Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Med Phys ; 51(1): 278-291, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37475466

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In order to accurately accumulate delivered dose for head and neck cancer patients treated with the Adapt to Position workflow on the 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-linear accelerator (MR-linac), the low-resolution T2-weighted MRIs used for daily setup must be segmented to enable reconstruction of the delivered dose at each fraction. PURPOSE: In this pilot study, we evaluate various autosegmentation methods for head and neck organs at risk (OARs) on on-board setup MRIs from the MR-linac for off-line reconstruction of delivered dose. METHODS: Seven OARs (parotid glands, submandibular glands, mandible, spinal cord, and brainstem) were contoured on 43 images by seven observers each. Ground truth contours were generated using a simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) algorithm. Twenty total autosegmentation methods were evaluated in ADMIRE: 1-9) atlas-based autosegmentation using a population atlas library (PAL) of 5/10/15 patients with STAPLE, patch fusion (PF), random forest (RF) for label fusion; 10-19) autosegmentation using images from a patient's 1-4 prior fractions (individualized patient prior [IPP]) using STAPLE/PF/RF; 20) deep learning (DL) (3D ResUNet trained on 43 ground truth structure sets plus 45 contoured by one observer). Execution time was measured for each method. Autosegmented structures were compared to ground truth structures using the Dice similarity coefficient, mean surface distance (MSD), Hausdorff distance (HD), and Jaccard index (JI). For each metric and OAR, performance was compared to the inter-observer variability using Dunn's test with control. Methods were compared pairwise using the Steel-Dwass test for each metric pooled across all OARs. Further dosimetric analysis was performed on three high-performing autosegmentation methods (DL, IPP with RF and 4 fractions [IPP_RF_4], IPP with 1 fraction [IPP_1]), and one low-performing (PAL with STAPLE and 5 atlases [PAL_ST_5]). For five patients, delivered doses from clinical plans were recalculated on setup images with ground truth and autosegmented structure sets. Differences in maximum and mean dose to each structure between the ground truth and autosegmented structures were calculated and correlated with geometric metrics. RESULTS: DL and IPP methods performed best overall, all significantly outperforming inter-observer variability and with no significant difference between methods in pairwise comparison. PAL methods performed worst overall; most were not significantly different from the inter-observer variability or from each other. DL was the fastest method (33 s per case) and PAL methods the slowest (3.7-13.8 min per case). Execution time increased with a number of prior fractions/atlases for IPP and PAL. For DL, IPP_1, and IPP_RF_4, the majority (95%) of dose differences were within ± 250 cGy from ground truth, but outlier differences up to 785 cGy occurred. Dose differences were much higher for PAL_ST_5, with outlier differences up to 1920 cGy. Dose differences showed weak but significant correlations with all geometric metrics (R2 between 0.030 and 0.314). CONCLUSIONS: The autosegmentation methods offering the best combination of performance and execution time are DL and IPP_1. Dose reconstruction on on-board T2-weighted MRIs is feasible with autosegmented structures with minimal dosimetric variation from ground truth, but contours should be visually inspected prior to dose reconstruction in an end-to-end dose accumulation workflow.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Flujo de Trabajo , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Órganos en Riesgo
2.
Pract Radiat Oncol ; 13(6): e499-e503, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37295724

RESUMEN

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is often used as upfront treatment for brain metastases. Progression or radionecrosis after SRS is common and can prompt resection. However, postoperative management strategies after resection for SRS failure vary widely, and no standard practice has been established. In this approved study, we retrospectively reviewed patients who received SRS for a brain metastasis followed by resection of the same lesion. We extracted patient-, disease-, and treatment-related variables and information on disease-related outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinicopathologic variables were used to create a model to predict factors associated with local failure (LF). A total of 225 patients with brain metastases treated with SRS from 2009 to 2017 followed by surgical resection were identified. Overall, 65% of cases had gross total resection (GTR) on postoperative imaging review. Twenty-one patients (9.3%) received adjuvant radiation therapy to the surgical cavity, and 204 (90.7%) were observed. Of these 204 patients, 118 had GTR with evidence of tumor within the pathology specimen. With a median follow-up of 13 months after resection, 47 patients (40%) developed LF after surgery. After salvage resection of a brain metastasis initially treated with SRS, the observed LF rate was 40% among those who had a GTR and evidence of tumor on pathologic examination. This LF rate is sufficiently high that adjuvant radiation to the surgical bed after salvage resection should be considered in these cases when there is tumor in the pathology, even after a GTR.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología
3.
Neurooncol Pract ; 8(2): 199-208, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33898053

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study investigated the impact of, in addition to age, the management and outcomes of elderly patients with glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried between 2004 and 2015 for GBM patients age 60 years and older. Three age groups were created: 60 to 69, 70 to 79, and 80 years and older, and 4 age/KPS groups: "age ≥ 60/ KPS < 70" (group 1), "age 60 to 69/KPS ≥ 70" (group 2), "age 70 to 79/KPS ≥ 70" (group 3), and "age ≥ 80/KPS ≥ 70" (group 4). Multivariable (MVA) modeling with Cox regression determined predictors of survival (OS), and estimated average treatment effects analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 48 540 patients with a median age of 70 years (range, 60-90 years) at diagnosis, and a median follow-up of 6.8 months (range, 0-151 months) were included. Median survival was 5.0, 15.2, 9.6, and 6.8 months in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively (P < .001). On treatment effects analysis, all groups survived longer with combined chemotherapy (ChT) and radiation therapy (RT), except group 1, which survived longer with ChT alone (P < .001). RT alone was associated with the worst OS in all groups (P < .01). Across all groups, predictors of worse OS on MVA were older age, lower KPS, White, higher comorbidity score, worse socioeconomic status, community treatment, tumor multifocality, subtotal resection, and no adjuvant treatment (all P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients with newly diagnosed GBM, those with good KPS fared best with combined ChT and RT across all age groups. Performance status is a key prognostic factor that should be considered for management decisions in these patients.

4.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 109(3): 718-725, 2021 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33516439

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Pediatric patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) are treated with multimodal therapy, often with radiation therapy (RT) as part of local therapy. We report on the efficacy and patterns of failure after proton beam therapy (PBT) for RMS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 2006 and February 2017, patients with RMS were enrolled in a prospective institutional review board-approved registry protocol for pediatric patients undergoing PBT. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment related outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Ninety-four RMS patients were treated with a combination of chemotherapy (CT) and PBT. The majority of patients had head and neck (49%) and genitourinary (30%) primaries. Median tumor size was 4.1 cm (range, 1.0-16.5 cm); 33 patients (35%) had primary tumors >5 cm. Median cyclophosphamide equivalent dose was 14.4 g/m2 (range, 0-30.8 g/m2). Median time from CT initiation to RT initiation was 13 weeks (range, 1-58 weeks). With median follow-up of 4 years, 4-year overall survival (OS) was 71%, and 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 63%. Thirty patients (32%) experienced relapse (13% with local failure [LF]). Four-year local control (LC) was 85% overall; 4-year LC rates were 100% for low-risk, 85% for intermediate-risk, and 55% for high-risk patients (P = .02). Tumor size predicted LC (P = .007), with 7% versus 33% LF rate by tumor size (≤5 cm vs >5 cm). Delayed RT delivery (≥13 weeks from initiation of CT) predicted worse LC (P = .01). Increased tumor size predicted both inferior PFS (P = .02) and OS (P = .01). Delayed RT delivery predicted both inferior PFS (P = .04) and OS (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: PBT provides LC comparable to prior studies using photon RT. Inferior LC, PFS, and OS rates were observed for patients with larger tumors and those treated with delayed RT. This finding supports ongoing prospective efforts to dose-escalate treatment of tumors >5 cm; however, these data call into question the optimal timing of local therapy, particularly for patients treated with reduced-dose cyclophosphamide.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Protones/métodos , Rabdomiosarcoma Alveolar/radioterapia , Rabdomiosarcoma Embrionario/radioterapia , Adolescente , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administración & dosificación , Niño , Preescolar , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/mortalidad , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Humanos , Lactante , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Rabdomiosarcoma Alveolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Rabdomiosarcoma Alveolar/mortalidad , Rabdomiosarcoma Alveolar/patología , Rabdomiosarcoma Embrionario/tratamiento farmacológico , Rabdomiosarcoma Embrionario/mortalidad , Rabdomiosarcoma Embrionario/patología , Factores de Riesgo , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Carga Tumoral , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/radioterapia
5.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 4926, 2020 03 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32188907

RESUMEN

Treatment for glioblastoma (GBM) includes surgical resection and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy. The optimal time interval between surgery and RT remains unclear. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with GBM. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Univariate (UVA) and multivariable Cox regression (MVA) modeling was used to determine predictors of OS. A total of 45,942 patients were included. On MVA: younger age, female gender, black ethnicity, higher KPS, obtaining a gross total resection (GTR), MGMT promoter-methylated gene status, unifocal disease, higher RT dose, and RT delay of 4-8 weeks had improved OS. Patients who underwent a subtotal resection (STR) had worsened survival with RT delay ≤4 weeks and patients with GTR had worsened survival when RT was delayed >8 weeks. This analysis suggests that an interval of 4-8 weeks between resection and RT results in better survival. Delays >8 weeks in patients with a GTR and delays <4 weeks in patients with a STR/biopsy resulted in worse survival. This impact of time delay from surgery to RT, in conjunction with extent of resection, should be considered in the clinical management of patients and future designs of clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Glioblastoma/radioterapia , Glioblastoma/cirugía , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Encefálicas/epidemiología , Terapia Combinada , Bases de Datos Factuales , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Glioblastoma/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
6.
Front Oncol ; 9: 1224, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31803614

RESUMEN

Background: Leptomeningeal disease (LMD), also known as neoplastic meningitis, leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, or carcinomatous meningitis, is a rare cancer complication occurring in ~5% of cases and ultimately leads to significant morbidity and mortality. In the modern era, incidence of this condition continues to rise with longer survival of patients with advanced and even metastatic disease due to continued improvements in systemic therapies that are providing prolonged control of distant disease, but with limited effect in the central nervous system (CNS). Typical treatment strategies include optimal systemic therapy for the primary disease, as well as neuroaxis directed therapies, which may include intrathecal chemotherapy (ITC) or radiotherapy (RT). Methods: A systematic review of radiotherapy for LMD was performed. Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from 1946 to 2018 for clinical trials, retrospective/prospective reviews, and case series with ≥2 human subjects that used radiation therapy techniques in the treatment of LMD. The outcome measures of interest included: characteristics of trial participants, inclusion/exclusion criteria, study type, number of participants, primary cancer histology, type of intervention for LMD, survival results if reported, length of follow up, and study conclusion. Results: Of 547 unique citations, 62 studies met the pre-specified eligibility criteria. These studies included 36 retrospective cohorts, 11 prospective series, 12 case series, and a single citation of guidelines, NCDB analysis, and a randomized control trial. Owing to study heterogeneity, meta-analyses of the endpoint data could not be performed. Conclusions: LMD is a devastating complication of cancer with reported survivals ranging from 2 to 4 months. Based on this systematic review, the recommendation for the treatment of LMD is for multimodality discussion of cases and treatment, including the use of radiotherapy, for LMD. However, with continued advances in systemic therapy as well as imaging advances, the landscape of LMD is evolving rapidly and the role of RT will likely also continue to evolve and advance. There is limited high-quality evidence to guide the optimal use of RT for the treatment of LMD, and there is a great need for prospective, histology specific investigation of the role of radiotherapy for LMD in the era of modern systemic therapies.

8.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 66(11): e27952, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31397065

RESUMEN

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): Bladder and prostate are unfavorable sites for rhabdomyosarcoma (B/P-RMS), and represent a challenging location for radiotherapy. MATERIALS/METHODS: Nineteen patients with B/P-RMS were enrolled on a prospective registry protocol (2008-2017) and treated with chemotherapy, proton beam therapy (PBT), and surgical resection (n = 8; 42%). Emphasis was given to treatment technique, disease-related outcomes, and toxicity associated with PBT. RESULTS: The majority of patients had bladder RMS (74%) of embryonal histology (95%), Group III (68%), and intermediate-risk disease by Children's Oncology Group (COG) risk stratification (89%). Seven patients (37%) had primary tumors >5 cm in size. All patients were treated according to COG protocols. With a median follow-up of 66.2 months, 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 76%. Four patients (21%) experienced disease relapse, all presenting with local failure. The 5-year local control (LC) rate was 76%. Tumor size predicted LC, with 5-year LC for patients with >5 cm tumors being 43% versus 100% for those with ≤5 cm tumors (P = .006). Univariate analysis demonstrated an effect of tumor size on OS (tumor >5 cm, hazard ratio [HR] 17.7, P = .049) and PFS (HR 17.7, P = .049). Acute grade 2 toxicity was observed in two patients (11%, transient proctitis). Late grade 2+ toxicity was observed in three patients (16%; n = 1 grade 2 skeletal deformity; n = 3 transient grade 2 urinary incontinence; one patient experienced both). CONCLUSIONS: PBT for B/P-RMS affords promising disease-related outcomes with an acceptable toxicity profile. Higher local failure rates were observed for larger tumors, supporting dose-escalation components of ongoing RMS clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Terapia de Protones , Rabdomiosarcoma Embrionario/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/radioterapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Preescolar , Terapia Combinada , Cistectomía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Proctitis/etiología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Terapia de Protones/efectos adversos , Terapia de Protones/métodos , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Sistema de Registros , Rabdomiosarcoma Alveolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Rabdomiosarcoma Alveolar/patología , Rabdomiosarcoma Alveolar/radioterapia , Rabdomiosarcoma Alveolar/cirugía , Rabdomiosarcoma Embrionario/tratamiento farmacológico , Rabdomiosarcoma Embrionario/patología , Rabdomiosarcoma Embrionario/cirugía , Riesgo , Carga Tumoral , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología
9.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 105(4): 795-802, 2019 11 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31377160

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Deintensification of adjuvant therapy is being considered for older women with early-stage, biologically favorable breast cancer. Although radiation therapy (RT) can be omitted in some cases, toxicity from hormone therapy (HT) is not trivial, and adherence rates vary. We hypothesized that adjuvant RT alone would produce survival outcomes comparable to those with adjuvant HT alone among elderly patients treated with lumpectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We searched the National Cancer Database (2010-2014) for healthy women (aged ≥70 years, Charlson/Deyo [CD] score 0-1) with T1N0 hormone-receptor-positive, HER-2-negative breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and adjuvant HT or RT. Propensity scores were used to match patients for analysis. RESULTS: We identified 2995 patients (median age, 78 years), most (81%) with a CD score of 0, clinical stage IA (77%), of whom 65% received HT alone and 35% received RT only after lumpectomy. On multivariate analysis of the matched cohort, older age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.13; P < .001), CD score 1 (HR 1.92; 95% CI 1.37-2.70; P = .0002), and living in a metropolitan (vs urban) area (HR 3.09; 95% CI 1.43-6.67; P = .004) were associated with inferior overall survival (OS), whereas treatment with HT (vs RT) was not (HR 1.13; 95% CI 0.85-1.49; P = .406). At a median follow-up of 45 months, no difference was found in OS between HT versus RT cohorts (85% and 86%, respectively; P = .44). CONCLUSIONS: For healthy, older women with biologically favorable breast cancer treated with lumpectomy, adjuvant RT or HT is associated with equivalent 5-year OS rates. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to explore these adjuvant monotherapy options in elderly patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/química , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Renta , Modelos Logísticos , Análisis Multivariante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Puntaje de Propensión , Radioterapia Adyuvante/mortalidad , Receptores de Estrógenos , Receptores de Progesterona , Características de la Residencia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo
10.
Adv Radiat Oncol ; 4(2): 362-366, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31011682

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to report on the safety, feasibility, and workflow of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) simulation, while immobilized in the treatment position, for radiation therapy treatment planning in the pediatric population. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between May and December 2017, 10 pediatric patients completed both MRI and computed tomography imaging simulation in treatment immobilization for radiation therapy planning for central nervous system disease. We report our initial institutional experience and workflow of the use of MRI simulation in immobilization for treatment planning in this population. RESULTS: Ten pediatric patients successfully underwent MRI and computed tomography imaging simulation for CNS disease. Two patients required anesthesia for sedation during the simulations. From our initial experience, MRI simulation was tolerated by all 10 pediatric patients without any safety or clinical issues, including those who required anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience supports the use of MRI simulation for radiation treatment planning in the pediatric population, with and without anesthetic sedation, as a safe and feasible image-guidance tool. This is particularly useful in the treatment of pediatric patients because MRI simulation enables superior, soft-tissue, anatomic imaging for a more robust delineation of organs at risk and target volumes without increasing radiation exposure.

11.
ACG Case Rep J ; 3(4): e104, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27807566

RESUMEN

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic agent that was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1996 for treatment of psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Since that time, numerous case reports have been published that describe the association of olanzapine and the development of pancreatitis. Furthermore, 3 reports suggest the mechanism of olanzapine-induced hypertriglyceridemia as the etiology of this progression. We report a case of a 36-year-old man who developed necrotizing pancreatitis secondary to olanzapine-induced hypertriglyceridemia. This case, to our knowledge, is the most severe case of this progression and the first case requiring plasmapheresis for acute management.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...