Contemporary management of paraesophaegeal hernias: establishing a European expert consensus.

BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment of paraesophageal hernias remains a challenge due to the lack of consensus regarding principles of operative treatment. The objectives of this study were to achieve consensus on key topics through expert opinion using a Delphi methodology. METHODS: A Delphi survey combined with a face-to-face meeting was conducted. A panel of European experts in foregut surgery from high-volume centres generated items in the first survey round. In subsequent rounds, the panel rated agreement with statements on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Internal consistency (consensus) was predefined as Cronbach's α > .80. Items that >70 % of the panel either rated as irrelevant/unimportant, or relevant/important were selected as consensus items, while topics that did not reach this cut-off were termed "undecided/controversial". RESULTS: Three survey rounds were completed: 19 experts from 10 countries completed round one, 18 continued through rounds two and three. Internal consistency was high in rounds two and three (α > .90). Fifty-eight additional/revised items derived from comments and free-text entries were included in round three. In total, 118 items were rated; consensus agreement was achieved for 70 of these. Examples of consensus topics are the relevance of the disease profile for assessing surgical urgency and complexity, the role of clinical history as the mainstay of patient follow-up, indications for revision surgery, and training and credentialing recommendations. Topics with the most "undecided/controversial" items were follow-up, postoperative care and surgical technique. CONCLUSIONS: This Delphi study achieved expert consensus on key topics in the operative management of paraesophageal hernias, providing an overview of the current opinion among European foregut surgeons. Moreover, areas with substantial variability in opinions were identified reflecting the current lack of empirical evidence and opportunities for future research.

Randomized clinical trial to evaluate mental practice in enhancing advanced laparoscopic surgical performance.

BACKGROUND: Mental practice, the cognitive rehearsal of a task without physical movement, is known to enhance performance in sports and music. Investigation of this technique in surgery has been limited to basic operations. The purpose of this study was to develop mental practice scripts, and to assess their effect on advanced laparoscopic skills and surgeon stress levels in a crisis scenario. METHODS: Twenty senior surgical trainees were randomized to either conventional training or mental practice groups, the latter being trained by an expert performance psychologist. Participants' skills were assessed while performing a porcine laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy as part of a crisis scenario in a simulated operating room, using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) and bariatric OSATS (BOSATS) instruments. Objective and subjective stress parameters were measured, as well as non-technical skills using the Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons rating tool. RESULTS: An improvement in OSATS (P = 0.003) and BOSATS (P = 0.003) scores was seen in the mental practice group compared with the conventional training group. Seven of ten trainees improved their technical performance during the crisis scenario, whereas four of the ten conventionally trained participants deteriorated. Mental imagery ability improved significantly following mental practice training (P = 0.011), but not in the conventional group (P = 0.083). No differences in objective or subjective stress levels or non-technical skills were evident. CONCLUSION: Mental practice improves technical performance for advanced laparoscopic tasks in the simulated operating room, and allows trainees to maintain or improve their performance despite added stress.

Error rating tool to identify and analyse technical errors and events in laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical error analysis is essential for investigating mechanisms of errors, events and adverse outcomes. Furthermore, it provides valuable information for formative feedback and quality control. The aim of the present study was to design and validate a technical error rating tool in laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: The framework consisted of nine task groups and four error modes. Unedited videos of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures were rated and analysed. The Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) global rating scale was used to assess technical skills. The incidence of errors and of injuries (events) were the main outcome measures, and were used to calculate the reliability, and construct and concurrent validity of the instrument. RESULTS: Two observers analysed 25 procedures. Inter-rater reliability was high regarding total number of errors (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0·90) and events (ICC 0·85). The median (interquartile range) error rate was 35 (26-44) and the event rate 3 (2-3) per procedure. Error frequencies and OSATS scores correlated significantly in all operative steps (rs = -0·75 to -0·40, P = <0·001-0·046). Surgeons demonstrating high OSATS scores had lower median (i.q.r.) error rates than surgeons with low scores in three of four steps: measuring bowel (4 (2-7) versus 10 (9-11); P = 0·004), jejunojejunostomy formation (5 (2-6) versus 10 (9-11); P = 0·001) and pouch formation (4 (3-6) versus 9 (5-12); P = 0·004). CONCLUSION: The proposed error rating tool allows an objective and reliable assessment of operative performance in laparoscopic gastric bypass procedures.

[Education in laparoscopic surgery: national survey on current strategies and relevance of simulation training]. / Ausbildung in der laparoskopischen Chirurgie: Umfrage zu vorhandenen Konzepten und der Bedeutung von Simulationseinheiten.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery demands from the surgeon specific operative skills. Learning -curves have been described for many procedures in this technique. In order to evaluate the avail-able laparoscopic teaching resources and meth-ods in Germany an opinion survey was per-formed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Directors of 284 surgical departments were polled using a questionnaire regarding department and operation statistics, -laparoscopic education and availability of simulation facilities ("Skills Labs" SL). RESULTS: The response rate was 54 %. 88 % of the department directors considered laparoscopic -simulation an efficient teaching method and 91 % felt that simulation improves operating room performance. A SL was available in 27 % of these -departments. The training modules most commonly offered were basic laparoscopic skills such as coordination exercises (100 %) and suturing techniques (89 %). The actual median acquisition costs amounted to 20 000 € in our evaluation, with annual running costs of a median of 1000 €. CONCLUSION: Although most of the questioned surgeons acknowledged the value of SL, this method of education is not widely available in Germany. Therefore we feel that simulation training in Germany still requires stronger support.