RESUMEN
Molluscum contagiosum is a common, contagious viral skin disease that often affects children and adolescents. Involvement of the areola and nipple are rarely reported. Herein we report two young women with molluscum contagiosum on the areola-nipple complex and we discuss the dermoscopic features of the lesions at this unusual site.
Asunto(s)
Dermoscopía , Molusco Contagioso/diagnóstico por imagen , Pezones , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Molusco Contagioso/patología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mammographic, sonographic and MRI findings of metaplastic breast carcinoma. METHODS: In this retrospective review study, we analyzed the medical files of 9600 patients who were treated for invasive breast cancers. Clinical information, histopathologic and radiologic findings of 65 patients were included in this study. All existing radiologic images and medical reports were reviewed retrospectively. Thirty-three patients had MG, 58 patients had US and 7 patients had MRI imaging results. RESULTS: Mammographically, the most frequent presentations of MPBC were round shape, microlobulated margin and high density masses. Calcifications with or without masses were not a frequent finding. The most common sonographic findings were round shape, partially indistinct angular margin, hypoechoic and heterogeneous echo patterns and no posterior feature masses. All lesions were presented as masses rather than non-mass enhancements on magnetic resonance imaging. Features of masses had more malignant feature on MRI than other modalities in all 7 patients. CONCLUSION: Metaplastic breast carcinoma is one of the rarest poorly differentiated invasive breast carcinomas. Interestingly, these aggressive tumors demonstrate benign or moderately malign features on imaging methods. This appearance of MPBC can cause it to be misdiagnosed as a benign breast lesion especially in young women. MPBC should be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis of large palpable breast masses. Therefore, follow-up at short intervals and/or multimodality imaging studies which include breast MRI are important for the diagnosis of MPBC.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Mamografía/métodos , Ultrasonografía Mamaria/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/mortalidad , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/terapia , Bases de Datos Factuales , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Imagen Multimodal/métodos , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the importance of routine pathological examination of contralateral breast specimens in breast cancer patients using reduction mammoplasty. METHODS: The weight of breast tissue resected from the contralateral breast in 71 patients and the number of slices used for pathological evaluation were recorded. Breast lesions found in the contralateral breast and accompanying lesions with tumors were examined. RESULTS: High risk proliferative lesions were reported in the contralateral breast of eight (11.2%) patients, and low-risk lesions were detected in 18 (25%). While the mean age of the patients with high-risk lesions was 45.6, it was 52.8 for the other patients (p=0.036). CONCLUSION: Bilateral reduction mammoplasty may be beneficial to delineate some pathologies in contralateral breasts even in those patients with normal clinical and radiological findings. The incidental discovery of these pathologies is much more likely in young breast cancer patients.
RESUMEN
Splenosis is the heterotopic autotransplantation of splenic tissue that usually follows traumatic splenic rupture and splenectomy. Implanted splenic tissue may give rise to a mass or masses in the chest, abdomen, or pelvis which the clinician must distinguish from benign or malignant tumors. A 38-year-old multiparous woman presented for a routine gynecological examination during breast cancer treatment. She had undergone splenectomy following traumatic splenic rupture at the age of 13. Pelvic examination revealed a left adnexal mass. Transvaginal ultrasonography showed a 39×56×40 mm diameter hyperechoic, hypervascular solid tumor on the left ovary. Total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed. The postoperative histological diagnosis was splenic tissue. Splenosis must be considered in the differential diagnosis of previosly splenectomized patients who present with unexplained masses.