Protocol for an independent patient data meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh placement for incisional hernia prevention after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: a collaborative European Hernia Society project (I-PREVENT-AAA).

INTRODUCTION: Incisional hernia (IH) is a prevalent and potentially dangerous complication of abdominal surgery, especially in high-risk groups. Mesh reinforcement of the abdominal wall has been studied as a potential intervention to prevent IHs. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that prophylactic mesh reinforcement after abdominal surgery, in general, is effective and safe. In patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), prophylactic mesh reinforcement after open repair has not yet been recommended in official guidelines, because of relatively small sample sizes in individual trials. Furthermore, the identification of subgroups that benefit most from prophylactic mesh placement requires larger patient numbers. Our primary aim is to evaluate the efficacy and effectiveness of the use of a prophylactic mesh after open AAA surgery to prevent IH by performing an individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA). Secondary aims include the evaluation of postoperative complications, pain and quality of life, and the identification of potential subgroups that benefit most from prophylactic mesh reinforcement. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic review to identify RCTs that study prophylactic mesh placement after open AAA surgery. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection and Google Scholar will be searched from the date of inception onwards. RCTs must directly compare primary sutured closure with mesh closure in adult patients who undergo open AAA surgery. Lead authors of eligible studies will be asked to share individual participant data (IPD). The risk of bias (ROB) for each included study will be assessed using the Cochrane ROB tool. An IPDMA will be performed to evaluate the efficacy, with the IH rate as the primary outcome. Any signs of heterogeneity will be evaluated by Forest plots. Time-to-event analyses are performed using Cox regression analysis to evaluate risk factors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No new data will be collected in this study. We will adhere to institutional, national and international regulations regarding the secure and confidential sharing of IPD, addressing ethics as indicated. We will disseminate findings via international conferences, open-source publications in peer-reviewed journals and summaries posted online. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022347881.

The association between referral source and outcome in patients with colorectal cancer.

AIM: The colorectal two-week wait fast track (FT) referral system was nationally implemented in the UK in 2000 to ensure patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) received prompt access to specialized services. The aim of this study was to determine the association between the mechanism of referral to colorectal services and the 5-year outcomes for patients with CRC. METHODS: Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed CRC presenting between October 2002 and September 2004 were identified retrospectively. Analysis for survival and recurrence of disease at 5 years from presentation was undertaken. Outcomes for patients were compared between fast track (FT), non-fast track (NFT) and emergency referral (ER) routes, using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. RESULTS: Out of 189 patients, 96 (51%) presented via the FT, 41 (22.5%) via the NFT and 52 (27.5%) via the ER referral route. The 5-year overall survival was 52.6% ± 5.1, 41.5% ± 7.7 and 38.5% ± 6.7 for the FT-, NFT- and ER groups respectively (p = 0.075). The 5-year cancer specific survival was 60.3% ± 5.2, 58.8% ± 5.3 and 43.5% ± 7.2 for the FT-, NFT- and ER groups respectively (p = 0.056). Patients referred as emergencies had worse 5-year overall survival; 49.3% ± 4.3 (FT&NFT) vs. 38.5% ± 6.7 (ER) (p = 0.042) and 5-year cancer specific survival 59.8% ± 4.4 (FT&NFT) vs. 43.5% ± 7.2 (ER) (p = 0.016). A total of 136 patients (FT n = 71, NFT n = 34, ER n = 31) underwent potentially curative surgery. Differences in 5-year survival did not reach statistical significance in these patients. CONCLUSION: Referral route to specialist services for patients with CRC via the fast track pathway compared to non-fast track pathway was not associated with improved survival.

Wound oozing after total hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Total hip arthroplasty is a commonly performed operation and yet little information exists about the duration of wound oozing, the factors associated with this and the implications. The aim of this work was to identify factors influencing wound oozing by establishing their effect on the time taken for wounds to cease oozing after total hip arthroplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were included. Wounds were examined for wound oozing on a daily basis by the same observer and were then re-dressed. The time taken for each wound to become dry was recorded. Data were analysed to determine if the time-to-dryness was influenced by wound length, body mass index, estimated volume of blood in the dissected tissues, duration of surgery and ASA grade. RESULTS: Time to dryness was associated with wound length (P = 0.01), body mass index (BMI, P = 0.05), estimated volume of blood in dissected tissues (P = 0.05) and length of hospital stay (P = 0.02). No association was found with duration of surgery or ASA grade. CONCLUSIONS: A small-incision, meticulous haemostasis at surgery and a reduction in pre-operative obesity reduce the time taken for hip arthroplasty wounds to become dry. Prolonged wound oozing delays hospital discharge.