History of C2 monitoring in heart and liver transplant patients treated with cyclosporine microemulsion.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of CsA has evolved since the introduction of CsA microemulsion. The purpose of the present review is to summarize the history of CsA concentration 2 hours postdose (C2) monitoring in heart and liver transplantation. C2 has been shown to be the best single time point that correlates with the area-under-the-curve, with a correlation coefficient (r2) ranging between .83 and.93. C2 monitoring (300 to 600 ng/mL) has resulted in a significant clinical benefit in long-term heart and liver transplant patients compared to trough level (C0) monitoring. Moreover, a C2 range of 300 to 600 ng/mL resulted in a similar calcineurin inhibition compared to a C2 range of 700 to 1000 ng/mL or a C0 range of 100 to 200 ng/mL while being less injurious to renal function. In de novo liver transplant patients not receiving induction therapy, the achievement of a target C2 of 850 to 1400 ng/mL by postoperative day 3 has resulted in a low acute rejection rate. Furthermore, C2 monitoring has been associated with a lower rejection rate in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-negative patients and with an overall lesser severity of acute rejection compared to C0 monitoring. In de novo heart transplant patients who receive antithymocyte globulin induction, a lower C2 range may be sufficient to prevent rejection and renal dysfunction. Future studies should help to fine-tune the optimal C2 range in heart or liver transplant patients receiving induction therapy and different maintenance immunosuppressive combinations.

Effects of chronic N-acetylcysteine treatment on the actions of peroxynitrite on aortic vascular reactivity in hypertensive rats.

BACKGROUND: Peroxynitrite (ONOO-), the product of superoxide and nitric oxide, seems to be involved in vascular alterations in hypertension. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of ONOO- on endothelium-dependent and independent aortic vascular responsiveness, oxidized/reduced glutathione balance (GSSG/GSH), malondialdehyde aortic content, and the formation of 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT), a stable marker of ONOO-, in N-acetylcysteine (NAC)-treated normotensive Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). RESULTS: In SHR only, NAC significantly reduced heart rate and systolic, but not diastolic, blood pressure. It also improved endothelium-dependent aortic relaxation in SHR, but not after exposure to ONOO-. Endothelium-dependent and independent aortic relaxations were markedly impaired by ONOO- in both strains of rat. NAC partially protected SHR against the ONOO- -induced reduction in endothelium-independent relaxation. Aortic GSSG/GSH ratio and malondialdehyde, which were higher in SHR than in WKY rats, showed a greater increase in SHR after exposure to ONOO-. NAC decreased GSSG/GSH and malondialdehyde in both strains of rat before and after exposure to ONOO-. The 3-NT concentration, which was similar in both strains of rat under basal conditions, was greater in SHR than in WKY rats after the addition of ONOO-, with a reduction only in NAC-treated SHR. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest an increased vulnerability of SHR aortas to the effects of ONOO- as compared with those of WKY rats. The selective improvements produced by NAC, in systolic arterial pressure, heart rate, aortic endothelial function, ONOO- -induced impairment of endothelium-independent relaxation, aortic GSSG/GSH balance, malondialdehyde content and 3-NT formation in SHR suggest that chronic administration of NAC may have a protective effect against aortic vascular dysfunction in the SHR model of hypertension.

Nonlinear kinetics and pharmacologic response to mibefradil.

BACKGROUND: Increasing oral doses of mibefradil (10 to 320 mg) decrease its apparent oral clearance; however, intravenous doses up to 80 mg do not reduce its systemic clearance. This study aimed to understand the mechanisms underlying the zero-order kinetics of mibefradil. METHODS: A group of 10 normotensive volunteers received 50 mg/day oral mibefradil for 8 days and, on days 1 and 8, 5 mg deuterated mibefradil by infusion. Ten additional volunteers observed the same protocol with a daily oral dose of 100 mg mibefradil. Serial blood samples were withdrawn, and mibefradil plasma concentrations were assayed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured for 4 hours, and an ECG was performed 2 hours after drug administration. RESULTS: Repeated oral administration of 50 mg mibefradil generated zero-order kinetics secondary to a decrease in mibefradil systemic clearance. Compared with the 50-mg dose, single and repeated oral doses of 100 mg further decreased mibefradil clearance. Mibefradil bioavailability was not affected by increasing mibefradil doses. Mean diastolic blood pressure was decreased by single and repeated doses of 100 mg to the same extent. Repeated doses of 100 mg reduced heart rate and prolonged the PR and QTc, changes that were associated with mibefradil plasma concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated doses of 50 mg or doses of 100 mg mibefradil generated zero-order kinetics secondary to a decrease in hepatic extraction of the drug. Zero-order kinetics did not affect the response-concentration relationship of mibefradil.

Effect of antioxidant treatments on nitrate tolerance development in normotensive and hypertensive rats.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of chronic antioxidant treatments on the development of nitrate tolerance in spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats by evaluating (i) coronary vascular reactivity, (ii) lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde), and (iii) peroxynitrite formation (3-nitrotyrosine). METHODS: Tolerance was induced in 16-week-old male SHR and WKY, by 4 days of continuous treatment with nitroglycerin patches. Two groups were orally pre-treated (2-weeks) with antioxidants: N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) or melatonin. Effects of serotonin (5-HT) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) perfusion were tested in isolated Langendorff-perfused hearts. 3-Nitrotyrosine levels were measured in coronary sinus effluent and malondialdehyde in plasma. RESULTS: Nitrate tolerance reduced SNP-induced dilation in both strains. This alteration was differently improved by antioxidants: melatonin was effective in SHR, whereas NAC was effective in WKY. Tolerance also reduced 5-HT-mediated vasodilation in WKY, which was reversed by both antioxidants. By contrast, nitrate tolerance enhanced the vasoconstriction to 5-HT in SHR and both antioxidants prevented this response. Furthermore, tolerance was associated with higher malondialdehyde levels in both strains and with higher 3-nitrotyrosine levels in SHR. These changes were reversed by both antioxidants. CONCLUSIONS: A participation of oxidative stress was suggested during nitrate tolerance development, since antioxidants prevented the increase in lipid peroxidation and improved vascular responses to SNP and 5HT. Differential effects of antioxidants on SNP-induced vasodilation in SHR and WKY may suggest distinct mechanisms of tolerance development in hearts from hypertensive and normotensive rats. An increased peroxynitrite generation, expressed by higher 3-nitrotyrosine levels, could contribute to nitrate tolerance in the coronary circulation of SHR.

Two-hour cyclosporine level determination is the appropriate tool to monitor Neoral therapy.

To assess the safety profile of Neoral dose adjustment using cyclosporine (CsA) trough levels (C0) compared with levels obtained 2 h after the morning dose (C2), 30 stable adult heart transplant patients 1 yr or more after surgery were converted from Sandimmune to Neoral. After a baseline visit (before conversion), initial follow-up included two visits (2 and 4-6 wk after conversion). After the first visit, patients were randomized to Group I (C0: 100-200 ng/ml) or Group II (C2: 200-400 ng/ml). Abbreviated pharmacokinetics were obtained for the estimation of the AUC0-4 h. Renal function was assessed by serum creatinine and the cimetidine-modified creatinine clearance. C2 correlated better than C0 with the AUC0-4 h (r = 0.91 vs. 0.63). Initial Neoral dose (mg/kg/d) was similar in both groups (2.8 +/- 0.5 and 2.8 +/- 0.8), and was lower in Group II at the second visit (2.0 +/- 0.7 vs. 3.0 +/- 0.6, p = 0.0001). C2 levels decreased in Group II from 912 +/- 438 to 555 +/- 271 ng/ml (p = 0.01), without evidence of acute rejection on endomyocardial biopsies. After the second visit,-both groups were monitored with C2, and the range was increased to 300-600 ng/ml. At the last visit (additional follow-up of 5 +/- 1 months), Neoral dose (mg/kg/d) was reduced to 2.0 +/- 0.3 in Group I (p < 0.001) and 1.8 +/- 0.4 in Group II. Serum creatinine was lower in Group II at the second visit (138 +/- 59 vs. 168 +/- 37 mumol/L, p = 0.01) and was similar in both groups at the last visit. Neoral dose reduction based on C2 levels was not associated with acute rejection. The better correlation with the AUC0-4 h suggests that C2 may be more reliable than C0 for Neoral dose adjustment.

Comparison of neoral dose monitoring with cyclosporine through levels versus 2-hr postdose levels in stable liver transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: We reported that cyclosporine 2-hr postdose levels (C2) correlate better with the AUC0-4 hr than trough levels (C0) in heart transplant patients receiving Neoral. METHODS: We compared Neoral dose adjustment with C0 (group 1: 100-200 ng/ml) vs. C2 (group 2: 700-1000 ng/ml; group 3: 300-600 ng/ml) in 35 stable adult patients >1 year after liver transplantation. The AUC0-4hr was calculated, and simultaneous blood samples were obtained to measure calcineurin inhibition. Clinical benefit was defined as the absence of rejection and no increase in serum creatinine at the 7-month follow-up. RESULTS: C2 correlated better with the AUC0-4 hr than C0 (r=0.92 vs. r=0.40). Neoral dose increased by 17% and 39% in groups 1 and 2, and decreased by 18% in group 3 (P=0.002 vs. group 1 and P=0.0004 vs. group 2). Serum creatinine increased by 2.1% and 16% in groups 1 and 2, and decreased by 5.1% in group 3 (P=0.006 vs. group 2). A clinical benefit was observed in 37.5%, 23%, and 82% of patients in groups 1, 2, and 3 (P=0.03 vs. group 1 and P=0.01 vs. group 2). Calcineurin inhibition was similar in all groups at 2-hr (44+/-17%, 39+/-30%, and 44+/-35%), in spite of different Neoral doses (2.9+/-0.9, 4.0+/-1.8, and 2.6+/-1.3 mg/kg/day) and C2 (857+/-226, 922+/-274, and 588+/-274 ng/ml). CONCLUSIONS: C2 correlated better with the AUC0-4 hr than C0. Neoral dose monitoring with a C2 range of 300-600 ng/ml resulted in a lower dose and greater clinical benefit compared to C0 or a higher C2 in stable liver transplant patients. The correlation between calcineurin inhibition and clinical events deserves further research.

Efficacy and side-effects of cyclosporine dose monitoring with levels 6 h after the morning dose in heart transplant patients.

The purpose of this study was to compare CsA dose monitoring with trough levels (T0) vs. levels obtained 6 h after the morning dose of CsA (T6), with respect to the incidence of acute rejection and renal dysfunction, and the cumulative dose, as well as the cost of CsA after heart transplantation. Twenty consecutive adult heart transplant patients receiving quadruple sequential immunosuppression were prospectively randomized into CsA monitoring with T0 (Group I) vs. T6 levels (Group II). Oral CsA was started at a dosage of 2 mg/kg/d, 1-4 d after transplantation. The target range for either T0 or T6 was 150 to 250 ng/ml (enzyme multiplied immunologic technique), respectively. The CsA dose was increased or decreased by 0.5-1 mg/kg/d if the measured level was outside of the target range. Throughout the follow-up period (Group I, 11 +/- 2 months; Group II, 10 +/- 3 months), the incidence of acute rejection (ISHLT grade > or = 2) was 50% in each group. The left ventricular ejection fraction and serum creatinine were similar in both groups at 1 month and at the end of the follow-up. The maximal dose of CsA (mg/kg/d): 3.8 +/- 1 vs. 5 +/- 0.6 (P = 0.002), the minimal dose: 2.2 +/- 0.7 vs. 3.4 +/- 0.8 (P = 0.003), and the current dose: 2.6 +/- 0.6 vs. 3.5 +/- 1 (P = 0.02), were lower in Group II, as well as the cumulative dose of CsA (mg): 61,790 +/- 19,754 vs. 88,524 +/- 18,082 (P = 0.005), and its cost (CDN$): 3,589 +/- 1,116 vs. 5,106 +/- 1,045 (P = 0.005). In conclusion, CsA dose monitoring with T6 was associated with a 30% lower CsA dose and cost compared to T0, with the same effectiveness in the prevention of acute rejection, and similar cardiac and renal function.

Plasma levels of nicotine and safety of smokers wearing transdermal delivery systems during multiple simultaneous intake of nicotine and during exercise.

Although transdermal nicotine patches have been studied extensively under recommended conditions, the present studies were designed to assess the nicotine plasma levels and the safety of transdermal nicotine patches in smokers undergoing situations suspected to result in increased nicotine plasma levels. The first study examined the effects of increasing nicotine intake through sequential administration of a nicotine patch (day 2), a patch followed by consumption of nicotine gum (day 3), and a patch followed by gum consumption and cigarette smoking (day 4). In this study, nicotine plasma levels increased transiently after the addition of each nicotine source. Mean areas under the concentration-time curves from 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24) for nicotine were 453 +/- 120 ng.hr/mL (day 2), 489 +/- 143 ng.hr/mL (day 3), and 485 +/- 143 ng.hr/mL (day 4). The second study evaluated the effects of physical exercise on the kinetics and the safety of two different types of nicotine transdermal devices: Nicoderm and Habitrol. The mean delivered dose of nicotine was higher with Nicoderm compared with Habitrol, and the two products were not considered to be bioequivalent. During a 20-minute exercise period, nicotine plasma levels increased by 13 +/- 9% for Nicoderm and 30 +/- 20% for Habitrol. This increase in nicotine plasma levels was probably related to the exercise-induced increase in peripheral circulation at the patch site. Results from both studies indicate a clinically nonsignificant increase in blood pressure and heart rate after the administration of nicotine. After exercise, subjects taking Habitrol tended to have a higher incidence of adverse events compared with baseline values. Safety profiles remained acceptable in both studies despite the increases in nicotine plasma levels. It was concluded that both superimposed nicotine sources and physical exertion result in short-lived plasma nicotine elevations and temporarily increase nicotine pharmacodynamic parameters without increased risk to the volunteers.

Stability of Clonazepam Suspension in HSC Vehicle.

The stability of clonazepam as an extemporaneous suspension compounded from tablets was studied. The clonazepam suspension (0.1 mg/mL) was prepared by incorporating pulverized 0.5-mg clonazepam tablets into the suspending Hospital for Sick children (HSC) Vehicle containing simple syrup and methylcellulose. This vehicle is also prepared extemporaneously. A clonazepam suspension and a clonazepam solution, both prepared in HSC Vehicle, were analyzed at various times during the 60-day study period against a clonazepam standard acetonitrile solutions stored in glass. These preparations using HSC Vehicle were stored at 4*C in a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) amber-colored plastic bottle. At various times during the 60 day study period, three samples from each bottle were removed and the concentration of clonazepam determined by a high-performance liquid chromatography assay procedure. This stability study demonstrates that storage of clonazepam suspension is safe for at least 60 days in a PVC bottle at 4*C, while the HSC solution rapidly loses the active ingredient by adsorption onto the plastic matrix due to the immediate availability towards the PVC.

Pharmacokinetics of epidural butorphanol in isoflurane-anaesthetized dogs.

Sixteen healthy male dogs were used at random in this protocol. The dogs were anaesthetized with isoflurane in oxygen. Eight of the dogs received 0.25 mg/kg of butorphanol (group B) and the others an equal volume of isotonic saline (group S) administered by a catheter inserted in the lumbosacral epidural space. Butorphanol concentrations in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Maximum concentration of butorphanol and time to obtain this concentration were 42.28 ng/mL at 13.88 min in blood, and 18.03 ng/mL at 30 min in CSF. Volume of distribution, clearance, mean distribution and elimination half-lives were respectively 4.39 L/kg, 2.02 L/h.kg, 16.5 min and 189.1 min. Mean isoflurane minimal alveolar concentration values for group B obtained following hind- or forelimb stimulation decreased by 31% after epidural butorphanol. Cutaneous analgesia (to pin-prick test) persisted for 3 h after the end of isoflurane anaesthesia in group B and was in correlation with the plasmatic analgesic dose of butorphanol (9 ng/mL). These results suggested that analgesia was predominantly obtained by action of butorphanol on the supraspinal structures following its vascular systemic absorption.

Presystemic elimination of morphine in anesthetized rabbits. Contribution of the intestine, liver, and lungs.

To assess the role of the intestine and the lung in the first-pass uptake of morphine relative to that of the liver, five groups of 6-7 New Zealand rabbits were used. A control group of conscious rabbits received 2 mg/kg of morphine iv. The remaining groups included anesthetized rabbits who received morphine into the aortic cross (2 mg/kg), the jugular vein (2 mg/kg), the portal vein (14 mg/kg), or into the duodenum (20 mg/kg). Multiple blood samples were withdrawn for 3 hr from the abdominal aorta, and morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide were assayed by HPLC. Anesthesia and surgery decreased morphine presystemic clearance from 264 +/- 14 to 194 +/- 12 ml/min/kg (p < 0.05). When morphine was injected into the aortic cross, the area under morphine plasma concentration-time curve (AUCM 0-->infinity) normalized by the dose was 7.81 +/- 0.56 10(-3) kg min/ml, a value that decreased to 5.26 +/- 0.36 (p < 0.05), 2.50 +/- 0.35 (p < 0.05), and 0.87 +/- 0.10 (p < 0.05) 10(-3) kg min/ml when morphine was injected before the lung, liver, or intestine, respectively. The extraction ratio of morphine by the lung, liver, and intestine was 0.33, 0.52, and 0.65, respectively. Compared with the aortic route, the AUCM6G 0-->infinity normalized by the dose ratio tended to be greater (p > 0.05) when morphine was injected into the jugular and portal veins, suggesting that morphine-6-glucuronide is not the major product result of morphine first-pass uptake.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Human pharmacokinetic study of immediate-release (codeine phosphate) and sustained-release (codeine Contin) codeine.

The authors compared, in a double-blind, randomized, crossover study in 13 healthy adult volunteers, the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics, relative bioavailability, and side effects of a new oral sustained-release formulation of codeine (SRC) containing 150 mg codeine base, with oral immediate-release codeine phosphate (IRC). Sustained-release codeine was given at a dose of 150 mg every 12 hours for 5 doses; IRC was given at a dose of 60 mg (2 x 30 mg) every 4 hours for the first 3 doses, and 30 mg every 4 hours thereafter for 12 doses. Plasma codeine levels were determined using a sensitive and specific high-performance liquid chromatography method and corrected for dose administered and codeine base equivalent. Mean values for single-dose pharmacokinetic parameters for SRC and IRC, respectively, were: Cmax of 217.8 and 138.8 ng/mL; Tmax of 2.3 and 1.1 hours; AUC0-inf of 1202.3 and 1262.4 ng.mL-1.hour-1; and t1/2el of 2.6 hours for both formulations. Their respective mean steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters were: Cmax of 263.8 and 222.9 ng/mL; Tmax of 3.2 and 1.1 hours; AUC0-12h of 1576.4 and 1379.1 ng.mL-1.hour-1; and t1/2el of 2.8 and 2.3 hours. These results indicate comparable bioavailability between both formulations with SRC providing delayed peak plasma levels. The sustained-release character of SRC can be explained by a delayed absorption, which is not limiting to drug elimination. Sustained-release codeine provides higher plasma codeine levels over a broader time interval and is expected to improve pain management.

Pharmacodynamics as a tool to assess the bioequivalence of non-systemically available drugs: size of the sample required.

Bioequivalence studies of drugs which are not systematically available must rely on the measure of the pharmacological response. Detection of a difference between two such preparations is often hampered by the need to include an elevated number of subjects. The number of subjects can be reduced whenever: (a) the characteristics of the subjects are well defined, (b) the selection of the baseline target effect is done rigorously, (c) the target effect can be quantified reliably, (d) the effect is measured when less variability is expected, e.g. at steady state, (e) the effect is measured repeatedly, and (f) when possible, the predicted maximal effect (Emax) and the concentration to elicit 50% of Emax are estimated. A simple equation has been derived to estimate the number of subjects needed in these bioequivalence studies.

Determination of atracurium and laudanosine in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography.

A high-performance liquid chromatographic method coupled with fluorometric detection has been developed for the determination of atracurium and its major end-product laudanosine in human plasma. The method enables good separation of atracurium from its metabolites after direct precipitation of plasma proteins. The assay is sensitive, reproducible and linear for atracurium concentrations ranging from 31.25 to 8000 ng/ml. In a clinical setting, drugs commonly administered during anesthesia did not interfere with the assay. This method provides a simple and time-saving alternative to existing methods.

Influence of extreme obesity on the body disposition and neuromuscular blocking effect of atracurium.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of atracurium, a nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent, were compared between morbidly obese patients and nonobese patients. Atracurium besylate (0.2 mg/kg) was administered intravenously as a bolus to patients who had received anesthesia. The force of contraction of the adductor pollicis was measured and plasma samples were collected for a 2-hour period. The concentrations of atracurium and its major end product, laudanosine, were determined by use of a chromatographic method. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship was characterized by use of several models. No difference was observed between obese patients and nonobese patients in atracurium elimination half-life (19.8 +/- 0.7 versus 19.7 +/- 0.7 minutes), volume of distribution at steady state (8.6 +/- 0.7 versus 8.5 +/- 0.7 L), and total clearance (444 +/- 29 versus 404 +/- 25 ml/min). However, if values were expressed on a total body weight basis, there was a difference between obese and nonobese patients in the volume of distribution at steady state (0.067 versus 0.141 L/kg) and total clearance (3.5 +/- 0.2 versus 6.6 +/- 0.5 ml/min/kg). Although atracurium concentrations were consistently higher in obese patients than in nonobese patients, there was no difference in the time of recovery from neuromuscular blockade between the two groups. Consequently, the median effective concentration was higher in obese than in nonobese patients (470 +/- 46 versus 312 +/- 33 ng/ml).

Pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of oral morphine solution and controlled-release morphine tablets in cancer patients.

Twenty-three adult patients with chronic pain due to cancer completed a double-blind, randomized, two-phase crossover trial comparing plasma morphine concentrations and analgesic efficacy of oral morphine sulfate solution (MSS) and controlled-release morphine sulfate tablets (MS Contin [MSC], Purdue Frederick, Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada). MS Contin was given every 12 hours to all patients except those whose daily morphine dose could not be equally divided into two 12-hour doses with the tablet strengths available. MSS was given every 4 hours. Patients received both of the test drugs for at least 5 days, and, on the final day of each phase, peripheral venous blood samples for morphine analysis were obtained. Eighteen patients received MSC every 12 hours, and five received it every 8 hours. The same total daily morphine dose was given in both phases. In the 18 patients who received MSC every 12 hours, the daily morphine dose was 183.9 +/- 140.0 mg (mean +/- SD). In this group, the mean area under the curve (AUC) with MSC was 443.6 +/- 348.4 ng/ml/hour, compared with 406.8 +/- 259.7 ng/ml/hour for MSS (P greater than 0.20). Mean maximum morphine concentrations (Cmax) for MSC and MSS were 67.9 +/- 42.1 and 58.8 +/- 30.3 ng/ml, respectively (P greater than 0.05). Mean minimum morphine concentrations (Cmin) were 17.0 +/- 17.7 and 18.3 +/- 15.0, respectively (P greater than 0.30). There was a significant difference (P less than 0.001) between the two drugs in time required to reach maximum morphine concentration (Tmax). Mean Tmax after MSC occurred at 3.6 +/- 2.3 hours. After MSS, it occurred at 1.3 +/- 0.4 hours. In the five patients who received MSC every 8 hours, the findings paralleled those in the principal group, with no significant differences between MSC and MSS in Cmax or Cmin and a highly significant difference between the two in Tmax. However, in this small group of patients, the AUC with MSC was significantly (P = 0.04) greater than that with MSS. All patients had very good pain control throughout the study and both formulations were well tolerated. There were no significant differences between MSC and MSS in pain scores or side effects. Under the conditions of this study there was no clinically significant difference in bioavailability between MSC and oral MSS. When given on a 12-hourly basis in individually titrated doses, the MSC provided therapeutic plasma morphine concentrations throughout the dosing interval.

Effects of food and sucralfate on the pharmacokinetics of naproxen and ketoprofen in humans.

Compliance to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy can be compromised by gastrointestinal side effects. To overcome this problem, food, antacid, or sucralfate are often co-administered with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Three studies were conducted on three groups of 12 volunteers in order to determine the influence of food or sucralfate on the pharmacokinetics of naproxen and ketoprofen. In a crossover experimental design, the first group received a single dose (50 mg) of ketoprofen with and without sucralfate (2 g). The second group received single (100 mg) and multiple (100 mg twice daily for 5 days) doses of enteric-coated ketoprofen with and without food. The third group received single (500 mg) and multiple (500 mg twice daily) doses of naproxen with and without sucralfate. Multiple blood samples were drawn and analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Short- and long-term pharmacokinetic parameters were determined. Results in group 1 showed that neither ketoprofen bioavailability nor maximal plasma concentration and time to reach maximal concentration were affected by the administration of sucralfate. However, in group 2 absorption of ketoprofen was markedly affected by food. In the presence of food, maximal plasma concentration decreased from 10.7 to 6.3 micrograms/ml after single-dose administration and 12.1 to 8.0 micrograms/ml after multiple-dose administration. The time to reach maximal plasma concentration was also modified by food, increasing from 2.8 to 7.1 hours after single-dose and 2.8 to 7.6 hours after multiple-dose administration. Food caused a significant decrease in the bioavailability of ketoprofen (over 40 percent) following both single-dose (23.8 versus 13.1 micrograms.hour/ml) and multiple-dose (29.3 versus 16.8 micrograms.hour/ml) administration. Results obtained in group 3 showed that sucralfate reduced the absorption rate constant of naproxen, from 1.7 to 1.2 hours-1 and from 1.5 to 0.7 hour-1 following single- and multiple-dose administration, respectively. However, bioavailability of naproxen was not affected by sucralfate administration. Overall, these studies have shown that sucralfate does not alter the pharmacokinetics of naproxen and ketoprofen; the amount of drug absorbed remains constant. However, plasma concentrations of ketoprofen after single- and multiple-dose administration were greatly affected by food, with a decrease of greater than 40 percent in bioavailability.