Top 10 priorities for future infertility research: an international consensus development study.

STUDY QUESTION: Can the priorities for future research in infertility be identified? SUMMARY ANSWER: The top 10 research priorities for the four areas of male infertility, female and unexplained infertility, medically assisted reproduction, and ethics, access, and organization of care for people with fertility problems were identified. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Many fundamental questions regarding the prevention, management, and consequences of infertility remain unanswered. This is a barrier to improving the care received by those people with fertility problems. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Potential research questions were collated from an initial international survey, a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines, and Cochrane systematic reviews. A rationalized list of confirmed research uncertainties was prioritized in an interim international survey. Prioritized research uncertainties were discussed during a consensus development meeting. Using a formal consensus development method, the modified nominal group technique, diverse stakeholders identified the top 10 research priorities for each of the categories male infertility, female and unexplained infertility, medically assisted reproduction, and ethics, access, and organization of care. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Healthcare professionals, people with fertility problems, and others (healthcare funders, healthcare providers, healthcare regulators, research funding bodies and researchers) were brought together in an open and transparent process using formal consensus methods advocated by the James Lind Alliance. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The initial survey was completed by 388 participants from 40 countries, and 423 potential research questions were submitted. Fourteen clinical practice guidelines and 162 Cochrane systematic reviews identified a further 236 potential research questions. A rationalized list of 231 confirmed research uncertainties were entered into an interim prioritization survey completed by 317 respondents from 43 countries. The top 10 research priorities for each of the four categories male infertility, female and unexplained infertility (including age-related infertility, ovarian cysts, uterine cavity abnormalities, and tubal factor infertility), medically assisted reproduction (including ovarian stimulation, IUI, and IVF), and ethics, access, and organization of care, were identified during a consensus development meeting involving 41 participants from 11 countries. These research priorities were diverse and seek answers to questions regarding prevention, treatment, and the longer-term impact of infertility. They highlight the importance of pursuing research which has often been overlooked, including addressing the emotional and psychological impact of infertility, improving access to fertility treatment, particularly in lower resource settings, and securing appropriate regulation. Addressing these priorities will require diverse research methodologies, including laboratory-based science, qualitative and quantitative research, and population science. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: We used consensus development methods, which have inherent limitations, including the representativeness of the participant sample, methodological decisions informed by professional judgement, and arbitrary consensus definitions. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: We anticipate that identified research priorities, developed to specifically highlight the most pressing clinical needs as perceived by healthcare professionals, people with fertility problems, and others, will help research funding organizations and researchers to develop their future research agenda. STUDY FUNDING/ COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was funded by the Auckland Medical Research Foundation, Catalyst Fund, Royal Society of New Zealand, and Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust. Geoffrey Adamson reports research sponsorship from Abbott, personal fees from Abbott and LabCorp, a financial interest in Advanced Reproductive Care, committee membership of the FIGO Committee on Reproductive Medicine, International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies, International Federation of Fertility Societies, and World Endometriosis Research Foundation, and research sponsorship of the International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies from Abbott and Ferring. Siladitya Bhattacharya reports being the Editor-in-Chief of Human Reproduction Open and editor for the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group. Hans Evers reports being the Editor Emeritus of Human Reproduction. Andrew Horne reports research sponsorship from the Chief Scientist's Office, Ferring, Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research, and Wellbeing of Women and consultancy fees from Abbvie, Ferring, Nordic Pharma, and Roche Diagnostics. M. Louise Hull reports grants from Merck, grants from Myovant, grants from Bayer, outside the submitted work and ownership in Embrace Fertility, a private fertility company. Neil Johnson reports research sponsorship from Abb-Vie and Myovant Sciences and consultancy fees from Guerbet, Myovant Sciences, Roche Diagnostics, and Vifor Pharma. José Knijnenburg reports research sponsorship from Ferring and Theramex. Richard Legro reports consultancy fees from Abbvie, Bayer, Ferring, Fractyl, Insud Pharma and Kindex and research sponsorship from Guerbet and Hass Avocado Board. Ben Mol reports consultancy fees from Guerbet, iGenomix, Merck, Merck KGaA and ObsEva. Ernest Ng reports research sponsorship from Merck. Craig Niederberger reports being the Co Editor-in-Chief of Fertility and Sterility and Section Editor of the Journal of Urology, research sponsorship from Ferring, and retains a financial interest in NexHand. Jane Stewart reports being employed by a National Health Service fertility clinic, consultancy fees from Merck for educational events, sponsorship to attend a fertility conference from Ferring, and being a clinical subeditor of Human Fertility. Annika Strandell reports consultancy fees from Guerbet. Jack Wilkinson reports being a statistical editor for the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group. Andy Vail reports that he is a Statistical Editor of the Cochrane Gynaecology & Fertility Review Group and of the journal Reproduction. His employing institution has received payment from HFEA for his advice on review of research evidence to inform their 'traffic light' system for infertility treatment 'add-ons'. Lan Vuong reports consultancy and conference fees from Ferring, Merck and Merck Sharp and Dohme. The remaining authors declare no competing interests in relation to the present work. All authors have completed the disclosure form. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Standardizing definitions and reporting guidelines for the infertility core outcome set: an international consensus development study.

STUDY QUESTION: Can consensus definitions for the core outcome set for infertility be identified in order to recommend a standardized approach to reporting? SUMMARY ANSWER: Consensus definitions for individual core outcomes, contextual statements, and a standardized reporting table have been developed. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Different definitions exist for individual core outcomes for infertility. This variation increases the opportunities for researchers to engage with selective outcome reporting, which undermines secondary research and compromises clinical practice guideline development. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Potential definitions were identified by a systematic review of definition development initiatives and clinical practice guidelines and by reviewing Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group guidelines. These definitions were discussed in a face-to-face consensus development meeting, which agreed consensus definitions. A standardized approach to reporting was also developed as part of the process. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Healthcare professionals, researchers, and people with fertility problems were brought together in an open and transparent process using formal consensus development methods. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Forty-four potential definitions were inventoried across four definition development initiatives, including the Harbin Consensus Conference Workshop Group and International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies, 12 clinical practice guidelines, and Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group guidelines. Twenty-seven participants, from 11 countries, contributed to the consensus development meeting. Consensus definitions were successfully developed for all core outcomes. Specific recommendations were made to improve reporting. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: We used consensus development methods, which have inherent limitations. There was limited representation from low- and middle-income countries. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: A minimum data set should assist researchers in populating protocols, case report forms, and other data collection tools. The generic reporting table should provide clear guidance to researchers and improve the reporting of their results within journal publications and conference presentations. Research funding bodies, the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials statement, and over 80 specialty journals have committed to implementing this core outcome set. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This research was funded by the Catalyst Fund, Royal Society of New Zealand, Auckland Medical Research Fund, and Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust. Siladitya Bhattacharya reports being the Editor-in-Chief of Human Reproduction Open and an editor of the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility group. Hans Evers reports being the Editor Emeritus of Human Reproduction. Richard Legro reports consultancy fees from Abbvie, Bayer, Ferring, Fractyl, Insud Pharma and Kindex and research sponsorship from Guerbet and Hass Avocado Board. Ben Mol reports consultancy fees from Guerbet, iGenomix, Merck, Merck KGaA and ObsEva. Craig Niederberger reports being the Editor-in-Chief of Fertility and Sterility and Section Editor of the Journal of Urology, research sponsorship from Ferring, and a financial interest in NexHand. Ernest Ng reports research sponsorship from Merck. Annika Strandell reports consultancy fees from Guerbet. Jack Wilkinson reports being a statistical editor for the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility group. Andy Vail reports that he is a Statistical Editor of the Cochrane Gynaecology & Fertility Review Group and of the journal Reproduction. His employing institution has received payment from HFEA for his advice on review of research evidence to inform their 'traffic light' system for infertility treatment 'add-ons'. Lan Vuong reports consultancy and conference fees from Ferring, Merck and Merck Sharp and Dohme. The remaining authors declare no competing interests in relation to the work presented. All authors have completed the disclosure form. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative: 1023.

Standardizing definitions and reporting guidelines for the infertility core outcome set: an international consensus development study† ‡.

STUDY QUESTION: Can consensus definitions for the core outcome set for infertility be identified in order to recommend a standardized approach to reporting? SUMMARY ANSWER: Consensus definitions for individual core outcomes, contextual statements and a standardized reporting table have been developed. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Different definitions exist for individual core outcomes for infertility. This variation increases the opportunities for researchers to engage with selective outcome reporting, which undermines secondary research and compromises clinical practice guideline development. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Potential definitions were identified by a systematic review of definition development initiatives and clinical practice guidelines and by reviewing Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group guidelines. These definitions were discussed in a face-to-face consensus development meeting, which agreed consensus definitions. A standardized approach to reporting was also developed as part of the process. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Healthcare professionals, researchers and people with fertility problems were brought together in an open and transparent process using formal consensus development methods. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Forty-four potential definitions were inventoried across four definition development initiatives, including the Harbin Consensus Conference Workshop Group and International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies, 12 clinical practice guidelines and Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group guidelines. Twenty-seven participants, from 11 countries, contributed to the consensus development meeting. Consensus definitions were successfully developed for all core outcomes. Specific recommendations were made to improve reporting. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: We used consensus development methods, which have inherent limitations. There was limited representation from low- and middle-income countries. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: A minimum data set should assist researchers in populating protocols, case report forms and other data collection tools. The generic reporting table should provide clear guidance to researchers and improve the reporting of their results within journal publications and conference presentations. Research funding bodies, the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials statement, and over 80 specialty journals have committed to implementing this core outcome set. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This research was funded by the Catalyst Fund, Royal Society of New Zealand, Auckland Medical Research Fund and Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust. Siladitya Bhattacharya reports being the Editor-in-Chief of Human Reproduction Open and an editor of the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group. J.L.H.E. reports being the Editor Emeritus of Human Reproduction. R.S.L. reports consultancy fees from Abbvie, Bayer, Ferring, Fractyl, Insud Pharma and Kindex and research sponsorship from Guerbet and Hass Avocado Board. B.W.M. reports consultancy fees from Guerbet, iGenomix, Merck, Merck KGaA and ObsEva. C.N. reports being the Editor-in-Chief of Fertility and Sterility and Section Editor of the Journal of Urology, research sponsorship from Ferring, and a financial interest in NexHand. E.H.Y.N. reports research sponsorship from Merck. A.S. reports consultancy fees from Guerbet. J.W. reports being a statistical editor for the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group. A.V. reports that he is a Statistical Editor of the Cochrane Gynaecology & Fertility Review Group and of the journal Reproduction. His employing institution has received payment from Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority for his advice on review of research evidence to inform their 'traffic light' system for infertility treatment 'add-ons'. N.L.V. reports consultancy and conference fees from Ferring, Merck and Merck Sharp and Dohme. The remaining authors declare no competing interests in relation to the work presented. All authors have completed the disclosure form. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative: 1023.

Top 10 priorities for future infertility research: an international consensus development study† ‡.

STUDY QUESTION: Can the priorities for future research in infertility be identified? SUMMARY ANSWER: The top 10 research priorities for the four areas of male infertility, female and unexplained infertility, medically assisted reproduction and ethics, access and organization of care for people with fertility problems were identified. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Many fundamental questions regarding the prevention, management and consequences of infertility remain unanswered. This is a barrier to improving the care received by those people with fertility problems. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Potential research questions were collated from an initial international survey, a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and Cochrane systematic reviews. A rationalized list of confirmed research uncertainties was prioritized in an interim international survey. Prioritized research uncertainties were discussed during a consensus development meeting. Using a formal consensus development method, the modified nominal group technique, diverse stakeholders identified the top 10 research priorities for each of the categories male infertility, female and unexplained infertility, medically assisted reproduction and ethics, access and organization of care. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Healthcare professionals, people with fertility problems and others (healthcare funders, healthcare providers, healthcare regulators, research funding bodies and researchers) were brought together in an open and transparent process using formal consensus methods advocated by the James Lind Alliance. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The initial survey was completed by 388 participants from 40 countries, and 423 potential research questions were submitted. Fourteen clinical practice guidelines and 162 Cochrane systematic reviews identified a further 236 potential research questions. A rationalized list of 231 confirmed research uncertainties was entered into an interim prioritization survey completed by 317 respondents from 43 countries. The top 10 research priorities for each of the four categories male infertility, female and unexplained infertility (including age-related infertility, ovarian cysts, uterine cavity abnormalities and tubal factor infertility), medically assisted reproduction (including ovarian stimulation, IUI and IVF) and ethics, access and organization of care were identified during a consensus development meeting involving 41 participants from 11 countries. These research priorities were diverse and seek answers to questions regarding prevention, treatment and the longer-term impact of infertility. They highlight the importance of pursuing research which has often been overlooked, including addressing the emotional and psychological impact of infertility, improving access to fertility treatment, particularly in lower resource settings and securing appropriate regulation. Addressing these priorities will require diverse research methodologies, including laboratory-based science, qualitative and quantitative research and population science. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: We used consensus development methods, which have inherent limitations, including the representativeness of the participant sample, methodological decisions informed by professional judgment and arbitrary consensus definitions. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: We anticipate that identified research priorities, developed to specifically highlight the most pressing clinical needs as perceived by healthcare professionals, people with fertility problems and others, will help research funding organizations and researchers to develop their future research agenda. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was funded by the Auckland Medical Research Foundation, Catalyst Fund, Royal Society of New Zealand and Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust. G.D.A. reports research sponsorship from Abbott, personal fees from Abbott and LabCorp, a financial interest in Advanced Reproductive Care, committee membership of the FIGO Committee on Reproductive Medicine, International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies, International Federation of Fertility Societies and World Endometriosis Research Foundation, and research sponsorship of the International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies from Abbott and Ferring. Siladitya Bhattacharya reports being the Editor-in-Chief of Human Reproduction Open and editor for the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group. J.L.H.E. reports being the Editor Emeritus of Human Reproduction. A.W.H. reports research sponsorship from the Chief Scientist's Office, Ferring, Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research and Wellbeing of Women and consultancy fees from AbbVie, Ferring, Nordic Pharma and Roche Diagnostics. M.L.H. reports grants from Merck, grants from Myovant, grants from Bayer, outside the submitted work and ownership in Embrace Fertility, a private fertility company. N.P.J. reports research sponsorship from AbbVie and Myovant Sciences and consultancy fees from Guerbet, Myovant Sciences, Roche Diagnostics and Vifor Pharma. J.M.L.K. reports research sponsorship from Ferring and Theramex. R.S.L. reports consultancy fees from AbbVie, Bayer, Ferring, Fractyl, Insud Pharma and Kindex and research sponsorship from Guerbet and Hass Avocado Board. B.W.M. reports consultancy fees from Guerbet, iGenomix, Merck, Merck KGaA and ObsEva. E.H.Y.N. reports research sponsorship from Merck. C.N. reports being the Co Editor-in-Chief of Fertility and Sterility and Section Editor of the Journal of Urology, research sponsorship from Ferring and retains a financial interest in NexHand. J.S. reports being employed by a National Health Service fertility clinic, consultancy fees from Merck for educational events, sponsorship to attend a fertility conference from Ferring and being a clinical subeditor of Human Fertility. A.S. reports consultancy fees from Guerbet. J.W. reports being a statistical editor for the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group. A.V. reports that he is a Statistical Editor of the Cochrane Gynaecology & Fertility Review Group and the journal Reproduction. His employing institution has received payment from Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority for his advice on review of research evidence to inform their 'traffic light' system for infertility treatment 'add-ons'. N.L.V. reports consultancy and conference fees from Ferring, Merck and Merck Sharp and Dohme. The remaining authors declare no competing interests in relation to the present work. All authors have completed the disclosure form. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

[Postanoxic encaphalopathy after and episode of resuscitated sudden death. Minimizing sequelae]. / Encefalopatía postanóxica tras episodio de muerte súbita reanimada. Cómo minimizar los daños.

Sudden death in young people while performing intense physical activity has a very low prevalence but a significant burden in terms of loss of years of life in society and a strong social impact. We present the case of a 19-year-old man who had a cardiac arrest while playing a football match, with prolonged resuscitation, and multiple subsequent complications (acute renal failure, coagulopathy, digestive bleeding, ischaemic colitis, and need for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement and hemicolectomy). The onset of intensive early rehabilitation in a specialised centre minimised the sequels, improving the Rankin score from 4 to 2 and Barthel index from 0 to 95 points, allowing the patient to lead an almost autonomous life.

Encefalopatía postanóxica tras episodio de muerte súbita reanimada. Cómo minimizar los daños / Postanoxic encaphalopathy after and episode of resuscitated sudden death. Minimizing sequelae

La muerte súbita en personas jóvenes mientras realizan una actividad física intensa es un proceso patológico muy poco prevalente, pero con una importante carga de pérdida de años de vida en la sociedad y con un fuerte impacto social. Presentamos el caso de un varón de 19 años que sufre una parada cardiaca mientras juega un partido de fútbol, con reanimación prolongada, y que sufre múltiples complicaciones posteriores (fracaso renal agudo, coagulopatía, hemorragia digestiva, colitis isquémica y precisa colocación de DAI y realización de hemicolectomía). El inicio de la rehabilitación precoz de manera intensiva en un centro especializado consiguió minimizar las secuelas, permitiendo mejorar en la Escala Rankin desde 4 a 2, y en el Índice de Barthel de 0 a 95 puntos, permitiendo realizar una vida casi autónoma del paciente

Sudden death in young people while performing intense physical activity has a very low prevalence but a significant burden in terms of loss of years of life in society and a strong social impact. We present the case of a 19-year-old man who had a cardiac arrest while playing a football match, with prolonged resuscitation, and multiple subsequent complications (acute renal failure, coagulopathy, digestive bleeding, ischaemic colitis, and need for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement and hemicolectomy). The onset of intensive early rehabilitation in a specialised centre minimised the sequels, improving the Rankin score from 4 to 2 and Barthel index from 0 to 95 points, allowing the patient to lead an almost autonomous life

Gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors.

OBJECTIVE: carcinoid tumors (CTs) represent the commonest neuroendocrine tumors. Those in the gastrointestinal tract are diagnosed in surgical specimens, clinically, and using imaging techniques (endoscopy, echoendoscopy, CT, Octreoscan, etc.). The goal of this retrospective study was to review a personal series of gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors, and to compare it to those in the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: the medical records of 40 Caucasian patients with over 50 gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors (including multiple cases) who were seen for a period of 16 years (1994-2009) were reviewed. RESULTS: mean age at presentation was 52 years, 50% were females, and mean tumor size was 9.9 mm. Most were gastroduodenal (42.5%) or rectal (30%), and were treated endoscopically. Metastases and carcinoid syndrome (CS) were seen in 5% of patients. Survival at study endpoint was 85%. CONCLUSIONS: age and gender were consistent with the literature. There was an increase in gastroduodenal (multifocal) and rectal carcinoids, likely because the series was essentially endoscopical in nature (bias). There was a lower rate of CS and higher survival, likely due to earlier diagnosis and treatment.

Tumores carcinoides digestivos / No disponible

Objetivo: los tumores carcinoides (TC) son los tumores neuroendocrinos más frecuentes. Los digestivos se diagnostican en las piezas quirúrgicas, en la clínica, y mediante los métodos de imagen (endoscopia, ecoendoscopia, TAC y Octreoscan, etc.). El objetivo de este trabajo retrospectivo fue revisar una serie personal de tumores carcinoides digestivos y compararla con la literatura. Pacientes y métodos: se revisaron las historias clínicas de 40 pacientes de raza blanca con más de 50 tumores carcinoides digestivos, algunos múltiples, observados durante 16 años (1994- 2009). Resultados: la edad media de presentación fue 52 años, 50% mujeres, con un tamaño medio del tumor de 9,9 mm. La mayoría eran gastroduodenales (42,5%) y rectales (30%) y fueron tratados por vía endoscópica. Las metástasis y el síndrome carcinoide (SC) se observó en un 5% de los casos. La supervivencia en el momento de cerrar el estudio era del 85%. Conclusiones: la edad y el sexo fueron similares a lo descrito en la literatura. Hubo un aumento de los carcinoides gastroduodenales (multifocales) y rectales, probablemente porque la serie era fundamentalmente endoscópica (sesgo). Se observó una disminución de la aparición SC y un aumento de la supervivencia probablemente por un diagnóstico y tratamiento más precoz(AU)

Objective: carcinoid tumors (CTs) represent the commonest neuroendocrine tumors. Those in the gastrointestinal tract are diagnosed in surgical specimens, clinically, and using imaging techniques (endoscopy, echoendoscopy, CT, Octreoscan, etc.). The goal of this retrospective study was to review a personal series of gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors, and to compare it to those in the literature. Patients and methods: the medical records of 40 Caucasian patients with over 50 gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors (including multiple cases) who were seen for a period of 16 years (1994- 2009) were reviewed. Results: mean age at presentation was 52 years, 50% were females, and mean tumor size was 9.9 mm. Most were gastroduodenal (42.5%) or rectal (30%), and were treated endoscopically. Metastases and carcinoid syndrome (CS) were seen in 5% of patients. Survival at study endpoint was 85%. Conclusions: age and gender were consistent with the literature. There was an increase in gastroduodenal (multifocal) and rectal carcinoids, likely because the series was essentially endoscopical in nature (bias). There was a lower rate of CS and higher survival, likely due to earlier diagnosis and treatment(AU)

New molecular method for the detection of human papillomavirus type 16 integration.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the cause of cervical cancer. Integration of HPV-16 DNA in cervical cells is considered to be a key event in the progression towards invasive cancer, but little is known about this event in anal carcinogenesis. The integration could be a useful biomarker for cancer progression. Optimized assays are needed to determine the value of real-time detection of HPV integration in longitudinal studies, and this approach is only possible with a high-throughput assay. The aim of this study was to develop a new multiplex real-time PCR assay based on simultaneous amplification of the E2 and E6 HPV open reading frames (ORFs) in order to assess the physical status (episomal and/or integrated) of HPV-16 in anal cells of HIV-positive men. The comparative threshold (Ct) cycle values for E2 and E6 obtained for SiHA cells and artificial mixtures of episomal and integrated DNA were as expected: similar Ct for episomal forms and absence of E2 amplification for integrated forms. The multiplex real-time PCR was tested in 77 consecutive samples from individual HIV-infected patients with HPV-16 anal infection. The integration of HPV-16 was detected in 25 (32%) patients: 23 as mixed (episomal and integrated) and two as completed integrated forms. The integration occurs in the early stage of anal lesions and was associated with the severity of the lesions (p 0.004). The multiplex real-time PCR assay developed in the course of this study was shown to be a simple, sensitive, specific and inexpensive technique which may be applied routinely to detect HPV-16 integration.

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).

A current review and update of an exceedingly novel and appealing topic, namely natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), is discussed, as well as the authors viewpoint thereon. Most reviewed studies were performed in laboratory animals, but reports on transvaginal cholecystectomy and the emergence of editorials and review articles on this topic pose a number of as yet unanswered questions on this type of surgery, which represents a potential advance towards "endoscopic surgery with no scars, no infection, minimal anesthesia requirements, and immediate recovery".

Cirugía endoscópica transluminal por orificios naturales (NOTES) / Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: NOTES

Se presenta una revisión actual, puesta al día, y punto de vista de los autores sobre un tema sumamente novedoso y atractivo, como es la Cirugía Endoscópica Transluminal por Orificios Naturales (NOTES: Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery). La mayoría de los trabajos revisados se han realizado en animales de experimentación, pero la publicación de la colecistectomía por vía transvaginal, y la aparición de editoriales y artículos de revisión sobre el tema, nos llevan a realizar una serie de preguntas no resueltas actualmente sobre este tipo de cirugía, que representa un avance potencial para conseguir "una cirugía endoscópica sin cicatrices, sin infecciones, con mínimos requerimientos de anestesia y una inmediata recuperación"(AU)

A current review and update of an exceedingly novel and appealing topic, namely natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), is discussed, as well as the authors' viewpoint thereon. Most reviewed studies were performed in laboratory animals, but reports on transvaginal cholecystectomy and the emergence of editorials and review articles on this topic pose a number of as yet unanswered questions on this type of surgery, which represents a potential advance towards "endoscopic surgery with no scars, no infection, minimal anesthesia requirements, and immediate recovery"(AU)

Severe and recurrent episodes of bronchiolitis obliterans organising pneumonia associated with indolent CD4+ CD8+ T-cell leukaemia.

The present study describes an adult male who has had recurrent episodes of pulmonary infiltrates with severe acute respiratory failure over a period of 10 yrs. Clinical and pathological characteristics revealed bronchiolitis obliterans with organising pneumonia (BOOP) that responded dramatically to prednisone. BOOP is characterised by inflammation of the bronchioles and surrounding tissue in the lungs. It can mimic infectious pneumonia but diagnosis is suspected when there is no response to multiple antibiotic treatment, and blood and sputum cultures are negative for microorganisms. A high proportion of double-positive (DP)-T-cells was detected in peripheral blood and in bronchoalveolar lavage, expressing CD4 and CD8alphabeta heterodimer with memory phenotype. These DP-T-lymphocytes expressed specific homing molecules that could explain their tropism to lung tissue, giving rise to the clinical symptoms. The patient did not present organomegaly, lymphadenopathy, lymphocytosis or other features of malignancy. However, T-cell receptor Vbeta chain analysis indicated clonal rearrangement, and cytogenetic studies displayed chromosomic alterations that were similar to clonal proliferation observed in ataxia-telangiectasia and T-prolymphocytic leukaemia. The findings suggest a smouldering form of lymphoproliferation, the first sign of which was bronchiolitis obliterans organising pneumonia requiring constant corticoid treatment.

Induction of interleukins IL-6 and IL-8 by siRNA.

The HIV-1 co-receptor CCR5 has been thought a relevant target for small interfering RNA (siRNA)-based therapeutics. However, recent findings suggest that siRNA can stimulate innate cytokine responses in mammals. All siRNA agents tested were able to down-regulate the expression of CCR5, albeit with different efficiency (51-74% down-regulation), block HIV-induced syncytia formation between HIV-1 BaL-infected and uninfected CD4(+) cells or block single-round HIV-1 infection as measured by a luciferase reporter assay (46-83% inhibition). Conversely, siRNA directed against CCR5 did not affect replication of a vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) pseudotyped virus, suggesting that inhibition of HIV replication was specific to CCR5 down-regulation. However, two of four siRNA tested were able to induce the production of interleukin (IL) IL-6 (sixfold induction) and IL-8 (ninefold induction) but no interferon (IFN)-alpha, IFN-beta, IFN-gamma, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha, MIP-1beta, RANTES, IL-1beta, IL-10 or IL-12p70 cytokine induction was noted. In the absence of detectable IFN-alpha, IL-6 or IL-8 may represent markers of non-specific effects triggered by siRNA.

Treatment of monocytes with interleukin (IL)-12 plus IL-18 stimulates survival, differentiation and the production of CXC chemokine ligands (CXCL)8, CXCL9 and CXCL10.

During inflammation, interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-18 are produced by macrophages and other cell types such as neutrophils (IL-12), keratinocytes and damaged endothelial cells (IL-18). To explore the role of IL-12 and IL-18 in inflammatory innate immune responses we investigated their impact on human peripheral blood monocytes and mature bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) macrophages. IL-12 and IL-18 together, but not alone, prevented spontaneous apoptosis of cultured monocytes, promoted monocyte clustering and subsequent differentiation into macrophages. These morphological changes were accompanied by increased secretion of CXC chemokine ligands (CXCL)9, CXCL10 (up to 100-fold, P < 0.001) and CXCL8 (up to 10-fold, P < 0.001) but not CCL3, CCL4 or CCL5. Mature macrophages (from BALs) expressed high basal levels of CXCL8, that were no modified upon stimulation with IL-12 and IL-18. In contrast, the basal production of CXCL9 and CXCL10 by BALs was increased by 10-fold (P < 0.001) in the presence of either IL-12 or IL-18 alone and by 50-fold in the presence of both cytokines. In conclusion, our results indicate a relevant role for IL-12 and IL-18 in the activation and resolution of inflammatory immune responses, by increasing the survival of monocytes and by inducing the production of chemokines. In particular, those that may regulate angiogenesis and promote the recruitment of monocytes, activated T cells (CXCL9 and CXCL10) and granulocytes (CXCL8).

Primary alloproliferative TH1 response induced by immature plasmacytoid dendritic cells in collaboration with myeloid DCs.

The role played by dendritic cell (DC) subsets in the immune response to alloantigens is not well defined. In vitro experiments have extensively shown that freshly isolated myeloid (M)DCs induce a strong T lymphocyte proliferation whereas plasmacytoid (P)DCs do not, unless activated by CD40 ligation. The aim of these studies was to explore whether the interplay among PDCs, MDCs and T cells modulates alloresponse. Freshly isolated MDCs and PDCs were merged in different proportions and used as antigen presenting cells (APCs) in mixed lymphocyte cultures (MLC). As described, isolated PDCs only induced a mild alloresponse, while MDCs were potent inducers of alloproliferation. Unexpectedly, when PDCs were merged with even low numbers of MDCs (down to 100 cells) and used as APCs, a potent Th1 cell proliferation was detected. Survival and maturation of PDCs was increased in these MLC conditions, which could partially explain the magnitude of the T-cell response. Interestingly, the proportion of IFNgamma-producing cells generated in such cultures was higher compared to MDC-stimulated cultures. These data suggest that the interaction between both DC subsets is determinant to generate a potent Th1 response, at least in an allogeneic situation, and may be relevant to the outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Differential expression of the cytokine receptors for human interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-18 on lymphocytes of both CD45RA and CD45RO phenotype from tonsils, cord and adult peripheral blood.

The objective of this study was to demonstrate the variable expression of cytokine receptors on naive versus memory human CD4+ T cell subpopulations in tonsillar tissue, cord blood and adult blood. We prove that the receptors for both interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-18 are expressed exclusively on memory T cells. This observation was seen not only on the CD45RO+ memory T cells but also on a significant percentage of the CD45RA+, CD62L-, CD27- and CCR7- populations. Furthermore, CD45RA+ CD62L+, CD27+ or CCR7+ CD4+ T cells that expressed IL-12Rbeta1 and IL-18Ralpha did not express CD31, a marker for recent thymic emigrants. We reveal that cord blood lymphocytes do not express IL-12Rbeta1 whereas IL-18Ralpha expression was detected at low levels. Importantly, the IL-12Rbeta2 signalling chain, which is absent in all resting T cells, was up-regulated in both CD45RA+ and CD45RO+ T cells as a result of stimulation with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 in vitro. This observed up-regulation was, however, restricted to 80% of the total CD4+ population. Finally, a very small proportion of the CD4+ CD45RO+ tonsillar T cells expressed the IL-12 and IL-18 receptors, thereby establishing the differential expression of these receptors between peripheral and tonsillar memory T cell subpopulations.

Distribución de los receptores de las citocinas reguladoras Th1 IL-12 y IL-18, en distintas subpoblaciones linfocitarias y su contribución a la inmunopatología de enfermedades asociadas a desequilibrios Th1/Th2 / Distribution of the human Th1 regulatory cytokine receptors for IL-12 and IL-18 on T-cells from adult blood, cord blood and tonsil tissue in health and in Th1/Th2-associated diseases

Las citocinas IL-12 e IL-18 están involucradas en la diferenciación de células Th1y actúan sinérgicamente estimulando la producción de IFN-gamma en células Th1. Por tanto, la presencia o ausencia de estos receptores es un factor importante en el desarrollo de una respuesta inmune adecuada. Los receptores de IL-12 e IL-18 están expresados constitutivamente en células citotóxicas naturales (NK), mientras que en las células T su expresión está limitada a un tercio de las células T de memoria. De todas formas, tanto las células T de memoria como las vírgenes, son capaces de expresar estos receptores después de una estimulación antigénica, incluyendo la segunda cadena del receptor de la IL-12, el IL-12Rbeta2, que no estaba expresada en las células en reposo. La expresión de IL-12R e IL-18R está alterada en individuos con patologías asociadas a desequilibrios Th1/Th2, tales como la inmunodeficiencia común variable o la infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana. Las poblaciones Th1 y Th2 también pueden estar alteradas localmente, como por ejemplo en el pulmón de pacientes con asma atópico o en la mucosa intestinal de pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias intestinales. Estos datos están a favor de la hipótesis de que alteraciones en la expresión de receptores de citocinas pueden estar involucradas en la patogénesis de algunas enfermedades (AU)

Evidence for increased expression of regulatory cytokine receptors interleukin-12R and interleukin-18R in common variable immunodeficiency.

We investigated the expression of T helper (Th)1/Th2 regulatory cytokine receptors on lymphocytes from patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), a disorder associated with raised Th1 cytokine production, comparing the results with those from healthy individuals and atopic asthmatics, the latter generally considered to have a Th2-driven disease. We proposed that alterations in some of the relevant receptors might be related to the observed imbalances in Th1/Th2 cytokines. Cells from CVID patients showed an increase in the percentages of CD212 [interleukin (IL)-12Rbeta1] cells within the CD4+ CD45RA+ and CD8+ CD45RA+ subsets (24% and 41%, respectively), as compared to CD4+ CD45RA+ and CD8+ CD45RA+ in healthy subjects (6% and 23%, respectivey). Approximately 21% of the CD4+ CD45RA+ naïve cells expressed IL-18Ralpha, compared with 11% in healthy subjects. In contrast, the cytokine-receptor expression in asthmatics was similar to that of controls. In spite of the above differences, after 72 h of stimulation with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28, cytokine receptor up-regulation was similar in all three groups, with up to 80% of both CD45RA+ and CD45RO+ lymphocytes expressing CD212 (IL-12Rbeta1) and IL-18Ralpha. Approximately 50% of the 'naïve', and 25% of the 'memory' subpopulations up-regulated IL-12Rbeta2. These findings provide further evidence of a polarization towards a Th1 immune response in CVID, the mechanism possibly involving up-regulation of IL-12-mediated pathways.

Follicular dendritic cells share a membrane-bound protein with fibroblasts.

The expression of a fibroblast antigen (AS02) on a proportion of CD21+ follicular dendritic cells (FDCs) provides evidence in support of their fibroblastic reticular origin. This antigen is expressed on the membrane of tissue fibroblasts but is absent from lymphocytes, macrophages or granulocytes. The distribution of AS02 in conjunction with other FDC markers (DRC-1, RFD3, CD23, IgM, and vitronectin) showed six types of FDCs. AS02 is present in the outer layers of primary and secondary follicles, but gradually decreases and disappears in the centre of germinal centres. In contrast, there is a progressive up-regulation of the other FDC markers. AS02 is re-expressed in involuting FDCs. Intermediate forms from fibroblastic to dendritic appearance are also apparent and occasionally FDC processes contain collagen type I and IV fibres, a characteristic feature of fibroblasts. In pathological follicles the normal differentiation pattern is disrupted, with persistence of the fibroblast marker, possibly due to altered interactions between FDCs and disrupted lymphocytic patterns. These findings provide new evidence for a local differentiation pathway of fibroblasts to mature FDCs.