RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to co-develop research priorities and identify meaningful research questions with a diverse group of stakeholders representing the CP community for implementation in subsequent research activities. The overarching aim of this research was to 1) Understand the mobility experiences, supported mobility device (SMD) use, and desired participation outcomes of people with cerebral palsy (CP) across the lifespan; and 2) Describe how perspectives of rehabilitation care and professional resources may influence mobility decision-making processes and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-round modified Delphi consensus study was conducted with a stakeholder advisory panel consisting of three adults with CP, two parents of children with CP, and four SMD providers. RESULTS: The advisory panel identified 11 unique topical categories focused on SMD selection and use, stratified by age group and stakeholder role. Questions or statements within each category were ranked, and top consensus and concordance statements were retained, reviewed, and refined for use in a co-developed focus group guide. Priorities were identified in three main groupings: (1) Age/GMFCS level/Environment-related; (2) Individual with CP/Caregiver need-related; and (3) Clinician/provider partnership-related. DISCUSSION: A modified Delphi process was a useful tool for stakeholders in co-developing research priorities related to SMD use across the lifespan. Drawing on the lived expertise of stakeholders is important in facilitating improved research translation in the CP community.
IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONRoutine incorporation of stakeholder voices in research and clinical practice can critically inform teams without lived experience of cerebral palsy to co-create meaningful priorities and focus areas for supportive mobility device provision and use from a lived perspective.Stakeholders identified that access to trial equipment, device adaptability, provider knowledge and training, and a focus on the presence or absence of shared decision-making are among the top research priorities when engaging with individuals with cerebral palsy who use supportive mobility devices.Given the heterogeneous nature of cerebral palsy and evolving mobility needs for individuals across different Gross Motor Function Classification System levels, a lifespan perspective and future-oriented approach to supportive mobility device research and clinical practice are crucial to address device design and implementation as well as barriers to quality provision practices.
