Body mass index is not associated with time on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or in-hospital mortality.

Morbid obesity, as characterized by BMI, is often utilized as an exclusion criterion for VV-ECMO because of presumed poor prognosis and technically complex cannulation. However, the "obesity paradox" suggests obesity may be protective during critical illness, and BMI does not capture variations in body type, adiposity, or fluid balance. This study examines relationships between BMI and patient outcomes. Adult VV-ECMO patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 admitted January 2012 to June 2021 were identified from an institutional registry. BMI and outcomes were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U tests and Pearson correlations with Bayesian post-hoc analyses. 116 of 960 ECMO patients met inclusion criteria. Median (Q1, Q3) BMI was 42.3 (37.3, 50.8) and min, max of 35.0, 87.8 with 9.0 (5.0, 15.5) ECMO days. BMI was not significantly correlated with ECMO days (r = -0.102; p = .279). Bayesian analyses showed moderate evidence against BMI correlating with ECMO days. In-hospital mortality (27%) was significantly associated with ECMO days (p = .014) but not BMI (p = .485). In this cohort of high-BMI patients, BMI was not associated with survival or time on ECMO. BMI itself should not be used as an exclusion criterion for VV-ECMO.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in the setting of penetrating traumatic injuries.

BACKGROUND: Currently, no absolute contraindications to the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support exist. However, the presence of penetrating traumatic injuries is often considered a relative contraindication to ECMO support. In this study, we aim to assess whether penetrating traumatic injuries should be considered a contraindication to the use of ECMO support, and how to better select patients who may benefit from this therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this paper, we present the findings of a retrospective review of all patients at a large, level 1 trauma center who received ECMO support following penetrating traumatic injuries. We describe the use of ECMO in these patients along with the complications associated with this therapy. CONCLUSION: In this study we show penetrating traumatic injuries should not be considered a contraindication to ECMO support, and how ECMO can be a useful treatment strategy in selected patients with these injuries.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure in phases of COVID-19 variants.

BACKGROUND: Adaptive mutations of the severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) virus have emerged throughout the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The characterization of outcomes in patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for severe respiratory distress from COVID-19 during the peak prevalence of different variants is not well known. METHODS: There were 131 patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection supported by ECMO at two referral centers within a large healthcare system. Three predominant variant phase time windows (Pre-Alpha, Alpha, and Delta) were determined by a change-point analyzer based on random population sampling and viral genome sequencing. Patient demographics and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The average age of patients was 46.9 ± 10.5 years and 70.2% (92/131) were male. Patients cannulated for ECMO during the Delta variant wave were younger compared to earlier Pre-Alpha (39.3 ± 7.8 vs. 48.0 ± 11.1 years) and Alpha phases (39.3 ± 7.8 vs. 47.2 ± 7.7 years) (p < .01). The predominantly affected race in the Pre-Alpha phase was Hispanic (52.2%; 47/90), while in Alpha (61.5%; 16/26) and Delta (40%; 6/15) variant waves, most patients were White (p < .01). Most patients received a tracheostomy (82.4%; 108/131) with a trend toward early intervention in later phases compared to Pre-Alpha (p < .01). There was no significant difference between the duration of ECMO, mechanical support, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), or hospital LOS over the three variant phases. The in-hospital mortality was overall 41.5% (54/131) and was also similar. Six-month survival of patients who survived to discharge was 92.2% (71/77). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in survival or time on ECMO support in patients during the peak prevalence of the three variants.

Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Caused by COVID-19 Versus Influenza.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be effective for refractory acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients with influenza, but its utility in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is uncertain. We compared outcomes of patients with refractory ARDS from COVID-19 and influenza placed on ECMO. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 120 patients with refractory ARDS due to COVID-19 or influenza placed on ECMO at 2 referral centers from January 2013 to October 2020. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared. The primary endpoint was survival to discharge. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics and comorbidities were similar. During the study period, 53 patients with COVID-19 and 67 patients with influenza were supported. Venovenous ECMO was the predominant initial cannulation strategy in both groups (COVID 92.5% vs influenza 95.5%; P = .5). Survival to hospital discharge was 62.3% (33 of 53 patients) in the COVID-19 group and 64.2% (43 of 67 patients) in the influenza group (P = .8). In patients successfully decannulated, median length of time on ECMO was longer in COVID-19 patients (14 [interquartile range (IQR), 9-30] days vs influenza 10.5 [IQR, 6.8-14.3] days; P = .004). Among patients discharged alive, COVID-19 patients had longer overall length of stay (COVID-19 37 [IQR, 27-62] days vs influenza 13.5 [IQR, 9.3-24] days; P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with refractory ARDS from COVID-19 or influenza placed on ECMO, there was no significant difference in survival to hospital discharge. In patients surviving to decannulation, the duration of ECMO support and total length of stay were longer in COVID-19 patients.

Angiotensin II: A Multimodal Approach to Vasoplegia in a Cardiac Setting.

Patients experiencing vasoplegia, a type of distributive shock, have limited options when conventional vasopressors are not appropriate or sufficient. This is especially true for patients with cardiac dysfunction, whether after heart transplant or ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation. Angiotensin II has been used in various clinical settings for distributive shock; however, its role in patients after orthotopic heart transplant or VAD implantation is not well studied. We present two cases where angiotensin II played a vital role in correcting vasoplegia for critical cardiac patients.

Diagnosis of Capnocytophaga canimorsus Sepsis by Whole-Genome Next-Generation Sequencing.

We report the case of a 60-year-old man with septic shock due to Capnocytophaga canimorsus that was diagnosed in 24 hours by a novel whole-genome next-generation sequencing assay. This technology shows great promise in identifying fastidious pathogens, and, if validated, it has profound implications for infectious disease diagnosis.

Metformin-induced lactic acidosis with emphasis on the anion gap.

The presence of an anion gap in a diabetic patient, especially if associated with evidence of compromised renal function, should prompt clinicians to consider metformin as a contributing factor. This consideration is especially important in patients with severe anion gaps associated with lactic acidosis out of proportion to the patient's clinical presentation.