RESUMEN
The electronic health record (EHR) may be an effective tool to help clinicians address tobacco use more consistently. To evaluate the impact of EHR-generated practice feedback on rates of referral to a state-level tobacco quitline, we conducted a cluster randomized clinical trial (feedback versus no feedback) within 19 primary care clinics in Oregon. Intervention clinics received provider-specific monthly feedback reports generated from EHR data. The reports rated provider performance in asking, advising, assessing, and assisting with tobacco cessation compared with a clinic average and an achievable benchmark of care. During 12 months of follow-up, EHR-documented rates of advising, assessing, and assisting were significantly improved in the intervention clinics compared with the control clinics (p<.001). A higher case-mix index and presence of a clinic champion were associated with higher rates of referral to a state-level quitline. EHR-generated provider feedback improved documentation of assistance with tobacco cessation. Connecting physician offices to a state-level quitline was feasible and well accepted.
Asunto(s)
Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Retroalimentación , Sistemas de Registros Médicos Computarizados/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Adulto , Anciano , Consejo/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oregon/epidemiología , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar/epidemiología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Telephone counseling for tobacco cessation is an effective and evidence-based approach to address tobacco use. The wide dissemination of region- and state-level quit lines has been a major goal for public health agencies. However, connecting patients in primary care settings to state-level quit lines has not been evaluated. METHODS: Observational study describing two methods (fax referral and providing a brochure) to connect private physician offices with a state-level quit line in Oregon. This study describes the resources required to create a clinical pathway for the 5A's in primary care (ask, advise, assess, assist, and arrange) using a state-level telephone quit line as an intervention for cessation in primary care clinics sharing a common electronic medical record system, focusing on the costs and generalizability of this approach. RESULTS: Of the 15,662 smokers identified in 19 primary care clinics, 745 patients were referred to the Oregon Tobacco Quit Line during the study period. The program cost in the first year was $15 to $22 per patient connected with the quit line; in subsequent years, the cost decreased to $4 to $6 per quit-line connection. CONCLUSIONS: Connecting private physician offices to a state-level quit line is feasible, can be accomplished at low cost with minimal use of resources, and may be cost effective. Regional, state, and local tobacco quit lines should consider a physician office "quit-line connection" as a practical approach to increase utilization.