RESUMEN
Introduction: on March 21, 2020, the first case of COVID-19 was confirmed in Uganda. A total lockdown was initiated on March 30 which was gradually lifted May 5-June 30. On March 25, a toll-free call center was organized at the Kampala Capital City Authority to respond to public concerns about COVID-19 and the lockdown. We documented the set-up and use of the call center and analyzed key concerns raised by the public. Methods: two hotlines were established and disseminated through media platforms in Greater Kampala. The call center was open 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. We abstracted data on incoming calls from March 25 to June 30, 2020. We summarized call data into categories and conducted descriptive analyses of public concerns raised during the lockdown. Results: among 10,167 calls, two-thirds (6,578; 64.7%) involved access to health services, 1,565 (15.4%) were about social services, and 1,375 (13.5%) involved COVID-19-related issues. Approximately one-third (2,152; 32.7%) of calls about access to health services were requests for ambulances for patients with non-COVID-19-related emergencies. About three-quarters of calls about social services were requests for food and relief items (1,184; 75.7%). Half of the calls about COVID-19 (730; 53.1%) sought disease-related information. Conclusion: the toll-free call center was used by the public during the COVID-19 lockdown in Kampala. Callers were more concerned about access to essential health services, non-related to COVID-19 disease. It is important to plan for continuity of essential services before a public health emergency-related lockdown.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Centrales de Llamados , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Uganda/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Centrales de Llamados/estadística & datos numéricos , Líneas Directas/estadística & datos numéricos , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of mortality and its predictors among pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) survivors treated at a rural Ugandan tertiary hospital. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of data between 2013 and 2023. We included all people that met the World Health Organisation's definition of tuberculosis cure and traced them or their next of kin to determine vital status (alive/deceased). We estimated the cumulative incidence of mortality per 1000 population, crude all-cause mortality rate per 1000 person-years, and median years of potential life lost for deceased individuals. Using Cox proportional hazard models, we investigated predictors of mortality. RESULTS: Of 334 PTB survivors enrolled, 38 (11.4%) had died. The cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was 113.7 per 1000 population, and the crude all-cause mortality rate was 28.5 per 1000 person-years. The median years of potential life lost for deceased individuals was 23.8 years (IQR: 9.6-32.8). Hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 4.3, 95% CI: 1.1-16.6) and unemployment (aHR: 7.04, 95% CI: 1.5-31.6) at TB treatment initiation predicted mortality. CONCLUSION: PTB survivors experience post high mortality rates after TB cure. Survivors who were hospitalized and unemployed at treatment initiation were more likely to die after cure. Social protection measures and long-term follow-up of previously hospitalized patients could improve the long-term survival of TB survivors.
Asunto(s)
Población Rural , Sobrevivientes , Tuberculosis Pulmonar , Humanos , Uganda/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/mortalidad , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Incidencia , Hospitalización , Adolescente , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Women's support can improve uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC). We assessed the level of women's support for VMMC and associated factors in fishing settlements on the shores of Lake Victoria in Uganda, to inform interventions aimed at increasing the uptake of safe male circumcision services in such high-risk populations. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study, employing mixed methods of data collection, at Kasenyi and Kigungu landing sites in April 2018. We included women aged 18-49 years, who had stayed at the landing sites for ≥3 months. We obtained qualitative data using focus group discussions (FGDs), and interviewer-administered semi-structured questionnaires for quantitative data. The tool captured demographic characteristics, community factors including cultural norms and beliefs, women's experiences, and health facility-related factors. The dependent variable was derived from the response to the question: "Would you encourage your partner/husband to go for VMMC?", and used as a proxy for support of VMMC. We used modified Poisson regression to identify factors associated with women's support for VMMC. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: We enrolled 313 women with a mean age of 28 (SD±6.8) years. Of the 313 women, 230 (73.5%) supported VMMC. Belief that VMMC increases penile hygiene (Adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR]=1.9; CI: 1.8-3.2), performing VMMC for religious reasons (aPR=1.9; CI: 1.8-2.9), preference for a circumcised man (aPR=1.3; CI: 1.2-1.5), belief that vaginal fluids facilitate wound healing (aPR=1.9; CI: 1.3-2.7), and knowledge about when a man can resume sex (4 weeks) after circumcision (aPR=2.1; CI: 1.8-3.3) were associated with women's support for VMMC. FGDs revealed that women were not adequately involved in VMMC activities for decision making. CONCLUSION: The support for VMMC was high among women in the fishing communities. However, women perceived they were not involved in decision-making for VMMC and had several misconceptions, including a belief that vaginal fluids facilitate wound healing. The Ministry of Health and VMMC implementing partners should devise strategies to increase sensitization and involvement of women in VMMC decision-making without slowing service uptake.
Asunto(s)
Circuncisión Masculina , Infecciones por VIH , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Humanos , Caza , Lagos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Uganda/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Safeguarding the psychological well-being of healthcare workers (HCWs) is crucial to ensuring sustainability and quality of healthcare services. During the COVID-19 pandemic, HCWs may be subject to excessive mental stress. We assessed the risk perception and immediate psychological state of HCWs early in the pandemic in referral hospitals involved in the management of COVID-19 patients in Uganda. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in five referral hospitals from April 20-May 22, 2020. During this time, we distributed paper-based, self-administered questionnaires to all consenting HCWs on day shifts. The questionnaire included questions on socio-demographics, occupational behaviors, potential perceived risks, and psychological distress. We assessed risk perception towards COVID-19 using 27 concern statements with a four-point Likert scale. We defined psychological distress as a total score > 12 from the 12-item Goldberg's General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). We used modified Poisson regression to identify factors associated with psychological distress. RESULTS: Among 335 HCWs who received questionnaires, 328 (98%) responded. Respondents' mean age was 36 (range 18-59) years; 172 (52%) were male. The median duration of professional experience was eight (range 1-35) years; 208 (63%) worked more than 40 h per week; 116 (35%) were nurses, 52 (14%) doctors, 30 (9%) clinical officers, and 86 (26%) support staff. One hundred and forty-four (44%) had a GHQ-12 score > 12. The most common concerns reported included fear of infection at the workplace (81%), stigma from colleagues (79%), lack of workplace support (63%), and inadequate availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) (56%). In multivariable analysis, moderate (adjusted prevalence ratio, [aPR] = 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-4.0) and high (aPR = 3.8, 95% CI 2.0-7.0) risk perception towards COVID-19 (compared with low-risk perception) were associated with psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: Forty-four percent of HCWs surveyed in hospitals treating COVID-19 patients during the early COVID-19 epidemic in Uganda reported psychological distress related to fear of infection, stigma, and inadequate PPE. Higher perceived personal risk towards COVID-19 was associated with increased psychological distress. To optimize patient care during the pandemic and future outbreaks, workplace management may consider identifying and addressing HCW concerns, ensuring sufficient PPE and training, and reducing infection-associated stigma.