[Evaluation of a clinical orientation Call Center during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic]. / Evaluación de un call center de orientación clínica durante los primeros meses de pandemia COVID-19: capacidad de resolución de los llamados.

BACKGROUND: During sanitary emergencies such as the recent pandemic, health services can collapse. In these cases, remote orientation services such as call centers may help to debottleneck these services. AIM: To assess the demand and problem resolution of a clinical guidance telephone service during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The call registry between May and August 2020 of an orientation call center for COVID-19 was analyzed. The number of calls, sociodemographic features of callers, type of enquiry and given indications were described. RESULTS: We analyzed 1,278 telephone calls, corresponding to 655 people. Sixty nine percent of queries were resolved during the call and in 31% of calls, users were referred to face-to-face evaluation. Two percent of these referrals were to an emergency service. CONCLUSIONS: The call center had a high level of resolution, favoring remote consultation and reducing face-to-face care, improving users'accessibility.

Evaluación de un call center de orientación clínica durante los primeros meses de pandemia COVID-19: capacidad de resolución de los llamados / Evaluation of a clinical orientation Call Center during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND: During sanitary emergencies such as the recent pandemic, health services can collapse. In these cases, remote orientation services such as call centers may help to debottleneck these services. AIM: To assess the demand and problem resolution of a clinical guidance telephone service during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and Methods: The call registry between May and August 2020 of an orientation call center for COVID-19 was analyzed. The number of calls, sociodemographic features of callers, type of enquiry and given indications were described. RESULTS: We analyzed 1,278 telephone calls, corresponding to 655 people. Sixty nine percent of queries were resolved during the call and in 31% of calls, users were referred to face-to-face evaluation. Two percent of these referrals were to an emergency service. Conclusions: The call center had a high level of resolution, favoring remote consultation and reducing face-to-face care, improving users'accessibility.