RESUMEN
PURPOSE: With the aging population, it is clear that the demand for future chronic pain treatment modalities is at an all-time high. One of the newest treatment modalities that is gaining popularity with both practitioners and patients alike is that of regenerative medicine and the use of stem cells to treat chronic painful conditions. This article aims to distill the most recent, available data from both laboratory research and clinical trials to better illuminate the potentials for these therapies in the treatment of chronic pain. RECENT FINDINGS: There are numerous investigations underway using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to treat painful, largely degenerative conditions. A large majority of these investigations focus on osteoarthritis of the knee and have demonstrated significantly improved pain scores. Some of these investigations have demonstrated significantly increased articular cartilage and meniscus growth as well as improved function. These studies have been smaller (n, 18) and need to be corroborated on a macrolevel. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP)-based therapies have been most extensively studied in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Multiple prospective and randomized trials and meta-analyses have afforded level I evidence in support of PRP's safety and efficacy in chronic knee pain demonstrating both decreased pain (via VAS) and increased functional status (via WOMAC and IKDC). There have been randomized controlled trials examining PRP therapies in treatment degenerative disc disease (intradiscal treatment), facet arthropathy (intra-facet injections), and sacroiliitis (SIJ) which have all yielded similar positive results. Each RTC demonstrated decreased pain scores and increased function but lacks the scale to derive concrete guidelines. Newer investigations are underway examining modified PRP formulas with increased fibrin (PRF) or various growth factors (PRGF) and have shown positive outcomes with respect to osteoarthritic conditions in small trials. Animal trials are underway further investigating these therapies as well as specific gene modulation therapies. This review of the most recent investigations into the application and uses of biologic stem cell-derived treatments for chronic painful conditions should act to illustrate the growing, favorable data for these types of modalities both with respect to pain control and functional improvement.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre Mesenquimatosas , Plasma Rico en Plaquetas , Terapia Biológica , Fibrina , Humanos , Péptidos y Proteínas de Señalización Intercelular , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/terapia , Artropatías/terapia , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/terapia , Sacroileítis/terapia , Articulación CigapofisariaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Health care practitioners have developed complex algorithms to numerically calculate surgical risk. We examined the association between the initiation of a new do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status during hospitalization and postoperative outcomes, including mortality. We hypothesized that new DNR status would be associated with similar complication rates, even though mortality rates may be higher. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Geriatric Surgery Research File. Two cohorts were defined by the presence of a new DNR status during the hospitalization that was not present on hospital admission. Multivariable logistic regression was used to control for differences between the DNR and non-DNR cohorts. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included rates of postoperative complications, including returning to the operating room, reintubation, failure to wean from ventilation, surgical site infections, dehiscence, pneumonia, acute kidney injury, renal failure, stroke, cardiac arrest, acute myocardial infarction, transfusion requirements, sepsis, urinary tract infections, venous thromboembolisms, total number of complications for each patient, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: In our geriatric population with a newly established DNR status, the mortality rate was 39.29%, significantly greater than the non-DNR population after multivariable regression. Secondary outcomes also occurred at an increased rate in the DNR cohort including surgical site infections (8.29% vs 4.04%), pneumonia (18% vs 2.26%), renal insufficiency (2.43% vs 0.35%), acute renal failure (5% vs 0.19%), stroke (3% vs 0.36%), acute myocardial infarction (6.29% vs 0.95%), and cardiac arrest (5.86% vs 0.51%). CONCLUSIONS: The initiation of a new DNR status during hospitalization is associated with a significantly higher burden of both morbidity and mortality. This contrasts with prior studies that did not show an increased rate of adverse outcomes and suggests that a new DNR status in postoperative patients may reflect a consequence of adverse postoperative events. The informed consent process in older patients at risk for adverse outcomes after surgery should include discussions regarding goals of care and acceptable risk.
RESUMEN
Regional anesthesia has evolved as an important tool for anesthesiologists and surgeons managing patients for surgery of the head and neck region. In recent years, ultrasound use has increased significantly, and newer nerve blocks have been established for surgeries of the head and regions. In this review, anatomy, indications, efficacy, and potential side effects of regional anesthesia for the head and neck region are presented. Evolving practice strongly suggests that regional nerve blocks for the head and neck region are safe and effective. Future studies and education will likely evolve practice to make these regional techniques standards for future surgeries of the head and neck region.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia de Conducción/métodos , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Cabeza/cirugía , Cuello/cirugía , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Cabeza/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Cuello/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Chronic pain management techniques have evolved in recent years. With regard to this, ultrasound (US) technology has become a standard for most acute pain procedures and essential for postsurgical pain relief and enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. This manuscript summarizes clinical studies evaluating US use for chronic pain management and compares efficacy with standard techniques including fluoroscopy (FL). US possesses several unique benefits when compared with FL, including elimination of radiation exposure while providing similar clinical outcomes. In summary, US use for chronic pain procedures is emerging as a viable, safe, and effective modality. Additional studies are needed to best appreciate US and its role in chronic pain management.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Bloqueo Nervioso/instrumentación , Manejo del Dolor/instrumentación , Dimensión del Dolor/instrumentación , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Understanding the etiologies of the complications associated with regional anesthesia and implementing methods to reduce their occurrence provides an opportunity to foster safer practices in the delivery of regional anesthesia. RECENT FINDINGS: Neurologic injuries following peripheral nerve block (PNB) and neuraxial blocks are rare, with most being transient. However, long-lasting and devastating sequelae can occur with regional anesthesia. Risk factors for neurologic injury following PNB include type of block, injection in the presence of deep sedation or general anesthesia, presence of existing neuropathy, mechanical trauma from the needle, pressure injury, intraneural injection, neuronal ischemia, iatrogenic injury related to surgery, and local anesthetic neurotoxicity. The present investigation discusses regional blocks, complications of regional blocks, risk factors, site-specific limitations, specific complications and how to prevent them from happening, avoiding complications in regional anesthesia, and the future of regional anesthesia.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia de Conducción/normas , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Bloqueo Nervioso/normas , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/prevención & control , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Anestesia de Conducción/efectos adversos , Anestésicos Locales/efectos adversos , Humanos , Bloqueo Nervioso/efectos adversos , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/etiologíaRESUMEN
There are several new anticoagulants on the market that will impact perioperative care, including the use of these anticoagulant drugs in the setting of regional anesthesia. The ideal pharmacological agent would prevent pathological thrombosis and allow for a normal response to vascular injury to limit bleeding. At present, all antithrombotic agents have increased bleeding risk as their main side effect. We describe the different categories of drugs, e.g., antiplatelet, anticoagulant, and thrombolytic, with particular emphasis on the new drugs that have been introduced into the market. These agents can be evaluated by a number of methods including low-, medium-, or high-risk procedures and guidelines and best practice standards that have been published regarding the amount of time to wait after stopping the medication and before performing a procedure, e.g., the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine recommendations. The present investigation will also describe new reversal agents for anticoagulants and the implications of all these drugs for regional anesthesia.