RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a growing public health problem around the world, yet there is little information on the prevalence of head injury in low and middle income countries (LMICs). We utilised data collected by the 10/66 research group to investigate the lifetime prevalence of head injury in defined sites in low and middle income countries, its risk factors and its relationship with disability. METHODS: We analysed data from one-phase cross-sectional surveys of all residents aged 65 years and older (n = 16430) distributed across twelve sites in eight low and middle income countries (China, Cuba, Dominican Republic, India, Venezuela, Mexico, Peru, and Puerto Rico). Self-reported cases of head injury with loss of consciousness were identified during the interview. A sensitivity analysis including data provided by informants of people with dementia was also used to estimate the impact of this information on the estimates. Prevalence ratios (PR) from Poisson regressions were used to identify associated risk factors. RESULTS: The standardised lifetime prevalence of TBI ranged from 0.3% in China to 14.6% in rural Mexico and Venezuela. Being male (PR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.29-1.82), younger (PR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.99), with lower education (PR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86-0.96), and having fewer assets (PR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.88-0.96), was associated with a higher prevalence of TBI when pooling estimates across sites. DISCUSSION: Our analysis revealed that the prevalence of TBI in LMICs is similar to that of developed nations. Considering the growing impact of TBI on health resources in these countries, there is an urgent need for further research.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , China/epidemiología , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/etiología , Estudios Transversales , Cuba/epidemiología , Países en Desarrollo , Personas con Discapacidad , República Dominicana/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Perú/epidemiología , Pobreza , Prevalencia , Puerto Rico/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Venezuela/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Many 'first generation' African Caribbean residents in the UK have now reached ages where risk of cognitive impairment and dementia starts to increase. In addition, conditions which may impair cognitive function, such as hypertension, diabetes and stroke, have high prevalence rates in African Caribbean populations. However, there is a lack of normative data for cognitive tests in this ethnic group. Cognitive assessment was carried out in a south London community population of 285 African Caribbean participants aged 55-75 years. Tests were drawn principally from the consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer's disease (CERAD) battery (Boston Naming Test, verbal fluency, word list recall, and Trailmaking Tests A and B) and also included orientation items from the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Clock Drawing Test. Independent effects of age, sex, education and occupation were identified on scores for most but not all cognitive tests. Compared with normative data for African American populations, lower scores on verbal fluency and the Boston Naming Test were observed but scores on memory tests were comparable. Normative data for the tests are presented, stratified by level of education.
Asunto(s)
Población Negra , Trastornos del Conocimiento , Cognición , Demencia , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Varianza , Población Negra/psicología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etnología , Demencia/diagnóstico , Demencia/etnología , Escolaridad , Londres/epidemiología , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas/normas , Atención Primaria de Salud , Valores de Referencia , Muestreo , Factores Sexuales , Clase Social , Indias Occidentales/etnologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Stroke, hypertension and diabetes are common in older Caribbean-born populations in the UK who may be at risk of depression secondary to vascular disease. AIMS: We examined the association between stroke, vascular risk factors and depression in a community-based Caribbean-born population aged 55-75 years. METHOD: Vascular risk factors were identified by interview, examination and blood tests. Depression was categorised using the Geriatric Depression Scale. Disablement was assessed as a potential mediating factor. RESULTS: Physical illness and disablement were strongly associated with depression, independent of disablement. Previous stroke was associated with depression, independent of disablement. No vascular risk factors were associated with depression. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of depression associated with stroke was not explained by disablement. However, the hypothesis that vascular risk factors are important in the genesis of depression was not supported.