Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
J Emerg Med ; 49(6): 901-6, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26433424

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) have long been used in the emergency department (ED) to treat acute agitation, little is known about how these medications are used in modern clinical practice. In particular, little work has been published about whether ED clinicians administer FGAs with adjunctive medications in accordance with expert guidelines or the prescribing practices of FGAs over time. OBJECTIVES: 1) To provide a comparison of the frequency with which FGAs are administered with adjunctive benzodiazepines or anticholinergic medications. 2) To analyze the prescribing trends for FGAs over time, particularly in the years after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) black-box warning for droperidol. METHODS: This is a structured review of a retrospective cohort of patients receiving haloperidol or droperidol in two EDs over a 7-year period. RESULTS: Haloperidol or droperidol was administered on 2833 patient visits during the study period, with haloperidol being administered most often. Adjunctive medications are administered less than half of the time. The use of droperidol has remained relatively static, whereas the use of haloperidol has increased. CONCLUSIONS: First-generation antipsychotics are still widely utilized in the ED. When administered, these medications are used with adjunctive medications that may decrease side effects less than half of the time. Droperidol use has remained unchanged in the years after the FDA black-box warning, whereas use of haloperidol has continued to rise.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Droperidol/administración & dosificación , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Haloperidol/administración & dosificación , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
J Emerg Med ; 48(6): 712-9, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25843924

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Emergency physicians regularly encounter agitated patients. In extremely agitated and violent patients, the onset of many traditional medications is relatively slow and often requires additional medication. Ketamine is frequently used in emergency departments (EDs) for procedural sedation and intubation, but has recently been suggested as a treatment for acute agitation. OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the use of ketamine in the treatment of acute agitation in an ED setting, including vital sign changes as a result of this medication. METHODS: This is a structured review of an historical cohort of patients over 7 years at two university EDs. Patients were included if they received ketamine as treatment for acute agitation. Abstracted data included age, vital signs including hypoxia, any additional medications for agitation, and alcohol/drug intoxication. RESULTS: Ketamine was administered for agitation on 32 visits involving 27 patients. Preadministration systolic blood pressure was 131 ± 20 mm Hg, with an average postadministration increase of 17 ± 25 mm Hg. The average baseline heart rate was 98 ± 23 beats/min, with an average increase of 8 ± 17 beats/min. No patients became hypoxic; 62.5% of patients required additional calming medication. Alcohol or drug intoxication was present in 40.6% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: We found ketamine was used rarely, but had few major adverse effects on vital signs even in a population with 21.9% alcohol intoxication. However, a high proportion (62.5%) of patients required additional pharmacologic treatment for agitation, implying that administering ketamine is useful only for initial control of severe agitation.


Asunto(s)
Agresión/efectos de los fármacos , Anestésicos Disociativos/uso terapéutico , Ketamina/uso terapéutico , Agitación Psicomotora/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Intoxicación Alcohólica/complicaciones , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Niño , Sobredosis de Droga/complicaciones , Quimioterapia Combinada , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Agitación Psicomotora/complicaciones , Retratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
4.
J Emerg Med ; 46(6): 808-13, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24656982

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent expert guidelines recommend oral second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) as first-line therapy for acute agitation in the emergency department (ED), with intramuscular (IM) SGAs as an alternative. However, little is known about how these meds are used in the ED or how often SGAs are prescribed. OBJECTIVES: 1) The measurement of patient characteristics, concomitant benzodiazepine use, and use of SGAs compared to haloperidol or droperidol; 2) the prescribing rates of SGAs over time in ED patients. METHODS: This is a structured analysis of a historical patient cohort from 2004-2011 in two university EDs. The cohort consisted of all patients receiving aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone. Descriptive analysis compared age, gender, use of first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) such as haloperidol/droperidol, and rates of concomitant benzodiazepine use. Linear regression was used to test whether SGA prescribing increased over time. RESULTS: There were 1680 unique patients accounting for 1779 ED visits who received SGAs over the study period, which is a minority of patients receiving any antipsychotic. Of patients receiving any SGA in the ED, most were given orally (93%). Adjunctive benzodiazepines were administered on 21% of visits, and were also administered on 21% of the visits involving alcohol + patients. The rate of SGA use in the ED is not increasing over time. CONCLUSION: Despite expert recommendations, SGAs are administered a minority of the time to ED patients. The rate is not increasing over time. When used, SGAs are most commonly given orally, are often administered with benzodiazepines, and are frequently administered to alcohol-intoxicated patients.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración Oral , Adulto , Intoxicación Alcohólica/tratamiento farmacológico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Aripiprazol , Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Dibenzotiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Droperidol/administración & dosificación , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Haloperidol/administración & dosificación , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Olanzapina , Piperazinas/administración & dosificación , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Fumarato de Quetiapina , Quinolonas/administración & dosificación , Risperidona/administración & dosificación , Tiazoles/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA