Remaining teeth, oral dryness and dental health habits in middle-aged Norwegian rheumatoid arthritis patients.

The aim of the study was to assess the effect of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) upon dental health. A questionnaire was mailed to all seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients aged 44-56 yr in the files of the two main departments of rheumatology in South Eastern Norway. Data were obtained from 125 patients, constituting 91% of the target group. The number of remaining teeth in these patients was not related to disease duration or physical dysfunction, whereas a relationship to prolonged use of medication for pain relief was indicated. Factors known to affect tooth loss in the general population, such as smoking habits, dental attendance, interdental cleaning habits, previous dental disease, and place of residence were found to be important in RA patients as well. The RA patients from Oslo had a mean number of 25 remaining teeth, which is the same as reported for the general Oslo population at this age. Oral dryness was reported by more than 50% of the RA patients, but was not related to the number of teeth. The conclusion is that serious and long lasting rheumatoid arthritis had little influence on the number of remaining teeth in this middle-aged group of Norwegians.

An open, controlled, randomized comparison of cyclosporine and azathioprine in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a preliminary report.

Cyclosporine (10 mg/kg/day) and azathioprine (2.5-3 mg/kg/day) were compared for 26 weeks in an open, controlled, randomized study of 24 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Each treatment group consisted of 12 patients. Those patients who took cyclosporine improved significantly in the 50-foot walk time, circumferences of proximal interphalangeal joints, Ritchie articular index, global assessment by investigator, and grip strength, when compared with baseline findings. In the azathioprine group, there was improvement only in grip strength.

Side effects of cyclosporin A treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Cyclosporin A (CyA) and azathioprine (Aza) were compared with respect to renal side effects in an open controlled, randomized study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Twelve patients were treated with CyA (mean dose 7.8 +/- 1.2 mg/kg/day) and 12 with azathioprine for 26 weeks. All patients also received prednisolone 5 mg/day. The patients had normal serum creatinine (less than 120 mumoles/liter) and protein-free urine before the trial. CyA increased serum creatinine in nine out of the 11 patients followed for 26 weeks, the mean increase was approximately 50%. Creatinine clearance was reduced by 31%. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and serum potassium were significantly increased by CyA. Urinary beta 2-microglobulin excretion was significantly increased by CyA, in five of the patients more than ten times. Urinary kallikrein excretion was reduced by more than 50% and urinary albumin excretion was doubled. All these parameters remained normal and unchanged in the azathioprine group. CyA was withdrawn in seven patients after 26 weeks. Urinary beta 2-microglobulin was still increased by 85% nine months after CyA treatment. The other parameters were gradually normalized after three to nine months except for one patient who developed renal failure. Urinary beta 2-microglobulin excretion was a very sensitive parameter for renal tubular damage in this study.

Duration of morning stiffness in rheumatic patients after medication with enteric-coated and plain naproxen tablets.

Twenty-nine adult rheumatic patients who were taking 500 mg naproxen at bedtime and had a certain degree of morning stiffness despite this medication took part in a randomized double-blind cross-over study in which the duration of morning stiffness after evening doses of 500 mg enteric-coated naproxen tablets was compared with that after identical doses of plain naproxen tablets. The duration of morning stiffness was significantly shorter after taking enteric-coated tablets (p less than 0.01), and the mean plasma naproxen morning concentration was 34% higher (p = 0.01). Since the results were unambiguous in such a small group of patients, they are judged to be of considerable clinical value.