RESUMEN
The study aimed to evaluate the long-term changes in circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness after vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair. A total of 33 eyes of 33 patients were enrolled. By using optical coherence tomography, the circumpapillary RNFL thickness was measured before surgery and 1, 3, 6 months and 1, 2, 3 years after surgery and compared with the preoperative value. The effect of duration, location, and extent of RRD on RNFL thickness change was evaluated. There was a significant increase of circumpapillary RNFL thickness at the 1-month, 3-month [except in the nasal superior sector (P = 0.627)], and only in the nasal inferior sector at 6-month (P = 0.010) follow-up compared with the baseline value (all Ps < 0.05). No significant differences were observed 1, 2, and 3 years after the surgery (P > 0.05). The duration, location, and extent of detachment did not reveal significant correlations with RNFL parameters (P > 0.05). Circumpapillary RNFL thickness in eyes with RRD after vitrectomy demonstrated a transient increase during the early postoperative period. This increase was not associated with duration, location, and extent of RRD. At 3 years following surgery, no RNFL thinning or thickening was observed.
Asunto(s)
Desprendimiento de Retina , Vitrectomía , Humanos , Fibras Nerviosas , Desprendimiento de Retina/cirugía , Células Ganglionares de la Retina , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Vitrectomía/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Silicone tube intubation is the most common method for treatment of nasolacrimal drainage disorder or repair of lacerated canaliculus. However, some cases are prolapsed earlier than expected, subsequently affecting the success rate of silicone tube intubation. The author introduced a successful reposition of the prolapsed silicone tube. METHODS: This study is a retrospective case series of 11 patients who were treated with reposition of prolapsed silicone tube using hole and lacrimal probe method. In all cases, the tubes were prolapsed within 2 months after the first surgery due to careless rubbing of the medial canthus by the patient. In all 11 cases, the development of a biofilm on tube was not observed at the time when the tube was prolapsed. All patients underwent immediate reposition of prolapsed tube without local anesthesia in the outpatient operating room on the day they visited. RESULTS: In all 11 cases, the prolapsed silicone tube was repositioned without any complications using this hole and lacrimal probe method. At 6-month follow-up examination, all patients presented with a well-positioned silicone tube up to the day of extubation without replacing it with a new silicone tube. CONCLUSIONS: This hole and lacrimal probe method is effective for the repositioning of prolapsed silicone tube after bicanalicular intubation of lacrimal system. This procedure includes easy performance in a short time and without local anesthesia in the outpatient operating room.