Effects of strength of relationship ties in recovery homes: A conundrum.

Recovery homes are a widespread source of support for those attempting to maintain abstinence. For those who are able to remain in these settings for at least 6 months, outcomes tend to be favorable; however, many leave prematurely. There is a need to better understand the social integration processes that play a major role in giving recovery home residents access to available recovery-related social capital that is associated with better outcomes. The current study involved Oxford House recovery homes in 3 states and examined the strength of relationship ties among house members. We found that those who associated with peers who have higher recovery scores tend to improve their own recovery scores over time. However, we also found that those with higher recovery scores tended to create "strong" ties with similarly high-scoring alters; likewise lower-scoring individuals preferentially formed strong ties with each other. These findings suggest a conundrum: recovery home residents most in need of relational support from more recovered housemates are the least likely to obtain it. We discuss possible pathways to creating more ties between high and low-recovered residents.

Complex Contexts within Oxford Houses: Psychiatrically Comorbid Social Networks.

This study aimed to explore whether there are differences between Oxford House recovery home residents with psychiatric comorbidity in their ability to form, maintain, and dissolve loaning ties and seek advice, when compared to Oxford House residents without comorbidity, and if differences do exist, are those ties mono- or bi-directional. Findings indicated unique interdependencies among individuals with psychiatric comorbidity for advice seeking, loaning, and recovery factor scores. The results of this investigation are consistent with the dynamic systems theory conceptions of community-based recovery. Recovery homes provide access to social capital, via the residents' social network, by facilitating recovery-oriented social exchanges, which can lead to changes to the recovery home social dynamics. Upon interpreting the results of this study, components from a dynamic systems theory emerged (e.g., explaining the processes that preserve or undermine the development, maintenance, and dissolution of a network); and provided a framework for interpreting the loaning, advice-seeking, and the latent recovery factor networks and their relationship with psychiatric comorbidity. A deeper understanding of the interplay among these dynamics is described providing an understanding of how Oxford House recovery homes promote long-term recovery in a shared community setting for those with high psychiatric comorbidity.

Lived experiences of Oxford House residents prescribed medication-assisted treatment.

Qualitative studies have examined the recovery experiences of individuals prescribed medication-assisted treatment (MAT), including their experiences within treatment facilities. However, the literature lacks qualitative studies exploring the recovery process of individuals prescribed MAT while living in recovery housing, such as Oxford House (OH). The purpose of this study was to explore how OH residents, who are prescribed MAT, make sense of recovery. The fact that OHs are drug-free recovery housing is what makes the issue of using MATs potentially contentious in these settings. Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was used to document the lived experiences of individuals prescribed MAT in OH. The sample included: five women and three men, prescribed either methadone or Suboxone, that were living in an OH in the United States. Participants were interviewed on four topics: their recovery process, their transition to OH, and their experience living in and outside of an OH. Analysis of results followed the recommendations for IPA from Smith, Flowers, and Larkin. Four general themes emerged from the data: Recovery Process, Managing Logistics of MAT Utilization, Personal Development, and Familial Values. In conclusion, individuals prescribed MAT did benefit from living in an OH to manage their recovery as well as stay compliant with their medication.

House Level Latent Classes as Predictors of Recovery and Evictions.

The current study explored whether substance abuse recovery houses could be categorized into meaningful classes, which might be associated with house evictions as well as changes in individual-level recovery capital. A total of 602 individuals from 42 recovery homes were followed for up to 6 data collection periods over 2 years. House level latent class analyses were based on house-level data. A 3-class model fit very well (entropy 0.94) and better than a 2-class model. Class profiles examined concurrent (averaged across waves 1 and 2) house and resident-level variables (e.g., gender, race, age, employment, education). Class was then used to prospectively predict outcomes of the hazard of eviction and improvement in a recovery index over waves 3-6. One latent class representing 45% of the recovery houses had the highest density of members willing to loan, able to pay their rent, active involvement in outside chapter activities-this group of houses had the best outcomes including the lowest eviction rate and highest mean recovery factor. The two other classes had higher eviction rates, with one having the lowest density of friendship, selectivity of residents, and ability to pay rent. The other of the higher eviction-rate classes surprisingly had the highest density of friendship and advice seeking, but the lowest density of willingness to loan. These findings suggest that there are meaningful differences in types of recovery homes, and that house characteristics appear to influence recovery changes and eviction outcomes.

Spiritual Awakening in 12-Step Recovery: Impact Among Residential Aftercare Residents.

Spiritually-based interventions in the form of 12-step programs are frequently offered as a part of substance use treatment programs in the United States. Programs based in the 12 steps guarantee that by working their program, an individual will undergo a process of transformation labeled a spiritual awakening. However, the impact of this experience on recovery factors and treatment adherence is unclear. The current study investigated adult residents (n = 115) who experienced a spiritual awakening attributed to 12-step group affiliation during their stay at residential aftercare facilities for substance use disorder. Self-efficacy and hope were greater for individuals who experienced a spiritual awakening versus those persons who did not experience awakening. Awakening was associated with greater affiliation to AA and decreased negative exit from the facility. Results revealed the potential for an awakening to improve treatment behavior and outcomes in a residential environment, as well as benefit an individual's personal recovery resources. Further theoretical and clinical implications are discussed.

Understanding recovery Capital in relation to categorical 12-Step involvement and abstinence social support.

Background: Although recovery capital represents various resources for persons recovering from substance use disorders, measures of this construct examine components that might not necessarily reflect the recovery goals of individuals who base their recovery through involvement in 12-step groups such as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and Narcotics Anonymous (NA). It is not clear whether 12-step involvement is related to recovery capital, particularly among individuals living in recovery homes who utilize social networks of recovering peers for their recovery. Thus, categorical involvement in a set of 12-step activities was examined in relation to recovery capital and abstinence social support. Methods: Differences in terms of general (recovery capital scores, retention rates) and abstinence-specific (abstinence social support) resources were examined in relation to recovery home residents who were (n = 395) and were not (n = 232) categorically involved in their 12-step recovery. Results: Residents with categorical 12-step involvement reported significantly higher levels of recovery capital and abstinence social support, and there was no significant difference observed in retention rates between residents who were/were not categorically involved in 12-step groups. Conclusions: Findings suggest community resources such as recovery homes and categorical involvement in 12-step groups are important recovery capital components that help individuals who use a 12-step approach to their recovery. Recovery capital among those involved with 12-step fellowships such as AA and NA should be assessed by examining abstinence-specific components such as representative involvement in 12-step groups and social support that is abstinence-specific.

Dynamic Interdependence of Advice Seeking, Loaning, and Recovery Characteristics in Recovery Homes.

Recovery homes in the US provide stable housing for over 200,000 individuals with past histories of homelessness, psychiatric co-morbidity and criminal justice involvement. We need to know more about how these settings help those remain in recovery. Our study measured advice seeking and willingness-to-loan relationships and operationalized them as a dynamic multiplex social network-multiple, simultaneous interdependent relationships--that exist within 42 Oxford House recovery homes over time. By pooling relationship dynamics across recovery houses, a Stochastic Actor-Oriented Modeling (SAOM) framework (Snijders et al., 2010) was used to estimate a set of parameters governing the evolution of the network and the recovery attributes of the nodes simultaneously. Findings indicated that advice and loan relationships and recovery-related attitudes were endogenously interdependent, and these results were affected exogenously by gender, ethnicity, and reason for leaving the recovery houses. Prior findings had indicated that higher advice seeking in recovery houses was related to higher levels of stress with more negative outcomes. However, the current study found that recovery is enhanced over time if advice was sought from residents with higher recovery scores. Our study shows that social embedding, i.e. one's position in relationship networks, affects recovery prospects. More specifically, the formation of ties with relatively more recovered residents as an important predictor of better outcomes.

Individual and Contextual Protective and Risk Characteristics for Residents of Recovery Homes.

Some recovery homes have facilitating relationships and organizational characteristics, and there are also social capital differences among residents of these recovery homes. It is important to better understand the impact of protective and risk individual and house factors on recovery issues among residents of these community-based settings. Individuals from 42 recovery homes were followed for up to six data collection periods over two years. House level latent class analyses tapped relationship and organizational domains and individual level latent class analyses were from derived from elements of recovery capital. Houses that manifested protective factors provided most residents positive outcomes, except those with elevated self-esteem. Houses that were less facilitating had more negative exits, except for those residents who were the highest functioning. Both individual and house characteristics are of importance in helping to understand risk factors associated with eviction outcomes for residents in recovery homes.

Willingness to Lend Resources is Associated with Increases in Recovery and Participation in Community Activities.

Recovery homes may facilitate individuals with substance use disorders re-integration back into community settings by providing friendship, resources, and advice. Participants of the current study were over 600 residents of 42 Oxford House recovery homes. Findings indicated that willingness to share resources in the form of loans was associated with higher levels of house involvement in recovery home chapters. Active involvement in house and community affairs may influence more recovery within homes or may be an indicator of houses with residents with more capacities and skills for positive long-term health outcomes. Such findings suggest that recovery is a dynamic process with multiple ecological layers embedding individuals, their immediate social networks, and the wider community.

Using Systems Theory to Improve Intervention Outcomes.

This article explores the potential of using systems methods for better conceptualizing the unexpected and complex sets of hurdles and opportunities that practicing psychologists frequently encounter. Examples are provided involving two distinct types of important clinical issues: 1) understanding how individuals maintain recovery from substance use disorders following treatment and 2) better understanding patients with chronic, unexplained post-viral illnesses. Traditional research methods used to explore these types of intricate social and medical issues have often lacked sophisticated dynamic systems-based perspectives, which could provide new insights into understanding how patient treatment gains can be maintained and how unexplained post-viral illnesses can be better understood. Our examples will demonstrate that systems-oriented approaches have the potential to provide psychologists unique opportunities to capture a fuller and richer depiction of a variety of clinical and community topics and thus provide new lenses that ultimately could provide better care for our patients.

Social integration in recovery living environments: A dynamic network approach.

Oxford Houses (OHs) are a large network of self-run community-based settings for individuals with substance use disorders. This present study explored a model based on conceptualizing recovery home social systems as dynamic multirelational (multiplex) social networks. The model is developed from data obtained from 42 OH recovery homes in three parts of the US, addressing whole networks of friendship, close friendship, and willingness to loan money. Findings indicated that close friend and loan relationships mutually reinforced each other over time as they coevolved. These types of insights can help community psychologists to better understand complex network dynamics in community-based settings.

An Examination of Psychiatric Severity and Social Cohesion Outcomes within Oxford Houses.

It is estimated that nearly 20 million adults in the United States have a substance use disorder (SUD), and 8.4 million of those adults have a comorbid mental disorder. Roughly half of those adults with a SUD and a psychiatric comorbidity fail to receive adequate treatment for either the SUD or the mental disorder (combined or separately). However, this sub-population has shown positive treatment outcomes (e.g., improved quality of life and increased length of stay in a recovery home) when allotted the proper resources to treat the overlapping symptomologies associated with their multiple diagnoses. Many individuals with SUD and psychiatric comorbidity receive community-based support from recovery residences, a ubiquitous form of aftercare treatment in the United States. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between psychiatric severity index scores (a proxy for psychiatric comorbidity that measures social functioning, impairment, symptoms, and behavior), length of stay in Oxford Houses (OHs), and quality of life. The present study found a significant negative relationship between length of stay and psychiatric severity scores, and between psychiatric severity scores and quality of life scores. Psychiatric severity was observed to predict decreased quality of life, while length of stay predicted decreased psychiatric severity. Psychiatric severity mediated the relationship between length of stay and quality of life based on house composition.

Recovery homes coping with COVID-19.

Recovery homes are a widespread community resource that might be utilized by some individuals with substance use disorders (SUD) and COVID-19. A growing collection of empirical literature suggests that housing can act as a low-cost recovery support system which could be effective in helping those with SUD sustain their recovery. Such settings could be already housing many residents affected by COVID-19. Many of these residents are at high risk for COVID-19 given their histories of SUD, homelessness, criminal justice involvement, and psychiatric comorbidity. Stable housing after treatment may decrease the risk of relapse to active addiction, and these types of settings may have important implications for those with housing insecurity who are at risk for being infected with COVID-19. Given the extensive network of community-based recovery homes, there is a need to better understand individual- and organizational-level responses to the COVID-19 pandemic among people in recovery homes as well as those managing and making referrals to the houses. At the present time, it is unclear what the effects of COVID-19 are on recovery home membership retention or dropout rates. This article attempts to provide a better understanding of the possible impact of COVID-19 on the infected and on recovery resources in general.

Medication assisted therapy and recovery homes.

There is a need to better understand improved recovery supportive services for those on Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT) for opioid use disorder (OUD) and, at the same time, enhance the available treatment interventions and positive long-term outcomes for this vulnerable population. A growing empirical literature supports the assertion that improved access to housing and recovery support is a low-cost, high-potential opportunity that could help former substance users who are utilizing MAT to sustain their recovery. Recovery home support could serve the populations that need them most, namely servicing a significant number of the enrolled in MAT programs. The two largest networks of recovery homes are staff run Traditional Recovery Homes (TRH) and self-run Oxford House Recovery Homes (OH). There is a need to better understand how substance users on MAT respond to recovery homes, as well as how those in recovery homes feel toward those on MAT and how any barriers to those utilizing MAT may be reduced. Recovery may be an outcome of the transactional process between the recovering individual and his/her social environment. In particular, how recovery houses can help people on MAT attain long-term recovery.

Individuals in sober living: Effects of contact with substance using family members.

This study examines the effects that substance-using family members have on those working to maintain recovery from substance use disorder. Participants (N = 229) were recruited from Oxford Houses (OH) across North Carolina, Texas, and Oregon. A stepwise linear regression with variables including abstinence self-efficacy, gender, substance use, attendance of Alcoholics Anonymous, and conflict with family and non-family was run to examine associations between the amount of substance using family members in the participant's social network. The abstinence self-efficacy mean score, gender, and days of serious conflict with non-family members were significantly associated with total number of substance-using family members in a participant's social network. These results may indicate that OH's serve as a buffer between substance using family members and one's abstinence self-efficacy. It remains unclear if individuals are at an increased risk of relapse from this familial influence when perceived abstinence self-efficacy drops. If so, OH residents could benefit from interventions that help them maintain their perceived abstinence self-efficacy.

An examination of abstinence social support among recovery home residents with psychiatric comorbidity.

BACKGROUND: Although social support is a resource that helps persons in their recovery from substance use disorders, it is not clear whether specific types buffer the effects of stress and optimize outcomes for those with psychiatric comorbidity. This investigation examined two types of social support in relation to lengths of stay to identify mechanisms related to retention among individuals with psychiatric comorbidity living in community-based settings. METHODS: Baseline rates of social support (abstinence specific and general types) and stress were examined in relation to follow-up lengths of stay (at four-months and beyond) among individuals (N = 368) with psychiatric comorbidity (n = 90) and no psychiatric comorbidity (n = 278) living in community-based settings (Oxford Houses) in the U.S. The psychiatric severity index of the Addiction Severity Index was used as a proxy measure of psychiatric comorbidity. Moderated mediation analyses were conducted to test the potential mediating effects of abstinence social support and general social support on the relationship between stress and lengths of stay, and whether these were influenced by psychiatric comorbidity. RESULTS: A full mediating effect was observed for abstinence social support for residents with psychiatric comorbidity, whereas a partial mediating effect for general social support was observed for all residents. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate qualities of social support have differential effects, substantiating the notion that specific components of social support optimize outcomes for those with psychiatric comorbidity living in recovery homes.

The Emergence, Role, and Impact of Recovery Support Services.

Various community recovery support services help sustain positive behavior change for individuals with alcohol and drug use disorders. This article reviews the rationale, origins, emergence, prevalence, and empirical research on a variety of recovery support services in U.S. communities that may influence the likelihood of sustained recovery. The community recovery support services reviewed include recovery high schools, collegiate recovery programs, recovery homes, recovery coaches, and recovery community centers. Many individuals are not provided with the types of environmental supports needed to solidify and support their recovery, so there is a need for more research on who may be best suited for these services as well as when, why, and how they confer benefit.

Exploring possible network properties facilitating recovery for residents of sober living homes.

Background: Recovery homes provide supportive settings for thousands of individuals with substance use disorders each year. However, not all residents of recovery homes improve in these settings, and the reasons for both improvement and lack of improvement are still unclear. It is possible that those low in recovery might benefit when they are in settings with high recovery residents. Methods: We examined social network ties among 19 recovery home settings that had pairings of low and high recovery residents. Results: We found that low recovery factor individuals generally increased their recovery factor scores over time. In the cases where recovery factor scores did not increase, the low recovery factor individuals had few social network ties with the high recovery residents. Conclusions: Both selection and influence can likely be factors that affect recovery behavior in these social settings, as residents may select friends who already exhibit similar behaviors as their own or be influenced by friends to adjust their behavior, so it is more like that of the group. A dynamic systems-based perspective can help investigators better understand how recovery-related behaviors and social relationships co-evolve, and how individual characteristics and house-level social structures can link to changes in individuals' recovery.

Reducing health disparities among black individuals in the post-treatment environment.

An important step in reducing health disparities among racial and ethnic minorities with substance use disorders involves identifying interventions that lead to successful recovery outcomes for this population. The current study evaluated outcomes of a community-based recovery support program for those with substance use disorders. Participants included 632 residents of recovery homes in three states in the US. A multi-item recovery factor was found to increase over time for these residents. However, rates of improvement among Black individuals were higher than for other racial/ethnic groups. Black Americans perhaps place a higher value on communal relationships relative to all other racial/ethnic groups, and by adopting such a communitarian perspective, they might be even more receptive to living in a house that values participation and involvement. The implications of these findings for health disparities research are discussed.

The relationship of Oxford Houses across heterogeneous house and setting characteristics.

Oxford Houses (OH) are democratically run, self-funded, substance-use recovery homes that operate across the United States and internationally. Previous research shows the OHs are present in diverse neighborhoods. The current study examined the neighborhoods of 42 OHs located in Oregon, Texas, and North Carolina to better quantify and understand house and neighborhood characteristics that are related to relapse rates. Independent variables were participants' length of stay in OH, wages earned from employment, and income/education neighborhood characteristics. Neighborhood characteristics were related to relapse rates, with higher relapse rates occurring in neighborhoods with lower income and education levels. This finding supports the OH organization's premise that while OHs may work across community settings, they perform better in neighborhoods with higher average income and education levels. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).