Prehospital Use of Ketamine: Effectiveness in Critically Ill and Injured Patients.

BACKGROUND: The military use of ketamine is well established. The benefits of prehospital civilian use have not been extensively reported. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients with prehospital ketamine use in Mayo One's air and critical care ground transport. RESULTS: The medical records were reviewed from 2014 to 2016 to assess the efficacy of Ketamine. During this time frame, 158 (167 instances) patients were treated with ketamine for analgesia (38%), sedation (44%), or procedural (18%) use. The patient population had a mean age of 49 (range: 1-100), with 105 (67%) male patients. Indications included trauma (69%), which was further broken down into blunt (57%), penetrating (4%), and miscellaneous (8%), and medical illness (31%). The mean ketamine dose was 52.6 mg (range: 5-200 mg) via intravenous route. Ketamine was utilized in 61% of patients after other medications were ineffective. Overall success rate was 98%. Mean pain scale before and after ketamine use was 9/10 and 3/10, respectively. Ketamine use increased yearly from 21 (13%) in 2014, 56 (36%) in 2015, and 81 (51%) in 2016. CONCLUSION: Prehospital ketamine use is effective alone or in conjunction with other medications for analgesia, sedation, and procedural use in trauma and critically ill patients with minimal hemodynamic and respiratory consequences.

Prehospital Blood Product Administration Opportunities in Ground Transport ALS EMS - A Descriptive Study.

IntroductionHemorrhage remains the major cause of preventable death after trauma. Recent data suggest that earlier blood product administration may improve outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether opportunities exist for blood product transfusion by ground Emergency Medical Services (EMS). METHODS: This was a single EMS agency retrospective study of ground and helicopter responses from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 for adult trauma patients transported from the scene of injury who met predetermined hemodynamic (HD) parameters for potential transfusion (heart rate [HR]≥120 and/or systolic blood pressure [SBP]≤90). RESULTS: A total of 7,900 scene trauma ground transports occurred during the study period. Of 420 patients meeting HD criteria for transfusion, 53 (12.6%) had a significant mechanism of injury (MOI). Outcome data were available for 51 patients; 17 received blood products during their emergency department (ED) resuscitation. The percentage of patients receiving blood products based upon HD criteria ranged from 1.0% (HR) to 5.9% (SBP) to 38.1% (HR+SBP). In all, 74 Helicopter EMS (HEMS) transports met HD criteria for blood transfusion, of which, 28 patients received prehospital blood transfusion. Statistically significant total patient care time differences were noted for both the HR and the SBP cohorts, with HEMS having longer time intervals; no statistically significant difference in mean total patient care time was noted in the HR+SBP cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In this study population, HD parameters alone did not predict need for ED blood product administration. Despite longer transport times, only one-third of HEMS patients meeting HD criteria for blood administration received prehospital transfusion. While one-third of ground Advanced Life Support (ALS) transport patients manifesting HD compromise received blood products in the ED, this represented 0.2% of total trauma transports over the study period. Given complex logistical issues involved in prehospital blood product administration, opportunities for ground administration appear limited within the described system. MixFM, ZielinskiMD, MyersLA, BernsKS, LukeA, StubbsJR, ZietlowSP, JenkinsDH, SztajnkrycerMD. Prehospital blood product administration opportunities in ground transport ALS EMS - a descriptive study. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(3):230-236.