RESUMEN
We report the case of a near fatal arterial injury in a patient undergoing an inside-out catheter placement through an occluded central venous system using the Surfacer device (Bluegrass Vascular). The right internal mammary artery was inadvertently lacerated during the procedure, leading to cardiovascular collapse. The patient was rescued by transfusion, placement of a chest tube, and coil embolization of the right internal mammary artery. Postprocedure analysis of intraoperative cone beam computed tomography revealed that this injury was predictable on imaging, underscoring the need for advanced imaging guidance to enhance the safety of this procedure.
RESUMEN
Background and Objective: Surgical creation of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) and grafts (AVG) continues to be the mainstay access for hemodialysis (HD). Avoidance of dependence on dialysis catheters continues to be a worldwide mission in dialysis access. Importantly, there is no one-size-fits-all approach to hemodialysis access and each patient should undergo access creation that is patient-centered. The aim of this paper is to review the literature, current guidelines, and discuss the common types of upper extremity hemodialysis access and their reported outcomes. We will also share our institutional experience regarding the surgical creation of upper extremity hemodialysis access. Methods: The literature review incorporates twenty-seven relevant articles from 1997 to present and one case report series from 1966. Sources were gathered from electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Google Scholar. Only articles written in the English language were considered and study designs varied from current clinical guidelines, systematic and meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and two main vascular surgery textbooks. Key Content and Findings: This review exclusively focuses on the surgical creation of upper extremity hemodialysis accesses. Creating a graft versus fistula ultimately is decided by the existing anatomy, and is centered around the need of the patient. Preoperatively, the patient should undergo a thorough history and physical exam, with special attention to any previous central venous access, as well as, delineating the vascular anatomy with ultrasound imaging. The major tenets of access creation are choosing the most distal site of the non-dominant upper extremity whenever possible; and ideally creation of an autogenous access is preferred over a prosthetic graft. Described in this review are multiple surgical approaches for upper extremity hemodialysis access creation and associated institutional practices performed by the surgeon author. In the postoperative period, follow up care and surveillance are imperative to preserve a functioning access. Conclusions: The most recent guidelines regarding hemodialysis access still favor arteriovenous fistula as the primary goal for patients with suitable anatomy. Preoperative evaluation including patient education, intraoperative ultrasound assessment, meticulous technique, and careful postoperative management are all paramount for successful access surgery. Dialysis access remains quite challenging, but with diligence the great majority of patients can be dialyzed without catheter dependence.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prehospital chest decompression can be a lifesaving procedure in severe chest trauma. Studies investigating prehospital chest decompression are mostly European where physicians are assigned to prehospital care units. This report is one of the first to compare demographics and outcomes in patients undergoing prehospital chest decompression by trained aeromedical nonphysician personnel to hospital chest decompression by physicians. METHODS: Prehospital tube thoracostomy (PTT) patients were identified from January 2014 to January 2019 and were matched in a 1:2 ratio based on age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and chest Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) to patients who underwent hospital tube thoracostomy (HTT) within 24 hours of admission. RESULTS: Forty-nine PTT patients were matched to 98 HTT patients. PTT patients had lower admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), a higher rate of pre-chest tube needle decompression, and higher level 1 trauma activation. PTT were placed sooner (21.9 vs 157.0 minutes, P < .001). Rates of tube malposition, organ injury, tube dislodgement, empyema, and hospital-acquired pneumonia over the course of hospital admission were not significantly different between the 2 groups. PTT patients had longer intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), but similar hospital LOS, and overall mortality. DISCUSSION: This report demonstrates that PTT is performed sooner than hospital placed tubes. Complication rates associated with tube thoracostomy and patient outcomes were not statistically different between PTT and HTT groups.
