RESUMEN
We describe characteristics of women alcohol abusers, risk factors for alcoholism in women, barriers to treatment, and implications and strategies for physicians dealing with alcohol abuse in women patients, including risk assessments and intervention strategies. Alcohol abuse and alcoholism have a different physiologic effect on women than on men. Societal attitudes about women and alcohol and internal (self-perception) and external (environmental) factors can create barriers to the detection and treatment of female alcohol abusers. Physicians are in an excellent position to address the medical, psychologic, and social concomitants of alcoholism and alcohol abuse. The Council on Scientific Affairs recommends that physicians become more active in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of alcohol-related problems in women, including the diseases that may be associated with chronic alcohol abuse and the effect of alcohol on the developing fetus. Specific American Medical Association policy and recommendations for physician practice are included.
Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo , Alcoholismo/complicaciones , Alcoholismo/diagnóstico , Alcoholismo/rehabilitación , Consejo , Femenino , Humanos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Controversy exists concerning whether the costs and potential risks outweigh the potential benefits of "crossover" use in the general blood supply of unutilized blood that was donated for autologous transfusion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Published articles and reports were identified through systematic search of MEDLINE and review of references cited in previously identified articles, textbooks, and reports. Consultation was made with experts in blood donation and transfusion. Additional peer review was received from the American Medical Association (AMA) Council on Scientific Affairs RESULTS: Concern over infectious disease transmission has led to increased interest in and support for autologous transfusion for individuals having planned surgeries. Different requirements exist for collection, labeling, and screening of blood to be used for autologous versus allogeneic transfusions; therefore, procedures for diverting autologous blood donations to the general blood supply involve considerable expense. Several cost-effectiveness studies of autologous blood donation and transfusion conclude that currently this "crossover" appears to be an expensive procedure yielding little increased benefit from a societal perspective. CONCLUSIONS: The recommendations in this report were adopted as AMA Policy at the AMA Annual Meeting in June 1997. The AMA does not encourage blood collection programs to "cross over" units donated for autologous use to the allogeneic blood supply. Practice guidelines are needed, and should be utilized to ensure parsimony in the use of autologous blood donations and transfusions.