Neoral rescue therapy in transplant patients with intolerance to tacrolimus.

BACKGROUND: The calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, are the mainstay of current immunosuppressive regimens for the prevention of acute rejection in organ transplantation. The choice of the individual agent used often depends on the preference of the Transplant Center and patient type. Adverse effects associated with tacrolimus may impact its clinical utility in many patients. This study characterizes the clinical outcomes of transplant recipients who experienced adverse effects from tacrolimus and were converted to cyclosporine-microemulsion-based (Neoral([cyclosporine, USP] MODIFIED) therapy. METHODS: Hepatic or renal allograft recipients unable to maintain adequate immunosuppression with a tacrolimus-based regimen for reasons of toxicity or efficacy were recruited for this study and converted to cyclosporine-microemulsion-based therapy. Data were collected on drug dosing, trough concentrations, and treatment duration, as well as detailed information on tacrolimus-associated toxicities that prompted rescue with cyclosporine-microemulsion. Furthermore, clinical and laboratory data related to the clinical course of the patients after conversion to cyclosporine-microemulsion were recorded for up to 1 yr following conversion. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-seven transplant recipients were enrolled in this study. Predominant reasons for discontinuation of tacrolimus were neurotoxicity (55%), diabetes (24%), nephrotoxicity (15%), and gastrointestinal intolerance (24%). Patients frequently had multiple symptoms prompting rescue therapy with cyclosporine-microemulsion. Over 70% of subjects had improvement or resolution of their tacrolimus-associated adverse symptoms within 3 months post-conversion. Acute rejection episodes occurred in 27% of patients converted to cyclosporine-microemulsion. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclosporine-microemulsion rescue therapy in patients experiencing adverse clinical effects associated with tacrolimus is an effective treatment option which leads to resolution of these adverse effects in the majority of patients, and allows for satisfactory clinical outcomes.

Combined cardiac surgery and liver transplantation.

During evaluation for liver transplantation, a 63-year-old man with cirrhosis secondary to hepatitis C was diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area, 0.87 cm(2)) and coronary artery disease. A combined procedure involving aortic valve replacement (pericardial xenograft), coronary artery bypass surgery, and orthotopic liver transplantation was performed. Convalescence was uneventful, and at 2 years after the procedure, the patient has normal cardiac function, good prosthetic valve function, and biochemically normal liver function.

Multimodality treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of prognostic factors in a single Western institution series.

There are few Western studies evaluating prognostic factors for survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the influence on survival of various therapeutic options including orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). A retrospective analysis was performed of 122 patients with HCC treated at the University of Alabama at Birmingham from January 1990 through December 1999. Clinicopathologic and treatment factors were analyzed with overall survival as the main outcome variable. Median age was 62 years. Most patients were male (74%) and white (79%). Eighty patients (66%) had associated cirrhosis. Sixty-three percent of patients presented with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage III or IV tumors. The median follow-up for survivors was 22 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rates for the entire cohort were 46%, 24%, and 17%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, ablative surgery (P = 0.003), AJCC stages I and II (P = 0.0012), and absence of vascular invasion (P = 0.0001) were found to be independent favorable characteristics. Forty-four patients underwent surgical resection (including OLT, n = 20) or a surgical ablative procedure. All but two nonsurgical patients died of disease. The actuarial 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for this group were 80%, 71%, and 61%, respectively. On multivariate analysis of the surgical group, only vascular invasion was associated with poor prognosis (P = 0.001). OLT was associated with a favorable prognosis on univariate analysis (P = 0.02). Forty percent of patients who received transplants underwent local/regional treatment before transplantation and the outcome in these patients was no different from that in other transplant patients. Surgical treatment is the only potential curative option for HCC, and qualifying for liver transplantation may be a favorable prognostic factor in surgical patients. Local/regional therapy prior to transplantation may provide a bridge to OLT without an increase in tumor-related mortality.

The safety and efficacy of a two-dose daclizumab (zenapax) induction therapy in liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Induction therapy with daclizumab has been shown to be efficacious in the prevention of acute rejection in kidney transplant patients. The routine use of antibody induction therapy in liver transplantation has not gained widespread acceptance, except in the cases of renal insufficiency. The recent approval of daclizumab prompted us to initiate this pilot study using induction therapy in those patients at risk for developing posttransplant renal insufficiency. METHODS: This nonrandomized study examined the use of daclizumab in 39 of the last 97 liver transplants performed at the University of Alabama in Birmingham. The daclizumab group received 2 mg/kg intravenously before organ engraftment, and 38 of the 39 received 1 mg/kg intravenously on postoperative day 5. The control group consisted of the remaining 58 contemporary patients. Additional immunosuppression consisted of steroids, tacrolimus, or microemulsion cyclosporine in all patients and mycophenolate mofetil in selected patients. RESULTS: Pretransplant demographics were not significantly different between the groups. In the induction group there were significantly fewer males, 14 (36%) vs. 34 (59%) (P=0.03). They had greater renal insufficiency at the time of transplant, serum creatine 1.9+/-0.37 mg/dl vs. 0.8+/-0.5; P=0.0009, and more patients were at higher acuity (status 1 and 2A): 12 (31%) vs. 3 (5%) P=0.0006 than in the noninduction group. By postoperative day 7, renal function improved in the induction group such that it was not significantly different from the noninduction group and remained similar throughout the rest of the follow-up. The induction group also experienced significantly less acute rejection, 7 (18%) vs. 23 (40%) (P=0.02) than in the noninduction group in the first 6 months. The 1-, 3-, and 6-month patient survival rates were similar in the induction group, 97.4%, 97.4%, and 97.4%, vs. non-induction 94.8%, 93.0%, and 93% (P=NS). The incidence of cytomegalovirus, in the first 6 months, in the induction group was four (10%) vs. five (9%) (P=NS) in the noninduction group. CONCLUSION: In the pilot study, induction therapy with daclizumab was safe, facilitated improvement in renal function, and appeared to reduce the incidence of acute rejection. Combination therapy with daclizumab may be an important adjunct in immunosuppressive strategies for liver transplant recipients.

Liver transplantation in the era of cost constraints.

BACKGROUND: The issue of containing cost has had a significant impact on organ transplantation. After our institution's 500th liver transplant, we critically examined the impact of the changing health care environment on liver transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 500 consecutive liver transplants done in the period of 1989 to 1998. RESULTS: Comparing the first 100 liver transplants to the last 100, patient demographics did not change significantly; however, mean waiting times increased significantly, from 30.4 days to 146.7 days, and median hospital stay decreased from 20.2 days to 10.9 days. One-year patient and graft survivals were not significantly different, 93.6% versus 96.5% and 88.0% versus 95.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite transplants in patients at higher risk and discharging patients sooner after transplantation, surgical results and patient survivals remained excellent. This was accomplished through improvements and modification of immunosuppression, outpatient treatment of uncomplicated acute rejection, and emphasis on close outpatient follow-up.

Improved outcomes in cadaveric renal allografts with pulsatile preservation.

BACKGROUND: Early immunologic and non-immunologic injury of renal allografts adversely affects long-term graft survival. Some degree of preservation injury is inevitable in cadaveric renal transplantation, and, with the reduction in early acute rejection, this non-immunologic injury has assumed a greater relative importance. Optimal graft preservation will maximize the chances of early graft function and long-term graft survival, but the best method of preservation pulsatile perfusion (PP) versus cold storage (CS) is debated. METHODS: Primary cadaveric kidney recipients from January 1990 through December 1995 were evaluated. The effects of implantation warm ischemic time (WIT) ( < or = 20 min, 21-40 min, or > 40 min) and total ischemic time (TIT) ( < or > or = 20 h) on death-censored graft survival were compared between kidneys preserved by PP versus those preserved by CS. The effect of preservation method on delayed graft function (DGF) was also examined. RESULTS: There were 568 PP kidneys and 268 CS kidneys. Overall death-censored graft survival was not significantly different between groups, despite worse donor and recipient characteristics in the PP group. CS kidneys with an implantation WIT > 40 min had worse graft survival than those with < 40 min (p = 0.0004). Survival of PP kidneys and those transplanted into 2 DR-matched recipients was not affected by longer implantation WIT. Longer TIT did not impact survival. DGF was more likely after CS preservation (20.2% versus 8.8%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Preservation with PP improves early graft function and lessens the adverse effect of increased warm ischemia in cadaveric renal transplantation. This method is likely associated with less preservation injury and/or increases the threshold for injury from other sources and is superior to CS.

Role of ERCP in asymptomatic orthotopic liver transplant patients with abnormal liver enzymes.

OBJECTIVE: The safety and efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the evaluation and management of biliary tract complications after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) have been previously demonstrated. However, the role of ERCP in evaluating asymptomatic OLT patients with abnormal liver enzymes with a previously normal biliary tree remains poorly defined. We sought to assess the utility of ERCP in this subset of patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of-asymptomatic OLT patients with abnormal liver enzymes evaluated by ERCP was undertaken. In addition to ERCP, all these patients had a diagnostic abdominal Doppler ultrasound, and a percutaneous liver biopsy. All patients had choledochocholedochostomy at the time of transplant and normal T-tube cholangiograms 3 months postoperatively. A radiologist, blinded to clinical findings, interpreted the ultrasound as normal, biliary dilation, or vascular abnormalities. The same radiologist interpreted ERCP findings. A pathologist, blinded to clinical findings, graded liver biopsies as normal, diagnostic, or abnormal but nondiagnostic. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients underwent 23 ERCPs. Twenty-two of the 23 ERCPs were normal (96%), and one abnormal ERCP finding did not explain the liver enzyme abnormality. Liver biopsy was diagnostic in 13 of 22 (57%) and in each case the ERCP was normal. The remaining 10 liver biopsies were abnormal but nondiagnostic. Ultrasound was abnormal in five of 22 cases, but in the three cases suggesting biliary dilation, the ERCP was interpreted as normal. CONCLUSION: Routine use of ERCP in evaluation of asymptomatic OLT patients with liver function test abnormalities and normal cholangiograms at 3 months was not diagnostically useful. In this subset of patients, liver biopsy was usually abnormal and frequently diagnostic and should be the initial invasive diagnostic procedure.

Liver transplantation for glycogen storage disease types I, III, and IV.

UNLABELLED: Glycogen storage disease (GSD) types I, III, and IV can be associated with severe liver disease. The possible development of hepatocellular carcinoma and/or hepatic failure make these GSDs potential candidates for liver transplantation. Early diagnosis and initiation of effective dietary therapy have dramatically improved the outcome of GSD type I by reducing the incidence of liver adenoma and renal insufficiency. Nine type I and 3 type III patients have received liver transplants because of poor metabolic control, multiple liver adenomas, or progressive liver failure. Metabolic abnormalities were corrected in all GSD type I and type III patients, while catch-up growth was reported only in two patients. Whether liver transplantation results in reversal and/or prevention of renal disease remains unclear. Neutropenia persisted in both GSDIb patients post liver transplantation necessitating continuous granulocyte colony stimulating factor treatment. Thirteen GSD type IV patients were liver transplanted because of progressive liver cirrhosis and failure. All but one patient have not had neuromuscular or cardiac complications during follow-up periods for as long as 13 years. Four have died within a week and 5 years after transplantation. Caution should be taken in selecting GSD type IV candidates for liver transplantation because of the variable phenotype, which may include life-limiting extrahepatic manifestations. It remains to be evaluated, whether a genotype-phenotype correlation exists for GSD type IV, which may aid in the decision making. CONCLUSION: Liver transplantation should be considered for patients with glycogen storage disease who have developed liver malignancy or hepatic failure, and for type IV patients with the classical and progressive hepatic form.

Hepatopulmonary syndrome and venous emboli causing intracerebral hemorrhages after liver transplantation: a case report.

Increasing experience has fostered the acceptance of liver transplantation as a treatment for patients with hepatopulmonary syndrome. Morbidity and mortality is most commonly attributed to progressive arterial hypoxemia postoperatively. A cerebral hemorrhage has been reported in one patient with hepatopulmonary syndrome after transplantation. However, a postmortem examination of the brain was not performed and the pathogenesis or type of cerebral hemorrhage was undefined. We report on a patient with severe hepatopulmonary syndrome who developed multiple intracranial hemorrhages after transplantation. The intracerebral hemorrhages were most consistent with an embolic etiology on postmortem examination. We postulate that venous embolization, caused by the manipulation of a Swan Ganz catheter in a thrombosed central vein, resulted in pulmonary emboli that passed through dilated intrapulmonary vessels into the cerebral microcirculation. Special attention to central venous catheters and avoidance of manipulation may be warranted in subjects with severe hepatopulmonary syndrome after liver transplantation.

Tacrolimus (FK506) and mycophenolate mofetil combination therapy versus tacrolimus in adult liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) prolongs allograft survival in experimental animals, prevents acute rejection in humans, and has recently been approved for use in renal transplantation in combination with cyclosporine. Tacrolimus (Prograf) has been shown to be effective for the prevention and treatment of allograft rejection in liver transplantation. However, there has been limited experience with the combination of tacrolimus and MMF in liver transplantation. METHODS: This retrospective pilot study examined the results in 130 primary, consecutive, adult liver transplants under two separate immunosuppressive protocols. Patients in the study group received MMF (1 g p.o. b.i.d.), tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg p.o. b.i.d.), and a standard steroid taper. MMF was also tapered and then discontinued within 3 months of transplantation. A historical control received tacrolimus (0.15 mg/kg p.o. b.i.d.) and the same steroid taper. RESULTS: Pretransplant demographics, including creatinine, were not significantly different between the groups. The 6-month patient and graft survivals of 96.3% (control) versus 92.0% (study) were not significantly different. The incidence of acute rejection was 45.0% in the control group versus 26.0% in the study group (P = 0.03). The study group had a lower incidence of rejection (mean episodes/patient +/- SEM): 0.28+/-0.07 vs. 0.61+/-0.10 (P = 0.007). All of the study group members responded to high-dose steroids. In the control group, three patients required monoclonal antibody therapy and two patients required the addition of MMF. The incidence of cytomegalovirus was similar in the study group and the control group (13.8% vs. 10.0%, P = NS). Early renal function was better preserved in the tacrolimus/MMF group (mean creatinine +/- SEM): 1.09 mg/dl +/- 0.05 vs. 1.51 mg/dl +/- 0.08 at 30 days, P = 0.0001. The study design required dosing with less tacrolimus (mean mg/day +/- SEM), which was achieved at 1 week (23.2+/-0.7 vs. 13.5+/-0.5); 1 month (18.7+/-0.8 vs. 11.4+/-0.5); 3 months (14.5+/-0.6 vs. 9+/-0.5); and 6 months (11.6+/-0.6 vs. 8.2+/-0.6); P = 0.0001, for all time points. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with tacrolimus and MMF may significantly reduce the incidence of acute liver allograft rejection, allow a significant reduction in tacrolimus dosage, and decrease the incidence of nephrotoxicity. Long-term analysis will be necessary to assess any increased risk of opportunistic infections.

In vivo gene transfer to the human biliary tract.

The human biliary tract offers an excellent model for gene transfer studies for a variety of diseases localized to the liver. The aim of this study was to determine if a viable liver might be employed to study viral transfection of the human biliary system in order to mimic in vivo human experiments. Using a normal human liver initially procured for transplantation, but subsequently found unsuitable, and with an intact biliary tree, the hepatic vascular supply was accessed for continuous perfusion. The common and left hepatic biliary system was isolated by balloon catheterization. A replication defective adenoviral vector containing the Escherichia coli beta-galactosidase (lac Z) reporter gene (AdCMVLacZ) was injected into the catheter-isolated left and common bile duct lumen. Viral exposure to the right duct system was prevented by ligation. The bile duct segments were excised and prepared for enzymatic (X-gal) staining. Intense staining was observed in the biliary epithelium exposed to the adenoviral vector. No evidence of beta-galactosidase staining was noted in the unexposed biliary mucosa. We report direct transfection of biliary epithelial cells from normal human liver with a recombinant adenovirus. Our data suggest potential therapeutic applications for gene therapy of hepatobiliary disorders.

Mesenteric arteriovenous fistula after vascularized pancreas transplantation resulting in graft dysfunction.

Mesenteric arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is an unusual complication after vascularized pancreas transplantation. We report the case of a patient who developed a mesenteric AVF in the transplanted mesenteric bundle which resulted in severe and protracted endocrine insufficiency necessitating reinstitution of insulin therapy. This was reversible with surgical correction of the AVF. This complication should be included in the differential diagnosis of pancreas allograft dysfunction.

Progress in renal transplantation. A single center study of 3359 patients over 25 years.

OBJECTIVE: The study analyzed 3359 consecutive renal transplant operations for patient and graft survival, including living related, cadaveric, and living unrelated patients. The analysis was separated into three groups according to immunosuppression and date of transplant. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Improvements in renal transplantation in the past 25 years have been the result of better immunosuppression, organ preservation, and patient selection. METHODS: A single transplant center's experience over a 25-year period was analyzed regarding patient and graft survival. Potential risk factors included patient demographics, tissue typing, donor characteristics, number of transplants, acute and chronic rejection, acute tubular necrosis, primary disease, and malignancy. RESULTS: The primary cause of graft loss was rejection. Improvement in cadaveric graft survival since 1987 with quadruple therapy was not apparent in living donor patients. Race continued to be a negative factor in graft survival. Avoiding previous mismatched antigens and the use of flow cytometry improved allograft survival. The leading cause of death in the past 7 years in cadaveric recipients was cardiac (52%). CONCLUSIONS: Improved graft survival in the past 25 years was related to 1) advances in immunosuppression, 2) better methods of cytotoxic antibody detection, and 3) human lymphocyte antigen match.

Surgical treatment of diabetes mellitus with pancreas transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The authors compared results and morbidity in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients undergoing preemptive pancreas transplantation (PTx) either before dialysis or before the need for a kidney transplant with IDDM patients undergoing conventional combined pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT) after the initiation of dialysis therapy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Combined PKT has become accepted generally as the best treatment option in carefully selected IDDM patients who either are dependent on dialysis or for whom dialysis is imminent. With improving results, the timing of PKT relative to the degree of nephropathy is evolving. However, it is not well established that the advantages of preemptive PTx can be achieved without incurring a detrimental effect on graft function or survival. METHODS: Over a 4-year study period, data on the following 3 recipient groups were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively: 1) 38 IDDM patients undergoing combined PKT while on dialysis (PKT:D); 2) 44 IDDM patients undergoing preemptive PKT before dialysis (PKT:ND); and 3) 20 IDDM patients undergoing solitary PTx. All patients underwent whole organ PTx with bladder drainage and were treated with quadruple immunosuppression. RESULTS: Actuarial 1-year patient survival is 100%, 98%, and 93%, respectively. One-year actuarial PTx survival (insulin-independence) is 92%, 95%, and 78%, respectively. The incidence of rejection, infection, operative complications, readmissions, and total hospital days was similar in the three groups. Long-term renal and pancreas allograft function and quality of life were similarly comparable. Rehabilitation potential favored the solitary PTx and PKT:ND groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive PKT or solitary PTx performed earlier in the course of diabetes is associated with good results, facilitated rehabilitation, and may prevent further diabetic complications.

En bloc transplantation of a horseshoe kidney from a high risk multi-organ donor: case report and review of the literature.

We report on the successful en bloc transplantation of a horseshoe kidney from an elderly, hypertensive multiple organ donor. To our knowledge the use of a horseshoe kidney from a multiple organ donor has not been reported previously.

Kidney/pancreas transplantation: a review of the current status.

KPT has become the treatment of choice for many Type I diabetics with impending or actual end-stage renal disease. The techniques of organ procurement, surgical transplantation, and postoperative management are well established. The current 1- and 3-year patient and graft survival rates are at least equal to those obtained in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients receiving kidney transplants alone. Although there is significant associated morbidity unique to the pancreas transplant, this is usually manageable without influencing the outcome. With the improvement in quality of life and the potential for arresting diabetic complications, KPT is a procedure that should be seriously considered for many Type I diabetic patients with advanced nephropathy.