Benefit of Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy for Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Treated with Radiation-based Therapy in a Real-world Setting: An Inverse Probability Treatment Weighted Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) improves survival for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) treated with radical cystectomy. Studies on the potential benefit of NAC before radiation-based therapy (RT) are conflicting. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of NAC on patients with MIBC treated with curative-intent RT in a real-world setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study cohort consisted of 785 patients with MIBC (cT2-4aN0-2M0) who underwent RT at academic centers across Canada. Patients were classified into two treatment groups based on the administration of NAC before RT (NAC vs no NAC). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with absolute standardized differences (ASDs) was used to balance covariates across treatment groups. The impact of NAC on complete response, overall, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) after RT in the weighted cohort was analyzed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: After applying the exclusion criteria, 586 patients were included; 102 (17%) received NAC before RT. Patients in the NAC subgroup were younger (mean age 65 vs 77 yr; ASD 1.20); more likely to have Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 (87% vs 78%; ASD 0.28), lymphovascular invasion (32% vs 20%; ASD 0.27), higher cT stage (cT3-4 in 29% vs 20%; ASD 0.21), and higher cN stage (cN1-2 in 32% vs 4%; ASD 0.81); and more commonly treated with concurrent chemotherapy (79% vs 67%; ASD 0.28). After IPTW, NAC versus no NAC cohorts were well balanced (ASD <0.20) for all included covariates. NAC was significantly associated with improved CSS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-0.56; p < 0.001) and overall survival (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.38-0.84; p = 0.005). This study was limited by potential occult imbalances across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: If tolerated, NAC might be associated with improved survival and should be considered for eligible patients with MIBC planning to undergo bladder preservation with RT. Prospective trials are warranted. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy might be associated with improved survival in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who elect for curative-intent radiation-based therapy.

Radiation-based Therapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Contemporary Outcomes Across Tertiary Centers.

BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy (RT) is an alternative to radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). OBJECTIVE: To analyze predictors of complete response (CR) and survival after RT for MIBC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a multicenter retrospective study of 864 patients with nonmetastatic MIBC who underwent curative-intent RT from 2002 to 2018. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Regression models were used to explore prognostic factors associated with CR, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median patient age was 77 yr and median follow-up was 34 mo. Disease stage was cT2 in 675 patients (78%) and cN0 in 766 (89%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was given to 147 patients (17%) and concurrent chemotherapy to 542 (63%). A CR was experienced by 592 patients (78%). cT3-4 stage (odds ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.63; p < 0.001) and hydronephrosis (OR 0.50, 95% CI 034-0.74; p = 0.001) were significantly associated with lower CR. The 5-yr survival rates were 63% for CSS and 49% for OS. Higher cT stage (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.46-2.56; p < 0.001), carcinoma in situ (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.25-3.53; p = 0.005), hydronephrosis (HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.79-3.10; p < 0.001), NAC use (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.95; p = 0.025), and whole-pelvis RT (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.86; p = 0.002) were independently associated with CSS; advanced age (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05; p = 0.001), worse performance status (HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.34-2.22; p < 0.001), hydronephrosis (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.17-1.91; p = 0.001), NAC use (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.97; p = 0.033), whole-pelvis RT (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51-0.80; p < 0.001), and being surgically unfit (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.12-1.80; p = 0.004) were associated with OS. The study is limited by the heterogeneity of different treatment protocols. CONCLUSIONS: RT for MIBC yields a CR in most patients who elect for curative-intent bladder preservation. The benefit of NAC and whole-pelvis RT require prospective trial validation. PATIENT SUMMARY: We investigated outcomes for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with curative-intent radiation therapy as an alternative to surgical removal of the bladder. The benefit of chemotherapy before radiotherapy and whole-pelvis radiation (bladder plus the pelvis lymph nodes) needs further study.

The Impact of Quality Variations on Patients Undergoing Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite efforts to define metrics assessing hospital-level quality for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) surgical care there remains a paucity of real-world data validating their ability to benchmark performance. Consequently, whether poor performance on hospital-level quality indicators is associated with inferior patient outcomes remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine hospital-level variations in RCC surgical quality after adjusting for differences in patient- and tumor-specific factors. Further, to determine associations between hospital-level quality performance and surgical volume, academic affiliation, and patient mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: RCC patients undergoing surgery in the USA and Puerto Rico (2004-2014) were identified from the National Cancer Database. OUTCOME MEASURES AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Hospital-level quality of care was assessed according to disease-specific process and outcome quality indicators. Case-mix adjusted hospital benchmarking was performed using indirect standardization methodology and multivariable regression models. A composite measure of quality, the Renal Cancer Quality Score (RC-QS), was subsequently derived and associations between RC-QS and surgical volume, academic affiliation, and patient mortality were determined. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Over 1100 hospitals were benchmarked for quality, with 10-31% identified as providing poor care for a given quality indicator. Lower RC-QS hospitals had smaller referral volumes and were less academic compared with higher RC-QS hospitals (p<0.001). Higher RC-QS was independently associated with lower 30-d, 90-d, and overall mortality (adjusted odds ratio [confidence interval]: 0.92 [0.90-0.95], odds ratio: 0.94 [0.91-0.96], hazard ratio: 0.97 [0.96-0.98] per unit increase, respectively). These data are retrospective and it is unknown whether improvement in the RC-QS improves outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Widespread hospital-level variations in RCC surgical quality exist, as captured by the RC-QS. Superior quality is associated with improved patient outcomes, including mortality benefit. The RC-QS serves as a benchmarking tool for RCC quality that can provide audit level feedback to hospitals and policymakers for quality improvement. PATIENT SUMMARY: We benchmarked hospital performance across quality indicators for kidney cancer surgical care. Overall, large variations in quality exist, with high volume academic hospitals demonstrating superior performance and improved patient survival. These data can inform hospitals and policymakers for quality improvement initiatives.