RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review to assess the utility of accelerometric methods to identify older adults at risk of falls. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed during all steps of this systematic review. Cross sectional and longitudinal studies assessing gait parameters in older adults using accelerometric devices, and comparing groups based on the risk of falls or fall history were identified from studies published in the MEDLINE, SCOPUS and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases between January 1996 and January 2017. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. The quality of the methodology used in the studies included was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: In total, 354 references were identified through the database search. After selection, ten studies were included in this systematic review. According to the cross sectional studies, people who fall or are at risk of fall are slower, and walk with shorter steps, lower step frequency, worse stride and step regularity in terms of time, position and acceleration profiles. One longitudinal study suggests considering harmonic ratio of upper trunk acceleration in the vertical plane. Two other longitudinal studies highlight the importance of considering more than one gait parameter, and sophisticated statistical tools to discern older adults at risk for future fall(s). CONCLUSION: This systematic review essentially highlights the lack of available literature providing strong evidence that gait parameters obtained using acceleration-based methods could be useful to discern older people at risk of fall. Available literature is encouraging, but further high quality studies are needed to highlight the cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships between gait parameters and falls in older adults.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gait patterns of healthy aging are needed to allow a comparison with pathological situations. However, little data is available. OBJECTIVE: To present gait pattern of healthy older specially selected to be "healthy walkers". METHOD: Fifty-seven older people benefited from a geriatric assessment including clinical and functional evaluations to include only those without gait disorders. Gait data were simultaneously recorded using a tri-axial accelerometer placed on the waist and four 3D position markers placed on the feet at the level of the heel and the toe. Volunteers walked at comfortable self-selected speed (CW), fast self-selected speed (FW), and finally in dual task walking condition (DTW). The extracted gait parameters were: gait speed, stride length, stride frequency, regularity and symmetry, swing, stance and double support time and ratio and minimum toe clearance. Gait speed and stride length were normalized to the right leg length. RESULTS: Fifty-seven older people with a mean age of 69.7 ± 4.2 years old (range from 65 to 82 years) were included. Data were analyzed according to the gender and according to the age (<70 or ≥70 years old). After normalization to leg length, the main significant differences were shown for stride length and minimum toe clearance in CW, FW and in DTW that were shorter in women. The regularity in FW was significantly lower among older volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: This work provides a data set considering 14 gait parameters obtained from 57 healthy old people strictly selected and assessed for three walking conditions and shows that GS, SL and MTC have to be related to the gender. The age-related impact on gait performances appears reduced in this cohort.
