Sustaining the development of primary care in academic medicine. Working Group on Sustaining the Development of Academic Primary Care. Association of American Medical Colleges.

This article is the report of the Working Group on Sustaining the Development of Academic Primary Care, one of the six subgroups of the Advisory Panel on the Mission and Organization of Medical Schools (APMOMS) sponsored by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). To begin, the group draws a distinction between primary care and generalism. Primary care is a core domain of health care and, in the context of emerging integrated systems, will increasingly be a multidisciplinary shared function. Non-subspecialized physicians, or "generalists," are a key element in the provision of primary care, but do not act alone. Core competencies for primary care are central to the education of all physicians. Therefore, irrespective of workforce goals for generalist physicians, primary care should have a strong, central position in the medical school so that graduates can receive a sound general medical education and can be prepared for any specialty and for lifelong learning in an evolving health care system. For primary care to achieve that position, medical schools must integrate primary care into their missions, strategic plans, operation, organization, academic administrative structures, curriculum development, faculty development (both school- and community-based), resource development, alliances with appropriate clinical services networks, financial policy, and evaluation and educational monitoring systems. The group briefly describes the elements of those changes and also proposes ways that the AAMC and medical school leaders could promote the central role of primary care in medical schools.

Comments on the AAMC policy statement recommending strategies for increasing the production of generalist physicians.

The United States has a physician specialty imbalance, primarily a shortage of generalists (defined as family physicians, general internists, and general pediatricians) relative to other specialists. In recent years, the rising costs of health care, the expansion of managed care, and problems of access to care have accentuated the critical role that generalists must play in a cost-effective, accessible health care system. Despite numerous public and private initiatives designed to address the supply of generalist physicians, the ratio of generalists to specialists has been decreasing. Although the factors contributing to the shrinking proportion of generalists are many and are often outside the control of educators, there is evidence that medical schools can play a major role in influencing specialty choice. Recognizing the need to address the specialty imbalance in this country, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) appointed the Generalist Physician Task Force to develop a statement suggesting actions that the AAMC and its constituents could take to foster a greater representation of generalist physicians in the United States. The task force produced an Executive Summary, published as an AAMC policy statement in early 1993, that contained recommended strategies for medical schools, graduate medical education, and the practice environment. The authors of the present article critique these recommendations, provide a background and rationale for each of them, and give suggestions about how some of the recommendations might be implemented. While they are in general agreement with the AAMC policy statement, they feel the recommended strategies fall short of the need. They maintain that the AAMC statement represents an admirable but cautious approach to a daunting problem, and that the time is past when cautious approaches will suffice. The authors conclude with the hope that bolder initiatives will emerge from the new AAMC Office of Generalist Physician Programs.