma54 for limiting amounts of core RNA polymerase similarly suppress the requirement for DksA and ppGpp in vivo and (iii) that the extent to which ppGpp and DksA affect transcription from sigma54 promoters in vivo reflects the innate affinity of the promoters for sigma54-RNA polymerase holoenzyme in vitro. Based on these findings, we propose a passive model for ppGpp/DksA regulation of sigma54-dependent transcription that depends on the potent negative effects of these regulatory molecules on transcription from powerful stringently regulated sigma70 promoters.

The role of the alarmone (p)ppGpp in sigma N competition for core RNA polymerase.

Some promoters, including the DmpR-controlled sigma(N)-dependent Po promoter, are effectively rendered silent in cells lacking the nutritional alarmone (p)ppGpp. Here we demonstrate that four mutations within the housekeeping sigma(D)-factor can restore sigma(N)-dependent Po transcription in the absence of (p)ppGpp. Using both in vitro and in vivo transcription competition assays, we show that all the four sigma(D) mutant proteins are defective in their ability to compete with sigma(N) for available core RNA polymerase and that the magnitude of the defect reflects the hierarchy of restoration of transcription from Po in (p)ppGpp-deficient cells. Consistently, underproduction of sigma(D) or overproduction of the anti-sigma(D) protein Rsd were also found to allow (p)ppGpp-independent transcription from the sigma(N)-Po promoter. Together with data from the direct effects of (p)ppGpp on sigma(N)-dependent Po transcription and sigma-factor competition, the results support a model in which (p)ppGpp serves as a master global regulator of transcription by differentially modulating alternative sigma-factor competition to adapt to changing cellular nutritional demands.

Integration of global regulation of two aromatic-responsive sigma(54)-dependent systems: a common phenotype by different mechanisms.

Pseudomonas-derived regulators DmpR and XylR are structurally and mechanistically related sigma(54)-dependent activators that control transcription of genes involved in catabolism of aromatic compounds. The binding of distinct sets of aromatic effectors to these regulatory proteins results in release of a repressive interdomain interaction and consequently allows the activators to promote transcription from their cognate target promoters. The DmpR-controlled Po promoter region and the XylR-controlled Pu promoter region are also similar, although homology is limited to three discrete DNA signatures for binding sigma(54) RNA polymerase, the integration host factor, and the regulator. These common properties allow cross-regulation of Pu and Po by DmpR and XylR in response to appropriate aromatic effectors. In vivo, transcription of both the DmpR/Po and XylR/Pu regulatory circuits is subject to dominant global regulation, which results in repression of transcription during growth in rich media. Here, we comparatively assess the contribution of (p)ppGpp, the FtsH protease, and a component of an alternative phosphoenolpyruvate-sugar phosphotransferase system, which have been independently implicated in mediating this level of regulation. Further, by exploiting the cross-regulatory abilities of these two circuits, we identify the target component(s) that are intercepted in each case. The results show that (i) contrary to previous speculation, FtsH is not universally required for transcription of sigma(54)-dependent systems; (ii) the two factors found to impact the XylR/Pu regulatory circuit do not intercept the DmpR/Po circuit; and (iii) (p)ppGpp impacts the DmpR/Po system to a greater extent than the XylR/Pu system in both the native Pseudomonas putida and a heterologous Escherichia coli host. The data demonstrate that, despite the similarities of the specific regulatory circuits, the host global regulatory network latches onto and dominates over these specific circuits by exploiting their different properties. The mechanistic implications of how each of the host factors exerts its action are discussed.